Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
2.6.21-kamikaze3: "Hyperspace"
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5345
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ekerazha wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:

ever tried it with SEGMEXEC, PAGEEXEC + mprotect in conjunction with ati-drivers or nvidia-drivers, then you know that it's a no-go, and if you disable those parts, you work less secure than exec-shield

(you can check this with paxtest )

yeah, what a pity that it can't be used with binary graphics drivers, this would make some linux desktop even more secure :lol:

furthermore wine doesn't work with SEGMEXEC as far as I know ...

This is the reason because there's "paxctl".


ah, well, yes, forgot, that I had tomboy.exe & some wine stuff running some time ago with it :lol:

does this also work with cxoffice?

nevertheless since lots of people use ati & nvidia-drivers and/or are dependend on those this would restrict the user base of that kernel to a big degree ... :roll:

you tried beryl / compiz with pax? :wink:

Waninkoko wrote:
Quote:
Changes since -v12:

- small tweak: made the "fork flow" of reniced tasks zero-sum

- debugging update: /proc/<PID>/sched is now seqfile based and echoing
0 to it clears the maximum-tracking counters.

- more debugging counters

- small rounding fix to make the statistical average of rounding errors
zero

- scale both the runtime limit and the granularity on SMP too, and make
it dependent on HZ

- misc cleanups


thanks :!:
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ekerazha
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth wrote:
ekerazha wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:

ever tried it with SEGMEXEC, PAGEEXEC + mprotect in conjunction with ati-drivers or nvidia-drivers, then you know that it's a no-go, and if you disable those parts, you work less secure than exec-shield

(you can check this with paxtest )

yeah, what a pity that it can't be used with binary graphics drivers, this would make some linux desktop even more secure :lol:

furthermore wine doesn't work with SEGMEXEC as far as I know ...

This is the reason because there's "paxctl".


ah, well, yes, forgot, that I had tomboy.exe & some wine stuff running some time ago with it :lol:

does this also work with cxoffice?

nevertheless since lots of people use ati & nvidia-drivers and/or are dependend on those this would restrict the user base of that kernel to a big degree ... :roll:

you tried beryl / compiz with pax? :wink:

Have I already said "this is the reason because there's paxctl"? ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gAzo0o
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can I request squashfs support or some patch... the official ones doesn't apply cleanly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buddabrod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/129
CFS v14 has been released :-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Preparing a hotfix...
Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5345
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
Preparing a hotfix...
Thanks.


thanks :)
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
priestjim
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 100
Location: Never never land

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wait for v15, judging by the discussion on lkml, it should be better ;)
_________________
My soul is my antenna, I am the instrument + the guitar is my amplifier.
-- Ottmar Liebert
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vipernicus
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

priestjim wrote:
Wait for v15, judging by the discussion on lkml, it should be better ;)

I hope so, v14 still makes my mouse lag under load, even when portage and make are reniced to 19.
_________________
Viper-Sources Maintainer || nesl247 Projects || vipernicus.org blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
creidiki
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 283
Location: Varese (Italy)

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/25/270

:o
_________________
'((eINIT) (soor overlay))
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buddabrod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hm.. suspend2ui_* doens't work anymore. Didn't use suspend2 for a long time now, but i'm quite sure that its ui worked with 2.6.19 at least.
Does anyone else have that problem?
I'm sure that everything is configured correctly since i checked it twice..

Logfile doesn't show anything usefull
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bollucks
l33t
l33t


Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

creidiki wrote:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/25/270

:o


Given that people are still having problems with CFS like mouse stalling, 3d games being better with SD etc., it's sad that Linus is just going to merge it. I guess Linus believes this is a case of silence must mean everything is ok...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buddabrod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bollucks wrote:
creidiki wrote:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/25/270

:o


Given that people are still having problems with CFS like mouse stalling, 3d games being better with SD etc., it's sad that Linus is just going to merge it. I guess Linus believes this is a case of silence must mean everything is ok...
My last issues were with v8 or earlier, no regressions since then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
exa_einstein
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great work, keep moving!
btw, I just realized this is the only usable kernel with mac80211 layer AND with suspend2. Saved me a lot of work :D thx!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5345
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

buddabrod wrote:
bollucks wrote:
creidiki wrote:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/25/270

:o


Given that people are still having problems with CFS like mouse stalling, 3d games being better with SD etc., it's sad that Linus is just going to merge it. I guess Linus believes this is a case of silence must mean everything is ok...
My last issues were with v8 or earlier, no regressions since then.


