| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xathin
n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I have all the AMD64 stuff installed, and I'm trying to use the latest version, but it won't install anything. All I get is a block error from portage.
| Code: | # emerge -av lightscribe
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.6-r1 USE="fortran gtk nls (-altivec) -bootstrap -boundschecking -build -doc -gcj (-hardened) -ip28 -ip32r10k (-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -nopie -nossp -objc -test -vanilla" 23,534 kB [0]
[ebuild N ] virtual/libstdc++-3.3 0 kB [0]
[ebuild N F ] app-cdr/lightscribe-1.8.13.1 USE="-sdk" 520 kB [1]
[blocks B ] =sys-devel/gcc-3.3* (is blocking app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat-1.0-r3)
Total: 3 packages (2 new, 1 in new slot, 1 block), Size of downloads: 24,053 kB
Fetch Restriction: 1 package (1 unsatisfied)
Portage tree and overlays:
[0] /usr/portage
[1] /usr/portage/local/layman/wschlich-testing
!!! Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be installed
!!! at the same time on the same system.
For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following
section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant):
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#blocked |
I have the emul-linux-x86-compat package installed, but the ebuilds don't make any mention of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
desultory
Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 Nov 2005
Posts: 9410
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is specified in emul-linux-x86-compat-1.0-r3.ebuild.
| Code: | | RDEPEND="!=sys-devel/gcc-3.3*" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xathin
n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| desultory wrote: | It is specified in emul-linux-x86-compat-1.0-r3.ebuild.
| Code: | | RDEPEND="!=sys-devel/gcc-3.3*" |
|
I understand what the blocking of a package means. But others have said that it works on their amd64 systems. What has to be set to get it to install on amd64?
Do I have to make my own ebuild to make it amd64 compatible? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
desultory
Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 Nov 2005
Posts: 9410
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| xathin wrote: | | I understand what the blocking of a package means. |
In your earlier post you indicated that you were unable to find, in the ebuilds, the reason for the package block, hence my response.
| xathin wrote: | | What has to be set to get it to install on amd64? |
The most obvious approaches would be to mask app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat-1.0-r3, or to remove any 3.3 series versions of sys-devel/gcc from the system.
| xathin wrote: | | Do I have to make my own ebuild to make it amd64 compatible? |
That is unlikely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xathin
n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 64
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| desultory wrote: | | xathin wrote: | | What has to be set to get it to install on amd64? |
The most obvious approaches would be to mask app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat-1.0-r3, or to remove any 3.3 series versions of sys-devel/gcc from the system. |
The problem with removing/not using sys-devel/gcc-3.3* is it's required by app-cdr/lightscribe, through virtual/libstdc++, which is why I was having the problem.
If I understand the usage of the app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat from the description, | Code: | | emul-linux-x86 version of lib-compat, with the addition of a 32bit libgcc_s and the libstdc++ versions provided by gcc 3.3 and 3.4 for non-multilib systems. |
it should include the necessary libraries that libstdc++ requires (please correct if I'm wrong). If this is true, should it not be required to have either the app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat or the virtual/libstdc++? And would it not be better to have the emul-linux-x86-compat for amd64?
The ebuild for app-cdr/lightscribe from the overlay does not have any support for amd64. The keywords are "-amd64 ~x86", which would mean that I would need to install it under the x86, not amd64. This would also mean that the dependencies of the package would not include any of the amd64 emulation packages.
If I am totally off base with this, please correct me. If there is a different ebuild for amd64, could someone let me know where I can get it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
svf
n00b
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks! everything's fine here with 4l-gui, LG and fluxbox on amd64.
_________________
uchafu! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sperlock
n00b
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 46
Location: Sparks, NV
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Version 1.8.15.1 is out now. I'm guessing I will have to wait for Wschlich to update the overlay? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
96140
Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
No need to modify anything for amd64. Especially don't modify the keywords! -amd64 is perfectly valid; you just need to put -amd64 after the appropriate lightscribe ebuilds in /etc/portage/package.keywords, just as you would with any other atom, like ~. This is all explained in the Portage handbooks.
The existing ebuild works just fine on my amd64 machine. If you're having problems, it's not because of the ebuild! I strongly recommend against modifying it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodwizzle
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 225
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I ran
layman -S
layman -a wschlich-testing
but emerge search lightscribe still comes up nothing. What am I doing wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oRo
n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: France, Paris
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| woodwizzle wrote: | I ran
layman -S
layman -a wschlich-testing
but emerge search lightscribe still comes up nothing. What am I doing wrong? |
Get a look at /etc/make.conf
| Code: |
echo "source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf" >> /etc/make.conf
|
By the way, SimpleLabeler still get a segfault
I ran it under gdb and I get this
| Quote: |
...
