Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
experiences with xorg-x11-6.7.0
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17, 18  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fideli
n00b
n00b


Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 61
Location: mississauga

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

anyone else getting this error? i'm trying to install r1 but i keep getting this error:

Code:

make[3]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/lib/dps'
checking ../../config/pswrap/pswrap over in ../../config/pswrap first...
make[4]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/config/pswrap'
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic -Wno-return-type -w     -I../.. -I../../exports/include   -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L                  -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE                          -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE                              -D_GNU_SOURCE                            -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DXENVIRONMENT  -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"'   -c -o main.o main.c
bison -y -d pswparser.y
conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
mv -f y.tab.c pswparser.c
+ mv -f y.tab.h pswparser.h
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic -Wno-return-type -w     -I../.. -I../../exports/include   -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L                  -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE                          -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE                              -D_GNU_SOURCE                            -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DXENVIRONMENT  -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"'   -c -o pswparser.o pswparser.c
flex -l  -t lexer.l > lexer.c
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -pedantic -Wno-return-type -w     -I../.. -I../../exports/include   -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L                  -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE                          -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE                              -D_GNU_SOURCE                            -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DXENVIRONMENT  -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"'   -c -o lexer.o lexer.c
<stdout>: In function `yylex':
<stdout>:1199: error: `yy_prev_more_offset' undeclared (first use in this function)
<stdout>:1199: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
<stdout>:1199: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[4]: *** [lexer.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/config/pswrap'
make[3]: *** [../../config/pswrap/pswrap] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/lib/dps'
make[2]: *** [includes] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/lib'
make[1]: *** [includes] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc'
make: *** [World] Error 2

!!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 702, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


it happens 10 minutes into the install. i removed cflags and still the same error.
_________________
-\ fideli /-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
veezi
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 10 Nov 2003
Posts: 226

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That '/etc/portage/package.keywords' is really nice .. I didn't know about it.

Two questions though:
1. What's the difference between using 'package.keywords' and 'package.unmask' to unmask a build?
2. Is there something similar to override virtuals?

Thanks,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maedhros
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 5511
Location: Durham, UK

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vzeidat wrote:
That '/etc/portage/package.keywords' is really nice .. I didn't know about it.

Two questions though:
1. What's the difference between using 'package.keywords' and 'package.unmask' to unmask a build?

You should use package.unmask if the particular package has been masked in package.mask, not if it's been masked becuase it doesn't have the right keywords.

vzeidat wrote:
2. Is there something similar to override virtuals?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean here! There are threads with much more detail than this around the place though, so I'm going to stop hijacking the thread now :wink:
_________________
No-one's more important than the earthworm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aeronova
n00b
n00b


Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:34 pm    Post subject: ati problem... Reply with quote

I have a dri-glx-ati related problem.
I followed the migration howto to use xorg instead of xfree.
I installed latest ati-drivers as well, but I cannot start X.
Belows are the error message.
I searched this forum to get some idea, but I can't.
Hope for your advise. Thanks.

Code:

hostname: Host name lookup failure

Release Date: 18 December 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.4-rc1-mm1 i686 [ELF]
Current Operating System: Linux spike 2.6.4-rc1-mm1 #1 Sun Feb 29 22:11:42 UTC 2004 i686
Build Date: 17 June 2004
   Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org
   to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
   (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
   (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Jun 17 18:26:38 2004
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"

Using vt 7
dlopen: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.so: undefined symbol: __glXActiveScreens
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.so
(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (loader failed, 7)
dlopen: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so: undefined symbol: __glDDXExtensionInfo
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so
(EE) Failed to load module "glx" (loader failed, 7)
dlopen: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so: undefined symbol: ATIPreInit
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
(EE) Failed to load module "ati" (loader failed, 7)
(EE) No drivers available.

Fatal server error:
no screens found

Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
    at http://wiki.X.Org
 for help.
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.

XIO:  fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
      after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aeronova
n00b
n00b


Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 4:14 pm    Post subject: I solved my problem! Reply with quote

I just re-emerged again xorg-x11 without "pie" and "hardened" option, and
I works fine.
Thanks guys anyway. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
semaphore
n00b
n00b


Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 6
Location: Blacksburg,VA

PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LouTheBlueGuru wrote:
Except for the stupid grey startup screen, it works just fine on both my x86 and a64. I do wish someone would try to figure out how to get rid of the nonfunctional grey startup screen!

I got rid of the checkered grey startup background by editing my /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf file.

