View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lou.B n00b
Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:05 am Post subject: emerge openoffice 2.0.1 failed |
|
|
Hi, I've got this problem with openoffice:
Code: |
=============
Building project MathMLDTD
=============
deliver -- version: 1.92
LINK: build.lst -> /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/MathMLDTD/build.lst
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin/deliver.pl line 760.
LINK: ../math.dtd -> /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin/math.dtd
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin/deliver.pl line 760.
LINK: ../w3c_ipr_software_notice.html -> /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin/w3c_ipr_software_notice.html
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin/deliver.pl line 760.
LOG: writing /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/MathMLDTD/deliver.log
Statistics:
Files copied: 3
Files unchanged/not matching: 0
=============
Building project boost
=============
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/boost
ERROR: Error 11 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/boost
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.0.1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 215, Exitcode 2
!!! Build failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
Has anyone have an idea what is going on??
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Make sure that you are not out of disk space.
df -hv
will show you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lou.B n00b
Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: |
localhost ~ # df -hv
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hdb3 27G 15G 11G 58% /
|
11G should handle emerge openoffice, i think :/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rojanu Guru
Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 361 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I had 2.01 on my system installed but after portage update, for some reason world update wants to recompile open office but it does not compile here is the error I get
Code: | #
# Aliases.
#
The alias mkout is set to: "perl $SOLARENV/bin/mkout.pl"
The alias deliver is set to: "perl $SOLARENV/bin/deliver.pl"
The alias build is set to: "perl $SOLARENV/bin/build.pl"
The alias zipdep is set to: "perl $SOLARENV/bin/zipdep.pl"
The alias nmake is set to: "dmake"
The variable SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING is set to: 1
****************************************************************************
*
* OpenOffice.org 680 configuration.
*
*
* Configuration part of OpenOffice.org 680 build is finished.
*
* NB! Be aware that you might not be able to build OpenOffice.org if you
* ignore any warning message that were generated during this configuration
* process.
*
*
* USAGE:
* Source LinuxIntelEnv.Set (in tcsh) or LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh (in sh)
* in order to set up the build-environment variables.
*
*
****************************************************************************
Configure completed
You may now run /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/bootstrap in /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1
A very clean straight-through build - deferring dep generation
Verifying environment
Path: \'/opt/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10/bin:.:/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin:/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/unxlngi6/bin:/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin:/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/bin:/usr/lib/ccache/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib/portage/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.4.5:/usr/i386-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.3.5-20050130:/opt/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10/bin:/opt/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10/jre/bin:/opt/sun-jdk-1.4.2.10/jre/javaws:/usr/kde/3.5/sbin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/usr/qt/3/bin:/usr/kde/3.4/sbin:/usr/kde/3.4/bin:/opt/vmware/workstation/bin:/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/bin\'
Shell: \'/bin/tcsh\'
Lang: \'en-GB\'
Gcc:
3.4.5
bison (GNU Bison) 2.1
Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman.
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
flex version 2.5.4
Bootstrapping
Unknown colorls variable `su'.
Unknown colorls variable `su'.
Unknown colorls variable `su'.
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.0.1 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1894: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 941: Called src_compile
!!! Build failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. |
Thank you. _________________ "Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand." --- Martin Fowler,
Linux User: #416714 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
filipe.lopes n00b
Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 1 Location: Porto, Portugal
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I seem to have the same problem. Last day I upgraded Openoffice from 1.4 to 2.0.1 and it compiled with no errors, except it does not start:
Code: |
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libucbhelper3gcc3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
|
When running revdep-rebuild it reports:
Code: |
Checking dynamic linking consistency...
broken /usr/lib/openoffice/program/kdefilepicker (requires libstlport_gcc.so libuno_sal.so.3)
broken /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libagg680li.so (requires libstlport_gcc.so)
broken /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libeggtray680li.so (requires libstlport_gcc.so)
broken /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libnpsoplugin.so (requires libstlport_gcc.so)
broken /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3 (requires libstlport_gcc.so libuno_sal.so.3)
done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)
Assigning files to ebuilds... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds)
|
and then starts recompiling Openoffice and at some point returns the same error that Lou.B reported.
Anyone?
Regards,
Filipe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yabbadabbadont Advocate
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 4791 Location: 2 exits past crazy
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm afraid that I don't have any suggestions for solving this. Personally, I use openoffice-bin as I didn't want to wait 12 hours for it to build... which it aparently doesn't do.
(I do the same with firefox and thunderbird) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seringen Apprentice
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 163 Location: berkeley, california
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:41 pm Post subject: colorls |
|
|
colorls is a part of coreutils i think. Have you updated that recently? you might need to roll back if that is the case. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmpogo Advocate
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 3269 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:46 pm Post subject: Re: emerge openoffice 2.0.1 failed |
|
|
Lou.B wrote: | Hi, I've got this problem with openoffice:
Code: |
=============
Building project MathMLDTD
=============
deliver -- version: 1.92
LINK: build.lst -> /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/MathMLDTD/build.lst
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin/deliver.pl line 760.
