View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PrakashP Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 1249 Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, just to be sure, do you have a SiI3112A or without the A? I have the A version. Perhaps that is the major problem. I also have to uncomment an error warning in siimage.c otherwise it would flood dmesg. Probably time for a note at lkml...
Something else: Did you try the siimage SATA driver in the SCSI section? Do you know to get it work? I don't know much about it... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AresTheImpaler Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 143
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a question about this release.. I'm using test 9 and the problem is that my clock keeps getting behind. Was this a problem with the relases or was it only my computer? also, if it was a bug is it now fixed?
Thanks,
Rigo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
b0fh Guru
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AresTheImpaler wrote: | I have a question about this release.. I'm using test 9 and the problem is that my clock keeps getting behind. Was this a problem with the relases or was it only my computer? also, if it was a bug is it now fixed?
|
Hey, I had this problem, too! I thought my cmos-battery was a little weak so I added rdate to start-scripts to sync time every boot Don't know if this is fixed, but I will try out... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kesereti Guru
Joined: 07 Nov 2002 Posts: 520
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...where's 2.6.0-test10-love??
Hehe, just teasing, I'm sure bssteph will have something forthcoming whenever it's done...^_^ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nepenthe Guru
Joined: 14 Jul 2002 Posts: 317 Location: Sanford, ME
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kesereti wrote: | ...where's 2.6.0-test10-love??
Hehe, just teasing, I'm sure bssteph will have something forthcoming whenever it's done...^_^ |
I second that =) waiting for loveness first |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kesereti Guru
Joined: 07 Nov 2002 Posts: 520
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The news about the SilImage3112A SATA controller getting better performance is definitely making me want to try the vanilla sources...but...it seems that once you've gone Love, you never want to go back ^_^ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
discomfitor l33t
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 927 Location: None
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The news about the SilImage3112A SATA controller getting better performance is definitely making me want to try the vanilla sources...but...it seems that once you've gone Love, you never want to go back ^_^ |
so true _________________ There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yodermk Apprentice
Joined: 09 Jun 2003 Posts: 189 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sepp wrote: | yodermk wrote: | They've fixed the PS/2 mouse problem right? Just thought I'd ask before bothering with the compile. |
for me ps/2 mouse still doesn't work. it really strange. neither my alps touchpad nor my external mouse gets any signals though it gets detected. |
Doesn't work at all? That must be a different problem. For me, and many others, test9-mm2 had a bug where the PS/2 mouse worked, but was very unresponsive. I was just wondering if someone who experienced that could confirm that it's been fixed.
If no one answers, I'll probably try it today or tomorrow, but if it hasn't been fixed, I'd rather save the trouble and keep my uptime with test8. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newbenji n00b
Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 69 Location: Denmark, Odense
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yodermk wrote: | sepp wrote: | yodermk wrote: | They've fixed the PS/2 mouse problem right? Just thought I'd ask before bothering with the compile. |
for me ps/2 mouse still doesn't work. it really strange. neither my alps touchpad nor my external mouse gets any signals though it gets detected. |
Doesn't work at all? That must be a different problem. For me, and many others, test9-mm2 had a bug where the PS/2 mouse worked, but was very unresponsive. I was just wondering if someone who experienced that could confirm that it's been fixed.
If no one answers, I'll probably try it today or tomorrow, but if it hasn't been fixed, I'd rather save the trouble and keep my uptime with test8. |
Mine is working perfect in 2.6.0-test9.. but i changed the protocol in XF86CONFIG-4. So now its
Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2"
Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
Hope its a help
/Benji |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sepp Guru
Joined: 11 Jul 2002 Posts: 330
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newbenji wrote: | yodermk wrote: | sepp wrote: | yodermk wrote: | They've fixed the PS/2 mouse problem right? Just thought I'd ask before bothering with the compile. |
for me ps/2 mouse still doesn't work. it really strange. neither my alps touchpad nor my external mouse gets any signals though it gets detected. |
Doesn't work at all? That must be a different problem. For me, and many others, test9-mm2 had a bug where the PS/2 mouse worked, but was very unresponsive. I was just wondering if someone who experienced that could confirm that it's been fixed.
