Gentoo Forums :: View topic

GimpShop

View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next

Gentoo Forums Forum Index

Unsupported Software

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

R!tman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 1303
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 8:07 pm Post subject:

meow wrote:

bump. pls release a official ebuild for gimpshop! thanks.

Yes, there should be an official. But before that happens, I will provide a fresh ebuild of the latest version, 2.2.8.

I will try to do an idiot proof explanation how it should work for all people, even unexperienced. That doesn't mean your an idiot if you don't manage ;-)

. Just ask if you have problems.

Do the following as root:

Code:

mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/media-gfx/gimp/files
cd /usr/local/portage/media-gfx/gimp/
wget http://n.ethz.ch/student/homartin/download/gimpshop/gimp-2.2.8-r1.ebuild
cd files
wget http://n.ethz.ch/student/homartin/download/gimpshop/gimp-2.2.8-configure-fix.patch
wget http://n.ethz.ch/student/homartin/download/gimpshop/gimp-2.2.8-restart-marker.patch
wget http://n.ethz.ch/student/homartin/download/gimpshop/gimpshop-2.2.8.patch
wget http://n.ethz.ch/student/homartin/download/gimpshop/ltmain_sh-1.5.0-fix-relink.patch
ebuild ../gimp-2.2.8-r1.ebuild digest
mkdir /etc/portage
echo media-gfx/gimp gimpshop >> /etc/portage/package.use
emerge gimp

brian33x51
Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 16 Jun 2002
Posts: 118

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:06 pm Post subject:

R!tman wrote:

meow wrote:

bump. pls release a official ebuild for gimpshop! thanks.

. Just ask if you have problems.

Do the following as root:

Code:

The patch "gimpshop-2.2.8.patch" is rejected outright.
Trying to apply it by hand it seems this is a "reverse" patch....all files fail.

R!tman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 1303
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:10 am Post subject:

brian33x51 wrote:

The patch "gimpshop-2.2.8.patch" is rejected outright.
Trying to apply it by hand it seems this is a "reverse" patch....all files fail.

Sorry to hear that. But as it works for me (on three computers) and for at least one other guy who private messaged me, I guess the problem is related to something else.

You could post error messages...

Redeeman
l33t
l33t

Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 957
Location: Denmark

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:54 am Post subject:

Lokheed wrote:

W3BMAST3R101 wrote:

Lokheed wrote:

And what would the Linux community say if a proprietary developer copied a Linux program to a tee?

Ever heard of CherryOS or IMBlaze?

Nope. Are people happy about it?

Besides making a watch look like a rolex doesnt make it a rolex. It makes it a cheap knock off. GIMP is far inferior to PSD and simply making it "look" like it doesnt bring it any closer to functioning just as well. Its a stupid idea and a waste of time unless you are actually going to code GIMP to function identically...

it isnt. gimp is much easier to use
_________________
Sandberg Enterprises

gwolf
Guru
Guru

Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 374
Location: Estonia

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:48 am Post subject:

R!tman wrote:

brian33x51 wrote:

The patch "gimpshop-2.2.8.patch" is rejected outright.
Trying to apply it by hand it seems this is a "reverse" patch....all files fail.

Works here as well. Thanks for the ebuild and good luck in making the official build

_________________
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ketchup is a vegetable.

W3BMAST3R101
Apprentice

Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 198
Location: Oregon, USA

Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:10 pm Post subject:

Will any of the devs ever look into moving this into portage? Or would that cause an outrage in the community to have that choice? the w3b

IhatemyISP
n00b
n00b

Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 14
Location: US Navy - Yokosuka, Japan

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:34 am Post subject:

brian33x51 wrote:

The patch "gimpshop-2.2.8.patch" is rejected outright.
Trying to apply it by hand it seems this is a "reverse" patch....all files fail.

Works perfectly here...

alienjon
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Posts: 1503

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:35 am Post subject:

I had to go to the site. For some reason the links weren't exactly what was written down in the step-by-step which I had followed. If it doesn't work for you, try removing the file name and browsing through the site itself. I was able to find the working links that way

R!tman
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 1303
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:45 am Post subject:

alienjon wrote:

I had to go to the site. For some reason the links weren't exactly what was written down in the step-by-step which I had followed. If it doesn't work for you, try removing the file name and browsing through the site itself. I was able to find the working links that way

I changed the links so that the gimpshop stuff is in its own directory. Those of you who still used the old step-by-step guide will have wrong links. This should be the latest and correct one.

thoffmeyer
Apprentice

Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 208
Location: GMT -5 Hours

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:45 pm Post subject:

I love the gimpshop... _________________ Conrad Guide, Current Maintainer Join us on IRC Server: irc.freenode.net Channel: #conrad

dekon
Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 80

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:50 pm Post subject:

R!tman wrote:

Do the following as root:

Code:

I follow your instructions, but when i run gimp everithing looks as "old gimp" no gimpshop.

emerge -av gimp:

Code:

[ebuild NS ] gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-2.6.3 -accessibility -debug 382 kB
[ebuild R ] media-gfx/gimp-2.2.8-r1 -aalib (-altivec) -debug -doc -gimpprint +gimpshop +gtkhtml* -hardened +jpeg +lcms (-mmx) +mng +png +python -scanner -smp (-sse) -svg +tiff -wmf 0 kB [1]

Total size of downloads: 382 kB
Portage overlays:
[1] /usr/local/portage

Do you want me to merge these packages? [Yes/No]

_________________
Sorry for my English,i am not good at in this

Brother Blackshirt
n00b
n00b

Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 4
Location: Ontario, Canada

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:01 am Post subject:

Dekon, did you add the gimpshop use flag to your /etc/make.conf ?

atrus123
Guru
Guru

Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 339
Location: Annapolis, MD

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:36 am Post subject:

dekon wrote:

R!tman wrote:

Do the following as root:

Code:

I follow your instructions, but when i run gimp everithing looks as "old gimp" no gimpshop.

emerge -av gimp:

Code:

I'm having the same exact problem. My emerge -av gimp is almost identical (+gimpshop enabled).