LINK: ../math.dtd -> /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin/math.dtd
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin/deliver.pl line 760.
LINK: ../w3c_ipr_software_notice.html -> /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/bin/w3c_ipr_software_notice.html
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solenv/bin/deliver.pl line 760.
LOG: writing /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/MathMLDTD/deliver.log
Statistics:
Files copied: 3
Files unchanged/not matching: 0
=============
Building project boost
=============
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/boost
ERROR: Error 11 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.1/work/ooo-build-2.0.1.2/build/ooa680-m1/boost
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.0.1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 215, Exitcode 2
!!! Build failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
Has anyone have an idea what is going on??
Regards |
If you repeat the compilation do you fail in the same place ? If not - it is probably hardware problem
On one of my machines long compiles are failing with similar (irrelevant) diagnostics, because processor overheats. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seringen Apprentice
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 163 Location: berkeley, california
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:19 pm Post subject: Re: emerge openoffice 2.0.1 failed |
|
|
dmpogo wrote: |
If you repeat the compilation do you fail in the same place ? If not - it is probably hardware problem
On one of my machines long compiles are failing with similar (irrelevant) diagnostics, because processor overheats. |
I disagree, I this it's too early on for it to be an overheating problem
Emory |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmpogo Advocate
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 3269 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:07 am Post subject: Re: emerge openoffice 2.0.1 failed |
|
|
seringen wrote: | dmpogo wrote: |
If you repeat the compilation do you fail in the same place ? If not - it is probably hardware problem
On one of my machines long compiles are failing with similar (irrelevant) diagnostics, because processor overheats. |
I disagree, I this it's too early on for it to be an overheating problem
Emory |
Perhaps, I don't know how far into compilation is the failure. My machine overheats in ~15-20 min of compilation (it has ambient CPU temperature
of 51C, when and if it goes above 60C it can fail). Nevertheless, it is interesting to see if it is repeatable at exactly the same spot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ganderatc n00b
Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're probably running the unstable coreutils. Re-emerge the stable coreutils (~5.2.1) and the problem should go away. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
naddahere n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2005 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
which jdk are u using? ive heard that 1.5 has caused problems. try using 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seringen Apprentice
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 163 Location: berkeley, california
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was able to replicate using a version of coreutils (i'm at work and can't remember which one)
the 1.5 jdk shouldn't be a problem these days.
Anyone with this or a similar problem should definitely check their coreutils version |
|
Back to top |
|
|
naddahere n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2005 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just tested this out and java1.5 works fine. Unstable coreutils is the offender. openoffice emerges fine with stable coreutils. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crudh l33t
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 696 Location: Sundbyberg, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rojanu wrote: | Well I had 2.01 on my system installed but after portage update, for some reason world update wants to recompile open office but it does not compile here is the error I get
Code: |
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
flex version 2.5.4
Bootstrapping
Unknown colorls variable `su'.
Unknown colorls variable `su'.
Unknown colorls variable `su'.
make: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.0.1 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1894: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 941: Called src_compile
!!! Build failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. |
Thank you. |
I have the same error and it seems to be related to tcsh. If I run tcsh I get:
Code: | # tcsh
Unknown colorls variable `su'. |
I'm gonna check it out later when I have time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crudh l33t
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 696 Location: Sundbyberg, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As someone posted earlier it seems to be related to stuff in DIR_COLORS that newer coreutils versions handle. tcsh has problems with it and segfaults with only that warning.
Commenting out the following lines:
Code: | #SETUID 37;41 # file that is setuid (u+s)
#SETGID 30;43 # file that is setgid (g+s)
#STICKY_OTHER_WRITABLE 30;42 # dir that is sticky and other-writable (+t,o+w)
#OTHER_WRITABLE 34;42 # dir that is other-writable (o+w) and not sticky
#STICKY 37;44 # dir with the sticky bit set (+t) and not other-writable
|
makes tcsh work. I'm trying to build OO again to see if it works now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crudh l33t
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 696 Location: Sundbyberg, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It got past my previous error but now I got the same error as the first poster. So it seems that unstable coreutils is the reason behind both errors. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sabishii-ookami n00b
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | emerge -1 coreutils |
That fixed my problem. OOo is correctly emerging now (passed boost) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ThorstenHirsch Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did the error occur for revdep-rebuild only?
This was the behavior I experienced. Calling emerge directly builds OOo fine.
There's also a bug related to this issue: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128789 _________________ alias bauerbob |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|