Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Love-sources 2.6.0-test9 - Late but great
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wdreinhart
Guru
Guru


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 569
Location: 4QFJ12345678

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bssteph wrote:

I haven't had any problems like that... are you using the latest ~x86 nvidia drivers? NvAGP or AGPGART?
Latest ~x86 and AGPGART (in the kernel) here, and I've no problems.


Using AGPGART as a module, and the latest ~x86 nvidia drivers (1.0.4496-r4).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dinini
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I have tested ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/stepan/bootsplash/kernel/bootsplash-3.1.1-2.6.0-test9.diff on 3 different machines using kernels 2.6.0-test9, 2.6.0-test9-mm1, 2.6.0-test9-mm2 with over a dozen configuration files and:

It only works when I use the LILO bootloader!

If I use grub then I get to see tux and then see the "no good signature" found message.

Sample config for lilo and grub shown in https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=641255 which were as close as I got to having them match and tossing out anything that didn't affect it. 4 days on this is enough, waiting for the next patch before trying again. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sindre
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Nov 2002
Posts: 315
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the same config bootsplash works on 2.6.0-test5-love3, but not on 2.6.0-test9-love2. I'm using grub. The bootsplash stuff does eventually appear as the bootsplash init script is run on test9-love2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dinini
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to clarify, the *initial* bootsplash image (verbose or silent) only works for me when using lilo, the background image from the /etc/runlevel/default script will appear on all the test9 flavors I've tried using both grub and lilo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ed0n
l33t
l33t


Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 638
Location: Prishtine/Kosove

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dinini wrote:
Well, I have tested ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/stepan/bootsplash/kernel/bootsplash-3.1.1-2.6.0-test9.diff on 3 different machines using kernels 2.6.0-test9, 2.6.0-test9-mm1, 2.6.0-test9-mm2 with over a dozen configuration files and:

It only works when I use the LILO bootloader!

If I use grub then I get to see tux and then see the "no good signature" found message.

Sample config for lilo and grub shown in https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=641255 which were as close as I got to having them match and tossing out anything that didn't affect it. 4 days on this is enough, waiting for the next patch before trying again. :)


I'am trying this too looks neat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bssteph
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 652
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ed0n wrote:
Dinini wrote:
Well, I have tested ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/stepan/bootsplash/kernel/bootsplash-3.1.1-2.6.0-test9.diff on 3 different machines using kernels 2.6.0-test9, 2.6.0-test9-mm1, 2.6.0-test9-mm2 with over a dozen configuration files and:

It only works when I use the LILO bootloader!

If I use grub then I get to see tux and then see the "no good signature" found message.

Sample config for lilo and grub shown in https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=641255 which were as close as I got to having them match and tossing out anything that didn't affect it. 4 days on this is enough, waiting for the next patch before trying again. :)


I'am trying this too looks neat.

HMM...
Maybe this is the root of the problem then. I have maybe a half hour of time to try stuff today, and I'll see what LILO does with it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
watersb
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 04 Sep 2002
Posts: 297
Location: take a left turn in Tesuque

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you need root=/dev/ram0 to boot from an init ramdisk on 2.6 kernels.

I posted an example in the Bootsplash support thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=642338#642338
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Random Task
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 171
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hey guys,
seeing as I've never patched my kernel before... How do you do it?

I downloaded the patch but I'm not sure how to do it!

Please advise!
_________________
If you can't kill something with that, it ain't supposed to die...

You're so drunk you're seeing double...
I've got two guns, one for each of ya!
-Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday, Tombstone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nephros
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 2139
Location: Graz, Austria (Europe - no kangaroos.)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's in this thread, a few posts up.
Uh, and did you notice there is an ebuild, linked to from the first post?
_________________
Please put [SOLVED] in your topic if you are a moron.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Random Task
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 171
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oops, I breezed through the post, searched the forums but I guess i didn't pay enough attention :oops: and I did try to do the ebuild, however figured the patch would be just as easy to install.

My mistake :D
_________________
If you can't kill something with that, it ain't supposed to die...

You're so drunk you're seeing double...
I've got two guns, one for each of ya!
-Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday, Tombstone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gibberx
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 217
Location: UMBC

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are we going to be putting Supermount-ng back in the patchset? Or, will it patch against the current love-sources? I guess I'll give it a shot soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peaceable Frood
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Apr 2003
Posts: 338
Location: New Jersey, USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Supermount doesn't patch against mm-sources. I've tried.
_________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we, they never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." George W. Bush
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gibberx
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 217
Location: UMBC

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh yeah, and love-sources are based off of mm-sources... bummer. No big deal though, I'm no stranger to the "mount" command. Used it a lot in my Debian days...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Random Task
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 171
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I must say this patchset works like a charm! Thank you guys I have my bootsplash back!!
_________________
If you can't kill something with that, it ain't supposed to die...

You're so drunk you're seeing double...
I've got two guns, one for each of ya!
-Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday, Tombstone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lovechild
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 2858
Location: Århus, Denmark

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phantom wrote:
Are we going to be putting Supermount-ng back in the patchset? Or, will it patch against the current love-sources? I guess I'll give it a shot soon.


It's an evil idea anyways, I found this "emerge magicdev" it's less evil but still evil enough for kernel devs to hate it, at least it's userspace based.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asimon
l33t
l33t


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 979
Location: Germany, Old Europe

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

watersb wrote:
I think you need root=/dev/ram0 to boot from an init ramdisk on 2.6 kernels.

