| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
baeksu
l33t
Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 609
Location: Seoul, Korea
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:07 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Mafteah wrote: | | Beagle doesnt work here too |
Which version of Beagle are you using? Have a look at the Beagle thread, especially this post.
_________________
Gnome:
1. A legendary being.
2. A never ending quest to make unix friendly to people who don't want unix and excruciating for those that do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perral1
n00b
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Location: Plano, Tx
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
hrmm...
CC sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.o
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c: In function `snd_ac97_mixer':
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c:1851: warning: implicit declaration of function `look_for_codec_id'
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c:1851: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c:1882: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
CC sound/pci/ac97/ac97_pcm.o
Yes, its a warning, but it leads to...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
sound/built-in.o(.text+0x35cc6): In function `snd_ac97_mixer':
: undefined reference to `look_for_codec_id'
sound/built-in.o(.text+0x35dcc): In function `snd_ac97_mixer':
: undefined reference to `look_for_codec_id'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
I'm on amd64, and this gets pulled in because of the emu10k1 driver. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| perral1 wrote: | hrmm...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
sound/built-in.o(.text+0x35cc6): In function `snd_ac97_mixer':
: undefined reference to `look_for_codec_id'
sound/built-in.o(.text+0x35dcc): In function `snd_ac97_mixer':
: undefined reference to `look_for_codec_id'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
I'm on amd64, and this gets pulled in because of the emu10k1 driver. |
| fallow wrote: |
We are making patchset for x86 . We will be not able to help You with x86_64 but We can Try
|
but I can try  hehe.
| Mafteah wrote: | | baeksu wrote: | | Quote: | | * inotify-42.patch - from 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 |
Is this like 2x better than 0.21 patch? I think the patch is this one: inotify-0.21-rml-2.6.12-rc1-1.patch, no?
Being picky 'cause us Beagle-cvs users get so much breakage with the changing versions...
[edit]: Oops, screwed up the version meself too. My point is still valid, I think. |
Beagle doesnt work here too :[ |
is very easy to reverse this version and to apply another version of inotify if You want
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mafteah
Apprentice
Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 265
Location: IL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robin79
l33t
Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 632
Location: /home/valdemarsvik
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This kernel is as stable as a solid wall thanx again fallow fast, responisve, stable can it be better?
| Code: |
13:05:03 up 20:02, 3 users, load average: 1.76, 1.03, 0.56
|
_________________
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------
Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Robin79 wrote: | This kernel is as stable as a solid wall thanx again fallow fast, responisve, stable can it be better?
| Code: |
13:05:03 up 20:02, 3 users, load average: 1.76, 1.03, 0.56
|
|
NICE 
btw.update1 with new reiser4 code + fix , existing fixes and fixes for ATI ( with fix from my ebuild and new love kernel fixes seems to emerged fine ) will be ready very soon .
| Code: |
LD [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19-r100/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/fglrx.o
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST
CC /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19-r100/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/fglrx.mod.o
LD [M] /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.10.19-r100/work/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/fglrx.ko
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/love1-upd1'
>>> Test phase [not enabled]: media-video/ati-drivers-8.10.19-r100
>>> Install ati-drivers-8.10.19-r100 into /var/tmp/por
|
.. I think should be ok propably now..
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poe
Bodhisattva
Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 2155
Location: Mysłowice/Lublin, Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fallow - good job soldier 2.6.12-rc1-love2 works very good, and boot-logo so sweet :}
pozdrowienia i oby tak dalej :]
_________________
Hardware:HP Pavilion DV6875SE[C2DT5550@1.83GHz_3GB-DDR2_320GB-SATA_GF8400GS]
http://popularcoffee.blogspot.com - Popkulturowa Kawa
RLU#342333 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
perral1
n00b
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Location: Plano, Tx
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fallow wrote: |
| fallow wrote: |
We are making patchset for x86 . We will be not able to help You with x86_64 but We can Try
|
but I can try hehe.
|
I know, but I thought perhaps it wasn't only amd64 related (it doesn't look like it, based on the error, but I guess that doesnt mean anything). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robin79
l33t
Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 632
Location: /home/valdemarsvik
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fallow: i just have to ask bakc in the begining when i used love sources for the first 4 times it was a really nice logo the orginal with a heaqt cant you get that in i liked that one alot it was very nice..
