| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| stable or unstable/testing, what is your default keyword? |
| arch (stable) |
|
54% |
[ 110 ] |
| ~arch (unstable/testing) |
|
45% |
[ 91 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 201 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Dlareh
Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 2102
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
~x86 laptop, amd64 server.
Running ~arch really isn't a big deal. Certainly not worth this poll.
_________________
"Mr Thomas Edison has been up on the two previous nights discovering 'a bug' in his phonograph." --Pall Mall Gazette (1889)
Are we THERE yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SirYes
Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 282
Location: Lodz, Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, thanks for your input!
| Dlareh wrote: | | Running ~arch really isn't a big deal. |
I expected that. 
| Dlareh wrote: | | Certainly not worth this poll. |
Well, how else could I get at least some answers?
_________________
Here to be: A new signature for 2008
My blog: In search for ultimate programming language |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
goom
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 96
Location: Dortmund, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm stuck on x86 b/c everything runs fine this way. Only some packages with ~x86 on my system. I once had a ~x86 install, but had a lot of troubles with it (about 2 years ago).
_________________
http://www.dispatchmusic.com
- Listen to Dispatch - smile - be happy -
http://www.maggimarkus.de
- my (german) page |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Monkeh
Veteran
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 1656
Location: England
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've got an ~amd64 desktop, ~x86 laptop, and an x86 server. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZmiyGorinich
Guru
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 369
Location: Zaporizhzhe, Ukraine
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use only x86, but some apps I emerge with ~x86, for example:
| Code: | www-client/mozilla-firefox
app-misc/tomboy |
_________________
Home: Athlon XP 2000+, ATI Radeon 9200 64Mb, 512Mb, hda:40Gb, hdb:120Gb, DVD-RW
Work : Duron 1.4, S3 ProSavage8 32Mb, 512Mb, hda:40Gb, CD-RW
Design, programming, hosting |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective
Veteran
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1923
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| x86, but overtime I put a LOT of stuff in my package.keywords and package.unmask. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pteppic
l33t
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 781
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
About two years ago, in an attack of complete N00bishness, I got bored typing ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~amd64' emerge blah, so exported it from roots bashrc. After a few updates I was running a full ~arch system completely by ignorance, but all is not bad 'cos it's still running now, and I have read the portage documentation since  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
at240
l33t
Joined: 12 Aug 2005
Posts: 603
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mainly x86. ~x86 when necessary or desirable.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CalPaterson
n00b
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 40
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I run x86, with 74 lines in /etc/portage/package.keywords. My http/ftp/ssh relay server runs OpenBSD. I don't really consider "stable" gentoo to be ery stable at all; it's really just a nice convenience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
olger901
l33t
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 606
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Running the stable amd64, expect for the ati-drivers and wine which I run unstable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ToeiRei
Veteran
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 1113
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
~x86 -> Unstable runs better on my laptop - stable as a rock, just 4 packages masked
server boxes -> stable
Rei
_________________
Blog | btrfs | Please stand by - The mailer daemon is busy burning your messages in hell... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gentoo Chat