I had my last lags with v12, v13 worked fine, v14 seems a little sluggish but I'm confident that v15 will be a "burner" :wink:
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could you try to add this hdaps patch from linuxpowertop?
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This kernel stops just booting somewhere after suspend2. A strange message I noticed: "request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-0000"

Any idea?
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought it could have to do with module loading, but at that state the kernel can't load any modules yet. If you google you'll find some interesting things, but I couldn't find a solution yet.

Here is my kernel config:

http://pastebin.ca/522501

Thanks for any help!
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phlogiston wrote:
This kernel stops just booting somewhere after suspend2. A strange message I noticed: "request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-0000"

Any idea?


Try this patch: http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info/patches/2.6.20/kamikaze6/hotfixes/runaway-loop-modprobe-binfmt-0000-fix.patch

I don't know if it will work because that hotfix was made for 2.6.20-kamikaze6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buddabrod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try without HIGHMEM set?
How large is your ram?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

buddabrod wrote:
Try without HIGHMEM set?
How large is your ram?


My ram is about 1.5GB 8)
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
Phlogiston wrote:
This kernel stops just booting somewhere after suspend2. A strange message I noticed: "request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-0000"

Any idea?


Try this patch: http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info/patches/2.6.20/kamikaze6/hotfixes/runaway-loop-modprobe-binfmt-0000-fix.patch

I don't know if it will work because that hotfix was made for 2.6.20-kamikaze6


For me that does not look like a fix. Furthermore this is in kernel already and of course this is exact the code that created the output!
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2007 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phlogiston wrote:
Waninkoko wrote:
Phlogiston wrote:
This kernel stops just booting somewhere after suspend2. A strange message I noticed: "request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-0000"

Any idea?


Try this patch: http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info/patches/2.6.20/kamikaze6/hotfixes/runaway-loop-modprobe-binfmt-0000-fix.patch

I don't know if it will work because that hotfix was made for 2.6.20-kamikaze6


For me that does not look like a fix. Furthermore this is in kernel already and of course this is exact the code that created the output!


The code in the patch is not the same code that is in kernel.

The function "dump_stack()" (which fixes the problem) doesn't exist in vanilla kernel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
Phlogiston wrote:
Waninkoko wrote:
Phlogiston wrote:
This kernel stops just booting somewhere after suspend2. A strange message I noticed: "request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-0000"

Any idea?


Try this patch: http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info/patches/2.6.20/kamikaze6/hotfixes/runaway-loop-modprobe-binfmt-0000-fix.patch

I don't know if it will work because that hotfix was made for 2.6.20-kamikaze6


For me that does not look like a fix. Furthermore this is in kernel already and of course this is exact the code that created the output!


The code in the patch is not the same code that is in kernel.

The function "dump_stack()" (which fixes the problem) doesn't exist in vanilla kernel.


hmm ok, but dump_stack() in my opinion does something else then fixing a problem. However I missed the {} which changes the sense of the if clause. So I'll give it a try now.
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phlogiston
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 1925
Location: Europe, Swizerland

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phlogiston wrote:


hmm ok, but dump_stack() in my opinion does something else then fixing a problem. However I missed the {} which changes the sense of the if clause. So I'll give it a try now.


That small modification did not solve the problem. I still can't boot that kernel.
_________________
Workstation: 5.1 SurroundSound, LIRC remote control; Laptop [IBM-T43]: patched sources, s2disk/ram, fingerprint sensor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum