| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
radkam
n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 11
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: stage1 -> bootstraping Problem |
 |
|
when i run bootstrap.sh i get a message:
| Code: |
Gentoo Linux; http://www.gentoo.org/
Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPLv2
Starting Bootstrap of base system ...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[ (0/3) Locating packages ]]
* Using baselayout : >=sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.12-r4
* Using portage : >=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22
* Using os-headers : >=sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.11-r2
* Using binutils : >=sys-devel/binutils-2.15.90.0.3-r4
* Using gcc : >=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1
* Using gettext : gettext
* Using libc : virtual/libc
* Using texinfo : sys-apps/texinfo
* Using zlib : sys-libs/zlib
* Using ncurses : sys-libs/ncurses
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[ (1/3) Configuring environment ]]
* GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo"
* PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
* DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
* PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
* PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
* CFLAGS="-O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe"
* CHOST="i386-pc-linux-gnu"
* CXXFLAGS="-O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe"
* MAKEOPTS="-j2"
* ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
* FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[ (2/3) Updating portage ]]
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 3) app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.13 to /
>>> md5 files ;-) pax-utils-0.1.11-r1.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) pax-utils-0.1.12.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) pax-utils-0.1.13.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-pax-utils-0.1.11-r1
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-pax-utils-0.1.12
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-pax-utils-0.1.13
>>> md5 files ;-) files/pax-utils-0.1.11.patch
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) pax-utils-0.1.13.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking pax-utils-0.1.13.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/pax-utils-0.1.13/work
>>> Source unpacked.
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -DVERSION="0.1.13" -o scanelf.o -c scanelf.c
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -DVERSION="0.1.13" -o pspax.o -c pspax.c
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -DVERSION="0.1.13" -o dumpelf.o -c dumpelf.c
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -DVERSION="0.1.13" -o paxelf.o -c paxelf.c
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -DVERSION="0.1.13" -o paxinc.o -c paxinc.c
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -Wl, -O1 paxinc.o paxelf.o -o scanelf scanelf.o
i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -Wl, -O1 paxinc.o paxelf.o -o pspax pspax.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../../i386-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: : No such file: No such file or directory
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [scanelf] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/../../../../i386-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: : No such file: No such file or directory
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [pspax] Error 1
!!! ERROR: app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.13 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 26, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
What is wrong ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bdm
Guru
Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 305
Location: Canada, Barrie, Ontario
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As far as I'm concerned, stage 1 installs aren't supported anymore because you get the same effect doing a stage 3 install? Can someone confirm or deny this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
radkam
n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zbulwersowalem sie teraz huju pierdolny |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
baigsabeeh
Guru
Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Posts: 520
Location: North Brunswick, NJ
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bdm wrote: | | As far as I'm concerned, stage 1 installs aren't supported anymore because you get the same effect doing a stage 3 install? Can someone confirm or deny this? |
I don't think that is the reason.
I think it's because Stage 3 + Rebuild = Stage 1. It's very easy to turn a Stage 3 install into a Stage 1 install.
_________________
BSD > SysV > Linux
BSD FTW! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peka
l33t
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 773
Location: Płońsk, Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think I have ever bootsraped, yet I have installed gentoo a few times.
What do you get when you do?
And baigsabeeh is right. If you want a stage 1 install but bootstrap fails, do a stage 3 and rebuild.
_________________
p3k4
Seize the time, Meribor. Live now; make now always the most precious time. Now will never come again...
Jean-Luc Picard, Star Trek TNG - The Inner Light |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
radkam
n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emerge -e system :
| Code: | Calculating system dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 116) sys-libs/gpm-1.20.1-r5 to /
>>> md5 files ;-) gpm-1.20.1-r4.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) gpm-1.20.1-r5.ebuild
>>> md5 files ;-) files/gpm-configure-LANG.patch
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-gpm-1.20.1-r4
>>> md5 files ;-) files/digest-gpm-1.20.1-r5
>>> md5 files ;-) files/gpm.conf.d
>>> md5 files ;-) files/gpm.rc6
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) gpm-1.20.1.tar.bz2
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) gpm-1.20.1-patches-1.4.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking gpm-1.20.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gpm-1.20.1-r5/work
>>> Unpacking gpm-1.20.1-patches-1.4.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gpm-1.20.1-r5/work
* Applying various patches (bugfixes/updates) ...