Add the -br flag to the X command in gdm.conf :
Code:
command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nick125
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Apr 2004
Posts: 19

PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

works nice for me. I cannot complain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
galah
n00b
n00b


Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2004 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Happy to say that this computer has never run xfree. The one time I emerged xorg it worked splendidly and immediately with no configuration necessary. :o

Yay!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fuqnbastard
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems Xorg is a bit more picky when it comes to valid config files, fixed that and now it works fine!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shift
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 21 Feb 2004
Posts: 146
Location: Vancouver, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

6.7.0-r1 seems to start up much faster. Finally got rid of that long delay.
_________________
Wallpapers:
Gentoo Space
Gentoo Infinity
Gentoo Matrix
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HezniK
n00b
n00b


Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Posts: 61
Location: Szczecin, Poland

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi

Just wanted to say that with xorg i get better performance with glx (meaning xorg-x11 vs. x11 opengl interface). In Quake2 i always had a problem with a mouse, that was only happening with using 3d acceleration (glx), so i discovered that when i switch to x11 opengl interface (from nvidia interface) mouse will work properly _but_ a performance will degrade seriously and a game loses it's smoothness, so it's like playing with constant lag (frags: me 0, friends: 100). GLXgears also shows performance degradation. Anyway with xorg-x11 interface it all plays so smoothly as nvidia, and mouse is working, gotta shot those bastards ! (mean: friends).
btw. GLXgears didn't show any performance raises.

bye
_________________
------------------------------
Autor tego postu zaprzecza jakoby aktywnie dzialal w ruchu anarchistycznym.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twiggy794
Guru
Guru


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 321
Location: Hershey, PA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm...I try emerge xorg-x11 but it tells me it can't find any masked ebuilds. I ls /usr/portage/x11-base/xorg-x11 and I see 2 ebuilds for xorg-x11. I synced my portage tree just this morning. Is there a catch to emerging xorg?

Also, what's the equivalent xf86config command for Xorg? And where are the config files stored in relation? I gotta whacky resolution that I need (1280x800) :oP

Thanks all
_________________
"Subtraction: Addition's tricky pal." --David Letterman
http://ferg.ath.cx == teh bL0g
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maedhros
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 5511
Location: Durham, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twiggy794 wrote:
Hmmm...I try emerge xorg-x11 but it tells me it can't find any masked ebuilds. I ls /usr/portage/x11-base/xorg-x11 and I see 2 ebuilds for xorg-x11. I synced my portage tree just this morning. Is there a catch to emerging xorg?

It's still masked as unstable, so if you want it, put this in your /etc/portage/package.keywords (you may need to create the file and the directory):
Code:
x11-base/xorg-x11   ~x86


Twiggy794 wrote:
Also, what's the equivalent xf86config command for Xorg? And where are the config files stored in relation? I gotta whacky resolution that I need (1280x800) :oP

I think the equivalent command it xorgconfig, but you may want to check that. The config files are in the same place, it's just called xorg.conf instead of XF86Config. The syntax inside the file is the same as well, you can just use your old file. Xorg looks for /etc/X11/XF86Config if it can't find /etc/X11/xorg.conf so you don't even need to move it! (It's probably a good idea though...)
_________________
No-one's more important than the earthworm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twiggy794
Guru
Guru


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 321
Location: Hershey, PA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got GNOME already emerged and compiled, then I un-emerged XFree so I could switch to Xorg. Will I need to re-compile GNOME? Please say no :D
_________________
"Subtraction: Addition's tricky pal." --David Letterman
http://ferg.ath.cx == teh bL0g
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maedhros
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 5511
Location: Durham, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twiggy794 wrote:
I've got GNOME already emerged and compiled, then I un-emerged XFree so I could switch to Xorg. Will I need to re-compile GNOME? Please say no :D

Nope, you won't need to. :D To all intents and purposes at the moment, it's just the same as if you upgraded XFree86.
_________________
No-one's more important than the earthworm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
StifflerStealth
l33t
l33t


Joined: 03 Jul 2002
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I have not posted in a long, long time.

Anyways, I would like to say that I removed everything XFree86 and installed xorg. I compiled everything against Linux-headers 2.6.6 and it all works flawlessly. I am using the nvidia-kernel 4496 and the nvidia-glx 4496. I am using the nvidia glx (to clarify: I did not do a opengl-update xorg) and I get a little over 3600 fps using GLX gears with my regular user, which is more than I got with XFree, so I guess everything worked out fine. I even had xfs going at the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeekGeek
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Location: Sol 3

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 2:49 pm    Post subject: emerge error building xorg 6.7.0-r1 Reply with quote

I'm getting the same error, but I haven't had time to research it yet. If I find anything useful, I'll post it. I'm attempting to emerge xorg 6.7.0-r1 on a fresh Gentoo install (i.e., console only, no X of any kind) and the xorg build bombs after about ten minutes. I have the following in my CFLAGS:

Code:

-fomit-frame-pointer -fstack-protector -march=pentium4 -O2


fideli wrote:
anyone else getting this error? i'm trying to install r1 but i keep getting this error:

Code:

-- redacted --

<stdout>: In function `yylex':
<stdout>:1199: error: `yy_prev_more_offset' undeclared (first use in this function)
<stdout>:1199: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
<stdout>:1199: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[4]: *** [lexer.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/config/pswrap'
make[3]: *** [../../config/pswrap/pswrap] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/lib/dps'
make[2]: *** [includes] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc/lib'
make[1]: *** [includes] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1/work/xc'
make: *** [World] Error 2

!!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r1 failed.

