| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
robnotts Guru


Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 405 Location: Nottingham, UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 7:25 am Post subject: lame on mmx celeron v lame on amd64 |
|
|
Thanks for all the help and advice given to me over the last couple of days, I am now up and running on linux64
One or two things seem to bother me...
I have a microsoft wireless keyboard and mouse, and I am getting a HUGE number of messages in my system log regarding funny keypresses...
example...
| Code: | atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0xd9 on isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e059 <keycode>' to make it known. |
And why oh why is lame so slow? It even seems faster on the dual-celeron machine! My guess is that this is due to the celerons using mmx and assembler code?
Rob
[/code] _________________ ---
Gentoo Phenom][ X4 955 on AMD790 + Geforce 220GT 8GB/1.75TB (Desktop)
+ MythTV (3xFreeview,1xFreesat HD) on 1080p
Gentoo Turion64 X2 Geforce 6150 2GB/120GB (Laptop) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
borh Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 24 Nov 2002 Posts: 89 Location: Ljubljana
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | And why oh why is lame so slow? It even seems faster on the dual-celeron machine! My guess is that this is due to the celerons using mmx and assembler code? |
Well, I don't know what is "slow", but I can give you my lame/ogg speed:
| Code: | # lame --preset standard test.wav test-standard.mp3
Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA
69403/69405 (100%)| 5:09/ 5:09| 5:23/ 5:23| 5.8555x| 0:00
|
and ogg:
| Code: | # oggenc -q 7 test.wav
File length: 30m 13.0s
Elapsed time: 1m 50.2s
Rate: 16.4521
|
So, ogg is about 3x faster in this unscientific test. This is on an Opteron 144 (1.8 GHz). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|