E17 is coming? (part 5)

DaggyStyle · Advocate Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 3798

that is the issue with e17, that it needs to be updated.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM

DaggyStyle · Advocate Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 3798

what is the difference between the 16.999.14 to the 9999 version? are both e17?
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM

Eckos · Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject:

19.699 is the last stable svn build or something like that, 9999 is the lastest unstable build (not guarenteed to work)
_________________
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | 2GB DDR2 533MHz RAM | GCC-4.3.2 | Gentoo x86_64 | KDE 4.1.2

deno · Guru Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 404

Does anyone get this warning when syncing?

ppurka · Advocate Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 2675

deno · Guru Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 404

Thanks for the reply ppurka. I knew I can digest ebuild. But I am wondering why does it take so long for such thing to be repaired. Also digesting sometimes doesn't work. Maybe in this case it would work but I recently tried to digest pmount-0.9.17 ebuild, which still has wrong data in Manifest, and it doesn't work. I had to replace data in Manifest manually to emerge pmount. Maybe it depends on it which data in Manifest are wrong...

Holysword · l33t Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 605 Location: Greece

Digest didn't solved for me, and I was about to post the problem here ><
It has about 1 week that I'm with this problem :S
_________________
i7-720QM | nVidia GT 230M | 4 GB DDR3 + 640GB swap (I know right?)
2.6.39.3-zen+ | BFQ+BFS+SLUB

"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach)

gimpel · Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:57 am Post subject:

What do you guys need imlib2-9999 for? E doesn't need it. And the things depending on it (like feh, epsilon, esmart, scrot...) are fine with stable imlib2.
_________________
http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/wiki - pro-audio software overlay

Holysword · l33t Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 605 Location: Greece

Actually I don't know XD
All that I know is that portage keep complaining about it.
What else is already stable, for I disable those unstable flags?
In enlightenment site tis sayin' that eet already have 1.0 version, but portage is not recognizing it... it is stable?
_________________
i7-720QM | nVidia GT 230M | 4 GB DDR3 + 640GB swap (I know right?)
2.6.39.3-zen+ | BFQ+BFS+SLUB

"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach)

Holysword · l33t Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 605 Location: Greece

I'm using the unstable version of the following packages:

gimpel · Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:49 am Post subject:

Yeah the core EFL (eet evas edje ecore e_dbus etc) and all the EFL apps are OK to have as scm version. But -9999 imlib2 shouldn't be needed.
_________________
http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/wiki - pro-audio software overlay

Holysword · l33t Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 605 Location: Greece

If I use imlib2 stable version but eet-9999 I couldn't even start enlightenment. Then I set eet ~* version, and it asks for esmart ~* version, edje ~* version and etc... I got everything in ~* version, just 'cause eet.
_________________
i7-720QM | nVidia GT 230M | 4 GB DDR3 + 640GB swap (I know right?)
2.6.39.3-zen+ | BFQ+BFS+SLUB

"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach)