Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
2.6.11-nitro0: Module Rodeo Until Dawn
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 12, 13, 14  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
freelight
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 295
Location: NYC, NY, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Compiled and booted beautifully, with a noticeable speed increase (from 2.6.11-rc4-nitro1). Thanks for the great kernel!
I do have a problem, though - I'm unable to get direct rendering to work.
I have an ATI card (Radeon 9500), enabled agpgart and nvidia-agp as modules and enabled the in-kernel fglrx support that you guys provided. The modules are loading without any complaints, but X (xorg-x11-6.8.2) won't use direct rendering. I've found this in the Xorg.0.log:
Code:
(II) fglrx(0): doing DRIScreenInit
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID PCI:2:0:0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
<<more of the same for card1 through card14>>
(II) fglrx(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
(EE) fglrx(0): DRIScreenInit failed!

Upon inspection, I've found that /dev/dri/ is indeed empty. I'm using udev 54, if that's of any relevance.
dmesg shows nothing of relevance.
Any ideas?


Last edited by freelight on Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:11 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jenden
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm having a similar issue with it compiling the nvidia module. I get the following error, also below is the output from emerge info.
Code:
  CC [M]  drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time'
make[2]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

Code:
DSI linux # emerge info
Portage 2.0.51-r15 (default-linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.20050125-r0, 2.6.11-rc4-nitro1 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.11-rc4-nitro1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.9
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.5 [2.3.5 (#1, Feb 19 2005, 02:09:35)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.6.3, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r1, 2.6.8.1-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kootenaykid
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Victoria, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mcoulman wrote:
Code:
CC      arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c: In function `main':
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:65: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to incomplete type `pbe'
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:66: error: dereferencing pointer to incompletetype
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:67: error: dereferencing pointer to incompletetype
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 2


Unlike 2.6.11rc3, this occurs regardless of the CONFIG_PM value

Workarounds? Pointers? Suggestions?


Bump. I get this exact same error on make.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John5788
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 2099
Location: 127.0.0.1

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have a question about IT, what if new nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel came out? or can I just unmerge those and just rely on nitro to provide me with the latest nvidia drivers?
_________________
John5788
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikegpitt
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 3200

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too had the nvidia errors:
Code:
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wdeclaration-after-statement'
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time'
make[2]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


I'm pretty sure it's because those options are only available in the gcc 3.4 series. I'm still running 3.3.x, hence the problems.

I'm going to try it now without the modules built in...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thebigslide
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 787
Location: under a car or on top of a keyboard

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikegpitt wrote:
I too had the nvidia errors:
Code:
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wdeclaration-after-statement'
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time'
make[2]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


I'm pretty sure it's because those options are only available in the gcc 3.4 series. I'm still running 3.3.x, hence the problems.

I'm going to try it now without the modules built in...


Just cut those flags out of the Makefile. It should compile fine.
_________________
/etc/portage/package.c{,xx}flags and package.features!
All posts released under the GPL and the Creative Commons license
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thebigslide wrote:
mikegpitt wrote:
I too had the nvidia errors:
Code:
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wdeclaration-after-statement'
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time'
make[2]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


I'm pretty sure it's because those options are only available in the gcc 3.4 series. I'm still running 3.3.x, hence the problems.

I'm going to try it now without the modules built in...


Just cut those flags out of the Makefile. It should compile fine.


Totally right. In next version (sometime today in experimental, if we get feedback soon enough) we will add check for the GCC
Version, and adjust the CFlags. Basically we need two informations PLEASE:

1)GCC version you use
2)The cflags being not recognized by this version (from the error message).

Ati users having problems with DRI:
Make sure you have the fglrx libraries (provided in ati package and/or ebuild stuff) FOR THE DRIVER 8.10.19!!!!!! This the driver
we use here ;)


John5788 wrote:
i have a question about IT, what if new nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel came out? or can I just unmerge those and just rely on nitro to provide me with the latest nvidia drivers?


We will update as soon as new drivers are out, although bumping us on the shoulder and a "Hey, new drivers out!" might
accelerate our reaction, so please do so if we would not have upgraded already.....

