View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cintra Advocate
Joined: 03 Apr 2004 Posts: 2111 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ferdinando wrote: | Cintra wrote: | no it was there earlier too - about a 1000 |
Code: | exairetos@Aurora ~ $ unclepine -u &> output
exairetos@Aurora ~ $ wc -l output
1003 output
exairetos@Aurora ~ $ tail -n 30 output
Unlinked Packages: 26
* app-admin/eselect-opengl-1.0.3
* app-admin/fam-2.7.0-r4
* app-cdr/cdrtools-2.01.01_alpha01-r2
* app-misc/ca-certificates-20050804
* app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets-1.79
* app-text/ghostscript-esp-7.07.1-r10
* app-text/poppler-bindings-0.4.3-r2
* dev-java/ant-core-1.6.5-r2
* dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03
* dev-java/java-config-1.2.11-r1
* mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61
* media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std-8.11
* media-libs/glide-v3-3.10-r4
* media-libs/glut-3.7.1
* media-libs/netpbm-10.31-r1
* net-mail/mailbase-1
* net-nds/portmap-5b-r9
* sys-apps/eject-2.1.0
* sys-apps/pcmcia-cs-3.2.8-r2
* sys-apps/utempter-0.5.5.6
* sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.15
* sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r8
* x11-apps/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-r3
* x11-base/opengl-update-3.0.0
* x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6
* x11-terms/xterm-207 |
There's something fishy here, isn't it?
P.S. Btw, if uncle pine is now x86, how will aunt mary behave? Anyway, poor aunt isn't dead, is it?
Bye | at least you don't see all those 'ignoring :' lines that way _________________ "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" W.S. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ferdinando Veteran
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 1027 Location: Gaeta (LT) - Italy
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cintra wrote: | at least you don't see all those 'ignoring :' lines that way |
True, but that output's still useless to me (at least xorg I'm sure I should'nt unmerge)
Bye _________________ La risposta, non la devi cercare fuori, la devi cercare dentro di te: e però è SBAGLIATA!
-- Corrado Guzzanti, "Pippo Chennedy Show", 1997 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xchris Advocate
Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 2824
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
she's not dead...
she is waiting for me and my spare time
Unclepine with these MODS is DANGEROUS!!!
all those ignored packages are important.
DONT trust unclepine if your portage is UNSTABLE (disclaimer...) _________________ while True:Gentoo() |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ferdinando Veteran
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 1027 Location: Gaeta (LT) - Italy
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xchris wrote: | she's not dead...
she is waiting for me and my spare time |
As long as she's healthy...
We'll wait for her too
Bye _________________ La risposta, non la devi cercare fuori, la devi cercare dentro di te: e però è SBAGLIATA!
-- Corrado Guzzanti, "Pippo Chennedy Show", 1997 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Cane n00b
Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 21 Location: Oslo, Norway
|
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi xchris, is the development of unclepine still alive? I'm really missing an update that fully supports portage 2.1.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
narcis n00b
Joined: 29 Dec 2005 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | unclepine -u -x | xargs emerge -C |
still works fine for me... But are there any newer alternatives? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
urcindalo l33t
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Almeria, Spain
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff Cane wrote: | hi xchris, is the development of unclepine still alive? I'm really missing an update that fully supports portage 2.1. |
I second the proposal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radfoj Guru
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 490 Location: Tísek, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
xchris wrote: | DONT trust unclepine if your portage is UNSTABLE (disclaimer...) |
I believe, that since portage-2.1 is stable for most archs (x86 amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc) ... work on unclepine will continue. I will be happy, when new version will be out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andzei1 n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
urcindalo wrote: | Jeff Cane wrote: | hi xchris, is the development of unclepine still alive? I'm really missing an update that fully supports portage 2.1. |
I second the proposal |
Is this a reason of such error:
Code: |
pipek unclepine-release-0.1 # ./unclepine -h
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./unclepine", line 42, in ?
from portage import flatten,match_from_list,pkgcmp,catpkgsplit,dep_opconvert,dep_parenreduce,isvalidatom
ImportError: cannot import name dep_opconvert
|
Should I wait for a new version of unclepine or should I check other things ?
Andrzej |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gentoo_lan l33t
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 891 Location: Charles Town, WV
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
andzei1 wrote: | urcindalo wrote: | Jeff Cane wrote: | hi xchris, is the development of unclepine still alive? I'm really missing an update that fully supports portage 2.1. |
I second the proposal |
Is this a reason of such error:
Code: |
pipek unclepine-release-0.1 # ./unclepine -h
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./unclepine", line 42, in ?
from portage import flatten,match_from_list,pkgcmp,catpkgsplit,dep_opconvert,dep_parenreduce,isvalidatom
ImportError: cannot import name dep_opconvert
|
Should I wait for a new version of unclepine or should I check other things ?
