| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tejecske
n00b
Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Pécs, Hungary
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:30 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: | checking for GTK - version >= 1.2.8... no
*** Could not run GTK test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK was incorrectly installed
*** or that you have moved GTK since it was installed. In the latter case, you
*** may want to edit the gtk-config script: /usr/bin/gtk-config
configure: error: Sorry you need gtk 1.2.8
configure: error: ./configure failed for src
make[1]: *** [gnome/Makefile] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gocr-0.40-r2/work/gocr-0.40/frontend'
make: *** [frontend] Error 2
!!! ERROR: app-text/gocr-0.40-r2 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1546: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
gocr-0.40-r2.ebuild, line 44: Called die
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
dreamer ~ #
|
| Quote: | This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:529: checking for gcc
configure:642: checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=athlon-tbird -mtune=athlon-tbird -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident -frename-registers -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=both) works
configure:658: gcc -o conftest -O2 -march=athlon-tbird -mtune=athlon-tbird -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident -frename-registers -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=both conftest.c 1>&5
configure:684: checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=athlon-tbird -mtune=athlon-tbird -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident -frename-registers -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=both) is a cross-compiler
configure:689: checking whether we are using GNU C
configure:698: gcc -E conftest.c
configure:717: checking whether gcc accepts -g
configure:779: checking for a BSD compatible install
configure:832: checking whether make sets ${MAKE}
configure:859: checking whether build environment is sane
configure:935: checking for working aclocal
configure:948: checking for working autoconf
configure:961: checking for working automake
configure:974: checking for working autoheader
configure:987: checking for working makeinfo
configure:1004: checking how to run the C preprocessor
configure:1025: gcc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out
configure:1084: checking for ANSI C header files
configure:1097: gcc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out
configure:1164: gcc -o conftest -O2 -march=athlon-tbird -mtune=athlon-tbird -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident -frename-registers -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=both conftest.c 1>&5
configure: In function 'main':
configure:1159: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit'
configure:1192: checking for working const
configure:1246: gcc -c -O2 -march=athlon-tbird -mtune=athlon-tbird -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident -frename-registers conftest.c 1>&5
|
_________________
The w/ELDER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
antirawker
n00b
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Baja Califas
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im using a sony vaio u1 laptop and it looks like im going to be using the conrad cd for doing a stage 1 gentoo install. but my question is whether or not if i could implement a japanese keyboard layout with conrad. it seems to skip the option to choose a specific keyboad layout. thanks in advance.
_________________
known by most...hated by many...adored by the rest |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erukian
n00b
Joined: 03 Jul 2002
Posts: 50
Location: Tacoma, Washington USA
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I followed this guide to the letter, when I got down to the string of emerges that has me build my toolkit, the gcc compile errored out saying missing directory. I used the 2006.1 as my base, not the 2006.0 stage 3 like in the guide. Was that my mistake? It didn't actually have a compile problem, it looked like a configuration problem since it stopped with a missing directory error.
Any ideas or should I wait for a 2006.1 stage3 verified and tested install from conrad?
-Joe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seventjah
n00b
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Erukian wrote: | I followed this guide to the letter, when I got down to the string of emerges that has me build my toolkit, the gcc compile errored out saying missing directory. I used the 2006.1 as my base, not the 2006.0 stage 3 like in the guide. Was that my mistake? It didn't actually have a compile problem, it looked like a configuration problem since it stopped with a missing directory error.
Any ideas or should I wait for a 2006.1 stage3 verified and tested install from conrad?
-Joe |
Same problem here, but I used the 2006.0 stage3, maybe we did something wrong? :p |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
matobsk
n00b
Joined: 16 Oct 2005
Posts: 64
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, you (probably) did nothing wrong.
As mentioned earlier in this thread, the gcc ebuild provided in this overlay is missing the files/c88 & files/c89 directories.
You need to copy them from the standard portage gcc in order for this overlay to finish building.
ie:
| Code: |
cp /usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/files/c8* /usr/local/overlays/conrad/sys-devel/gcc/files/
emerge --resume
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1551
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, I just thought I'd let you know, guide 3.1 will come very soon, along with a stable kernel patchset.
