| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TSikorski
n00b
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 4:48 pm Post subject: emerge problems after installing portage 2.0.47-r2 |
 |
|
After installing portage 2.0.47-r2 I am finding that various packages will no longer build. For example if I try to:
emerge cdrtools
I get the following messages:
| Code: |
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) app-cdr/cdrtools-2.0 to /
>>> md5 ;-) cdrtools-2.0.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking cdrtools-2.0.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/cdrtools-2.0/work
>>> Source unpacked.
RULES/rules1.top:213: incs/Dcc.x86-linux: No such file or directory
sh ./conf/cc-config.sh cc incs/Dcc.x86-linux
Trying to find cc
Found cc
Creating empty 'incs/Dcc.x86-linux'
make: *** No rule to make target `show-all-if-ambiguous'. Stop.
!!! ERROR: app-cdr/cdrtools-2.0 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 24, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
|
I just happend to pick cdrtools as an example I get a similiar result with gaim. For gaim emerge goes through the unpacking and configure stage but fails with s similiar message when make is invoked. Here is what gaim looked like:
| Code: |
.....
Gaim will be installed in /usr/bin.
Warning: You have an old copy of gaim at /usr/bin/gaim.
configure complete, now type 'make'
make: *** No rule to make target `show-all-if-ambiguous'. Stop.
!!! ERROR: net-im/gaim-0.59.8-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 50, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
|
If I go to the previous release of portage which for me is
2.0.46-r12 both of the above packages are correctly built and installed.
What is the message `show-all-if-ambigous' trying to tell me?? And who is issueing the message? I tried re-installing 'make' but that didn't change things. Anyone else seen this.
Thanks.
Regards,
Ted
_________________
ted.sikorski@utoronto.ca |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20067
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This may be obvious and you're wanting to do that, but .47 versions of portage are masked. I'd personally downgrade to the stable .46-r12.
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TSikorski
n00b
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. I did some looking on a couple of systems that I have here.
I compared /usr/portage/profile/package.mask on a system which was "emerge rsync'd" on Feb 11 and package.mask has an entry for portage it says:
| Code: |
# <carpaski@gentoo.org> (07 Feb 2003)
# Testing for UserPriv compile. Works, but breaks a couple ebuilds.
>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.47_pre1
|
After a recent emerge rsync done on Feb 19 the above line is no longer in profile.mask.
Am I correct in assuming that if the entry is not in package.mask then portage will be upgraded with the next emerge -u world?
I didn't explicity emerge portage-2.0.47 it got installed as part of an emerge rysnc, emerge -u world cycle.
_________________
ted.sikorski@utoronto.ca |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20067
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my package.mask: | Code: | # <carpaski@gentoo.org> (20 Feb 2003)
# Odd problems on select systems and is breaking some ebuilds.
=sys-apps/portage-2.0.47-r2 |
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ikshaar
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 1339
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same as TSikorski. Somebody incorrectly unmasked portage .47
And that screwed up my system big time 
Ok remasking it, seems to solve most of it 
_________________
"May God stands between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk" - Babylon 5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rac
Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002
Posts: 6553
Location: Japanifornia
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ikshaar wrote: | Somebody incorrectly unmasked portage .47
And that screwed up my system big time |
It would be helpful if you could provide detailed bug reports and help with troubleshooting. That would help make the .47 series stable faster.
_________________
For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ikshaar
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 1339
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2003 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
In my package.mask:
| Code: |
# <carpaski@gentoo.org> (20 Feb 2003)
# Odd problems on select systems and is breaking some ebuilds.
=sys-apps/portage-2.0.47-r2
|
|
I agree, but apparently, it is already known. I doubt you want to have duplicate report.
This is the thread were I originally talked about the problem.
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=36802&highlight=
And the idea of the forum, I thought, was to discussed, before to submit a bug report to see if it is an already well known problem. As you can see, I was unable to determine by myself if it was a portage or gtk-engines problem. It would have been difficult for me to fill an interesting bug report !!!
PS : Too bad, I tried bug-buddy but unfortunately it's only to report gnome bug.
_________________
"May God stands between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk" - Babylon 5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20067
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Portage & Programming