* 01_all_info.patch ... [ ok ]
* 03_all_DESTDIR.patch ... [ ok ]
* 04_all_root.patch ... [ ok ]
* 05_all_serialconsole.patch ... [ ok ]
* 08_all_nodebug.patch ... [ ok ]
* 09_all_logfillup.patch ... [ ok ]
* 10_all_link.patch ... [ ok ]
* 11_all_lib_segv.patch ... [ ok ]
* 12_all_linux26-dependcache.patch ... [ ok ]
* 20_all_gpm-1.20.1-subscript.patch ... [ ok ]
* 21_all_synps2-four-way-button.patch ... [ ok ]
* 25_all_gpm-mousewheel-support.patch ... [ ok ]
* 30_all_gpm-1.20.1-weak-wgetch.patch ... [ ok ]
* 60_all_parallel-build.patch ... [ ok ]
* Done with patching
* Applying gpm-configure-LANG.patch ... [ ok ]
>>> Source unpacked.
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --libdir=/lib --sysconfdir=/etc/gpm --build=i386-pc-linux-gnu
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -Wl, -O1) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
!!! Please attach the config.log to your bug report:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/gpm-1.20.1-r5/work/gpm-1.20.1/config.log
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/gpm-1.20.1-r5 failed.
!!! Function econf, Line 495, Exitcode 0
!!! econf failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peka
l33t
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 773
Location: Płońsk, Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's just a wild guess (well, not entirely) but you shouldn't have a comma i.e. "," in your cflags and they read "-O2 -mtune=pentium4 -pipe -Wl, -O1".
Try removing this comma and we'll see what's next.
_________________
p3k4
Seize the time, Meribor. Live now; make now always the most precious time. Now will never come again...
Jean-Luc Picard, Star Trek TNG - The Inner Light |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
radkam
n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes... there is an comma ... i fix it........... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peka
l33t
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 773
Location: Płońsk, Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...also...
... at the moment you're using gcc-3.3.4 and mtune cflag was introduced with 3.4.6 version. I'm not sure - maybe it will just ignore it.
Consult gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs for more info about allowed cflags.
_________________
p3k4
Seize the time, Meribor. Live now; make now always the most precious time. Now will never come again...
Jean-Luc Picard, Star Trek TNG - The Inner Light |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Paapaa
l33t
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 955
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Always use -march which also implies -mtune (== -mcpu (deprecated) ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaglover
Watchman
Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 8291
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| radkam wrote: | | zbulwersowalem sie teraz huju pierdolny |
Is this your way to say: "I'm deeply grateful to Gentoo developers for providing this wonderful OS for free and also to members of this great support forum"?
In hope I got this translation right I'll throw in my two cents: you better set your CHOST to i686 now - before you bootstrap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gergan Penkov
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 1464
Location: das kleinste Kuhdorf Deutschlands :)
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jaglover wrote: | | radkam wrote: | | zbulwersowalem sie teraz huju pierdolny |
Is this your way to say: "I'm deeply grateful to Gentoo developers for providing this wonderful OS for free and also to members of this great support forum"?
In hope I got this translation right I'll throw in my two cents: you better set your CHOST to i686 now - before you bootstrap. |
_________________
"I knew when an angel whispered into my ear,
You gotta get him away, yeah
Hey little bitch!
Be glad you finally walked away or you may have not lived another day."
Godsmack |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raku
Bodhisattva
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 2374
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jaglover wrote: | | radkam wrote: | | zbulwersowalem sie teraz huju pierdolny |
Is this your way to say: "I'm deeply grateful to Gentoo developers for providing this wonderful OS for free and also to members of this great support forum"?
In hope I got this translation right I'll throw in my two cents: you better set your CHOST to i686 now - before you bootstrap. |
This is the way of saying: "Please, ban me now !!!"
I already asked tomk to do this.
I apologize everyone for my Polish folk.
_________________
raku
Powered by Archlinux  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Installing Gentoo
