| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Locke355
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 21 May 2002
Posts: 98
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
runs fine.. i do get that error that exit error that means nothing.. but then when i exit out.. i have no benchmark files. Worked fine in windows.
Help? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blueworm
l33t
Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 962
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2172 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
20.091440 / 56.899609 / 155.410110 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 56.190502
| crazycat wrote: | | It is strange , i get even more score than a guy with a same cpu but fx5900 instead. |
I upgraded from a GF4 Ti 4200. The difference is more noticable at higher reslolutions and when using AA and AF.
A7N8X, k7 3000+, 512Mb Kingston HyperX, FX5900.
linux-2.6.2 vanilla kernel, nvidia driver 5336. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarrenM
l33t
Joined: 25 Apr 2002
Posts: 653
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
2800+@2300Mhz, FX5950
21.899708 / 63.449738 / 165.947556 fps -- Score = 62.027393 rand[1814308868]
This test is running low-res so of course it will be cpu dependant. Run it at >= 1280x960 and you will see a different story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zephyr1256
Apprentice
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 170
Location: Kingsport, TN
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
1.33 Ghz Athlon / GeForce ti 4200 / MSI K7T266 Pro2
7.084349 / 23.268814 / 80.412552 fps -- Score = 23.278854 rand[823438765]
I mention my MB because it's AGP bus is a piece of crap, it only supports 4x AGP and I can only run it at 2x AGP and I have to disable SBA and FW or I get random hard lockups(same with a previous AGP card).
From what I've seen here, my slow CPU probably doesn't help much either.
_________________
The Congress shall have power...To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries; --U.S. Constitution. Article 1, Section 8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ck42
l33t
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 789
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
kernel: 2.6.3-r3-mm
x86 Linux
AMD Duron 1.7@2208
GF3 Ti450 @240/540
M/b: Asus A7V333-X
memory: Corsair XMS 512Mb @ 184Mhz
nvidia driver: 1.0.5336-r1
12.052369 / 32.799828 / 101.396690 fps
Score = 32.810734 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kidacro
n00b
Joined: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 25
Location: Philly
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
geforce 440mx 64mb, p4 2.8ghz, 1gb 800mhz rambus, optimized linux-2.4.22-gentoo-r5 kernel, kde 3.2.0, nvidia 4436 port
bash-2.05b$ cat benchmark.log
16.807957 / 56.091454 / 181.030930 fps -- Score = 55.164387 rand[1814308868] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crazycat
l33t
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 838
Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well , for me is 1024x768 is high-res, I normally play 1024x768 or 1280x1024 for better distanse accurasy with 16bit low details for constant framerate and better visibility. High quality details often distrub finding targets and enabled effects lower the framerates and change mouse sensivity at undesireble times.
But its a personal preference, (also an advantage over the ones with all gfx on). On the other side i never really saw any differences on 1280x1024 w/ or without antialiansing or such stuff like tripple buffering. I think theese are merely marketig features to make people buy new products. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
borkdox
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 123
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1537 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
14.245944 / 40.186298 / 118.294189 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 40.159294
Processor: Athlon XP Tbred-A 1800+
Motherboard: Soltek SL-75FRN2-L
Memory: 512MB DDR PC2700 Apacer, Infineon Chips)
Video Card: MSI Geforce4 Ti 4200 64Mb
Card number: 1
Memory speed: 594.000 MHz
Core speed: 301.500 MHz
What do you people think? 
EDIT:
Forgot the kernel version: 2.6.3-love1
and the nvidia drivers: 53.36 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
perry
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Nov 2002
Posts: 142
Location: Cornfields of Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wedge_ wrote: | | @blackhole: the 3.7.0 drivers are pretty crap in UT2K3/2K4 for me. The 3.2.8 driver should be a lot better. |
No kidding. I just got a 9800 PRO tonight.. Goes along with an AMD 2500+.
3.7 drivers:
14.400753 / 37.499260 / 79.376747 fps -- Score = 37.519161 rand[1219471432]
3.2.8 drivers:
24.775637 / 62.255024 / 172.128845 fps -- Score = 59.419044 rand[1216583569]
Scanning through the thread, that seems to be on par. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hardcore
l33t
Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 626
Location: MSU, MI
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lamer0 wrote: | | thanks for all the replies. Seems ut2k4 is very cpu dependant. Interesting. |
well when you have 12 bots, it is CPU dependant, do a flyby benchmark to single out the video card as the bottleneck. Botmatch's have and always will be CPU dependant (until AI is done by the vid card). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wishkah
Guru
Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 441
Location: de
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nevermind...
Kernel 2.6.3-ck1-em1
nvidia 5336-r1
Results are:
| Code: |
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 1894 MHz
GeForce4 460 Go/AGP/SSE2
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?quickstart=true?numbots=12?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
12.138675 / 37.877949 / 107.159737 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 37.869244
|
_________________
if only I could fill my heart with love... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moled
l33t
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Posts: 635
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lamer0 wrote: | | thanks for all the replies. Seems ut2k4 is very cpu dependant. Interesting. |
yes
start a game
open the console
"stat fps"
watch your framerate
press pause
watch the insane increase in framerate |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viperlin
Veteran
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 1319
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
benchmark crashes with:
| Code: |
center pointXlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
|
i have an nvidia card, the game plays fine. so far there has not been a reason found for this happening, it's in the same place too, after the guy fires the three rockets, pauses just as the person in front flies in the air and crashes before they hit the ground.
however
benchmark.log:
| Code: |
2.770304 / 32.572937 / 118.906845 fps -- Score = 32.551086 rand[1814308868]
|
AMD Athlon XP 2600
Geforce 4 MX 440
Nvidia 4496 drivers
Kernel 2.6.1-r1
Gnome Firefox Gaim, loads of programs running. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hardcore
l33t
Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 626
Location: MSU, MI
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| viperlin wrote: | benchmark crashes with:
| Code: |
center pointXlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
|
i have an nvidia card, the game plays fine. so far there has not been a reason found for this happening, it's in the same place too, after the guy fires the three rockets, pauses just as the person in front flies in the air and crashes before they hit the ground.
however
benchmark.log:
| Code: |
2.770304 / 32.572937 / 118.906845 fps -- Score = 32.551086 rand[1814308868]
|
AMD Athlon XP 2600
Geforce 4 MX 440
Nvidia 4496 drivers
Kernel 2.6.1-r1
Gnome Firefox Gaim, loads of programs running. |
I think someone already mentioned this, but you can safely ignore that message. Read up here about it, http://icculus.org/lgfaq/#launcheveryxig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viperlin
Veteran
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 1319
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hardcore wrote: | | viperlin wrote: | benchmark crashes with:
| Code: |
center pointXlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
|
i have an nvidia card, the game plays fine. so far there has not been a reason found for this happening, it's in the same place too, after the guy fires the three rockets, pauses just as the person in front flies in the air and crashes before they hit the ground.
however
benchmark.log:
| Code: |
2.770304 / 32.572937 / 118.906845 fps -- Score = 32.551086 rand[1814308868]
|
AMD Athlon XP 2600
Geforce 4 MX 440
Nvidia 4496 drivers
Kernel 2.6.1-r1
Gnome Firefox Gaim, loads of programs running. |
I think someone already mentioned this, but you can safely ignore that message. Read up here about it, http://icculus.org/lgfaq/#launcheveryxig. |
they did but that explanation is crap, it just says it's nothing to worry about.
but i now guess that is not causing the benchmark to crash, it is actually where the benchmark ends and that message is just displayed. (so does the benchmark end with a guy in mid-air after 3 rockets?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hardcore
l33t
Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 626
Location: MSU, MI
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| viperlin wrote: | | they did but that explanation is crap |
Well actually its not, because it has nothing to do with the benchmark itself. As the original poster of this thread said, bechmark results are in:
~/.ut2004demo/Benchmark/Results
I think you are assuming that the bechmark results will be displayed after you finish the bechmark (which by the way does end with 3 rockets). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viperlin
Veteran
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 1319
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeh, so it does not explain that the demo ends there and it's not an error exit message 
how were my results.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hardcore
l33t
Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 626
Location: MSU, MI
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha better than mine were:
| Code: | UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1416 MHz
GeForce3/AGP/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
5.311451 / 25.195124 / 77.607903 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 25.197701 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viperlin
Veteran
Joined: 15 Apr 2003
Posts: 1319
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wow you've got one of them AMD Pentiums too..... (benchmark program gave the same style thing a while ago on my dads PC, apart from it said Pentium Athon XP.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elboricua
Apprentice
Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 226
Location: Bronx, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 2394 MHz
GeForce FX 5600/AGP/SSE2
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
14.070617 / 44.226368 / 134.203827 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 44.102165 |
Kind of lower than I expected. P4 2.4 1024 MB of Crucial 2700 DDR ram, 2.6.3-ck1 kernel. nvidia 5336-r1
_________________
Boricua Hasta La Muerte |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eug2k
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Posts: 141
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | bash-2.05b# cd /usr/local/games/ut2004demo/Bench*
bash-2.05b# sh bench*
center pointXlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
bash-2.05b# |
I see the whole benchmark but I get no results |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarrenM
l33t
Joined: 25 Apr 2002
Posts: 653
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The benchmark finishes straight after the guy fires the 3rd rocket. That's normal, it will just stop without any messages. To see your results you have to open the text file .ut2004demo/Benchmark/benchmark.log in your home directory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SPiRiTs
n00b
Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
15.083660 / 46.372326 / 148.349426 fps -- Score = 46.143497 rand[1814308868]
p4 2.4
radeon 9800
kernel 2.6.3 mm2
ati-driver 3.28
with ati-driver 3.70 i have 2x less fps , i use alsa, so i need to use the new openal.so lib to have good fps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
robtm
n00b
Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Location: Fredrikstad, Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
GenuineIntel PentiumPro-class processor @ 1399 MHz
MOBILITY FIREGL T2 Pentium 4 (SSE2)
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
13.770211 / 41.632824 / 121.834846 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 41.546227
|
Dell Inspiron 8600, Pentium M 1.4ghz, 768MB, ATI Radeon 9600 128MB
2.6.2-love1, 3.2.8 ATI drivers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eug2k
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Posts: 141
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DarrenM wrote: | | The benchmark finishes straight after the guy fires the 3rd rocket. That's normal, it will just stop without any messages. To see your results you have to open the text file .ut2004demo/Benchmark/benchmark.log in your home directory. |
There is no benchmark dir in .ut2004demo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gamers & Players