I posted an example in the Bootsplash support thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=642338#642338


No, the root kernel parameter should contain your true root filesystem, not /dev/ram0. The initrd code uses /dev/ram which is hardcoded in init/do_mounts_initrd.c. There's no need to specify it in a kernel parameter. To use an initrd you have to tell the boot loader about it, that's all. Here an example for GRUB:

Code:

title=Gentoo GNU/Linux 2.6.0-test9-mm1
        root (hd1,0)
        kernel /bzImage-2.6.0-test9-mm1 root=/dev/main_vg/root_lv hdb=ide-scsi hdd=ide-cd
        initrd /initrd-lvm-2.00.07-r1.gz


Notice that initrd support was broken (only if you used devfs) for several 2.6-test and mm-source releases but is fixed in the current release.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sindre
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Nov 2002
Posts: 315
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Earlier I noticed that the hdparm results of recent mm-sources and love-sources have been quite a bit lower than on vanilla development-sources. However I ran a bonnie++ test on 2.6.0-test5-love3 (hdparm about 47MB/sec), and 2.6.0-test9-love2 (hdparm about 34MB/sec). The results didn't differ much so I think it's just the hdparm report being wrong, unless of course I interpreted the results of bonnie++ wrongly.

2.6.0-test5-love3: bonnie++ -f
Code:
Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
sindre        1512M           61793  19 13149   3           30575   3 152.0   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 24742  93 +++++ +++ 26034 100 25579 100 +++++ +++ 24022 100
sindre,1512M,,,61793,19,13149,3,,,30575,3,152.0,0,16,24742,93,+++++,+++,26034,100,25579,100,+++++,+++,24022,100

2.6.0-test9-love2: bonnie++ -f
Code:
Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
sindre        1512M           65708  20 12123   3           30520   3 202.9   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 26685  93 +++++ +++ 25941 100 27809  99 +++++ +++ 23443 100
sindre,1512M,,,65708,20,12123,3,,,30520,3,202.9,0,16,26685,93,+++++,+++,25941,100,27809,99,+++++,+++,23443,100
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sgaduuw
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Sep 2002
Posts: 133
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just writing in to confirm that my computer with test9-love 2 with ACPI enabled will shutdown properly after I've unpatched the kexec patch with
Code:
patch -p1 -R < /path/to/kexec.path

the kexec patch in question can be downloaded from here
_________________
my website
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bssteph
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 652
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry for the utter lack of communication, it seemed like everyone was answering everyone else well enough that I could clam up. ;)
It's tenth week here, which means it's the week before finals, which means I've been very busy doing all the things I should have done the past nine weeks. I dunno when I'll have time to screw around with the patches again (haven't even touched LILO yet), but yeah...
I'm less busy during exams week than this week, doesn't that rule? ;)

sindre: I want to say that i read somewhere (maybe LKML) that hdparm's been acting strangely on 2.6, but I can't remember where I saw that ATM...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
norvillebarnes
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 28 Jun 2003
Posts: 116
Location: Sudbury, ON Canada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just thought I chime in and say that lilo may indeed be the answer to the bootsplash problems. I've had no problems at all with bootsplash but I use lilo (never tried grub to be honest). With the exception of a couple of the mm patches I've had (vesa) framebuffer working in every 2.6 kernel by simply having vga=791 in my lilo global options. From there it was just a matter of adding initrd=/boot/initrd-1024x768 to lilo.conf, and presto it works great. I wish I could be of more help because it's awesome having bootsplash working with 2.6, but I have no experience with grub.

A problem that I have noticed is that with test9-mm2 or love2 (not sure about mm/love1) the kernel fails to load my agpgart module, leaving me without dri. I have an Intel 845G chipset that uses i830. Agpgart and drm are compiled into my kernel. Vanilla test 9 loads without any errors. Has anyone else with onboard video noticed this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoinBald
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Posts: 39
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Again,
Thank You bssteph, Lovechild and all!
I just got back from vacation and they are piling it on again :( soo short n' sweet.
Was one of those seat sales in the middle of the week.
Love is Grand! The best yet.
Anyone tried the cfq prio v2 patch yet?

For removable media, I use http://submount.sf.net
Works great!

Thanks again,
Loyal lover,
Baldy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Random Task
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 171
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know vesa supports up to 1280x1024, but is there a way to get higher resolutions with the framebuffer, or any other framebuffer for that matter?

My notebook has a default resolution of 1600x1200, yeah its crazy but I love it for the desktop realestate!

Is it possible to have a framebuffer do 1600x1200 or am I just being too picky?

Thanks people!
_________________
If you can't kill something with that, it ain't supposed to die...

You're so drunk you're seeing double...
I've got two guns, one for each of ya!
-Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday, Tombstone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulisdead
Guru
Guru


Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 510
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This may have cropped up since 2.6-test7, since I didn't use test 8 much, and haven't tried burning a DVD+R in vanilla test 9, and also haven't tried the mm-sources for test9, but my DVD+R will only burn at around 1.4-1.5x. Unfortunately, I used up my last DVD+R, and probably won't be able to get more till pay day next week to do more testing with DVD+R burning with the different kernels.
_________________
"we should make it a law that all geeks have dates" - Linus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1249
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, impatiently waiting for love3, as mm3 has been released. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
antisthenes
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 06 May 2003
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

-test9-mm3

Looks like more IO fixes from Andrew, but no mention of the problems some people were having with DAO cd burning in -test9-mm2.

Looks easy enogh to -love up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 4 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum