View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
synss Apprentice
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 282 Location: Dijon > Berlin > Tokyo > Nürnberg > München
|
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I finished rewriting elogviewer, there are not many changes from a user's stand point but there is proper licensing, proper credits, etc. And a better organization of the code as well as a few bug fixes. I hope I did not add new bugs, too. It's uploaded at sourceforge.
(k)elogviewer need icons. I could not care less myself, being a happy openbox user, but I think the projects need one in order to look good to everybody else. Hence I am fully open and would enjoy seeing artwork from whoever knows how and has time for making icon sets. His name will be added to the credits, that's all I can do.
Whoever wants to hack into the code should start from elogviewer-0.5.0 and is welcome. As Jeremy_Z said, I am busy these days, so whoever feels like contributing is welcome. Although, I would like to supervise everything concerning elogviewer. I may go on from time to time myself.
The code is actually simple, so do not be scared looking into it. _________________ Compress portage tree
Elog viewer
Autodetect swap
Last edited by synss on Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:42 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeremy_Z l33t
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 671 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think we could share an icon (since people using gnome won't be using kelogviewer and vice cersa). Samewise we should try to keep the same features in both versions, so that kelog and elog would be the same soft but with just a different backend (QT / GTK). _________________ "Because two groups of consumers drive the absolute high end of home computing: the gamers and the porn surfers." /.
My gentoo projects, Kelogviewer and a QT4 gui for etc-proposals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
V-Li Retired Dev
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 613
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok guys, apart from the icon thing I can tell you that elogv for the command line and elogviewer for GTK+ have made it into Portage.
kelogviewer has to wait until the source files have moved to Sourceforge.
If you don't have x86 and you can sucessfully run it on that arch, please file a bug (or notify me by email or PM) and tell so. The respective arch team will take care of keywording then.
Code: |
/etc/portage/package.keywords
app-portage/elogv ~*
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeremy_Z l33t
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 671 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi i've been a bit busy but i uploaded the source in the CVS repository. The release should follow soon (sf permission issue ) _________________ "Because two groups of consumers drive the absolute high end of home computing: the gamers and the porn surfers." /.
My gentoo projects, Kelogviewer and a QT4 gui for etc-proposals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
V-Li Retired Dev
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 613
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
kelogviewer is in Portage now, too. app-portage/kelogviewer as you may guess. Inform me about successful runs on other architectures than x86, or file a bug to the arch team yourself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xenon Guru
Joined: 25 Dec 2002 Posts: 432 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Einfo for elogviewer says that you need to create the /elog directory to use the tool. Couldn't this be avoided or the directory moved or made customizable, so not to clog the root folder just for one - albeit useful - single package? And by the way, why is that directory needed? I used elogviewer for a while, checked the directory and it's empty. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
synss Apprentice
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 282 Location: Dijon > Berlin > Tokyo > Nürnberg > München
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xenon wrote: | Einfo for elogviewer says that you need to create the /elog directory to use the tool. Couldn't this be avoided or the directory moved or made customizable, so not to clog the root folder just for one - albeit useful - single package? And by the way, why is that directory needed? I used elogviewer for a while, checked the directory and it's empty. |
It is not needed so just delete it
/usr/portage/app-portage/elogviewer/elogviewer-0.5.1.ebuild wrote: | 36 elog "To operate properly this software needs the directory"
37 elog "$PORT_LOGDIR/elog created, belonging to group portage."
38 elog "To start the software as a user, add yourself to the portage" | so that $PORT_LOGDIR/elog is actually needed. In short: if you have elogs, you do not need to do anything, if elogviewer works, you are done.
I believe the mistake comes from:- your $PORT_LOGDIR is empty
- when displaying its info, it was interpreted (as nothing because empty)
- $PORT_LOGDIR/elog became /elog
elogviewer does not need anything but python, pygtk and elogs to read.
And it actually comes from /etc/make.conf.example wrote: | save (saves one log per package in $PORT_LOGDIR/elog, /var/log/portage/elog if $PORT_LOGDIR is unset) | about line 355. It is portage related, that is why elogviewer would not do it for you. _________________ Compress portage tree
Elog viewer
Autodetect swap |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xenon Guru
Joined: 25 Dec 2002 Posts: 432 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, that makes much more sense! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Apatrid n00b
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
V-Li wrote: | kelogviewer is in Portage now, too. app-portage/kelogviewer as you may guess. Inform me about successful runs on other architectures than x86, or file a bug to the arch team yourself. |
I've been using kelogviewer for a long time on amd64. The version from portage, once I create custom ebuild to add amd64 keyword, works fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
V-Li Retired Dev
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 613
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apatrid wrote: | V-Li wrote: | kelogviewer is in Portage now, too. app-portage/kelogviewer as you may guess. Inform me about successful runs on other architectures than x86, or file a bug to the arch team yourself. |
I've been using kelogviewer for a long time on amd64. The version from portage, once I create custom ebuild to add amd64 keyword, works fine. |
There is a bug now that asks amd64 architecture team about keywording it testing. See bug #159595 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwall64 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 128 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
anybody seen this error with elogviewer?
Quote: |
intellistation2800 ~ # elogviewer
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/elogviewer", line 640, in ?
Elogviewer()
File "/usr/bin/elogviewer", line 490, in __init__
self.filelist.populate()
File "/usr/bin/elogviewer", line 230, in populate
log = LogEntry(filename)
File "/usr/bin/elogviewer", line 195, in __init__
(c, p, t) = re.split(':', str(filename))
ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
|
it was working for me fine, then this error started happening. _________________ Intel Core2Quad Q9400
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
8GB DDR2-1066 RAM OCZ
GeForce 9600GT
5x Seagate 1TB 7200.12 (4x Software RAID5)
Gentoo 64-bit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
V-Li Retired Dev
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 613
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cwall64 wrote: | anybody seen this error with elogviewer?