Andrzej |
I have the same problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-Craig- Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 333
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also have the same problem.
line 42:
Code: |
from portage import flatten,match_from_list,pkgcmp,catpkgsplit,dep_opconvert,dep_parenreduce,isvalidatom
|
Well I think it's because of the portage update, maybe some function name was changed? Or the function was removed?! I have no clue and I'm not in the mood to check it right now... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6051 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
have a search back!
I posted a fix for this
it is because unclepine has note been upgraded to portage2.1 _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
odborg Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 Apr 2002 Posts: 89 Location: Aalborg, Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did the changes mentioned. When i run i get:
Code: | !!! Critical Error
!!! You miss this file : /var/db/pkg/sci-visualization/gnuplot-4.0-r1/PROVIDE |
Reemerging gnuplot didn't help.
I also tried to 'emerge -C gnuplot', only to have unclepine complain about another package:
Code: | !!! Critical Error
!!! You miss this file : /var/db/pkg/games-puzzle/drod-bin-1.6.6/PROVIDE |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
narcis n00b
Joined: 29 Dec 2005 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since there are lots of different patches across the entire thread, could somebody just post the latest version with all patches considered? Unclepine version 0.2, so to say? Thanks alot... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
randomeister n00b
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
narcis wrote: | Since there are lots of different patches across the entire thread, could somebody just post the latest version with all patches considered? Unclepine version 0.2, so to say? Thanks alot... |
Interestingly I can't even get the naib patch to work:
Code: | patching file unclepine
Hunk #2 FAILED at 491.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 530.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 533.
3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file unclepine.rej
|
...so I think it sounds like a great idea if someone could please post the script with a working version.
xchris, I hope you understand from this thread and others that people adore and depend on your script!
Respect!
Randy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6051 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
/me goes away to find out what new portage broke... _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 1096 Location: Toruń [PL]
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does it mean you're really going to make this tool work with the current portage?
One more thing. Does it REALLY REALLY not break dependencies like emerge --depclean? _________________ Sabayon Professional 1.1 (czyli zdradziłem oryginalne Gentoo)
@ Dell Inspiron 8600 (nVidia, Realtek, Pentium M) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6051 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gabrys wrote: | Does it mean you're really going to make this tool work with the current portage?
|
I will give it a go (just back from hols so will have a go tomorrow) BUT it will be a plater-fix since my understanding or python-portage is next to none
so again when I post patch-file use at own risk _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6051 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
right I got something working...
first problem: portage-2.1 broke into separate modules some functions - this is fixed by my original patch
second problem: as Xchris stated IF a package doesn't provide anything then a PROVIDE file isn't created in the database - cause unclepine to cause an exception.
these two things have been fix and have been tested with unclepine -sw ONLY!!!! I have gone through each of the entry to ensure their sanity (ie cross-ref with the relevant ebuild) and it spews out good stuff
a emerge --depclean before as well as after (and a emerge world -uvDp) didn't throw any anomylys up so all is good
Please bear in mind that although I can code in python I am not upto speed in what is in the python code used in PORTAGE (or most of what is in unclepine). I have picked up a fair bit and trust what I have done for my use of unclepine BUT I am equally fairly comforable with what is on my system and what is ment to be where and why.
if other aspects of unclepine do not work I will try to put a band-aid over it until xchris has some time to upgrade it to portage-2.1
@xchris hope you dont mind I tagged my handle into the patchset
have fun
Code: |
34c34
< version="0.1_beta18"
---
> version="0.1_beta18a Naib-Patch-2"
42c42,45
< from portage import flatten,match_from_list,pkgcmp,catpkgsplit,dep_opconvert,dep_parenreduce,isvalidatom
---
> from portage import flatten,match_from_list,pkgcmp,catpkgsplit,isvalidatom
>
> from portage_dep import dep_opconvert,paren_reduce
>
589c592,595
< if os.path.getsize(dirname+'/PROVIDE')<1:return
---
> try:
> os.path.getsize(dirname+'/PROVIDE')
> except:
> return
|
_________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
urcindalo l33t
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Almeria, Spain
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
What's the current state of the script?
Does it work with portage 2.1.1?
If so, could anybody share a working version of it?
Thanks is advance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ferdinando Veteran
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 1027 Location: Gaeta (LT) - Italy
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
urcindalo wrote: | What's the current state of the script? | More or less frozen because xchris has gone back to his real life.
urcindalo wrote: | Does it work with portage 2.1.1? | No, but you can use Naib's patch just above your post.
Bye _________________ La risposta, non la devi cercare fuori, la devi cercare dentro di te: e però è SBAGLIATA!
-- Corrado Guzzanti, "Pippo Chennedy Show", 1997 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|