View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dciwalsh n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Posts: 8 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2002 9:13 pm Post subject: Problems with Natsemi module & Athlon CPU |
|
|
Hi,
I've been installing Gentoo 1.2 on my computer the last few days
with mixed results. My computer has an Athlon XP 1800+,
1 Gb DDR RAM, an ATI-Radeon8500DV graphics card and a
Netgear FA311 network card.
So I got Gentoo running, and the network connection up using the
natsemi module. However when I tried to get the Desktop going,
"emerge kde" exit exited with the error:
checking for mcopidl ... not found. Econf failed, Line 9, Exit code 1.
Then I noticed that when compiling my kernel I had left the
CPU type set to Pentium III. I thought this might be the root of the
problem so I set the CPU type (in make menuconfig) to Athlon.
Recompiled, mounted /boot, and copied bzImage to /boot.
Now however the network module "natsemi" won't load.
"make modules_install" gives the following error.
/lib/modules/2.4.19-gentoo-r5/kernel/drivers/net/natsemi.o:
unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy
:insmod natsemi failed.
Just to check that I didn't change anything else I reset the
kernel CPU settings to "pentium III", and the network connection
worked again.
Any ideas on either problem (network, kde)??
Thanks
-Danny |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2002 9:39 pm Post subject: Re: Problems with Natsemi module & Athlon CPU |
|
|
dciwalsh wrote: | checking for mcopidl ... not found. Econf failed, Line 9, Exit code 1. |
I don't use KDE, but searching the forums for 'mcopidl' found a bunch of threads about arts. Can you try emerging arts manually first, and see if that fixes your error?
Quote: | /lib/modules/2.4.19-gentoo-r5/kernel/drivers/net/natsemi.o:
unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy
:insmod natsemi failed. |
This one sounds familiar...is it the same issue as in here? I think the workaround was to compile as a P3 like you did, but this might help explain things. I used "_mmx_memcpy" as my search term to find this. _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sputnik1969 Guru
Joined: 08 Aug 2002 Posts: 401 Location: Berlin / Germany
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2002 9:49 pm Post subject: Re: Problems with Natsemi module & Athlon CPU |
|
|
dciwalsh wrote: |
Recompiled, mounted /boot, and copied bzImage to /boot.
Now however the network module "natsemi" won't load.
"make modules_install" gives the following error.
/lib/modules/2.4.19-gentoo-r5/kernel/drivers/net/natsemi.o:
unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy
:insmod natsemi failed.
|
I think it is a dependency-problem...
Did you make again a "make modules" before "make modules_install" and after "make bzimage" ????
The correct order should be:
Change CPU-Type to Athlon,
make dep && make bzImage && make modules && make modules_install
Then copy bzImage to /boot
I hope this will solve your problem... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dciwalsh n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Posts: 8 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2002 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So it seems like the fix for the network problem is
to compile the kernel as a Pentium III.
Am I right in thinking this won't cause any other
problems?
Re. Kde. I did do "make modules" before
"make modules_install".
I'll try emerging arts first, although I don't think it
complained about it. After quitting with an error
when I ran "emerge kde". If I run it again
(emerge kde) the initial output says...
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: qtver-from-kdever command not found
reeet-qt: command not found
set-kdedir: command not found
Then it seems to run until it quits with the econf error.
Are these "command not found"s something to worry
about? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dciwalsh n00b
Joined: 01 Sep 2002 Posts: 8 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2002 9:37 pm Post subject: kde not installing: mcopidl error |
|
|
I just got kde to install by:
emerge alsa
emerge arts
emerge kde |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2002 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dciwalsh wrote: | So it seems like the fix for the network problem is to compile the kernel as a Pentium III. |
That's my understanding, for now. I can understand sputnik1969's intuition, but I think it crashed to earth in this situation. It looks like a dependency problem, but I think it's really a driver bug.
Quote: | Am I right in thinking this won't cause any other problems? |
I looked into this a while back...the only thing I could find that was Athlon-specific was a specialized MMX implementation of a couple of core memory manager routines. You will experience a performance hit of an unknown (probably not very significant) amount, but that should be the only difference. _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|