Cheers,

T
_________________
Retired gentoo user
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John5788
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 2099
Location: 127.0.0.1

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger683 wrote:
John5788 wrote:
i have a question about IT, what if new nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel came out? or can I just unmerge those and just rely on nitro to provide me with the latest nvidia drivers?


We will update as soon as new drivers are out, although bumping us on the shoulder and a "Hey, new drivers out!" might
accelerate our reaction, so please do so if we would not have upgraded already.....

Cheers,

T


so its safe if i unmerge nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel?
_________________
John5788
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

no, you still need the libs that nvidia package installs, u only can unmerge the nvidia kernel, this is the module
itself and is included in nitro now.

you will only need to upgrade nvidia-glx in the future (darckness, correct me if im wrong, i use ati ;) )
At least this is true for ati, i only left the ati's libGL*.* and such in my lib + usr + X11R6 directories
_________________
Retired gentoo user
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
feld
Guru
Guru


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 593
Location: WI, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After seeing things have been resolved and hopefully patched up forever, i've returned. sorry if I sounded rude or offending in the last thread. I always did like your work....


I just got this patchset installed.


Dude, i'm not kidding. My desktop is AT LEAST 2x as responsive. No joke. Everything just FLIES. The mouse is like wet ICE on wet ICE!!!!

I seriously don't know what to say.

This has to be your best patchset ever!

Keep it up cuz I am in heaven right now!!!!


:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:



-Feld
_________________
< bmg505> I think the first line in reiserfsck is

if (random(65535)< 65500) { hose(partition); for (i=0;i<100000000;i++) print_crap(); }
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rzZzn
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kootenaykid wrote:
mcoulman wrote:
Code:
CC      arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c: In function `main':
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:65: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to incomplete type `pbe'
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:66: error: dereferencing pointer to incompletetype
arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:67: error: dereferencing pointer to incompletetype
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 2


Unlike 2.6.11rc3, this occurs regardless of the CONFIG_PM value

Workarounds? Pointers? Suggestions?


Bump. I get this exact same error on make.


Bump here too...

With 2.6.11-rc5 with rt it did work

on amd64

rZn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pifactorial
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 77
Location: 3<x<4 on the gamma function

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Posting here using the old "nv" driver because I'm having the same problems as a13x:
Code:
nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008
 printing eip:
c0272cae
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in: nvidia
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<c0272cae>]    Tainted: P      VLI
EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.11-nitro0)
EIP is at pci_register_driver+0xe/0x80
eax: e199ffa0   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 00000003   edx: 00000000
esi: decc6000   edi: e19a0f80   ebp: decc6000   esp: decc7f64
ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Process modprobe (pid: 6488, threadinfo=decc6000 task=df35f590)
Stack: 00000009 e19a0340 e19a0f80 e19a305e 00000000 0000000c 0000001b 0000001a
       0000001c e16389cc e15b249b e15b257c e19a0340 decc6000 00000000 decc6000
       c0134882 c05c9808 00000001 e19a0340 b76ad008 0805d810 00000000 c010332f
Call Trace:
 [<e19a305e>] nvidia_init_module+0x5e/0x3f0 [nvidia]
 [<c0134882>] sys_init_module+0x192/0x280
 [<c010332f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 e9 0b fb ff ff 8d 74 26 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 57 b9 03 00 00 00 53 83 ec 04 8b 5c 24 10 <8b> 43 08 8d 93 94 00 00 00 c7 43 2c 20 d4 51 c0 c7 83 80 00 00


Has this been fixed yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks to EvilDarkEchelon for this one:
FIX for x86_64 asm_offsets: (YES; IT WAS IN THE rc5-nitro0-rt)
Code:

--- linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   2005-02-08 13:45:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   2005-02-17 00:50:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
 #include <linux/stddef.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
+#endif
 #include <asm/pda.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/segment.h>
@@ -62,8 +64,10 @@
           offsetof (struct rt_sigframe32, uc.uc_mcontext));
    BLANK();
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
    DEFINE(SIZEOF_PBE, sizeof(struct pbe));
    DEFINE(pbe_address, offsetof(struct pbe, address));
    DEFINE(pbe_orig_address, offsetof(struct pbe, orig_address));
+#endif
    return 0;
 }


pifactorial wrote:
Posting here using the old "nv" driver because I'm having the same problems as a13x:
Code:
nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008
 printing eip:
c0272cae
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in: nvidia
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<c0272cae>]    Tainted: P      VLI

