View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jlmiller n00b
Joined: 23 Sep 2002 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:05 am Post subject: emerge sendmail or postfix block |
|
|
I seem to be unable to emerge sendmail or postfix and as I'm still kind of new to the whole portage system I'd appreciate any help. I understand that it's blocking it due to a conflict, but how do I work around that? Here's the command and output.
# emerge --pretend sendmail
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] net-dns/hesiod-3.0.2 to /
[blocks B ] net-mail/ssmtp ("virtual/mta" from pkg net-mail/sendmail-8.12.6)
[ebuild N ] net-mail/sendmail-8.12.6 to /
Same error for postfix, just substitue appropriate names.
Thanks,
jlmiller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2002 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
ssmtp is providing the "virtual/mta" service, which the other things you want to emerge would also like to provide, so you have to get rid of ssmtp first: _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jlmiller n00b
Joined: 23 Sep 2002 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2002 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do I dare to ask what ssmtp is and if I'll need it for the successful operation of postfix? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2002 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jlmiller wrote: | Do I dare to ask what ssmtp is and if I'll need it for the successful operation of postfix? |
It's a stripped-down, send-only sendmail semi-replacement. You will not need it for the successful operation of postfix. In fact, it will interfere with the successful operation of postfix, which is why Portage is complaining. _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jlmiller n00b
Joined: 23 Sep 2002 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2002 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for all your help, again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|