_________________
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------
Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.12-rc1-love1 Update 01 is ready
new reiser4 + fix, fixed sk98lin , fix for ati users, Imago's fb fix ,bk alsa and jfs and XBOX patches
| Code: |
-2.6.12-rc1-love1 UPDATE 01--
* 2.6.12-rc1-love-reiser4-to-22032005-with-save-read-lock.diff //new r4 code
* reiser4-2.6.11-fix.patch //latest fix from namesys
* 2.6.12-rc1-love1-sk98lin-709-patch.bz2 // SK98lin driver,fixef for .12rc1
* IMAGOs_fb_fix.patch //thx Imago
* inter_module_get_fix //a fix for ATI users.
* bk-alsa from mm3
* bk-jfs from mm3
* 2.6.12-rc1-love1-xbox.bz2 //a XBOX patches from FireBurn |
the new ebuild for updated love , the patch and info here --> http://vivid.dat.pl/fallow/pub/index.php?path=love-sources%2F2.6.12-rc1-love1%2Fupd01/
for the ATI USERS :
You required two things :
1) new ebuild for ati-drivers ->> http://vivid.dat.pl/fallow/pub/love-sources/2.6.12-rc1-love1/upd01/ati-ebuild-for-love.tar.bz2
2) and 2.6.12-rc1-love1 with UPDATE01
now on my box ati-driver is compiled ok , but I have only nvidia card so I cant do testing deeply.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Poe wrote: | Fallow - good job soldier 2.6.12-rc1-love2 works very good, and boot-logo so sweet :}
pozdrowienia i oby tak dalej :] |
SIR , thanks SIR
| perral1 wrote: |
I know, but I thought perhaps it wasn't only amd64 related (it doesn't look like it, based on the error, but I guess that doesnt mean anything). |
in update01 is new alsa code , try this , anyway I also have emu10k1 is ok
if will be bad , I can look into it later
| Robin79 wrote: | | fallow: i just have to ask bakc in the begining when i used love sources for the first 4 times it was a really nice logo the orginal with a heaqt cant you get that in i liked that one alot it was very nice.. |
I can do it logo selection for next love
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
avx
Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 2152
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi!
Only three things!
1. FbSplash works again - don't know why or how, but who cares 
2. ATI-Drivers compiled and working fine - gotta play a little UT now
3. Fallow, you seriously ROCK
Thanks for that sweet easter present! Keep on the good work and make me LOVE my system!
cheers,
ph030
EDIT:
One thing comes to my mind:
If you could make it possible, to use all ACPI-Funktions on my notebook, you've got one wish free
It's a Toshiba Tecra S1 (unfortunately no real Toshiba-Bios), if you need some Info about it, please tell me so!
EDIT2:
Thanks for the PM, that's what I call user-service  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sith_Happens
Veteran
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 1807
Location: The University of Maryland at College Park
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All is well thanks to you fallow. Thanks much.  I too appreciate the pm, very classy.
EDIT: I spoke too soon. I was able to install the ati-drivers, but I couldn't load them, I got this error: | Code: | | [ 394.222902] fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_get |
fbsplash is still not working on my machine either, even though I'm using the latest hardmasked version. I'd like to upgrade to the latest love-sources, but I can't seem to get anything to work with it. I'm considering going back to 2.6.11-love2. 
_________________
"That question was less stupid; though you asked it in a profoundly stupid way."
I'm the brains behind Jackass! | Tutorials: Shorewall |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sith_Happens
Veteran
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 1807
Location: The University of Maryland at College Park
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sith_Happens wrote: | All is well thanks to you fallow. Thanks much. I too appreciate the pm, very classy.
EDIT: I spoke too soon. I was able to install the ati-drivers, but I couldn't load them, I got this error: | Code: | | [ 394.222902] fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_get |
fbsplash is still not working on my machine either, even though I'm using the latest hardmasked version. I'd like to upgrade to the latest love-sources, but I can't seem to get anything to work with it. I'm considering going back to 2.6.11-love2. |
Have you seen my problem fallow? As far as fbsplash goes, it seems to load the image into ram, but beyond that dmesg reveals no answers: | Code: | [ 0.001157] checking if image is initramfs... it is
[ 0.017804] Freeing initrd memory: 248k freed
|
_________________
"That question was less stupid; though you asked it in a profoundly stupid way."
I'm the brains behind Jackass! | Tutorials: Shorewall |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Im not a fbsplash author/maintainer .
It compiles ok , applied ok , version is for 2.6.12-rc1 and working fine on my box
I can say , HAVE You regenerated initrd by the new splashutils ?