(no debugging symbols found)
Using /etc/lightscribe.rc
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7460d2c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
(gdb)
|
And if I ask for backtrace, I get this :
| Quote: |
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7460d2c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#1 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#2 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#3 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#4 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#5 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#6 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#7 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#8 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#9 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#10 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#11 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#12 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#13 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#14 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#15 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#16 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#17 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#18 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#19 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#20 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#21 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
#22 0xb7460d3f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++-v3/libstdc++.so.5
...
|
undefinitly
I tried to re-emerge virtual/libstdc++ but still get segfault
I tried to use LaCie LightScribe Labeler :
| Quote: |
Kenza 4L # ./4L-cli
Using /etc/lightscribe.rc
Missing subcommand
Usage:
4L-cli enumerate
4L-cli update
4L-cli version
4L-cli open <drive_path>
4L-cli close <drive_path>
4L-cli mediainfo <drive_path>
4L-cli printinfo [-q <best|medium|draft>] [-m <title|content|full>] <drive_path>
4L-cli preview [-q <best|medium|draft>] [-g] [-s <fit_auto|fit_height|fit_width|no_fit|DPI>]
[-o <output_file>] [-p <preview_size>] [-m <title|content|full>] <drive_path> <input_image>
4L-cli print [-q <best|medium|draft>] [-g] [-s <fit_auto|fit_height|fit_width|no_fit|DPI>]
[-m <title|content|full>] <drive_path> <input_image>
<DPI>: resolution to use for the input image
|
It works but....
| Quote: |
Kenza 4L # ./4L-cli enumerate
Using /etc/lightscribe.rc
Erreur de segmentation
|
Without source code of Lightscribe... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sperlock
n00b
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 46
Location: Sparks, NV
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can version 1.8.13.1 be found anywhere still? Lightscribe only has the current 1.8.15.1 version available.
_________________
http://informationthreshold.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oRo
n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: France, Paris
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sperlock wrote: | | Can version 1.8.13.1 be found anywhere still? Lightscribe only has the current 1.8.15.1 version available. |
I've looked after it but unable to find |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dek
l33t
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 657
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, if anyone finds a mirror with lightscribe-1.8.13.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm, please post a link.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodwizzle
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 225
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oRo wrote: | | woodwizzle wrote: | I ran
layman -S
layman -a wschlich-testing
but emerge search lightscribe still comes up nothing. What am I doing wrong? |
Get a look at /etc/make.conf
| Code: |
echo "source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf" >> /etc/make.conf
|
|
Then I get this error when searching for lightscribe:
!!![Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf' in /etc/make.conf
!!! Incorrect multiline literals can cause this. Do not use them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oRo
n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: France, Paris
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| woodwizzle wrote: |
Then I get this error when searching for lightscribe:
!!![Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf' in /etc/make.conf
!!! Incorrect multiline literals can cause this. Do not use them. |
Strange....
I guess you doesn't have an portage directory "/usr/portage/local/layman" or layman is misconfigurated
Maybe "/usr/local/portage/layman" is your overlay directory ??
Get a look at http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Overlays |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whimmel
n00b
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 1
Location: Celebration, FL
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dek wrote: | | Yeah, if anyone finds a mirror with lightscribe-1.8.13.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm, please post a link. |
I went into the overlay and copied the current ebuild to one named lightscribe-1.8.15.1.ebuild, then I was able to install with emerge -av --digest lightscribe-1.8.15.1 normally..
Unfortunately, I'm still getting the segfault when trying to enumerate the drive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sperlock
n00b
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 46
Location: Sparks, NV
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| whimmel wrote: | | dek wrote: | | Yeah, if anyone finds a mirror with lightscribe-1.8.13.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm, please post a link. |
I went into the overlay and copied the current ebuild to one named lightscribe-1.8.15.1.ebuild, then I was able to install with emerge -av --digest lightscribe-1.8.15.1 normally..
Unfortunately, I'm still getting the segfault when trying to enumerate the drive. |
I tried this but couldn't get it to even install, much less run.
_________________
http://informationthreshold.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
guerro
Guru
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 402
Location: Brescia
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
new version of lightscribe:
lightscribe-1.10.13.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm
Please update ebuild 
_________________
(.(*. .*).)
.. G u e r r o ..
(.(.* *.).) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oRo
n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Location: France, Paris
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| guerro wrote: | lightscribe-1.10.13.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm
|
After install, and re emerge virtual/libstdc++ && sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, SimpleLabeler work fine |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Morimando
Guru
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 339
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I modified the ebuild to work with lightscribe-1.10.13.1, but 4L-cli enumerate doesn't recognize my drive 
Does anyone know what might be the problem? the drive is a Samsung SH-203B
_________________
That young girl is one of the least benightedly unintelligent organic life forms it has been my profound lack of pleasure not to be able to avoid meeting.
