| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Anior Guru


Joined: 17 Apr 2003 Posts: 317 Location: European Union (Stockholm / Sweden)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jakamaka Apprentice


Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 266 Location: My self-sustainable fusion of thought
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 _________________ It would be more interesting to learn from children, than try to teach them how to behave, how to live and how to function. - U.G. Krishnamurti |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mdeininger Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2005 Posts: 1738 Location: University of Tuebingen, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heh, yeah, that sounds a lot like back in grammar school. gotta love quantum physics!
*note to my teacher if you should ever read this: make sure you explain em-waves better next time! nobody in class got that, at all!* _________________ "Confident, lazy, cocky, dead." -- Felix Jongleur, Otherland
( hot: jyujinX on Twitter | ef.gy ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tamsco Guru


Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Posts: 313 Location: dmse.mit.edu
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what I read of the abstract it seems like marketing speak because the inherent nature of the computer is the fundamanetal properties oif quantum mechanics which unlike a current cannot be turned off. The trick however is that extracting the information from the qubit does require work so while the computer might be doing the calculation while it is off, it always has to be on to get it to tell you.
While I have a great deal of respect for the Kwiat group (He and Bouwmeester are easily tops in this field) the whole field is so overhyped and overmarketed that every little things gets hyped. This seems like a good paper but not IMHO Nature worthy as we're not going to see muich come of this in the next five years. _________________ If you get your problem solved put a [SOLVED] in the title!
Is OpenOffice still compiling?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue.sca l33t


Joined: 28 Aug 2003 Posts: 680 Location: Mainz, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tamsco wrote: | | While I have a great deal of respect for the Kwiat group (He and Bouwmeester are easily tops in this field) the whole field is so overhyped and overmarketed that every little things gets hyped. This seems like a good paper but not IMHO Nature worthy as we're not going to see muich come of this in the next five years. |
Same thoughts, but I think we have to wait for more than 20 years... _________________ geek by nature, linux by choice
i want my avatar back... thank you
:wq |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lepaca Kliffoth l33t


Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 737 Location: Florence, Italy
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wait... you mean the article is serious?? I thought it was a joke all along o_O I even laughed when it suggested not running the computation at all to make everything less error-prone... _________________ It isn't enough to win - everyone else must lose, and you also have to rub it in their face (maybe chop off an arm too for good measure).
Animebox! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pitcrawler Apprentice


Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 150 Location: Oklahoma, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This means we can compile gentoo stuff in a "parallel universe" while we're doing other stuff in our own universe. (Read the article and you'll see that this is theoretically not impossible at some time in the future) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
madchaz l33t


Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 972 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actualy, the article is more or less correct. The interpretation is just off a bit.
Quantum computers, by nature, work by not working. That's why they are so fast. The idea is that all the possibilities are always present, it's the act of taking a mesurement that "fixes" the awnser in time. The basic principle is that the actual calculation gets done in a different dimension, making the work appear instantanious (spelling?). Note that we're talking dimension in quantum physics, not sci-fi movie phisic. Basicaly, it's a different axis on the graph. You normaly have xyz for length, width and dept. This one takes place in something that would come after Z. (at least, that's my understanding of it) _________________ Someone asked me once if I suffered from mental illness. I told him I enjoyed every second of it.
www.madchaz.com Under heavy reconstruction. Bring a hardhat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|