| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SlashBeast
Moderator
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 2540
Location: Zduńska Wola, Poland.
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:48 am Post subject: |
 |
|
6600 lepsze od 7600GS?
_________________
github |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Może to magia pamięci DDR2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SlashBeast
Moderator
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 2540
Location: Zduńska Wola, Poland.
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nie wydaje mi się by glxgears Był miarodajny. Kiedyś testowałem pod agp 4x karty GF2 mx400 i GF4 mx440, wyszlo tam, ze GF2 ma +40 FPSów więcej w glxgears niż GF4. Ciekawe, prawda?
_________________
github |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
unK
l33t
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 755
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GF4 mx to nie GF4 tylko właśnie bardzo podobny syf do GF2 mx, więc nic dziwnego ;p
| Code: | 40179 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8035.721 FPS
40824 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8164.697 FPS
40801 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8160.094 FPS
40764 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8152.744 FPS
40418 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8083.438 FPS
40787 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8157.283 FPS |
GF 6800LE
_________________
ncmpcpp - an ncurses mpd client, inspired by ncmpc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
frugo3000
n00b
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Polska, Szczecin
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
frugo3000@b4t3ry ~ $ glxgears
66115 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13222.921 FPS
70220 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14043.888 FPS
71192 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14238.324 FPS
69648 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13929.598 FPS
68303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13660.506 FPS
71184 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14236.795 FPS
70714 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14142.746 FPS
66844 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13368.695 FPS
71013 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14202.582 FPS
71059 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14211.800 FPS
|
a64 x2 3600+@2.85GHz + 7900GS  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomborek
n00b
Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 15
Location: Warsaw, Poland
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wlasnie zmienilem starego Radeona 9200SE AGP na Geforce 7300gt, 256MB GDDR3 AGP. zwykle emerge nvidia-drivers + zmiana xorg.conf z "radeon" na "nvidia" + openselect ... i mamy:
| Code: | tomborek ~ # glxgears
30364 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6072.766 FPS
31327 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6265.238 FPS
31369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6273.622 FPS
31328 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6265.489 FPS |
wczesniej (daaawno temu, jak dzialaly mi jeszcze oryginalne stery ATI pod linuksem, czyli 22 lutego 2005) bylo:
| Code: | bash-2.05b$ glxgears
5363 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1072.600 FPS
5695 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1139.000 FPS
5694 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1138.800 FPS
5694 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1138.800 FPS |
na opensource'owych sterach "radeon" bylo odpowiednio: ok.500 frames i 250-260FPS
Procek AthlonXP 2000+, 768MB ram, plyta MSI KT4Ultra
_________________
nothin' to declare... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 489 frames in 5.0 seconds = 97.763 FPS
488 frames in 5.0 seconds = 97.596 FPS
490 frames in 5.0 seconds = 97.909 FPS
489 frames in 5.0 seconds = 97.704 FPS
491 frames in 5.0 seconds = 98.052 FPS
488 frames in 5.0 seconds = 97.533 FPS |
Ati Xpress 200M na rozdzielczości 1280x800, fullscreen.
_________________
powered by power plant |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yatmai
Veteran
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 1501
Location: Kraków
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Zastanawiałem się czemu nagle CS mi zaczął strasznie mulić kompa,
wpadam tutaj, ktoś odgrzebał temat, to myślę sobie, też się dopiszę. Glxgears i.... freeze systemu.
Dzięki głupiemu contestowi wyszło czemu sobie pociupać nie mogłem  Także dzięki za wygrzebanie, no i moje wyniki dla Radeona 9600 i najnowszych sterów Ati:
| Code: | 8007 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1601.228 FPS
8098 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1619.520 FPS
8100 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1619.911 FPS
8102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1620.301 FPS
|
_________________
Desktop: [Ath64 X2 2GB DDR2 GF76GT] [amd64] [2.6.29-gentoo] [nVidia] [KDE 3.5.10]
Lapek: [HP nc6000] [i686] [2.6.29-ARCH] [ati-open] [KDE 3.5.10] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ufoman
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 80
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Też 9600, ale desktopowy i kręcony co nieco:
| Code: | 10859 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2171.652 FPS
11559 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2311.680 FPS
11584 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2316.713 FPS
11604 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2320.751 FPS
11745 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2348.992 FPS |
_________________
Registered Linux User #417638
amd64 no-multilib
desktop: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3 v2.0, Athlon II X2 250 @3,6GHz, 4GB DDR2 800, Radeon HD 4850, Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 320GB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wprawdzie na lapku mam ubuntu  ale na 8400gs jest:
| Code: |
23685 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4736.821 FPS
23776 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4755.012 FPS
23844 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4768.738 FPS
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dylon
Guru
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 317
Location: Gliwice
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cel 2,53GHz + gf7100 zintegrowany na pl.gl 
| Code: | 6650 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1329.876 FPS
6993 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1398.535 FPS
7002 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1400.342 FPS |
katastrofa (moj stary fx5200 mial ok 1600fps)
_________________
Maciej Dylski |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vermaden
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | sys: Solaris SXCE build 85 / SXDE 1/08
cpu: Q6600 @ 2925 MHz [ 9 x 325 / PCIE: 120 ]
gfx: Intel X3000 @ G965 |
| Code: | bash-3.2$ /usr/X11/demo/glxgears
9167 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1833.249 FPS
9162 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1832.238 FPS
9169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1833.672 FPS
9170 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1833.838 FPS
9161 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1832.082 FPS |
Ubuntu 7.10 wyciagnelo ~1770 FPS
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rzecz dziwna (względem poprzedniego wskazania):
| Code: | fgl_glxgears
868 frames in 5.0 seconds = 173.600 FPS
878 frames in 5.0 seconds = 175.600 FPS
875 frames in 5.0 seconds = 175.000 FPS
glxgears
929 frames in 5.0 seconds = 185.776 FPS
928 frames in 5.0 seconds = 185.484 FPS
929 frames in 5.0 seconds = 185.768 FPS |
Ta sama karta X200M, ten sam xorg.conf,
| Code: | uname -r
2.6.25-tuxonice-r6-bno
fglrxinfo
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: ATI Radeon Xpress Series
OpenGL version string: 2.1.7659 Release |
_________________
powered by power plant |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nUmer_inaczej
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 119
Location: Bydgoszcz
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4600 @ 2.40GHz + GeFORCE 8800 GS 1600x1200
| Code: | 28704 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5740.086 FPS
5910 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1181.763 FPS
6021 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1204.172 FPS
5957 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1191.149 FPS
5981 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1196.046 FPS
5978 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1195.449 FPS
6070 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1213.874 FPS
6040 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1207.930 FPS
6074 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1214.791 FPS
6042 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1208.265 FPS
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lucjusz
n00b
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 19509 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3897.949 FPS
19563 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3912.490 FPS
19490 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3895.784 FPS
19740 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3947.939 FPS
19379 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3875.691 FPS
19511 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3902.115 FPS
19707 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3935.966 FPS
19366 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3873.000 FPS
19575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3912.705 FPS
19600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3919.990 FPS |
IFL90: GeForce 8600M GT, driver 173.14.09, 2.6.25-gentoo-r5, x86_64 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 20033 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4006.473 FPS
20087 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4017.250 FPS
20094 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4018.729 FPS |
| Code: | | 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 8800 GT (rev a2) |
Fullscreen 1280x1024.
_________________
powered by power plant |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polskie forum (Polish) 