-- redacted --


_________________
DeekGeek
How can the eyes be the Windows of the soul when they never blue screen?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flandry
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 52
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After emerging X.org, i get the following message when i run startx: Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/Speedo/, removing from list.
This same message is repeated five time for various fonts. I looked through the log file and couldn't find any other errors besides this one, and it looked like it had successfully loaded fonts (if i read the log right). Just before crashing out, the monitor resyncs and and i think i see a mouse cursor. So i think i'm close: what do i do?

The fonts for which the message is repeated is CID, type1, and a local directory under /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Klementas
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Posts: 47
Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 3:24 pm    Post subject: xorg is a buggy piece of crap Reply with quote

I've had nothing but problems with xorg since emerging it. I've *never* had any problems with xfree. Using xorg, after I log in the screen just goes blank sometimes and I have to key ctrl-alt-F7 to get it back. I also just came home and tried to log in, but xorg decided to not take any keyboard input at all!!! When I checked my /var/log/messages, it was filled with thousands of lines of garbage. I can also no longer halt or reboot my machine in X mode, it just locks up. I have to ctrl-alt-F<> to a different terminal before I can reboot or halt my box. All in all, a very bad program.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Klementas
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Posts: 47
Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 3:34 pm    Post subject: plus configure and xterm problems Reply with quote

I forgot to mention the configure doesn't work right. If you use X -configure, it doesn't setup the keyboard at all. I had to do a *lot* of tweaking of the config file just to get it to work. Also, my xterm no longer worked the way it did under xfree. I could no longer use alt-1, alt-2, etc. in irssi, there was no scrollbar, the backspace key no longer worked. I had to set all that up in my .Xdefaults. I don't understand the decision to change the xterm defaults, but it's much worse than under xfree. I'll be spending the next few hours putting xfree back on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
StifflerStealth
l33t
l33t


Joined: 03 Jul 2002
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:15 pm    Post subject: Re: plus configure and xterm problems Reply with quote

Klementas wrote:
I forgot to mention the configure doesn't work right. If you use X -configure, it doesn't setup the keyboard at all.
To configure X.org use the following command:
Code:
# Xorg -configure
It took less than a second, but I had a perfectly good config file. I had to add my specific keyboard, but the defaults worked just fine. It went so quick that I thought it failed at first.

DeekGeek wrote:
I'm getting the same error, but I haven't had time to research it yet. If I find anything useful, I'll post it. I'm attempting to emerge xorg 6.7.0-r1 on a fresh Gentoo install (i.e., console only, no X of any kind) and the xorg build bombs after about ten minutes. I have the following in my CFLAGS:

Code:
-fomit-frame-pointer -fstack-protector -march=pentium4 -O2
I use to have "-fomit-frame-pointer" in my CFLAGS, butI removed it because I was having a lot errors with it. Some packages just would not compile while others would. This is what I have for CFLAGS:
Code:
-march=pentium4 -O3 -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -fprefetch-loop-arrays
-funroll-loops -ffast-math -pipe
I hope this helps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Klementas
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Posts: 47
Location: Missouri

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

X -configure or Xorg -configure is the same thing on my box. And they both produce a config file that doesn't work, with the keyboard or anything else.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepustule
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 210
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:41 pm    Post subject: libX11.so.6 missing Reply with quote

Well, so far xorg works nicely - with full NVidia drivers. Unreal Tournament 2004 is faster and smoother than it ever is on Windows,

BUT

Neither evolution or mozilla will load any more. libX11.so.6 is missing.

ouch!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neotyk
n00b
n00b


Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Location: Mind?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:05 pm    Post subject: not too good Reply with quote

I've been useing it for a while it was OK,
so I've emerged new release -r1, and problems started:
see my post describing it: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=189857

Hubert.
_________________
yes, yes, no, no
[img:5b0d5ae295]http://jobble.uaznia.net/images/antypixel/Jobblemap.png[/img:5b0d5ae295]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
superjaded
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 726

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:45 pm    Post subject: Re: libX11.so.6 missing Reply with quote

thepustule wrote:
Neither evolution or mozilla will load any more. libX11.so.6 is missing.


I don't remember having to recompile anything for broken libraries, but it's worth a shot. Have you run revdep-rebuild from gentoolkit yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 16 of 18

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum