| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jsnorman Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:11 am Post subject: OpenOffice 2 Beta - What Do We Need to Do??? |
|
|
Does anyone know if anyone is working on ebuilds for ~amd64 for the OO2 beta? Putting aside all the silly noise over use of Java, it us a big improvement and I would like to get it over to 64 bit asap.
If someone is working on this, can I help in any way? If not, can someone point me to the right resources to start on this myself? Thanks.
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lavish Bodhisattva


Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 4292 Location: Venice Island, European Union
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sure, it works fine. There`s just a little problem with symlinks (in my opinion)... so try to run it in this way:
| Code: | | /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice.bin& |
_________________ www.minimalblue.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tukachinchila Apprentice


Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 274 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:49 am Post subject: Re: OpenOffice 2 Beta - What Do We Need to Do??? |
|
|
| jsnorman wrote: | | Does anyone know if anyone is working on ebuilds for ~amd64 for the OO2 beta? Putting aside all the silly noise over use of Java, it us a big improvement and I would like to get it over to 64 bit asap. |
I'd like to try it on my amd64 also.
| jsnorman wrote: | | If someone is working on this, can I help in any way? |
Try searching bugzilla to see if anyone is working on an ebuild.
| jsnorman wrote: | | can someone point me to the right resources to start on this myself? |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1
If you decide to go for it, I'd by happy to help out with the ebuild. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lavish Bodhisattva


Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 4292 Location: Venice Island, European Union
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:34 pm Post subject: Re: OpenOffice 2 Beta - What Do We Need to Do??? |
|
|
| tukachinchila wrote: | | Try searching bugzilla to see if anyone is working on an ebuild. |
It's in portage...
| Code: |
darkstar ~ # etcat -v openoffice-bin
[ Results for search key : openoffice-bin ]
[ Candidate applications found : 4 ]
Only printing found installed programs.
* app-office/openoffice-bin :
[ ~ ] 1.1.1 (0)
[ ] 1.1.3 (0)
[ ~ ] 1.1.4 (0)
[ I] 1.9.87 (0) |
 _________________ www.minimalblue.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stef Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmm .. it does not seem to like the 64bit blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.01. any tricks for compatibility?
[edit]
Downloaded the 32bit sun jre and installed it in /opt by hand ... in OOo: Tools->Options Java: Add this.
Seems to work fine  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hayl Guru


Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 442 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Go into the options and turn off the JRE. it loads up _way_ faster this way. _________________ "I do not fear computers. I fear lack of them." - Isaac Asimov |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsnorman Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:02 pm Post subject: Re: OpenOffice 2 Beta - What Do We Need to Do??? |
|
|
| lavish wrote: | | tukachinchila wrote: | | Try searching bugzilla to see if anyone is working on an ebuild. |
It's in portage...
| Code: |
darkstar ~ # etcat -v openoffice-bin
[ Results for search key : openoffice-bin ]
[ Candidate applications found : 4 ]
Only printing found installed programs.
* app-office/openoffice-bin :
[ ~ ] 1.1.1 (0)
[ ] 1.1.3 (0)
[ ~ ] 1.1.4 (0)
[ I] 1.9.87 (0) |
 |
Maybe I was not clear enough. I want to get OO 2.0 Beta COMPILED in 64 bit glory - not run 32 bit binaries. The version of openoffice in openoffice-bin is, if I am not mistaken, compiled 32 bits and therefore using multilib, or is the -bin version actually 64 bit? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fourhead l33t


Joined: 03 Sep 2003 Posts: 875 Location: Cologne, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OOo 2 is working very well here on AMD64. I've disabled Java and it indeed loads like 10 times faster. Does anybody know when there will be a PPC binary available (I'd like to switch it on my other machine too)? Also, are there any informations yet how OOo 2 will handle i18n and if it will compile on AMD64/PPC (OOo 1 doesn't compile on AMD64 at all).
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
suka Developer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 383
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| elektrohirn wrote: | OOo 2 is working very well here on AMD64. I've disabled Java and it indeed loads like 10 times faster. Does anybody know when there will be a PPC binary available (I'd like to switch it on my other machine too)? Also, are there any informations yet how OOo 2 will handle i18n and if it will compile on AMD64/PPC (OOo 1 doesn't compile on AMD64 at all).
Tom |
OOo 2.0-pre does not compile on AMD64, too, don't get your hopes too high that the final version will. PPC on the other hand should work fine (as 1.1.x does) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fourhead l33t


Joined: 03 Sep 2003 Posts: 875 Location: Cologne, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
What the hell are they doing with there code that it doesn't compile on AMD64? If it does compile on a completely different arch, shouldn't it compile on the same arch with some advancements? Well anyway, any hope for a PPC binary soon?
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lavish Bodhisattva


Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 4292 Location: Venice Island, European Union
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: OpenOffice 2 Beta - What Do We Need to Do??? |
|
|
| jsnorman wrote: | | Maybe I was not clear enough. I want to get OO 2.0 Beta COMPILED in 64 bit glory - not run 32 bit binaries. The version of openoffice in openoffice-bin is, if I am not mistaken, compiled 32 bits and therefore using multilib, or is the -bin version actually 64 bit? | It's a 32bit binary version. I'm sorry, but I thought u know that it's not still possible to compile it on amd64 (at least.. it's possible with some serious hacks), so I wasn't too much clear about it :/ _________________ www.minimalblue.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ronmon Veteran


Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 1043 Location: Key West, FL
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Someone is working on a 64 bit build. Like the 32 bit binary builds, it takes almost 4 minutes to load whether java is enabled or not. Plus it crashes whenever I scroll in a file selection box. 32 bit 1.9.87 crashed when I tried to save changes in a .sxw that I had created in OO-1.1.4.
Personally, I'm going to wait until they get things figured out a bit better. 1.1.4 loads in about 5 seconds, so I can open it, do some quick work and close it before beta even starts up. For me that makes it a no-brainer. _________________ Ask Questions the Smart Way - by ESR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsnorman Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks for the link ronmon. I guess I will keep waiting.. I too have had many problems with the 32 bit binary. Really should have a 64 bit build, glad someone is working on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MorLipf Apprentice


Joined: 09 Nov 2004 Posts: 226 Location: Solingen, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I emerged the hardmasked openoffice-bin-1.9.87 package. Now I have start problems on my Gentoo AMD64 2005.0:
| Code: | moritz% /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice.bin
zsh: no such file or directory: /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice.bin
moritz% oowriter
/opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice: line 163: /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/javaldx: No such file or directory
/opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice: line 224: /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/pagein: No such file or directory
/opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice: line 235: /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/soffice.bin: No such file or directory
|
What can I do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stef Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:50 pm Post subject: oo 2.0 beta |
|
|
hmm well... using sun 32bit jre as i mentioned above and openoffice-bin loads in < 3 sec. on my amd64 3000.
I had really *slow* loading times without the 32bit jre since OO always started the 64bit blackdown vm which then took 100% cpu for some time ... until it gave up reporting that it did not find a good vm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
^jimmy^ n00b


Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 51 Location: Erlangen, Germany
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 11:38 am Post subject: Re: oo 2.0 beta |
|
|
| stef wrote: | hmm well... using sun 32bit jre as i mentioned above and openoffice-bin loads in < 3 sec. on my amd64 3000.
I had really *slow* loading times without the 32bit jre since OO always started the 64bit blackdown vm which then took 100% cpu for some time ... until it gave up reporting that it did not find a good vm. |
How did you install the 32bit JRE on your AMD64?
Could you please explain me?
Cheers!
Jimmy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|