EFLAGS: 00010282   (2.6.11-nitro0)
EIP is at pci_register_driver+0xe/0x80
eax: e199ffa0   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 00000003   edx: 00000000
esi: decc6000   edi: e19a0f80   ebp: decc6000   esp: decc7f64
ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Process modprobe (pid: 6488, threadinfo=decc6000 task=df35f590)
Stack: 00000009 e19a0340 e19a0f80 e19a305e 00000000 0000000c 0000001b 0000001a
       0000001c e16389cc e15b249b e15b257c e19a0340 decc6000 00000000 decc6000
       c0134882 c05c9808 00000001 e19a0340 b76ad008 0805d810 00000000 c010332f
Call Trace:
 [<e19a305e>] nvidia_init_module+0x5e/0x3f0 [nvidia]
 [<c0134882>] sys_init_module+0x192/0x280
 [<c010332f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 e9 0b fb ff ff 8d 74 26 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 57 b9 03 00 00 00 53 83 ec 04 8b 5c 24 10 <8b> 43 08 8d 93 94 00 00 00 c7 43 2c 20 d4 51 c0 c7 83 80 00 00


Has this been fixed yet?


Not quite.... still waiting for darckness to get usable.....

T
_________________
Retired gentoo user
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rzZzn
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger683 wrote:
Thanks to EvilDarkEchelon for this one:
FIX for x86_64 asm_offsets: (YES; IT WAS IN THE rc5-nitro0-rt)
Code:

--- linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   2005-02-08 13:45:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   2005-02-17 00:50:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
 #include <linux/stddef.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
+#endif
 #include <asm/pda.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/segment.h>
@@ -62,8 +64,10 @@
           offsetof (struct rt_sigframe32, uc.uc_mcontext));
    BLANK();
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
    DEFINE(SIZEOF_PBE, sizeof(struct pbe));
    DEFINE(pbe_address, offsetof(struct pbe, address));
    DEFINE(pbe_orig_address, offsetof(struct pbe, orig_address));
+#endif
    return 0;
 }



Thx i'd tried this patch but it still print out the same error...

Is there someting else I have to do... enable disable somthing in config?
It did work with rt in rc5 though
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pifactorial
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 77
Location: 3<x<4 on the gamma function

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm still trying to get force feedback to work. I said before that it was a problem with HID - I was wrong. I think force feedback is implemented correctly in the kernel, and that everything should work except for a relatively small bug. That's my gut feeling anyway.

So here's the place it's really failing (drivers/input/evdev.c):
Code:
case EVIOCSFF:
     if (dev->upload_effect) {
          struct ff_effect effect;
          int err;

          if (copy_from_user(&effect, p, sizeof(effect)))
               return -EFAULT;
          err = dev->upload_effect(dev, &effect);
          if (put_user(effect.id, &(((struct ff_effect __user *)arg)->id)))
               return -EFAULT;
          return err;
          }
     else return -ENOSYS;

It's returning ENOSYS (error, not implemented) because it can't find "dev->upload_effect".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey pifactorial, sorry that i curerently cant take this as a prio no.1 , but ill look into it when everything else for experimental is ready today.

cheers,

T
_________________
Retired gentoo user
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thecrazyperson_ws
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

uman wrote:
I don't want to download gcc-3.4.3. It's -* masked, and rather than deal witch that I'm going to just keep self-installing the module.


GCC 3.4.3 is NOT masked as -*. i'm running it just fine.


/* ------------------------Code Listing 1------------------------------
tidus@Tidus /usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc $ cat gcc-3.4.3.20050110.ebuild | grep KEYWORDS
KEYWORDS="-* ~amd64 ~mips ~ppc64 ~x86 -hppa ~ppc ~sparc -ia64"
tidus@Tidus /usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc $
------------------------------------------------------------------------/*

that -* in there means masked for all arches except these explicitly listed. (my arch is bolded)