If no one answers, I'll probably try it today or tomorrow, but if it hasn't been fixed, I'd rather save the trouble and keep my uptime with test8. |
Mine is working perfect in 2.6.0-test9.. but i changed the protocol in XF86CONFIG-4. So now its
Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2"
Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
Hope its a help
/Benji |
my mouse doesn't even work on the console, so it's not an xfree problem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IntergalacticWalrus Guru
Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 513 Location: Montreal QC (Canada)
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm... Due to known issues with kernel preempting, do you guys think it's really worth it to upgrade from test9 to test10? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yodermk Apprentice
Joined: 09 Jun 2003 Posts: 189 Location: Quito, Ecuador
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for that bit of info. I'll try test10 later today or tomorrow and if the mouse seems broken, will try that XFree change.
Regarding preempting, by Linus' wording I was under the impression that it's not a regression, so it shouldn't be any worse than previous test releases. Just stuff they haven't fully debugged yet. But maybe I'm wrong.
Anyone know if there's a regression?
If so, you can always turn preempting off. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jazz Guru
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 543 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well the matter of fact is that i'm already running the test10 and its great !!
Only had problems with the inbuilt patch for frambuffer..but got it fixed it the hard way !
My spec's are P4 2.4 (533), DDR 512MB (333), Intel 845GEBV2 mobo..
80GB barracuda 7200 HDD...
I have heard lots of this mm sources.. but dont understand the exact differences between the gentoo-dev-sources and mm-sources !!
Perhaps some one cud be kind enough to make me understand which one's better for me and why !!
Thanks,
Bye,
Jassi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ian l33t
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 Posts: 834 Location: Somerville, MA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was using test8-mm1, but wow, just, amazing...
I have 320 MB of RAM, GKrellm2 says 312 MB (stupid manufacturers using different number schemes...), and I used to have about 100 or so MB free, under normal usage (Firebird, Gaim, BeepMP, Gkrellm2, XFce4).
With test10 vanilla though, I have 178 MB free, swap isn't even touched. This is quite an impressive increase in memory usage, unless I just forgot to start some huge program that I normally have running in the background :p.
I've noticed that the system seems slightly more responsive, boots a bit faster, and just seems to be a bit happier, but that's probably due more to my perception than anything else.
No mouse issues, I'm using a PS/2 mouse.
Haven't tried USB or anything CPU or I/O intensive yet, but at this rate, it's all looking good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gralves Guru
Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 389 Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
b0fh wrote: | AresTheImpaler wrote: | I have a question about this release.. I'm using test 9 and the problem is that my clock keeps getting behind. Was this a problem with the relases or was it only my computer? also, if it was a bug is it now fixed?
|
Hey, I had this problem, too! I thought my cmos-battery was a little weak so I added rdate to start-scripts to sync time every boot Don't know if this is fixed, but I will try out... |
I used to have this problem around test6... I think I solved it using the rtc clock emulation or advanced rtc clock...
by the way I'm compiling test10 now... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
watashiwaotaku7 n00b
Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
im using a synaptics touchpad this is the first time i tried it since probly about test2 and it now works well as opposed to before
has anyone else gotten software suspend to work im using
echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep (or something like that) and it shuts down just fine but using "linux resume=/dev/hdc6" at the lilo prompt doesnt work for me is this user error or is this still not working completely? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SaFrOuT Apprentice
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Posts: 256 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have a small question plz,
what is the difference between the normal kerle and the vanilla and the love ones
is the difference only in more drivers for more hardware or the diff is in performance or what? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
manywele l33t
Joined: 12 Jul 2003 Posts: 739 Location: Inside
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, what happened to the i2c-isa module? My sensors don't work any more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glennj n00b
Joined: 23 Oct 2003 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 1:28 am Post subject: 2.6 kernels hang during boot |
|
|
It is really frustrating to read all of these glowing reports about the 2.6 kernels when I can not get one to boot up on my system. I have tried configuring it myself and then thinking I must be doing something wrong, I copied the config from the 2.6 live CD and rebuilt.
Without fail, the 2.6 kernels fail while starting up processes in /etc/init.d. Here is what is started up (in order): metalog cupsd eth0 portmap fam named netmount nscd ntp-client ntpd postfix samba spamd upsd upsmon vcron xfs gdm It will usually hang while launching postfix but sometimes it will get past postfix and hang while launching samba.
Is anyone besides me seeing this? Does anyone have an idea about what the problem might be?
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peaceable Frood Guru
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Posts: 338 Location: New Jersey, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm putting together Frood1, not that it's so famous but here's what I've patched it with already,
2.6.0-test10-libata1.patch
x86_64-handle_signal().patch
supermount-2.0.2a-2.6.0-test8.patch
bootsplash-3.1.3-2.6.0-test9.patch
scsi_scan_cleanups.patch
r8169-8110S-11122003.patch
prism54_wlan_2003-11232003.patch
bcm5700_broadcom_gigabit_drvr.patch
NVIDIA_forcedeth_v18.patch
2.6.0-test9-amd64-acpi-compilefix.patch
many of the gentoo-dev-sources patches have been added, and more to come! _________________ "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we, they never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." George W. Bush |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Felgerkarb n00b
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 17 Location: Palo Alto, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
sepp wrote: | newbenji wrote: | yodermk wrote: | sepp wrote: | yodermk wrote: | They've fixed the PS/2 mouse problem right? Just thought I'd ask before bothering with the compile. |
for me ps/2 mouse still doesn't work. it really strange. neither my alps touchpad nor my external mouse gets any signals though it gets detected. |
Doesn't work at all? That must be a different problem. For me, and many others, test9-mm2 had a bug where the PS/2 mouse worked, but was very unresponsive. I was just wondering if someone who experienced that could confirm that it's been fixed.
If no one answers, I'll probably try it today or tomorrow, but if it hasn't been fixed, I'd rather save the trouble and keep my uptime with test8. |
Mine is working perfect in 2.6.0-test9.. but i changed the protocol in XF86CONFIG-4. So now its
Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2"
Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
Hope its a help
/Benji |
my mouse doesn't even work on the console, so it's not an xfree problem! |
My mouse doesn't work on console, without
Code: | gpm -m /dev/mouse -t ps2 |
You probably have already tried that, though. I had to do it manually each time, and was going to add it to my startup scripts, but with the XFree86 config set up as described above, it works fine in my WM, and I find I don't really need the mouse in console, routinely.
-F |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gibberx Apprentice
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 217 Location: UMBC
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is anybody using ELPP (Enhanced Linux Progress Patch)? I tried patching test9 with ELPP and supermount-ng, but it wouldn't boot. So, I gave up.
It *would* be nice to have that progress bar with about 5 lines of fading verbose output underneath.... ah well. Bootsplash is nice too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Beekster Apprentice
Joined: 26 Nov 2002 Posts: 268 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 5:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uptime: 15:41:43 up 14:41, 1 user, load average: 921.69, 596.17, 269.52
Gentoo Linux - Kernel 2.6.0-test9-bk27
Just tried that stress test - wow. The system stuttered quite a bit while making the processes (forking?)... and then got smooth. Scary shit for the proprietary software companies out there.
My timing sucks - test9-bk27 became test10. I ran test7-bk5 for 35 days, and test9-bk24 for a few days and found it to be a very noticeable improvement. Test10 is about the same as 9-bk24 was in feel. Very happy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anime_Fan Guru
Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 366 Location: Linköping, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
IntergalacticWalrus wrote: | Hmm... Due to known issues with kernel preempting, do you guys think it's really worth it to upgrade from test9 to test10? |
Yes! My 2.6.0-test10 system (not preemptible ) feels much more stable and responsive in X.
I don't know what they must've fixed, but it must've been a bottleneck somewhere. Opera is much faster at going back in history, etc.
It could also be that there was a newer nvidia driver in the kernel, but... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hutu n00b
Joined: 23 Feb 2003 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did try.
boot up with no error.
but elpp only copes with redhat's init script, on gentoo, it can't show the real init process steps. I hope somebody could modify a gentoo version of the elpp.
Phantom wrote: | Is anybody using ELPP (Enhanced Linux Progress Patch)? I tried patching test9 with ELPP and supermount-ng, but it wouldn't boot. So, I gave up.
It *would* be nice to have that progress bar with about 5 lines of fading verbose output underneath.... ah well. Bootsplash is nice too. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|