I forget do " # lilo " for example also but now everything is ok
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sith_Happens
Veteran
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 1807
Location: The University of Maryland at College Park
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fallow wrote: | Im not a fbsplash author/maintainer .
It compiles ok , applied ok , version is for 2.6.12-rc1 and working fine on my box
I can say , HAVE You regenerated initrd by the new splashutils ?
I forget do " # lilo " for example also but now everything is ok
cheers. |
Yeah, I figure it's probably something I did wrong, although I have rebuilt the initrd with the latest version of splash utils. The ati-driver is a biggie though. Oh well, I think I'll downgrade to 2.6.11-love2. Its a good, stable kernel that works for me without much fuss. I guess I'll try again with the next love release. Thanks anyway fallow.
_________________
"That question was less stupid; though you asked it in a profoundly stupid way."
I'm the brains behind Jackass! | Tutorials: Shorewall |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Meqif
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like there's something wrong with acpi...
| Code: | meqif@envy:: dmesg|grep ACPI [~]
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20050309
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 *5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *9 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *9 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 *10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *9 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *9 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 *11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
ACPI: Assume root bridge [\_SB_.PCI0] segment is 0
ACPI: Assume root bridge [\_SB_.PCI0] bus is 0
ACPI: Can't get handler for 0000:00:00.0
(...)
ACPI: Can't get handler for 0000:02:0d.0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCI1._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCI2._PRT]
pnp: PnP ACPI init
ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:00
ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:01
ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:02
(...)
pnp: PnP ACPI: found 15 devices
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
ACPI: No ACPI bus support for vesafb.0
ACPI: No ACPI bus support for i8042
ACPI: No ACPI bus support for serial8250
|
I'm going to reverse the bk-acpi patch... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Meqif wrote: | Looks like there's something wrong with acpi...
I'm going to reverse the bk-acpi patch... |
OK , please back with the resulet .
ACPI is ok on my box - via kt133
@Sith_Happens: is strange that ATI works for ph030 , anyway , You're welcome
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
perral1
n00b
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Location: Plano, Tx
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, it didn't fix the emu10k1 problem, but I get another one now.
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/acpi.o
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/common.o
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.o
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c:7:32: mach_pci_blacklist.h: No such file or directory
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c: In function `pci_conf1_read':
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c:25: warning: implicit declaration of function `mach_pci_is_blacklisted'
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/pci] Error 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Meqif
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fallow wrote: | | Meqif wrote: | Looks like there's something wrong with acpi...
I'm going to reverse the bk-acpi patch... |
OK , please back with the resulet .
ACPI is ok on my box - via kt133 |
The errors are gone. I forgot to say in my earlier post that my splash didn't work as well, even with both updates applied to the kernel and a fresh initrd... I thought it was because of the acpi patch ( ACPI: No ACPI bus support for vesafb.0 ) but the problem remains even with the patch reversed. Oh well... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2208
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| perral1 wrote: | well, it didn't fix the emu10k1 problem, but I get another one now.
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/acpi.o
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/common.o
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.o
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c:7:32: mach_pci_blacklist.h: No such file or directory
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c: In function `pci_conf1_read':
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c:25: warning: implicit declaration of function `mach_pci_is_blacklisted'
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/pci] Error 2 |
Please Try this fix http://vivid.dat.pl/fallow/pub/love-sources/2.6.11-love1/amd64_f1.diff
IT should work
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
perral1
n00b
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Location: Plano, Tx
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that fixes that error, thanks!
Love compiles fine w/o emu10k1, im about to go try booting it.
Last edited by perral1 on Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrWoland
l33t
Joined: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 603
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Running with update01 and the latest rr4 patch on my almost fully rr4 system No problems yet, although I am using Deadline for IO. All the genetic options for the cpu scheduler are enabled
_________________
I'm not a Guru, I just ask a lot of questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
planetside
n00b
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | perral1 wrote:
well, it didn't fix the emu10k1 problem, but I get another one now.
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/acpi.o
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/common.o
CC arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.o
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c:7:32: mach_pci_blacklist.h: No such file or directory
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c: In function `pci_conf1_read':
arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.c:25: warning: implicit declaration of function `mach_pci_is_blacklisted'
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/pci/../../i386/pci/direct.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/pci] Error 2
Please Try this fix Smile http://vivid.dat.pl/fallow/pub/love-sources/2.6.11-love1/amd64_f1.diff
IT should work Wink |
I had the same problem. How would I go about applying a .diff fix? Thanks in advance! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