[...]
|
Delete /var/log/portage/elog/* and try again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwall64 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 128 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
V-Li wrote: | cwall64 wrote: | anybody seen this error with elogviewer?
[...]
|
Delete /var/log/portage/elog/* and try again. |
That did not solve the problem, any other ideas? Does it not work with ~x86 versions of portage? _________________ Intel Core2Quad Q9400
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
8GB DDR2-1066 RAM OCZ
GeForce 9600GT
5x Seagate 1TB 7200.12 (4x Software RAID5)
Gentoo 64-bit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aysen Apprentice
Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 187 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to ask what's the current status of kelogviewer? Is there any work going on on it?
Eg. I'd love it to recognize the new "qa" elog class. Is it something we can expect in the near future?
Oh, and I've filed a bug with a patch to allow kelogviewer to build with dev-python/pykde instead of broken kde-base/pykde (broken on x86 because of broken =dev-python/PyQt-3.14.1-r2 dependency). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JeliJami Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 1086 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
on amd64, elogv shows warnings,logs,.. but elogviewer only shows the ebuild names, no loggings
on the console it shows the error
Code: | Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/elogviewer", line 545, in selection_changed
self.logview.set_text(filename)
File "/usr/bin/elogviewer", line 377, in set_text
elif self.headerlist.is_active(section) and \
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'section' referenced before assignment |
when I click an ebuild name
configuration in /etc/make.conf
Code: | PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log qa"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save"
PORT_LOGDIR="/var/log/"
|
_________________ Unanswered Post Initiative | Search | FAQ
Former username: davjel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
synss Apprentice
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 282 Location: Dijon > Berlin > Tokyo > Nürnberg > München
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do not know why I do not receive any email when things get posted here. Anyway.
As far as new features go, elogviewer does not support the new save-into-only-one-file feature (I do not have my gentoo box here, I forgot the name, "savesomething") and using it will break my prog.
I have absolutely no time before at least April to do anything for elogviewer (I will not even be at home most of the time) so I would be grateful if somebody would add the couple of classes/functions missing, I believe it is not too much work, actually, despite the fact that I am an amateur-programmer, I hope the source is readable. I may submit patches with small updates and fixes so that elogviewer can cope with portage, but I cannot make anything serious now.
Next, for at least some time, Mac OS X is going to be my main OS, I will likely put a Debian on my lightweight PC so that I get something quick and --- probably later in April, either Gentoo or OpenSuSE on the amd64 Opteron sitting in my office.
In other words anybody willing to contribute to Gentoo and thinking (k)elogviewer is/are useful can take over with the development.
ãã¿ã¾ãã
and thank you for your understanding _________________ Compress portage tree
Elog viewer
Autodetect swap |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vinboy n00b
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
good stuff |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JeliJami Veteran
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 1086 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the crash of elogviewer on amd64 mentioned above, is no longer
all I can remember was changing the ELOG settings in /etc/make.conf into
Code: | PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log qa"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save"
#PORT_LOGDIR="/var/log/"
|
(commented PORT_LOGDIR)
Code: | equery l elogviewer
[ Searching for package 'elogviewer' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ~] app-portage/elogviewer-0.5.1 (0) |
_________________ Unanswered Post Initiative | Search | FAQ
Former username: davjel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devsk Advocate
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 2995 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is someone maintaining elogviewer at this time? I have a bug to report. I think 'sorting' on timestamps is buggy. It shows 12/31/07 before 01/20/08 if sorted in desc order. If in asc order, it shows 01/20/08 before 12/31/07. i.e. entries are shown like:
12/31/07
..
06/09/07
...
01/20/08
...
01/01/08
and the 'sort' arrow is pointing upwards.
Or
01/01/08
...
01/20/08
...
06/09/07
...
12/31/07
and the 'sort' arrow is pointing downwards. I think its sorting on month first whereas it should sort on year first, month second and then on date, hour, minutes, seconds etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devsk Advocate
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 2995 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MMMMM Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Posts: 141 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:31 pm Post subject: elogviewer / kelogviewer |
|
|
Hello,
elogviewer in portage is stable 0.5.2-r2 / unstable 0.6.2-r2, on Homepage 2.2. Is there a way of using the current version through the emerge system?
sunrise overlay does not work.
kelogviewer isn't in portage.
does anyone know?
M
Last edited by MMMMM on Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jasn Guru
Joined: 05 May 2005 Posts: 439 Location: Maryland, US
|
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not in main portage but it looks like the 2.x versions are at least available in the gentoo-guis and vaca overlays.
Good Luck.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anon-E-moose Watchman
Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6098 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://sourceforge.net/projects/elogviewer/
ebuild download link is on page along with gzipped tar file _________________ PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, 6.1 zen kernel
gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MMMMM Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Posts: 141 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was successfull using the vaca overlay. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
synss Apprentice
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 282 Location: Dijon > Berlin > Tokyo > Nürnberg > München
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 7:50 pm Post subject: Re: elogviewer / kelogviewer |
|
|
MMMMM wrote: | elogviewer in portage is stable 0.5.2-r2 / unstable 0.6.2-r2, on Homepage 2.2. Is there a way of using the current version through the emerge system?
|
2.1 should be in unstable from... today!
MMMMM wrote: | kelogviewer isn't in portage. |
Yes, kelogviewer is dead. but but but the version that survived is the Qt4 version because I now like it/know it better than gtk and maintaining two GUIs was too much work. _________________ Compress portage tree
Elog viewer
Autodetect swap |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|