View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Asceta n00b
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 Posts: 64 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: Beryl not showing windows [SOLVED] |
|
|
Hi all,
Until yesterday I was using beryl-9999 (from xeffects overlay) without problems. All was working perfectly. Yesterday I updated different packages (kernel-2.6.20-r6, freetype, libXsomething...). After the system update I made a revdep-rebuild and the system told me that all was ok. After that I rebuild completly the beryl stuff just in case. Now I can't use beryl any more . When I try to use beryl the system slows down and the application windows doesn't appear any more, and they are there because I use the window preview plugin (I think it is called miniature preview or something similar) an I can see the window with its contents but there is nothing on the desktop. As soon as I change to KWin all the windows appear on the desktop again. It is very strange and I don't know what to do.
Now I'm at work and I can't tell you more especific things about the problem but if you need to know something I will reply as soon as I arrive at home.
My beryl setup is based on nvidia drivers (I'm using the latests nvidia drivers and after the kernel update I've re-emerged them).
Any clue on how to solve this?
Btw, where are the xeffects forums? it seems the xeffects web has changed and now you can only access a new blog, but the forums are gone!
Last edited by Asceta on Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:14 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spudmuffin n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm having the same problem using beryl 0.2.1 with AIGLX on Radeon driver after updating the following packages:
sys-apps/man-1.6e-r3 [1.6e-r1]
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r6 (but I haven't updated my kernel yet)
x11-libs/libXfixes-4.0.3 [4.0.1]
x11-proto/inputproto-1.4 [1.3.2]
x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0 [1.1.2]
x11-libs/libXi-1.1.0 [1.0.1]
x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1 [1.1.1]
x11-libs/libXdamage-1.1.1 [1.0.3]
x11-libs/libXcomposite-0.3.1 [0.3]
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.3.3 [6.3.0.5-r1]
dev-libs/dbus-glib-0.73 [0.72] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-BarneY- Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have problems too, after updating the following packages:
media-sound/alsa-headers-1.0.14_rc2
sys-apps/man-1.6e-r3
x11-libs/libXfixes-4.0.3
x11-proto/inputproto-1.4
x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0
x11-libs/libXi-1.1.0
x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1
x11-libs/libXcomposite-0.3.1
x11-libs/libXdamage-1.1.1
dev-libs/dbus-glib-0.73
After starting beryl the emerald theme occurs and afterwards the desktop freezes until beryl get killed from the console.
Config: beryl-0.2.1 with xf86-video-i810-1.6.5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
billydv l33t
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 911 Location: Mount Vernon, NY
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same problem Nvidia drivers with beryl 0.2.1 _________________ Billy DeVincentis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-BarneY- Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 91
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ipic Guru
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 Posts: 377 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can confirm that the workaround given in the bug report works for me.
Include the following in /etc/portage/package.mask Code: |
=x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0
=x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1
|
Re-emerge those two packages and Beryl works again.
Regards
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwall64 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 128 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same issue here with 9999 and .0.2.1 versions. I also tried re-emerging all the beryl/emerald/heliodir packages after update and revdep-rebuild. _________________ Intel Core2Quad Q9400
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
8GB DDR2-1066 RAM OCZ
GeForce 9600GT
5x Seagate 1TB 7200.12 (4x Software RAID5)
Gentoo 64-bit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zarec99 n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Zilina,Slovak Republic
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:05 pm Post subject: beryl issue |
|
|
masking these progs/libs solved this problem thx
=x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0
=x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1
, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asceta n00b
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 Posts: 64 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll try it when I arrive at home.
But I think this is not a good solution because why should I mask a package that is marked as stable in the portage tree?
What do you think about?
I think it is better to try to re-emerge xorg-server as posted here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174959#c7
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ipic Guru
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 Posts: 377 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asceta wrote: |
But I think this is not a good solution because why should I mask a package that is marked as stable in the portage tree? |
Well, its a better solution than Beryl not working at all!
Also, you are masking (if you follow the instructions) just these particular versions of the two packages. Since you are using a masked package set (Beryl), you will from time to time find that various bits of packages break each other. I find it reasonably common to have to mask out package versions from time to time so that all my packages work. Usually, after some time, portage releases make newer versions available that work OK, and then the masks become redundant.
And, just to be pedantic - there is no such thing as "stable" in the portage tree! Just masked or not masked. Not masked does not imply stable.
Regards
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwall64 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 128 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: Re: beryl issue |
|
|
zarec99 wrote: | masking these progs/libs solved this problem thx
=x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0
=x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1
, |
I can verify that this does solve the problem. I am now trying rebuilding xorg-xserver from the bugs list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zarec99 n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Zilina,Slovak Republic
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
,ok ,i trying too ,unmasking packages ,and reemerging xorg-server |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zarec99 n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Zilina,Slovak Republic
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asceta wrote: | I'll try it when I arrive at home.
But I think this is not a good solution because why should I mask a package that is marked as stable in the portage tree?
What do you think about?
I think it is better to try to re-emerge xorg-server as posted here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174959#c7
Regards |
yes ,masking these stable packgaes isn`t good solution ,but is a faster than rebuild xorg server
btw i`d like faster solutions |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zarec99 n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Zilina,Slovak Republic
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i am unmask previosly masked packages =x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0 =x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1 and rebuild x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r5 ,but beryl fails ,sorry this is doesn`t works for me ,i will back to mask =x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0 =x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asceta n00b
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 Posts: 64 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well,
The first thing I've tried is to recompile xorg-server (without masking any package). Now my beryl setup works again .
zarec99, did you re-emerge both packages after unmasking them?, and after that, did you recompile xorg-server?
It worked for me and I think this is better than masking packages.
Thank you all.
I'll change the subject to [SOLVED]. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ipic Guru
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 Posts: 377 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can confirm that unmasking and re-emerging the upgraded packages, and then emerging xorg-server works for my installation. To be explicit, these three were emerged in this order Code: |
=x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0
=x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1
=x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r5 | I did a complete reboot to make sure there was nothing lyng around, and beryl works fine after a restart.
Regards
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asceta n00b
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 Posts: 64 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I did a reboot aswell after reemerging xorg-server, but I'm not sure if it is really necessary.
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zarec99 n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Zilina,Slovak Republic
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asceta wrote: | Yes, I did a reboot aswell after reemerging xorg-server, but I'm not sure if it is really necessary.
Regards |
finaly ,it works for me too,some reemerging ,and for guys with nvidia cards ,eselect opengl set nvidia (white cube)
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwall64 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 128 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ipic wrote: | I can confirm that unmasking and re-emerging the upgraded packages, and then emerging xorg-server works for my installation. To be explicit, these three were emerged in this order Code: |
=x11-proto/randrproto-1.2.0
=x11-libs/libXrandr-1.2.1
=x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r5 | I did a complete reboot to make sure there was nothing lyng around, and beryl works fine after a restart.
Regards
Ian |
I didn't reboot, just restarted X and it worked fine after the xorg recompile! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonnevers Veteran
Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 1594 Location: Gentoo64 land
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cwall64 wrote: | I didn't reboot, just restarted X and it worked fine after the xorg recompile! |
I recompiled xorg-server and rebooted, after that beryl worked fine. I didn't try just restarting xorg but I think that it would have been fine, as you said.
Code: | user hostname ~ $ emerge -pv xorg-server
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.3.0.0 USE="dri ipv6 nptl xorg (-3dfx) -debug -dmx -kdrive -minimal -sdl -xprint" 0 kB
Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|