View previous topic :: View next topic |
OpenOffice.org Vs OpenOffice-ximianised |
OOo |
|
32% |
[ 38 ] |
OO-ximian |
|
67% |
[ 78 ] |
|
Total Votes : 116 |
|
Author |
Message |
MickKi Veteran
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 1173
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:00 pm Post subject: OpenOffice or Ximian? |
|
|
Hi All,
I have only used OpenOffice (on Knoppix), but I am now psyching myself up for a mega-long emerge of office in my Gentoo, run on a 600MHz PIII. I only want to do it once, don't we all? but I am not sure what I should emerge:
or,
Code: | openoffice-ximian-1.1.59 |
What are the differences between the two?
Is it a just a matter of aesthetics?
Is the ximian version free, or do we (will) have to pay Novell?
I would be grateful for your views _________________ Regards,
Mick |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ari Rahikkala Guru
Joined: 02 Oct 2002 Posts: 370 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try the -bin packages out first and emerge whichever you want when you'll be away for a day or so. The reasons why I prefer the ximianised version are aesthetical, rather much like the way the reasons why I prefer not to live on a landfill are aesthetical. _________________ <laurentius> gentoo linux?
<ari> Yesh.
<laurentius> they look horny |
|
Back to top |
|
|
placeholder Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 2500
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use OOo because I use Fluxbox and don't want to have a bunch of GNOME libs in order to use OOo-ximian. Basically, anything ximian is just a version of the program designed to work better with the GNOME DE, seeing that the Ximian project was made in order to make Linux better for the desktop and GNOME was the DE they chose to use in order to make their Ximian DE.
So OOo-ximian is OOo with some GNOME bindings, and it is free. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roguelazer Veteran
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 1233 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Plus OOo-ximian has purtier icons. _________________ Registered Linux User #263260 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Duty Apprentice
Joined: 15 Nov 2003 Posts: 253
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've always preferred AbiWord, although I'm not sure if the rest of this "AbiSuite" thing even exists, or is remotely usable yet; I haven't had much need for the other components of an office suite.
Any killer advantages that the OOo WP has over Abi's? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ShadyCharacter n00b
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just use Abiword now, much less bloated. Although between the two I prefer Ximian. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wolfpack98 n00b
Joined: 11 Mar 2003 Posts: 61 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't had a chance to use OpenOffice-Ximian yet..
But because I alrady have kde/gnome libs on my system for various programs I've been using, i might as well try OO-Ximian to see how it runs..
I'm on fluxbox so *shrug* _________________ "no fate but what we make..."
--- John Connor, Terminator 3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spb Retired Dev
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Posts: 2135 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, when I had OpenOffice installed, it was the -ximian variety. These days, emacs is good enough for me (with LaTeX if I'm doing anything fancy). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42 Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Duty wrote: | I've always preferred AbiWord, although I'm not sure if the rest of this "AbiSuite" thing even exists, or is remotely usable yet; I haven't had much need for the other components of an office suite.
Any killer advantages that the OOo WP has over Abi's? | It has better .doc import/export support. That's about all I can notice, though, from my own experience. _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sindre Guru
Joined: 01 Nov 2002 Posts: 315 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
[ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.59 -gnome +kde +ooo-kde 1,525 kB
Building openoffice-ximian with the ooo-kde USE-flag resulted in an amazing startup time on kde for me, in addition to integrate better with the rest of the environment. The ebuild didn't like -march=pentium4 though, had to turn that one down a notch. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MickKi Veteran
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 1173
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you All,
Ximian clearly appears to be the favourite! I am also mostly running fluxbox, although I have KDE installed and occassionally launch it from within fluxbox.
The last hint is very useful: the +ooo-kde flag dropped a load of gnome libs and dependencies. All I need to emerge now is:
Code: | # emerge -uDpv app-office/openoffice-ximian
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/startup-notification-0.6 201 kB
[ebuild N ] app-shells/tcsh-6.12-r3 -cjk +perl 804 kB
[ebuild N ] app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.59 -gnome +kde +ooo-kde 192,360 kB
Total size of downloads: 193,366 kB
| All I need to do now, is put a few days(?!!) aside to emerge the darn thing
One last thing, I seem to have only 2.35GB free on my Gentoo / partition. Is that enough to compile it, or am I going to crash and burn? _________________ Regards,
Mick |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scarr Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Jun 2002 Posts: 88 Location: Lebanon, TN
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OOo usually takes about 1-1.5 Gb to build so you should be fine. I haven't actually tried the Ximian build, but it should be within that range. _________________ Scott Carr * OpenOffice.org * Documentation Maintainer
http://documentation.openoffice.org
jabber: scarr@progbits.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djm Arch/Herd Tester
Joined: 12 Apr 2004 Posts: 690 Location: Wadham College, Oxford
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've never used the ximian version, is it as sensitive to CFLAGS as the normal version?
