View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
steveD Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2002 1:41 pm Post subject: Gentoo on KDE website |
|
|
I go to KDE website (www.kde.org) in the download section for KDE 3.0.1, I see the folder Gentoo (next to other distros). There are no 3.0.1 binaries in this folder yet. There is 1 file showing how to install the binaries. Hopefully, there will be KDE binaries there in the future, so some people can install without going thru long compilation time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klavs Guru
Joined: 22 May 2002 Posts: 536 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2002 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want a binary, why do you use Gentoo? the reason why you recompile is to squeeze those 10-15% extra performance (or much more? hoping some benchmarks will show up some day), and another benefit an optimized recompiling gives you, is often much faster startup and response times, from especially KDE.
Unless ofcourse you expect KDE to deliver binaries for all the architectures supported by GCC-3.1?
Otherwise, I believe you can just install a RedHat RPM (using alien) if you want binaries. (or use Mandrake's that's compiled for i586 - a little better than 386 - don't know how much though. _________________ Best regards,
Klavs Klavsen
Denmark
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent.
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child
who is carrying a .38. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2002 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't pre-compiled binaries defeat most, if not all, of the purpose behind Gentoo?
It's the large apps like KDE, XFree86, etc where you're likely to gain the largest speed increase by compiling a version optimized for your machine.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveD Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2002 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The KDE binaries for Gentoo that the KDE team is going to make is for Pentium machines (686 binaries) with -O3 optimization (from the file I read there). If I compile KDE on my machine (Pentium II), the binaries will also be 686 binaries with -O3 optimization. Do I gain any perfomance in this case if I compile from source? I just save a lot of time from compiling big apps like KDE. I still use portage for compiling other stuff. I prefer using binaries for big packages like KDE, X if the binaries has the same optimization and machine type like my machine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2002 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
steveD wrote: | Do I gain any perfomance in this case if I compile from source? |
Here's a list of KDE optimizations that I just posted to the Tips & Tricks forum. Folks that have used these suggestions have noticed a remarkable increase in the responsiveness and overall speed of KDE.
So yes, there is some benefit to compiling it yourself. I realize it takes a heckuva long time, but if you start the compile before you go to bed at night, it should be finished (or close to finished) by the time you wake up the next day.
IMO, the tradeoff is worth it.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|