| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What is your favorite window manager? |
| KDE 3.0 |
|
16% |
[ 267 ] |
| KDE 2.2.2 |
|
0% |
[ 3 ] |
| Enlightenment |
|
10% |
[ 162 ] |
| Fluxbox |
|
26% |
[ 421 ] |
| Blackbox |
|
1% |
[ 30 ] |
| WindowMaker |
|
3% |
[ 55 ] |
| Sawfish |
|
1% |
[ 23 ] |
| IceWM |
|
1% |
[ 22 ] |
| Gnome |
|
14% |
[ 241 ] |
| Other |
|
23% |
[ 384 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 1608 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Nitro Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Apr 2002 Posts: 661 Location: Wisconsin, USA
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 12:34 am Post subject: Favorite Window Manager? |
|
|
This is just one of those pointless non-technical opinion polls. The question: "What is your favorite window manager?"
I know KDE and Gnome are Desktop Environments, but hey, some people just know they are using KDE.
I bet KDE will win, I'm not a fan of KDE though, I like Enlightenment for my workstation, and if I'm sticking to the basics, Fluxbox hits the spot perfect.  _________________ - Kyle Manna
Please, please SEARCH before posting.
There are three kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and those who can't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
klieber Administrator


Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 1:12 am Post subject: Re: Favorite Window Manager? |
|
|
| Nitro wrote: | | This is just one of those pointless non-technical opinion polls. |
Ah...you mean a flame war.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Right now I'm using Sawfish under Gnome, but I'm still searching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chiphead n00b

Joined: 11 May 2002 Posts: 6 Location: Atlantic City, NJ
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 3:21 am Post subject: Windowmaker rocks... |
|
|
Fast, light and minimal eye candy. 'Nuff said.
If someone could do an ebuild of wdm, I'd almost be set for life (hint, hint).
BTW - Is there a forum to request new packages? nethack-x11 (or gnome/qt) would be sweet... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dice Guru


Joined: 21 Apr 2002 Posts: 577
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm using blackbox, I took a look at fluxbox briefly but the tabs got on my nerves (only app I could think of where I'd want them is GIMP) so I switched back to blackbox. Maybe I'll try out fluxbox again in the future if they add some more features, it seems to be worked on quite a bit more than bb is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guzz n00b


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 25 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fluxbox - Lean and Mean _________________ That's it Mr. Giraff, get all the marmalade. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DArtagnan l33t


Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 942 Location: Israel, Jerusalem
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 7:39 am Post subject: win manager |
|
|
I tried everything but i'm still searching.
I like Kde3 but it eats a lot of memory
pacman _________________ All for one and one for All
--
MACPRO machine... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeevz Bodhisattva


Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 195 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing beats Fluxbox!
<--- puts on his fire-proof blanket and runs for his life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DArtagnan l33t


Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 942 Location: Israel, Jerusalem
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 1:36 pm Post subject: kde |
|
|
kde beats
 _________________ All for one and one for All
--
MACPRO machine... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheWart Guru


Joined: 10 May 2002 Posts: 432 Location: Nashville,TN - USA
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, I concur with those fluxbox fans, nothing beats it when you add in all the factors like features, speed, mem usage, and ease of use. Plus, I like having my screen uncluttered with icons. And when fluxbox gets AA, ill be in hog heaven. _________________ Face it, we are all noobs.
On the box it said it was designed for Win XP or better, so why won't it work with Linux? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yannick Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2002 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| to dice : you can disable tabs globally (with the root menu) and enable them for gimp for example (with the window menu). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anti n00b


Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've used KDE long ago, gnome a while ago, but now I've settled with Blackbox. Been running it for some months now, and I doubt I'll ever change. Well, maybe to Fluxbox, but that's only because it resembles Blackbox so much
And on this occassion, could anyone maybe tell me what is so different about Fluxbox? Speeds? Features? _________________ stuff is good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hielvc Advocate

Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 2786 Location: Oceanside, Ca
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I like xfce. It its small & fast as can be on a OC166 gonin 200 and it supports gnome & kde |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
c_kuzmanic Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 488 Location: Los Angeles , California
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I recently abandoned KDE 3.0 due to the fact that it consumes too much memory/processor time. I 've tried Blackbox, Gnome , Fluxbox, IceWm, WindowMaker and XFce. My vote goes to XFce for speed and ease of configuration. My second choice would be Fluxbox, but configuration is a hassle at the present stage. If Window Managers would be comparable to mechwarrior 4 mechs, KDE would be Daishi (Powerful but lumbering), Fluxbox a Shadowcat(Small, light and very nimble) and XFce a BlackKnight(Fast, Powerful and very reliable) . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vilanox n00b

Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 12 Location: nyc
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used KDE to help me from my transition from windows to linux. Now that I know I can live without desktop icons, fluxbox is my favorite. For some reason I couldn't get it to work nicely until I switched from kdm to .xinitrc. But they all are a nicer alternative to windows.
-vilanox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Black_Xmas n00b


Joined: 28 Apr 2002 Posts: 13 Location: Andover, England
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Torn between Flux and E... It's gotta be E though, the tabs on Flux are annoying and changing backgrounds is a pain in the ass.
Both of them are sweet, Flux is mighty fast for it's flaws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeevz Bodhisattva


Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 195 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Black_Xmas wrote: | Torn between Flux and E... It's gotta be E though, the tabs on Flux are annoying and changing backgrounds is a pain in the ass.
Both of them are sweet, Flux is mighty fast for it's flaws. |
You can turn off tabs if you don't like them. And yes, it can be a bit annoying changing the background. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeevz Bodhisattva


Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 195 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| c_kuzmanic wrote: | If Window Managers would be comparable to mechwarrior 4 mechs, KDE would be Daishi (Powerful but lumbering), Fluxbox a Shadowcat(Small, light and very nimble) and XFce a BlackKnight(Fast, Powerful and very reliable) . |
Hehe... I like the mechwarrior allusion.
| Anti wrote: | | And on this occassion, could anyone maybe tell me what is so different about Fluxbox? Speeds? Features? |
Fluxbox is Blackbox with some extras thrown in. As a matter of fact, it is based off the Blackbox 0.61.1 code. For more information about the differences checkout the website and read "What is FluxBox" and "Features" sections. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AutoBot l33t


Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 968 Location: Usually Out
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One more for fluxbox, just a tip for those using flux you can add this or similar to your menu file for a simple way of adding apps if you haven't already
| Code: |
[submenu] (Settings)
[exec] (Edit Menu) {xterm -title [EditMenu] -e nano -f ~/.fluxbox/menu}
[end]
|
_________________ This message self destructed a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
c_kuzmanic Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 488 Location: Los Angeles , California
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2002 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope I'm not straying off topic here, but does anybody know if Fluxbox supports a "run" command, such as in Xfce by pressing "ALT+F12" ?
Also, I'm looking for a good desktop pager programm for fluxbox, I tried bbpager but that doesn't really do the trick for me, are there any others, maybe one that works under gkrellm? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FINITE Guru


Joined: 10 May 2002 Posts: 449
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2002 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Another vote for fluxbox. I like KDE alot but its too dam FAT! Mem usage in KDE is about 20-30% more than in fluxbox, nuf said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AutoBot l33t


Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 968 Location: Usually Out
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2002 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| c_kuzmanic wrote: | I hope I'm not straying off topic here, but does anybody know if Fluxbox supports a "run" command, such as in Xfce by pressing "ALT+F12" ?
Also, I'm looking for a good desktop pager programm for fluxbox, I tried bbpager but that doesn't really do the trick for me, are there any others, maybe one that works under gkrellm? |
Yep:
What is it that you don't like about bbpager ? _________________ This message self destructed a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
c_kuzmanic Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 488 Location: Los Angeles , California
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2002 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok , lets say I have five workspaces. Bbpager shows all those workspaces and the windows on it which is great. However, when I click on a workspace, it doesn't change views and does not switch focus to that particular workspace. I guess I'm looking for something similar to the KDE pager, where you click on a workspace and the view focusses on that workspace...
Am I missing something here?
And by the way, the more I work with Fluxbox, the better I like it. By now I'm beginning to think it has a serious edge over KDE/Gnome/ Xfce. Fluxbox and X never consume more than 16MB of ram on my ATHLON XP 2000+, 1.5 GB DDR RAM machine. Since I do a lot of compiling, I've noticed a dramatic speed increase using Fluxbox. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AutoBot l33t


Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 968 Location: Usually Out
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2002 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yep your missing something, middle click the desktop you want to go to on bbpager  _________________ This message self destructed a long time ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
c_kuzmanic Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 488 Location: Los Angeles , California
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2002 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Autobot - Thanks for your fast responses, I really appreciate your help.
As far as bbpager is concerned : Big "Duuh" on my side, how embarrassing for me, lol. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|