View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MTer n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 13 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2002 11:31 am Post subject: bootstrap error: groff won´t compile |
|
|
As in the topic title, I am busy with a fresh install of Gentoo 1.1a and encoutered a problem during the bootstrap proces.
After compiling gcc-2.95.3-r5 the bootstrap-script tries to emerge groff-1.17.2-r1, after checking the configure settings it stops and dumps the following output on my screen:
Code: |
.....
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
checking for gpp... no
checking for aCC... no
checking for CC... no
checking for cxx... no
checking for cc++... no
checking for cl... no
checking for KCC... no
checking for RCC... no
checking for xlC_r... no
checking for xlC... no
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking that C++ compiler can compile simple program... no
configure: error: a working C++ compiler is required
!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 1, Exitcode 1
!!! (no error message)
!!! emerge aborting on /usr/portage/sys-apps/groff/groff-1.17.2-r1.ebuild |
But I do have a C++ compiler installed!
Does anybody have an idea how to solve this problem? Is this a bug, or is it me doing something wrong? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rob3rt n00b
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 12 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2002 10:31 am Post subject: new snapshot |
|
|
hey this happen to me too. I tried Gentoo 1.1a. But I found solution somewhere here around. I think i downloaded new snapshot and everything went ok. _________________ Smol Robert
robert.smol<at>stereoit.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MTer n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 13 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2002 4:08 pm Post subject: Re: new snapshot |
|
|
Hey Rob3rt,
Could you please tell me where to find this new snapshot? I already tried to use the latest stage1-x86-1.1a.tbz2 tarball from gentoo´s ibiblio server, this didn't solve the problem
thanks in advance, Arnold _________________ If you try to fail, and succeed. Which one have you done? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MTer n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 13 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2002 5:59 pm Post subject: problem solved? |
|
|
Apparently this is a bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
Hope this one is solved quickly, otherwise I can't use Gentoo for some time _________________ If you try to fail, and succeed. Which one have you done? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rob3rt n00b
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 12 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 6:40 pm Post subject: reopened |
|
|
if U look at the status of that BUG U'll see it is REOPENED. So I can not help you, sorry. When this happened to me, it was fixed in like one day, so be patient and go to the pub, see your girlfriend and other stuff I did the same
_________________ Smol Robert
robert.smol<at>stereoit.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Damek n00b
Joined: 31 May 2002 Posts: 4 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2002 9:33 pm Post subject: This bug has copped up again... |
|
|
Trying to bootstrap myself into Gentoo using the 1.2 x86 iso, and when it got to groff, it complained about no C++ compiler. So, I searched the forums and found this thread and the bugzilla entry... Just thought I'd drop in and let people know this is broken again, and I've gone and reopened the bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1805
Here's hoping it gets fixed soon so's I can try out Gentoo; it sounds cool! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
teeqemm Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2002 1:17 pm Post subject: Re: This bug has copped up again... |
|
|
I got groff to compile by using a stage2-image (which includes a g++ executable) and then doing a 'emerge rsync' before bootstrapping. during bootstrap gcc gets rebuild while g++ remains untouched (I guess that's the bug: the bootstrap process does not build g++). i'm still surprised that we need g++ at all to bootstrap... Thanks to groff!
have a nice day!
Thomas |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|