When I find time, and if you INDs would quit releasing every other day ( 8) ) I'll get around to installing this. Last time i ran into the IND release schedule, i had installed 2.6.10-nitro3 not even a half hour before darckness released nitro4. I was going "WTF". then i went and updated. then found some programs to update to test. found they worked, so went back to playstation and goofy drugs (sorry darckness, couldn't put that saying any other way) :).
_________________
Bevelle: Dual Athlon MP 2000+, 1.25G ram, 120G HD, Gentoo 2005.1-r1, Kernel 2.6.15-gentoo-r5

Gagazet: Pentium 2-266, 288M ram, 240G HD, currently installing gentoo

Besaid: p-150, 80M ram, win2k pro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jzono1
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CFLAGS for intel pentium 4 prescott???
I want to know some cflags that don't break everything, but gives me nice boosts in performance.
sse2/sse3 ones too!
anybody got any suggestions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MG-Cloud
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 200

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just installed, using the nvidia modules you guys bundled with the kernel. That's a great idea - really makes the updating process more convenient ^_^

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thebigslide
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 787
Location: under a car or on top of a keyboard

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Tiger683

Code:
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wdeclaration-after-statement'
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time'
make[2]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

This can be fixed in the Makefile by adding a condition append to the CFLAGS based on GCC version number. GCC 3.4.x will support those flags, anything lower won't. 3.4.3-r1 is the mainstream build of 3.4.x (in gentoo)
_________________
/etc/portage/package.c{,xx}flags and package.features!
All posts released under the GPL and the Creative Commons license
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thebigslide
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 787
Location: under a car or on top of a keyboard

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jzono1 wrote:
CFLAGS for intel pentium 4 prescott???
I want to know some cflags that don't break everything, but gives me nice boosts in performance.
sse2/sse3 ones too!
anybody got any suggestions?


do a search for "CFLAGS CENTRAL"
_________________
/etc/portage/package.c{,xx}flags and package.features!
All posts released under the GPL and the Creative Commons license
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 1347
Location: Heffner's House

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thebigslide wrote:
@Tiger683

Code:
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wdeclaration-after-statement'
cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time'
make[2]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia/nv.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/accel3d/nvidia] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

This can be fixed in the Makefile by adding a condition append to the CFLAGS based on GCC version number. GCC 3.4.x will support those flags, anything lower won't. 3.4.3-r1 is the mainstream build of 3.4.x (in gentoo)


I know ;)

Tiger683 wrote:

-- snipp --
In next version (sometime today in experimental, if we get feedback soon enough) we will add check for the GCC
Version, and adjust the CFlags. Basically we need two informations PLEASE:

1)GCC version you use
2)The cflags being not recognized by this version (from the error message).

-- snipp --

Cheers,

T


T
_________________
Retired gentoo user
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rzZzn
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rzZzn wrote:
Tiger683 wrote:
Thanks to EvilDarkEchelon for this one:
FIX for x86_64 asm_offsets: (YES; IT WAS IN THE rc5-nitro0-rt)
Code:

--- linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   2005-02-08 13:45:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   2005-02-17 00:50:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
 #include <linux/stddef.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
+#endif
 #include <asm/pda.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/segment.h>
@@ -62,8 +64,10 @@
           offsetof (struct rt_sigframe32, uc.uc_mcontext));
    BLANK();
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
    DEFINE(SIZEOF_PBE, sizeof(struct pbe));
    DEFINE(pbe_address, offsetof(struct pbe, address));
    DEFINE(pbe_orig_address, offsetof(struct pbe, orig_address));
+#endif
    return 0;
 }



Thx i'd tried this patch but it still print out the same error...

Is there someting else I have to do... enable disable somthing in config?
It did work with rt in rc5 though



The 2.6.11 gentoo-dev-sources works too but still not this one :cry:
I even tried to copy over asm-offsets.c from rc5 too this one

Any ideas???

EDIT: Got it to work now :D did some changes in my config file...

rZn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mirko_3
l33t
l33t


Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 605
Location: Birreria

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm trying to reverse the software suspend patch, so that I can use ndiswrapper, but I'm having problems with mm/vmscan.c
Can I copy it over from vanilla, or is it used by other patches?
_________________
Non fa male! Non fa male!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robin79
l33t
l33t


Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Posts: 632
Location: /home/valdemarsvik

PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mirko i use ndiswrapper but have to compile with softwaresuspend support :(
_________________
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------

Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 3 of 14

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum