Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
How many of you are using Linux just to be cool?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

rackathon
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
t_2199
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 7:49 pm    Post subject: How many of you are using Linux just to be cool? Reply with quote

OK maybe thats a weird thread for a linux forum but this is really on my mind for a few days now and please understand me right I dont want to start a flamewar or something...(I have big respect for the Open Source Community)

I was a Windows User for several years now but I just had to try linux too see what its all about.. First I started with SuSE but I was never satisfied with it so one day I decided to install Gentoo. It was like opening the door to another world I was confused big time at the beginning but now I would call myself Linux experienced. I was so amazed by Linux or better with Gentoo and yes its an absolutley amazing OS and the whole community is amazing, too!

So I had Gentoo fully installed and I was very satisfied with it and I was browsing arround the forums, emerged some programms, helped to find bugs, tried out many WMs like GNOME, Kde, enlightment, fluxbox, blackbox, played arround with the kernel, reinstalled everything from the scratch with reiser4 just for fun and all the "cool" things you can do with Linux. But one day everything was working smoothly and I was wondering: "Cool, I have Linux now and what can I do with it now ??"

What I do with my PC usually:
Listen to music -- Winamp owns XMMS. Takes less memory runs more stable and you can get thousand of plugins!

File sharing -- Theres no decent Direct Connect client for Linux and yes I tried them all -- DC++ owns them all.. Plus theres only an old version avaible for linux of my favourite Bit Torrent Client ABC (Yet another bit torrent client) ..

Playing some DirectX games if I want to waste my time -- Much better windows driver for the most graphic cards + most of the games runs faster with windows nativley...

Burning CDs..... Nero (my old version, not the latest) owns K3b or all other burning programms I ever tried under linux

Coding.. Ecplise is avaible for windows, too.. OK kdevelop is cool but I dont really need it..

Browsing.. Mozilla is avaible for windows, too..

Going to lan-partys -- Its a pain in the ass when you go to a lan party just with linux installed!

Office -- OpenOffice is avaible for windows, too..

Browsing arround in the lan -- I dont feel like installing a Samba server just because I want to have acces to my brothers porn..

Watching Videos.. I tried Kaffeine and MPlayer and I had problems with both of them (random crashes and other things)... Could be the codecs though but I never had any problems with Media Player.. I think the windows media player is ugly but at least its running fast and without crashes..

Overall I have to say I can do my work much faster with windows I have the feeling that the WM that XP is using is much faster than KDE´s kwin + xp boots in about half the time linux needs (even without X)..

So for me theres absolutely no reason to use Linux instead of Windows and I dont feel like keeping Linux just to say" Hey look im a smart hacker I know how to use Linux".. The only reason that came to mind is that its free.


So my question is how many of you just use Linux so others think of you "wow what a guru" and how many of you take a advantage of using linux instead of using windows..

And now please dont start with the things like: Its way more secrue! No its absolutly not. If you click on a exe file you got from some spam email account of course youll get a virus. I never used a Firewall neither a Anti-Virus prog the only thing I did was turning on the automatic update function. I never had any problems with secruity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Omadon
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 103

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't approve much of Microsoft business practices.
Everyone and their grandmother can write a destructive worm for the windows platform, and they do spread. Microsoft often takes weeks to release a security update after a hole has been made public.
Software is generally better supported on Linux than windows; as most of it is open source, there is a greater community of people who understand how an application works and are willing to aid in the support effort.
Most Linux software is free.
Windows like control, it likes to execute applications which I don't want to run, and it's difficult to force such activites to stop. Linux generally tells me everything, and I can control what goes on on my machine.
Linux has superb remote administration tools (sshd), allowing me to access my machine from remote locations with ease.
Linux seems more developer oriented (I code C/C++, and I find better and more tools on Linux than Windows for this.)
Linux is open source, and supports open source efforts; open source software is generally more stable...

thousands of dedicated intellegent minds render a better result than a few.

I use Linux because I support open source.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pigeon
Guru
Guru


Joined: 21 Jun 2002
Posts: 307

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eh? If you don't like it, don't use it.

I use linux when linux does the job better, and windows when windows does the job better. So should you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr Evil
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't use Linux because it's to be cool or anything. Rather, I enjoy it because it's an alternative to the primary OS used by most home users. I enjoy the UNIX style environments. I can do 95% of what I can in Windows, and do it free in Linux.

Granted, I realize that there are issues with some things in Linux that Windows might not necessarily have, and vice versa. But, over the course of the past few weeks (since I got this Gentoo box running), I have found that I do almost all of my computing on the Linux box, and my Windows box sits relatively idle. I'm more comfortable using the environment that I have set up (and continually tweak). I find I'm more comfortable being able to do much of the computing I need to do from a command line environment if I need to.

For me, it's simply a matter of comfort. Windows wore out its welcome, although I do still need to keep it around. However, Linux has won me over simply because I enjoy it more so than I do Windows. I also enjoy that it doesn't hold my hand, and can often be quite troublesome to configure something properly. I guess it's the challenges as well as the comfort that I like.

So no, it's definitely not a cool factor. It's just an alternative OS that I prefer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Riftwing
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 06 Oct 2002
Posts: 293

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, for me it's the opposite. For you, the only reason you can see to use Linux is is that it is free while for me the only reason I can see to use windows is games.
Quote:
Listen to music -- Winamp owns XMMS. Takes less memory runs more stable and you can get thousand of plugins!

XMMS is all I need, there isn't anything I want to do that I can't do in XMMS. XMMS also has never crashed on me so I'm not sure how you can get more stable than that. Not sure how the memory compares to Winamp because I haven't throughly tested the use of memory by both programs, but apparently you have. :lol: Amarok also looks rather good but I don't exactly feel like installing all of KDE just to find out.
Quote:
File sharing -- Theres no decent Direct Connect client for Linux and yes I tried them all -- DC++ owns them all.. Plus theres only an old version avaible for linux of my favourite Bit Torrent Client ABC (Yet another bit torrent client) ..

I have no problems with filesharing but I don't use Direct Connect.I mostly use SoulSeek and amule. However, I will admit DC++ is the best dc client, although I hear it can run under wine. As far as bit torrent, I find bittorrent-theshadow suits all my bit torrent needs extremely well and would probably use the same program in windows if I were running it.
Quote:
Playing some DirectX games if I want to waste my time -- Much better windows driver for the most graphic cards + most of the games runs faster with windows nativley...

Games is the reason I said Windows is vastly superior than Linux. WineX does run many directx games but WineX is rather ghetto and doesn't run everything. Also there aren't very many Linux ports of games but I guess that will change if/when Linux becomes a much more popular OS which is the way it is going.
Quote:
Burning CDs..... Nero (my old version, not the latest) owns K3b or all other burning programms I ever tried under linux

As far as burning cds I don't see what there is that cdrecord cannot do.
Quote:
Coding.. Ecplise is avaible for windows, too.. OK kdevelop is cool but I dont really need it..

Coding... I don't really use IDEs so it's not a problem. There's also anjuta which is another good ide. VIM is good though :lol:
Quote:
Browsing.. Mozilla is avaible for windows, too..

Browsing is about the same on both OS's, as you said.
Quote:
Going to lan-partys -- Its a pain in the ass when you go to a lan party just with linux installed!

I don't go to many lan parties but when I do it seems the only game people play are Half-Life mods like Counter-Strike that work under winex anyway.
Quote:
Office -- OpenOffice is avaible for windows, too..

Office utils are about the same on both OS's, as you said.
Quote:
Browsing arround in the lan -- I dont feel like installing a Samba server just because I want to have acces to my brothers porn..

What's wrong with Samba? It works flawlessly.
Quote:
Watching Videos.. I tried Kaffeine and MPlayer and I had problems with both of them (random crashes and other things)... Could be the codecs though but I never had any problems with Media Player.. I think the windows media player is ugly but at least its running fast and without crashes..

As far as watching videos, Mplayer is the best media player ever made and the Windows version just doesn't match up. It has also never crashed on me so I'm not quite sure what you're talking about.

I don't use linux just "to be cool". I use it because it's a stable operating system that does what I want it to do, not to mention it's free as you said and opensource. The only things I can think of that windows is superior in is obviously games and also video editing. So I don't really agree with most of your post.
_________________
Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun. - Ash, Army of Darkness
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gtaluvit
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Aug 2003
Posts: 135
Location: Columbia, MD

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use strictly Gentoo at home. I blew away my windows partition over a year ago and never went back. Now I don't play many PC games, I can access my digital camera, all my hardware works, and I have *FREE* apps for all I need so losing windows wasn't an issue.

Now, with the examples you gave, I can see your point in the windows makes more sense for you, since Nero is an excellent app and so forth. However, lets look at an example of something that Linux can do easily that windows is hard pressed to support.

Example. I had a movie file I wanted to share with people at work. I SSH'd into my box, copied the file to my public_html directory, and people could get to it. However, our workstations are managed and Win2k didn't have the proper codecs and couldn't install them. I SSH'd back in, used mplayer/mencoder to covert the movie from whatever codec it was to simple MPEG1. Placed the new file in the public_html directory, and boom, everyone could watch. That even has "cool" factor. :)

You use the tools that are available to you and that work best for you. Gentoo is best for me.
_________________
I'm out of bed and dressed, what more do you want?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shank
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why do I use linux?

Simply put, its the CODE!

It's free to distribute and its free to edit/look at!

It's OPEN, doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that's the advantage of GNU/*BSD/LINUX.

I use windows when i have to, for using Offix etc.

I really like OS X, from a user perspective.

But, i spend most of my time either browsing the web, chatting on IRC, or poking around in code.

If your a coder then I don't see how you cannot like *BSD or LINUX. All the codes there for you to learn from, use, and abuse.

That's why GNU and open source software is great! When I sit down at a liinux box, i feel like i'm in control, and have access to all the guts of whats happening on my computer, i own the computer, the computer doesn't own me. When I use a windows machines (and to a lesser extent a OS X box) i feel confined, I can only do what MS says i can do, what I'm allowed todo. THis isn't so in linux.

It's the FREEDOM man. FREE as in SPEECH!


Last edited by shank on Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:09 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ponds
n00b
n00b


Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 69
Location: MSU, Starkville, MS

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that linux is great in the fields for which it excels. I think alot of people use linux that don't need it, but I think its awesome that they use it. I also think alot of people don't use linux that would benefit from it.

That being said, and I mean no offense, but it sounds like what you're using it for are kind of basic things that don't require any real computing or environment, with the slight acception of coding.

Windows is probably a better environment for that because it sacrifices extensability for ease of use.

In my job, there isn't a day that I could live without linux. I cannot imagine doing 95% of the things that i do on windows.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sgaap
l33t
l33t


Joined: 16 Aug 2002
Posts: 754
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Playing some DirectX games if I want to waste my time -- Much better windows driver for the most graphic cards + most of the games runs faster with windows nativley...

Just use a card with decent drivers (nvidia), most native linux games runs faster with it than on windows (ok, only if the native linux port is any good --> not like ut2k3/4's opengl support)
Quote:

Watching Videos.. I tried Kaffeine and MPlayer and I had problems with both of them (random crashes and other things)... Could be the codecs though but I never had any problems with Media Player.. I think the windows media player is ugly but at least its running fast and without crashes..

Never had any problem in linux (and gentoo) running divx/xvid/svcd/dvd etc movies, maybe your compile options are to tight?
Quote:

Burning CDs..... Nero (my old version, not the latest) owns K3b or all other burning programms I ever tried under linux

Burn dvd's and cd's all the time, never had any complaints about burn software on linux (it does the job)
Quote:

Games is the reason I said Windows is vastly superior than Linux. WineX does run many directx games but WineX is rather ghetto and doesn't run everything.

The fact that games are made for windows doesnt make it superior to linux (or other OS's), games that have been ported well run almost everytime just as fast or faster on linux
Winex only runs a handfull of direct3d games (most games that run with winex are opengl games --> which work fine with wine), basically direct3d sucks and I never buy games that have to be emulated

I use linux simply because it does everything I want and most of the time better than when using windows, but thats a purely personal thing
_________________
In "old" Europe we already have a word for "pre-emptive strikes" mr Bush: its called "war"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hjlane3
Guru
Guru


Joined: 22 Feb 2003
Posts: 377
Location: Wilmington, DE USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm    Post subject: Re: How many of you are using Linux just to be cool? Reply with quote

t_2199 wrote:
Listen to music -- Winamp owns XMMS. Takes less memory runs more stable and you can get thousand of plugins!

bah, xmms does all you need to listen to music. and if it's resources you want to conserv, use mpg123 or ogg123.

Quote:
File sharing -- Theres no decent Direct Connect client for Linux and yes I tried them all -- DC++ owns them all.. Plus theres only an old version avaible for linux of my favourite Bit Torrent Client ABC (Yet another bit torrent client) ..

1. giFT for gnutella/kazaa,openft. 2. Azureus is the best bittorrent client I've seen (even though it's a java app :-( )

Quote:
Playing some DirectX games if I want to waste my time -- Much better windows driver for the most graphic cards + most of the games runs faster with windows nativley...

The games I play most are native linux and I have an nvidia card so i'm set. And with my emulated games (cs, CoD), they run better in linux under winex than in windows for me.

Quote:
Burning CDs..... Nero (my old version, not the latest) owns K3b or all other burning programms I ever tried under linux

Don't know what you're talking about, I even had my windows zealot friend admit k3b rocks. (plus, nero = $$$, k3b=free

Quote:
Coding.. Ecplise is avaible for windows, too.. OK kdevelop is cool but I dont really need it..

I"m not really much of a coder, but gedit works perfectly fine for me...

Quote:
Browsing.. Mozilla is avaible for windows, too..

Sure is, but epiphany isn't :-P

Quote:
Going to lan-partys -- Its a pain in the ass when you go to a lan party just with linux installed!

All my lan parties we play CS, CoD, or a UT game, all of which I can play great.

Quote:
Office -- OpenOffice is avaible for windows, too..

Sure is.

Quote:
Browsing arround in the lan -- I dont feel like installing a Samba server just because I want to have acces to my brothers porn..

Nautilus' built in windows share browsing work beatifully for me.

Quote:
Watching Videos.. I tried Kaffeine and MPlayer and I had problems with both of them (random crashes and other things)... Could be the codecs though but I never had any problems with Media Player.. I think the windows media player is ugly but at least its running fast and without crashes..

Ok, i'm sorry, but I laughed really hard when I read this. MPlayer kicks Windows Media Player's ass any day. Fast, cleaner, a hell of alot more confgurable, and alot easier to play diffrent types of video (don't need to install seperate codec packs, AND i can play VCD images right ffom the image file)

Quote:
Overall I have to say I can do my work much faster with windows I have the feeling that the WM that XP is using is much faster than KDE´s kwin + xp boots in about half the time linux needs (even without X)..

Firstly, I get frustrated all the time when in windows because of how un-responsive things are (compaired to gnome anyway, i don't like kde). Secondly, yes XP boots "faster" than linux, but I hardly ever need to boot my linux machine...

Quote:
So for me theres absolutely no reason to use Linux instead of Windows and I dont feel like keeping Linux just to say" Hey look im a smart hacker I know how to use Linux".. The only reason that came to mind is that its free.

Your loss man.


Quote:
So my question is how many of you just use Linux so others think of you "wow what a guru" and how many of you take a advantage of using linux instead of using windows..

Linux works a hell of alot better for me than windows does, that's why I use it.

Quote:
And now please dont start with the things like: Its way more secrue! No its absolutly not. If you click on a exe file you got from some spam email account of course youll get a virus. I never used a Firewall neither a Anti-Virus prog the only thing I did was turning on the automatic update function. I never had any problems with secruity.

Last time I tried to installs windows it took me 3 tries because I was infested with viruses before I could even get updates and a firewall downloaded...
_________________
I wish hell would freeze over already. :-(
EDIT: w00t, it has!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soda_popstar
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 177

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After about a year and a half of Linux use, I've pretty much come to the same conclusion as that of the original poster. It's been great using Linux, but there really haven't been too many real advantages. Last week's dip back into the Windows world solidified that argument for me. Don't get me wrong - Linux is great and I support open source and open standards. But from a more pragmatic point of view, a commercial OS like Windows or Mac OS X is a better working environment for me. It has nothing to do with the inherent nature of commercial products, but the fact remains that driver support and general ease of use is found there.

Some advantages that I find are the Linux filesystems, which allows multiple users or applications to access the same file simultaneously. I love being able to allow my brother across the network view the same TV shows at the same time as me. It's a pain when I have to wait for him to finish watching videos on his Windows computer before I take a peek.

Another good plus for Linux is the lack of adware! I installed zip utilities, FTP clients, etc. in Windows XP and the adware is such an eyesore.

However, on the flip side, it just feels great knowing that virtually all hardware I throw at Windows XP will just work. Linux is a great project and its progression has been astounding, but don't undermine Windows. It's an excellent OS as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sqeaky
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use almost exclusively linux, the only reason I have windows is to do work stuff, but that will change soon.

reasons I use linux instead of windows
1. Its free
2. I get the choise as to what I use and what I have installed, have you ever tried removing internet explorer. For something with so many security flaws you think there would be a way to get rid of it.
3. I can fix it. if I get a cryptic error in either OS I can search for it on google and find any available fixes. Keyword [available]. I have never had a software issue with linux that could not be fixed. I have had many software issues with windows that could not be fixed short of a reinstall.
4. Linux does what I want and what I tell it to, windows does lots of extra stuff. I do not always want lots of graphics and cool stuff mandatorily as part of my os i would rather have a faster more responsive system. I also do not like spyware, many times in windows this unavoidable and trying to remove things that have patched explorer.exe or taskman.exe is not possible without reinstalling. In gentoo a comparable issue would involve checking the source and recompiling.
5. It's stable. Linux is many times more stable than windows. All my friends blame me for my unstable windows boxes, but a regular user should not be able to destabilize the OS doing regular user things. linux/kde/gnome do not crash when i move icons on the desktop, but sometimes windows does.
6. Security. Each OS has a way to go before true security is reached but linux is much closer, it does basic things like prompt for passwords and allow basic file permissions that work windows permissions generally do not work correctly. I have never sat down in front of a windows box that could stop me from seeing certain files.
7. Updates, linux gets updates frequently and security updates almost overnight, windows gets security fixes once a month and upgrades whenever MS feels like releasing another service pack.
8.Software choices, MS forces windows media player on the user, I don't like it i don't use it by I can't remove it did I use this reason already, well it needs to be stated that the user who wants it must be able to setup their computer appropriatly. Example a file server doesn't need media players it needs maxixmum hard drive space.
9. games I play run faster in linux, namely unreal and quake3. and starcraft runs plenty fast.
10. ease of use does not matter to me, I can use any OS quite well.


Last edited by Sqeaky on Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:30 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
placeholder
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And now please dont start with the things like: Its way more secrue! No its absolutly not. If you click on a exe file you got from some spam email account of course youll get a virus. I never used a Firewall neither a Anti-Virus prog the only thing I did was turning on the automatic update function. I never had any problems with secruity.


Are you saying that if you click a .exe(not used for Linux binaries) that I will get a virus? Are you insane or just retarded? Unless you flock around as root dangerous contamination is impossible and only things you have write-access to can be damaged. :roll: Maybe I understood that message wrong though.

Some of the reasons I use Linux have already been mentioned by me in other topics, but I shall review some of the many reasons that I do.

1) I hate capitalism, so free software naturally suits me much better. (I am socialist)

2) MW Windows* has crapped out on me in the worst of times more than the oldest pickup truck would on anyone. I used it for about 5 years and probably reinstalled it about 20 times or more. No exaggeration at all there.

3) Windows* has been so anal in the past, blocking me out from what I want to do. It also has a lot of stupid animations and sounds that can be turned off but then there are frickin' horrific dialogue boxes for things from Windows update to plug n play. I know I frickin' plugged the device in, so why can it not shutup and let me use it?

4) I can completely customize it the way I want from the software I use to how that software looks and acts. I never wrote a batch script my whole life, whereas I have written quite a few bash scripts because they are easy to write and very helpful.

5) Windows* is slow. Windows loses to GNOME and about everything else because in the startup it decides to load about every frickin' program they think you want into RAM such as MS Movie Maker and Media Player. That's why things in Windows don't have an initial load time, since they were loaded at sign-in. I'd personally would rather use my damn computer than wait for programs I never use to load(such as MS movie maker).

6) Mac isn't great either. I've said much about Windows, since it was what I used. However, Mac is also restricting.

7) Windows* is insecure. No matter how much you try to fight it, not having permissions and leaving bugs open for days, weeks, and even months does not create a secure environment. IPtables even loads with the kernel since I have security enabled in _the system kernel_. Something seems so much better about that... wonder what it is....

8) Linux is free. I would rather not depend on a company like MS in which I have to buy or get warez of a ton of third party programs in order to make it do what I want. Yeah, Linux is basically all third-party, but it's really the open-source community and the programs cost me _nothing_.

9) Linux hasn't ruined things for me. One night I was going to relax and watch some Onegai Twins after some martial arts training in my yard for about an hour (think it was nunchuku at the time) and Windows decided to get thouroughly b0rked. I don't remember exactly why, but it doesn't need much of a reason, does it? I spent 4 hours doing the reinstall with all the drivers and programs I had to put in. Bleh.

10) Windows* has shit for a command line. I love the Linux command line because it's useful and you can actually do anything from it and fix problems. With Windows you can take the silver rod of reinstallation in your ass and that's about it if it gets b0rked.

11) Linux hasn't given me a bunch of frickin' problems. Maybe I had a time setting something up in the past, but it's not like it's major like when Windows decides to go down. I've lost so much data due to Windows getting b0rked. One time, I had a power outage and the computer shutoff. Windows did nothing after scan disk. Had to reinstall _again_.

12) Linux runs smoothly and feels nice to use. For some reason, I feel very laid back when using Linux. Probably because I see my brother (who uses XP for the time being) getting all this adware which he can't remove (he tried about everything including manual deletion) and he even got the sasser worm, but I sit here getting nothing because of the security of the UNIX filesystem hierarchy.

In the end the main reason is that Windows has given me no reasons to like it, only reasons to hate it and Linux has given me only reasons to like it. Sure there have been some downs, but nothing major. I also like the feel of Linux a lot better. Fast, smooth, comfortable. To sum Linux's feeling up in three words.

Until next time. 8)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mirrorball
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 24 Apr 2003
Posts: 235
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't it cool that there are thousands of programmers out there writing software anyone can install for free and download its source code? And I don't approve of Microsoft's business practices. In fact I boycott several companies besides Microsoft. I would hate myself if I were supporting those greedy bastards somehow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Riftwing
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 06 Oct 2002
Posts: 293

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sgaap wrote:
The fact that games are made for windows doesnt make it superior to linux (or other OS's), games that have been ported well run almost everytime just as fast or faster on linux
Winex only runs a handfull of direct3d games (most games that run with winex are opengl games --> which work fine with wine), basically direct3d sucks and I never buy games that have to be emulated

Actually, wrong. More gaming support for one OS would make it a better area for that OS. Also many games do not run as fast as windows such as ut2004 because they didn't spend as much time optimizing opengl as they did with directx. I never said Linux wasn't a good platform for developing games but Windows has more games so it's obviously a better OS for games.
_________________
Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun. - Ash, Army of Darkness
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sqeaky
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

when I totally dropped windows xp I gained about 15 fps in ut2003 and from what I understand ut2004 is just enhancements and bugfixes for 2003.

oh yeah and for game trials there is no registry to hide crap in, I can see what files a games changes and reset game trials( I have a full time job and frequently work overtime, so plz don't be mad at me for wanting to get atleast a few play hours in on a game demo) if I still not sure I want to buy it, or at a minimum I can remove it however I cannot remove all the reg keys that have been hidden from me to make my system less capable of doing what i want.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sqeaky
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh yeah and capitalism rocks, its breeds competition which creates innovation. like the athlon 64(YAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY). I can of 2 technological innovations(good or bad) for every one from a socialist nation.

*edit*
I think windows is much better for the average gamer


Last edited by Sqeaky on Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldan
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Posts: 137
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well, DUH.
Of course it's cool. But I also think there are some valuable things I can do with Linux I can't do with Windows (and vice-versa). Ditto FreeBSD

--Oldan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
placeholder
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sqeaky wrote:
when I totally dropped windows xp I gained about 15 fps in ut2003 and from what I understand ut2004 is just enhancements and bugfixes for 2003.


I also gained much better speed in games with them looking better as well. Just because Windows has more games, doesn't mean it's better suited to play the games over Linux. Linux uses RAM better and more wisely.

However, UT2004 is a lot more than patches and bug fixes for UT2003. Of course, UT2003 was _supposed_ to have vehicles but they didn't get around to that. On the other hand, UT2004 has over 100 levels of gameplay and is all around awesome. It's 5.2gb (I tar.bz2'd it down to 2.2gb to get it on a DVD along with Quake3) when installed (at least in Linux) and has a lot more things than UT2003 did.

If it is just patches and bug fixes then they did a damn good job at making a whole new experience. 8)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sqeaky
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You cn get more levels by playing on new servers and there was a way to get vehicle support in ut2003, you needed to know what you where doing and do it from the ut2003 console. ut2004 was originally going to be just another patch. but it did get a little bit out of hand which is why it is now not compatible with ut2003.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Riftwing
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 06 Oct 2002
Posts: 293

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Somehow this has magically turned into a UT2003/2004 thread...
_________________
Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun. - Ash, Army of Darkness
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
placeholder
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2500

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riftwing wrote:
Somehow this has magically turned into a UT2003/2004 thread...


Eh, sorry about that. I didn't think it would get carried on.

PS: I know of the total conversion mods and such for UT2003 and once played in an awesome arena made by someone but lost that with a reinstallation of Windows XP. :cry:

Well anyway... back on topic. I really don't know of anyone who uses Linux to be cool. Sure, that might be an effect of Linux usage but I don't think people use it for that effect. :roll:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stonent
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 1138
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wanted to use Linux to be cool, that wore off quickly as I found RH 6 kinda *meh*.
Then came Mandrake 8 better but still nothing excited me about it.

Then I found Freesco and later ClarkConnect and finally found a niche in my house for it, but still my main system. Knoppix comes along and finally I'm starting to see how useful it can be. Then I get a job which has me setting up Linux servers and simulation equipment. Now I'm seriously considering making a switch back. (Though it was strictly RH 6.2 there)

Finally Gentoo finds its way into my laptop and suddenly, "Hey I don't have to choose out of a list of 9 million packages (in which I have no idea of their use) during the install!" and "Wow, my system will always have the latest updates without waiting forever for updates!"

That was all it took. The CFLAGS are just a bonus.
_________________
Inspiron 4100 & Sun UltraAXe
Portage on Solaris|Dell Laptop Hacks
The way you feel about organized religion is the same way I feel about organized socialism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nlightn
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:04 am    Post subject: Tip: Styles can be applied quickly to selected text. Reply with quote

t_2199 wrote:
I never used a Firewall neither a Anti-Virus prog the only thing I did was turning on the automatic update function. I never had any problems with secruity.


If you never had a firewall or anti-virus program, how do you know you've never had a security problem? I'm not asking this facetiously; how would you know? I have had friends and family (some of them quite experienced in using PCs) who have had a virus/trojan on their system and they didn't even know it, even with Norton running in the background.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
superjaded
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 726

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heh, when I initially tried Linux out (around eight years ago), I really had nobody to "act cool" around. I didn't really get into forums like I do these days to say the least.

So, no, I don't really use Linux "to be cool." I don't think anyone tries out linux "to be cool." They may try it because of all the hype it gets these days, but it's not very comparable to someone doing something in highschool to conform what the "cool kids" believe to be cool.

I look at it a different way, as far as whether or not I "need" Linux. Windows doesn't give me anything Linux doesn't do better (commercial/closed stuff nonwithstanding), so I use Linux.

hjlane3 wrote:
Nautilus' built in windows share browsing work beatifully for me.


If you compiled gnome-vfs with the "samba" USE flag enabled, it automatically pulled in samba3.

Heh, I don't think that argument is really valid, though, considering Windows comes with SMB client/server support BUNDLED. The only difference is that you have to install it by hand in gentoo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15  Next
Page 1 of 15

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum