| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
padoor Veteran


Joined: 29 Dec 2005 Posts: 2768 Location: india
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:00 am Post subject: firefox renamed BON ECHO?? |
|
|
my update just emerged mozilla-firefox-2.0.rc3
help calls itself Bon Echo _________________ reach out a little bit more to catch it (DON'T BELIEVE the veteran part under my user name) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncleOwen Veteran

Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 1493 Location: Germany, Hamburg
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not a bug, it's a feature The Mozilla Foundation has very strict (and IMHO braindead) rules on what may call itself Firefox and what not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seppel Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 10 Nov 2002 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| UncleOwen wrote: | | The Mozilla Foundation has very strict (and IMHO braindead) rules on what may call itself Firefox and what not. |
Gentoo, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shopro l33t


Joined: 12 May 2004 Posts: 678 Location: Dayton, OH, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think theres a use flag called branding which might enable the official branding. _________________ Just because I have nothing to say is no reason why you shouldn't listen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncleOwen Veteran

Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 1493 Location: Germany, Hamburg
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Seppel wrote: | | UncleOwen wrote: | | The Mozilla Foundation has very strict (and IMHO braindead) rules on what may call itself Firefox and what not. |
Gentoo, too. | Err, what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
przeuj Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 94 Location: Krakow
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seppel Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 10 Nov 2002 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| UncleOwen wrote: | | Seppel wrote: | | UncleOwen wrote: | | The Mozilla Foundation has very strict (and IMHO braindead) rules on what may call itself Firefox and what not. |
Gentoo, too. | Err, what? |
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/name-logo.xml |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncleOwen Veteran

Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 1493 Location: Germany, Hamburg
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ah, yes. I thought you were saying that Gentoo has rules for the name firefox, which would be wired... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
golding Apprentice


Joined: 06 Jun 2005 Posts: 219 Location: Adelaide / South Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand!
Gentoo supposedly compiles everything from source, so how do we break the Firefox package such that we aren't allowed to use their branding?
Who do I complain to, on our side and on theirs?
Just pure political mumbo jumbo IMHO _________________ Regards, Robert
..... Some people can tell what time it is by looking at the sun, but I have never been able to make out the numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rokstar83 Guru


Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 422 Location: Not Funny Anymore, Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the mozilla side it has everything to do with trademark and Quality Assurance. On the gentoo side it has everything to do with source code compiliation and patching. If gentoo only used the stock firefox source with no custom patches on our end (which for some arches is impossible from what I understand) then we could call it firefox. Unfortunetly the way trademark works you only have to no not enforce it once to get it taken away. If Mozilla knowingly ignored gentoo patching the source code and still letting us use the trademarked name, then someone else could "patch" the code base and distribute a version of firefox with malware/spyware preinstalled and mozilla wouldn't be able to tell them they couldn't call it firefox. Personally I think its a valid comprimise as both sides are happy. I mean do you really really really need the firefox name in the About menu option?
You should do a google search, gentoo thread search for the Debian/iceweasel stuff if you want to see how things could go really really bad.
Isn't the mozilla-firefox-bin package not called bon-echo because its a mozilla released binary? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yabbadabbadont Veteran


Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Posts: 4739
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I might be wrong, but I believe that "Bon Echo" is just the codename for the 2.0 release candidate... _________________ Thou Shalt Not Invoke dd When Tired |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
golding Apprentice


Joined: 06 Jun 2005 Posts: 219 Location: Adelaide / South Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yabbadabbadont wrote: | | Do you ever worry that you are a figment of your own imagination? |
Always
As for the original, I still reckon its all mumbo jumbo ..
Imagine if you weren't allowed to use your surname because your genes weren't original, they had been patched with the other parents DNA .. just as stupid _________________ Regards, Robert
..... Some people can tell what time it is by looking at the sun, but I have never been able to make out the numbers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slycordinator Veteran


Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 3015 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| golding wrote: | | yabbadabbadont wrote: | | Do you ever worry that you are a figment of your own imagination? |
Always
As for the original, I still reckon its all mumbo jumbo ..
Imagine if you weren't allowed to use your surname because your genes weren't original, they had been patched with the other parents DNA .. just as stupid |
Except there aren't trademarks related to the configuration of my personal genes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slycordinator Veteran


Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 3015 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yabbadabbadont wrote: | | I might be wrong, but I believe that "Bon Echo" is just the codename for the 2.0 release candidate... |
Yeah... my firefox (source install through emerge) calls itself firefox in the about. And a while back when the current releases were still in "beta" it was called Deer Park in the about since that was the codename. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slycordinator Veteran


Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 3015 Location: Houston, TX
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NaiL Apprentice


Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Posts: 202 Location: Spain/BCN
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If it is the problem with the trademark... i must say "bon echo" is ugly. i want to customice my firefox name!!! xD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aurisor Guru


Joined: 20 Sep 2003 Posts: 360 Location: Boston MA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NaiL wrote: | | If it is the problem with the trademark... i must say "bon echo" is ugly. i want to customice my firefox name!!! xD |
There's an extension for it....can't seem to remember the name, nor can I find it via google. Pfft. _________________ The problem with seeing too much is that it makes you insane. --Phaedrus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aurisor Guru


Joined: 20 Sep 2003 Posts: 360 Location: Boston MA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| golding wrote: |
As for the original, I still reckon its all mumbo jumbo ..
Imagine if you weren't allowed to use your surname because your genes weren't original, they had been patched with the other parents DNA .. just as stupid |
I agree with what you're saying on a conceptual level, but I think Firefox's argument makes a lot of sense. Basically, they want to protect the good name of firefox. Let's say gentoo, or ubuntu, or red hat released a version of firefox with a few of their own custom patches on it. If a user who didn't know better used it and something broke, they would have no way of knowing that the version of firefox they're using has been modified down the line.
Basically the firefox guys are saying "Do whatever you want with our software, but if you're going to apply weird patches don't call it firefox." That way users will say "Damn Bon Echo" instead of "Damn firefox."
I definitely was confused at first, but after I figured out where they're coming from, I think it's one of the more sane uses of a trademark I've seen in a while. _________________ The problem with seeing too much is that it makes you insane. --Phaedrus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Viaken n00b

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ishan wrote: | | There's an extension for it....can't seem to remember the name, nor can I find it via google. Pfft. |
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/31/ - Firesomething
I'm a big fan of Mozilla Spacebadger, myself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NaiL Apprentice


Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Posts: 202 Location: Spain/BCN
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slycordinator Veteran


Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 3015 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This isn't an issue with the trademark.
When 1.5 was still in beta, it was called "Deer Park." And this was before the trademark.
As was mentioned, it's a codename. No different than MS calling it Whistler rather than "Microsoft Windows" and then later having it changed to XP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yngwin Developer


Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 3537 Location: in the Dutch Mountains ;-)
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | | USE="branding" emerge -av mozilla-firefox |
_________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devsk Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2003 Posts: 2026 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
there is no branding stuff involved here. just plain code name:
| Code: | About Bon Echo
Continuing the tradition, Firefox 2 will use a pre-release code name taken from a public park. Bon Echo Provincial Park is located in Ontario, Canada. The name literally translates to "good echo", and reflects how our goal echoes that of Firefox 1, once again focusing on improving the browsing experience for our users, making it simple, effective, fast and useful. | from http://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=Firefox2&redirect=no |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yngwin Developer


Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 3537 Location: in the Dutch Mountains ;-)
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The branding useflag does help, because my firefox-2.0-rc3 calls itself Firefox, not Bon Echo. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tehdarkknight Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 17 Oct 2005 Posts: 79 Location: /dev/college
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*edit*
Its kind of a mix of both sides. It's code name is Bon Echo, yet at the same time, you can't patch it and call it Firefox. _________________ There are 10 kinds of people in the world: People who understand binary and those that don't.
Feel free to IM me to discuss anything as opposed to posting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|