_________________
JOIN IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
Zen bugs/requests?: http://zen-kernel.org/issues
--
Join: ARCFPWDLVEFOTTSBNA - Anti-Rice club for people who don't like volcanoes except for on the TVs sometimes but not always |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EAD
Guru
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 352
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheater1034 wrote: | | Hi, I just thought I'd let you know, guide 3.1 will come very soon, along with a stable kernel patchset. |
btw, will there be a reiser 4.1 in the new guide? and maybe gcc 4.2 and the new perl 2.5 ? and so on? I love new bleeding edge  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kensai
Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 568
Location: Puerto Rico
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EAD wrote: | | btw, will there be a reiser 4.1 in the new guide? and maybe gcc 4.2 and the new perl 2.5 ? and so on? I love new bleeding edge |
Sometimes is not a matter of loving them is knowing how to deal with them once you have them.
_________________
Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Perspective of a Thinking Human Being |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
antirawker
n00b
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Baja Califas
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ive been using the most up to date conrad install method but, the glibc-2.5 ebild fails to install properly. i get the ERROR: ....Called die message after it compiles and attempts to install. any suggestions?? thanks in advance.
_________________
known by most...hated by many...adored by the rest |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chrisdupre
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 120
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:48 am Post subject: bump |
|
|
bump!!
same thing here? Any veterans have any suggestions? Everything else is great up to this point. Also I tried taking "ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86" out also? with no luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
antirawker
n00b
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Baja Califas
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
anyway to work around this error in the glibc-2.5 ebuild?seems like 2.5 is still rendered unstable and it's conflicting somewhere in the build. i just cant pin-point where though. any suggestions?
_________________
known by most...hated by many...adored by the rest |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chrisdupre
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 120
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:25 am Post subject: Wait for 3.1 |
|
|
Well antirawker looks like we need to wait for 3.1 instructions  . I am going to try another kernel maybe vipernicus? Wish me luck dude  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
antirawker
n00b
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Baja Califas
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
i dont think the kernel has much to do with it since glibc failed to compile and install correctly while trying to rebuild the tool kit...but im going to try a few things and see if i cant manipulate the sitution. 
_________________
known by most...hated by many...adored by the rest |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chrisdupre
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 120
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:59 am Post subject: hrmmm...., well lets see what happens |
|
|
Good Luck,
If you do get it working let me know the solution and thanks ahead of time! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
matobsk
n00b
Joined: 16 Oct 2005
Posts: 64
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats strange, my conrad updated to glibc-2.5 without any issues.
Though I was using the 2.5-beta snapshots for the last few months, that probably made a big difference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
antirawker
n00b
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Baja Califas
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
matobsk, which version of the conrad install directions did you happen to use and which install CD did you use? if possible, give me a run down of those details. thanks.
_________________
known by most...hated by many...adored by the rest |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LinuxMan
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 83
Location: Ukraine / Ternopil
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use glibc and binutils from conrad overlay(which use patched version of hashstyle). But new glibc and binutils has built-in support. But i read that built-in version incompatible with patched so i need to update all my world(this can take a week on my fast system becouse my world is big) all in stable version of glibc hashstyle maked compatible and i can safely update system?
_________________
SORRY FOR MY VERY VERY VERY VERY BAD ENGLISH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tejecske
n00b
Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Pécs, Hungary
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:07 am Post subject: how soon |
|
|
very soon?
_________________
The w/ELDER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitesouls
Guru
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 358
Location: In Front of My Laptop
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cheater1034 wrote: | | Hi, I just thought I'd let you know, guide 3.1 will come very soon, along with a stable kernel patchset. |
I wonder when the new release of this installation will arive.
_________________
whitesouls
Please insert the [SOLVED] tag if your problem is solved in your respective thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
antirawker
n00b
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Baja Califas
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yea..what Lord Vader said. 
_________________
known by most...hated by many...adored by the rest |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1551
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lord Vader wrote: | | cheater1034 wrote: | | Hi, I just thought I'd let you know, guide 3.1 will come very soon, along with a stable kernel patchset. |
I wonder when the new release of this installation will arive. |
I've been extremely busy, I will update the files and hopefully have it out tomorrow, and if we're lucky later tonight.
_________________
JOIN IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
Zen bugs/requests?: http://zen-kernel.org/issues
--
Join: ARCFPWDLVEFOTTSBNA - Anti-Rice club for people who don't like volcanoes except for on the TVs sometimes but not always |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