-- Marvin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lixantrope
n00b
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: LaCie on gentoo amd64 |
|
|
I have successfully installed and used the LaCie lightscribe labeler. I didn't install it from portage, since it is not there, I downloaded the two rpm packages (http://www.lacie.com/download/drivers/lightscribe-1.8.15.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm and http://www.lacie.com/download/drivers/4L-1.0-r6.i586.rpm from http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10803).
The installation was almost straightforward, except for a small glitch (it assumes that /usr/lib is your lib dir, which is not true in case of 32-bit apps on a amd64 system). The steps:
0. you need the various emul-linux* packages (I guess the xlibs, baselibs and compat), for the sake of completeness here is the list of my installed emul-linux* packages that could matter:
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs (10.2)
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat (1.0-r3)
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs (10.0-r1)
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs (10.0)
1. Install both rpms (either via rpm -i, or convert them via rmp2tgz, then unpack in root directory)
2. LaCie assumes /usr/lib to be the lib directory, but then then running 4L-gui and 4L-cli won't find the libraries.
-copy the lib files to /usr/lib32 (as root):
| Code: | cp /usr/lib/liblightscribe.so.1 /usr/lib32/
ln -s /usr/lib32/liblightscribe.so.1 /usr/lib32/liblightscribe.so
cp -r /usr/lib/lightscribe /usr/lib32/
|
Just moving them is not enough, because updating LaCie will fail later (though hardlinking them should work, alternatively you could use the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable).
3. update LaCie (it downloads info about newer CD/DVD writers)
4. run enumerating, now your drive should be found if it hasn't been found before the update. Output should look something like this (the line 'Usable: 1' is important, if it is 0, your drive won't be recognized)
| Code: | $ 4L-cli enumerate
Using /etc/lightscribe.rc
Drive path: /dev/hda
Usable: 1
Full name: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T20L NC08 147
Model: DVDRAM GSA-T20L
Manufacturer: HL-DT-ST
Capabilities: monochrome
Drive inner radius: 21000
Drive outer radius: 58700 |
5. if your drive is recognized, make the 4L-cli and 4L-gui suid
| Code: | chmod +s /usr/4L/4L-cli
chmod +s /usr/4L/4L-gui |
Alternatively, instead of giving suid permissions to the binaries, you may use sudo (edit /etc/sudoers to allow specific users etc.)
6. just to test it, put in a lightscribe DVD/CD medium and run
| Code: | | 4L-cli mediainfo /dev/your_dvd_or_cd_drive |
The output should have a line saying: "Lightscribe media: 1"
7. run 4L-gui and burn the image and have a look at the PDF manual (http://www.lacie.com/download/manual/LightScribeLabelerLinux_en.pdf), it is short and concise
Enjoy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cpicton
n00b
Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a way to fix the segmentation fault some people have been experiencing.
From what I have seen, the people using amd64 with the 32 bit compatibility libs are not experiencing problems, but the 32 bit users which have compiled their own glibc/stdc++ are getting the segfault.
What I have done is to take some libraries from ubuntu dapper, and put them in their own dir. I then use the dapper dynamic loader to run lightscribe, but using the different libraries.
You can download lightscribe-libs.tar.bz2 from http://www.tangent.co.za/~chrisp/lightscribe-libs.tar.bz2
Uncompress them to somewhere (like /home/chrisp/lightscribe)
Create a script as follows:
/home/chrisp/bin/lightscribe
| Code: | #!/bin/bash
DIR=/home/chrisp/lightscribe
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DIR/lib:$DIR/usr/lib $DIR/lib/ld-linux.so.2 /usr/4L/4L-cli "$@" |
This only works for the cli version, but that is all I am using anyway. If you need the gui, you may need to copy more libs from dapper into the directory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dony
n00b
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 70
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all,
I installed the rpm's (rpm2tar; tar) from lacie and it works great with my Asus DRW-1814BL.
lightscribe-1.8.15.1-linux-2.6-intel.rpm
4L-1.0-r6.i586.rpm
The only thing I had to do for my amd64 is to
cp /usr/lib/liblightscribe.so.1 /usr/lib32/liblightscribe.so.1
("emul-linux-x86-xxx" were installed)
Regards
Dony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yoyo
Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 Mar 2003
Posts: 4273
Location: Lyon - France
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe an "ln -s /usr/lib/liblightscribe.so.1 /usr/lib32/liblightscribe.so.1" should do the trick.
BTW, thanks for posting your solution.
Enjoy !
_________________
La connaissance s'accroît quand on la partage.
JCB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dony
n00b
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 70
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're right - a link is the better Solution ...
FYI: It takes about 15 Min. to "lightscribe" a DVD in best resolution.
Regards
Dony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