J.
_________________
"I cannot support a movement that exploded spending and borrowing and blames its successor for the debt."
-Andrew Sullivan

Tarch
n00b
n00b

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 42

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 10:37 pm Post subject:

Same probem here =( Bye! =)

Clapper
Apprentice

Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 177

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:22 pm Post subject:

I have had gimpshop up and working fine, thanks to help on these threads. Recently, trying to update my system, my emerge is stopp ing with:

Code:

workstation gimp # emerge -pv gimp

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies -
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-2*".
(dependency required by "media-gfx/gimp-2.2.8-r1" [ebuild])

This is probably something simple to fix. I don't think a "=gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-2*"
dependency even exists in portage anymore, from what I have been told. Can anyone
tell me what I can do to fix? Is the gimp-2.2.8-r1.ebuild overlay I downloaded have
something which is now broken as far as portage is concerned?

Clapper
Apprentice

Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 177

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject:

I think I answered my own question. This thread:

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-424011-highlight-libgtkhtml.html

says that libgtkhtml has been renamed gtkhtml.

I edited the ebuild, and things seem to be compiling ok now, without error....

Clapper wrote:

I have had gimpshop up and working fine, thanks to help on these threads. Recently, trying to update my system, my emerge is stopp ing with:

Code:

Clapper
Apprentice

Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 177

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:43 pm Post subject:

Arg! I altered the ebuild file, to reflect gtkhtml, rather than libgtkhtml, and now I get this:

Quote:

workstation gimp # emerge gimp
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) media-gfx/gimp-2.2.8-r1 to /

!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!! /usr/local/portage/media-gfx/gimp/gimp-2.2.8-r1.ebuild
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size

>>> Please ensure you have sync'd properly. Please try 'emerge sync' and
>>> optionally examine the file(s) for corruption. A sync will fix most cases.

Any ideas?

Clapper wrote:

I have had gimpshop up and working fine, thanks to help on these threads. Recently, trying to update my system, my emerge is stopp ing with:

Code:

Vulcano23
n00b
n00b

Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 51

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:54 am Post subject:

Clapper wrote:

Arg! I altered the ebuild file, to reflect gtkhtml, rather than libgtkhtml, and now I get this:

Quote:

Any ideas?

Try:

Code:

# emerge gimp --digest

and see if that fixes it!

Clapper
Apprentice

Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 177

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:30 am Post subject:

That worked! What did I just do?

Vulcano23 wrote:

Clapper wrote:

Arg! I altered the ebuild file, to reflect gtkhtml, rather than libgtkhtml, and now I get this:

Quote:

Any ideas?

Try:

Code:

# emerge gimp --digest

and see if that fixes it!

Vulcano23
n00b
n00b

Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 51

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:39 pm Post subject:

Clapper wrote:

That worked! What did I just do?

I just realize I might have given you the *bad* way of solving the problem. For each package, portage keeps track of the file sizes and other attribute by using a digest.
When you download a package during the emerge process, the system will see if the downloaded size matches the expected size. If they match, the emerge process continues, otherwise it will print an error message like the one you were receiving. By appending the --digest flag, you tell portage to recompute the digest using the newly downloaded file, thus overriding the security mechanism.

I think a proper procedure to follow in this situations would be to:

1) sync and try to emerge the package again: this could download a new, fixed digest for the package.
2) remove the package file from /usr/portage/distfiles and emerge again: the downloaded package might be corrupted so we can try to download it again.
3) Verify the downloaded file is correct and run emerge package --digest: since the digest in portage seems to not match a correct file we can force emerge to compute a new digest.

I will be glad to hear what others have to say about this.

dekon
Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 80

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:50 pm Post subject:

Brother Blackshirt wrote:

Dekon, did you add the gimpshop use flag to your /etc/make.conf ?

i add gimsop use flag to /etc/portage/package.use:

Code:

media-gfx/gimp -gtkhtml -python gimpshop gimpprint

_________________
Sorry for my English,i am not good at in this

metalshark
Apprentice

Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 197
Location: Bournemouth, England

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:24 pm Post subject: Gentoo Bugzilla

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87553 Just added an ebuild for the latest version.

Aries-Belgium
l33t
l33t

Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Posts: 730
Location: Willebroek, Belgium

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo Bugzilla

metalshark wrote:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87553

Just added an ebuild for the latest version.

Okay, I just emerged this ebuild (yes, from my portage overlay). But when I run gimp or gimpshop I get the standard gimp windows ...

_________________
Ep2.nl | Developers Community

Last edited by Aries-Belgium on Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total

omp
Retired Dev

Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1018
Location: Glendale, California

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo Bugzilla

metalshark wrote:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87553

Just added an ebuild for the latest version.

Thank you. I'll try it when I get home. IMO, The Gimp interface is inferior to that of Photoshop.

_________________
meow.

Q-collective
Advocate

Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2054

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo Bugzilla

omp wrote:

metalshark wrote:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87553

Just added an ebuild for the latest version.

Thank you. I'll try it when I get home. IMO, The Gimp interface is inferior to that of Photoshop.

Yeah, SDI sucks, too bad GimpShop doesn't solve that one (or do they now?)

Display posts from previous:

	Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Page 5 of 8

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Designed by Kyle Manna © 2003; Style derived from original subSilver theme. | Hosting by Gossamer Threads Inc. © | Powered by phpBB 2.0.23-gentoo-p9 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group