View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
corsair Retired Dev
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 451 Location: Aachen, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject: Sun Netra X1 not shutting down competely |
|
|
Hi,
I just noticed that my Sun Netra X1 will not shut down completely. Here is the output from serial console:
Code: |
netra ~ # poweroff
INIT: Sending processes the TERM signal
INIT: Sending processes the KILL signal
* Stopping local ... [ ok ]
* Stopping vixie-cron ... [ ok ]
* Stopping sshd ... [ ok ]
* Stopping syslog-ng ... [ ok ]
* Saving random seed ... [ ok ]
* Stopping DDClient ... [ ok ]
* Unmounting network filesystems ... [ ok ]
* Stopping eth0
* Bringing down eth0
* Shutting down eth0 ... [ ok ]
* Stopping lo
* Shutting down lo ... [ ok ]
* Deactivating swap ... [ ok ]
* Unmounting filesystems ... [ ok ]
* Shutting down RAID devices (raidtools) .../dev/md0: successfully stopped.
[ !! ]
* Remounting remaining filesystems readonly ... [ ok ]
Power down.
Program terminated
ok
|
at this stage the fans are still running. Now I do this:
Code: |
ok power-off
lom>
LOM event: +96d+6h37m3s host power off
lom>
|
And as you can see I'm getting to the point the system is completely shut down.
I do remember that this system shut down completely some while ago, i.e. some kernels earlier, but I don't know what I've changed.
Hope someone can help.
Regards,
Markus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Weeve Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Oct 2002 Posts: 641
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe there were some kernel changes made a little while back so that servers/headless boxes wouldn't power down on a halt but that desktops would. If I recall correctly, this was to emulate Solaris behavior in similar circumstances (but I could be wrong about that). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
corsair Retired Dev
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 451 Location: Aachen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info. I searched the kernel changelogs, but didn't found anything that would underline your statement (I actualy don't know what I would search for. I tried 'power', 'sparc' and such things).
Do you know if this is an configureable kernel option? I would realy like to get the old behaviour back.
Regards,
Markus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Weeve Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Oct 2002 Posts: 641
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if it is configurable. I'd search the sparclinux mailing list as that is where I recall this being discussed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|