I might give it a go... _________________ the forums.gentoo.org poster formally known as metal leper |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Adso n00b
Joined: 19 Mar 2004 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ximian just looks a little fancier but for a wp i would rather use abi. OO doesnt spell check correctly for me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hanta Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Jun 2002 Posts: 115 Location: Vantaa - Finland
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:18 pm Post subject: Re: OpenOffice or Ximian? |
|
|
MickKi wrote: | What are the differences between the two? |
There was a good web-page about the changes, but I can't find it
MickKi wrote: | Is it a just a matter of aesthetics? |
No, it's also about functionality. For one, ximian build has cups integration, so printers configured to cups show directly in ximian oo.
MickKi wrote: | Is the ximian version free, or do we (will) have to pay Novell? |
It's free. Seems that Novell is doing a lot of good things with linux (ximian connector is now under GPL as is YAST). Lets just hope they keep it up.
MickKi wrote: | I would be grateful for your views |
I think ximian is the way to go. I think even debian has ximian patched OO. _________________ Janne |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jake Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2003 Posts: 1132
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd rather use the Ximian version, but last time I tried it my formulas in Writer didn't work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MickKi Veteran
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 1173
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scarr wrote: | OOo usually takes about 1-1.5 Gb to build so you should be fine. I haven't actually tried the Ximian build, but it should be within that range. |
Aaaaargh!
11h 35m later . . . my 2.35G free disk space was chewed up, everything ground to a halt just as it was installing the last few files and I had to recover and resize everything using Knoppix.
I've squeezed down my /home partition and added another 1GB to my /. It's now re-emerging openoffice-ximian from the start!
I hope this is a lesson to all of you out there with unecessarily large swap partitions and small /.
Let's hope it will compile now without going bang again. _________________ Regards,
Mick |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrCrippen n00b
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Posts: 18 Location: Warendorf / Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used OOo a long time and it worked fine for me.
Well, I wanted to try out gnome and as I heard ximian integrated better I tried it out to
and it works fine as well. The thing about cups is what I like best.
But unfortunately both need so much time to start and I don't know how to make it faster _________________ registered Linux user number 359161 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hanta Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Jun 2002 Posts: 115 Location: Vantaa - Finland
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MickKi wrote: | Let's hope it will compile now without going bang again. |
If it doesn't, you might want to try this out:
Code: | * app-office/openoffice-ximian-bin
Latest version available: 1.1.52
Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
Size of downloaded files: 68,812 kB
Homepage: http://ooo.ximian.com
Description: Ximian-ized version of OpenOffice.org, a full office productivity suite.
License: LGPL-2 | SISSL-1.1
|
_________________ Janne |
|
Back to top |
|
|
placeholder Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 2500
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking of all this.... Is there anyway to get only the writer with OOo? I don't need anything else and rarely even use the writer so I was curious. PM me if you know, please. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arand Apprentice
Joined: 22 Apr 2003 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly off topic but I need to vent some frustrantions.
I switched back to the vanilla Ooo because the ximianized version failed to install after 20 hours of compling. I would have used the binbary version but it was not up to date so I switched back to the vanilla version because the binary version is uptodate.
I don't really use the program that much only for opeing MS documents, most of my document writing now is done in latex.
There I feel better, thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MickKi Veteran
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 1173
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
WOOHOO!
OOo-Ximian installed and it is indeed: a)much better looking (OK, that may be subjective), and b)seriously faster in launching than the vanilla OOo (mind you I used the KDE USE flags as mentioned above).
After I stretched out my / partition to give it enough size to compile I didn't experience any other glitches.
Quote: | Speaking of all this.... Is there anyway to get only the writer with OOo? I don't need anything else and rarely even use the writer so I was curious. PM me if you know, please. | I don't think that compiling it with a USE flag, like +xowriter -xooffice (or -xo<OOo_component_name>) would work, although you could give it a try and abort if it starts compiling other components. Alternatively, you would probably have to create a special ebuild script - but I wouldn't have a clue on how to go about it. I am not sure how tightly knit the different parts of the OOo are and whether they could function seperately.
Anyway, if you're only using the writer, abiword looks like a very descent lighter package. _________________ Regards,
Mick |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djm Arch/Herd Tester
Joined: 12 Apr 2004 Posts: 690 Location: Wadham College, Oxford
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to etcat -u, openoffice is affected by only gnome and kde uses flags (USE="+/-gnome/kde")
and openoffice-ximian isn't affected by any use flags
It also says that neither binary version isn't affected by any use flags _________________ the forums.gentoo.org poster formally known as metal leper |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lefou Apprentice
Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Posts: 199 Location: Germany, Lusatia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a i18n-version of OpenOffice-ximian available? I'm using app-i18n/openoffice-bin-de-1.1.2 from www.gentoo.de. I think, a localized version is better than a DE-optimized one.
lefou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
playfool l33t
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 688 Location: Ã
rhus, Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use the version that comes with Fedora Core Rawhide, it has most of the Ximian stuff in there and the native widget framework from the development series should be in there as well.
Anyways, I like it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|