View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mirko_3 l33t
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 605 Location: Birreria
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, that's how I did it before, and got the error anyway.. having it in the kernel was just a test, really... _________________ Non fa male! Non fa male! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkless n00b
Joined: 01 Jan 2004 Posts: 42 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Corp.Nobbs wrote: | I got my vmware working.. I had to disable in the kernel Code: | Local APIC support on uniprocessors (X86_UP_APIC) |
|
Unfortunately, if you're running an SMP kernel you cannot avoid smashing into the bug.
I'm contemplating making a patchset based on 2.6.4-rc2 vanilla to see if the error is caused by one of Andrew's patches or it's caused by changes in mainline. _________________ Ignorance should be painful. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steel300 Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1155
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
darkless wrote: | Corp.Nobbs wrote: | I got my vmware working.. I had to disable in the kernel Code: | Local APIC support on uniprocessors (X86_UP_APIC) |
|
Unfortunately, if you're running an SMP kernel you cannot avoid smashing into the bug.
I'm contemplating making a patchset based on 2.6.4-rc2 vanilla to see if the error is caused by one of Andrew's patches or it's caused by changes in mainline. |
It's one of Andrew's patches that kills it. I'm still working out which one. _________________ Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lhpu n00b
Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mergine...make oldconfig...compiling...reboot
everything works perfect great work steel 300 _________________ Linux for choice |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bssteph l33t
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 Posts: 652 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't forget to have X run at nice level somewhere between -10 and -15. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
discomfitor l33t
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 927 Location: None
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WOOHOO!
My bootsplash works again now! Hooray for steel300! _________________ There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 1249 Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this has been discussed some months ago, nevertheless I would like to have an easy metod:
How do you renice X automatically, so that only X is reniced and not every app loaded afterwards? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neenee Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 1786
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SysOP XXL Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 27 Jan 2004 Posts: 139 Location: Kecskemét, Hungary
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wooohooo! Just finished "making love" !
Steel For President! Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Evil Dark Archon Guru
Joined: 21 Dec 2002 Posts: 562 Location: Santa Rosa, CA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@nevynxxx:
there are still a few patches that can't be included in love-sources, sysfs-backing-store because it breaks reiser4 (although the patch itself is broken right now due to a patch that Andrew Morton introduced in this latest -mm release, fortunately i have an idea of exactly which patch breaks it) and reiserfs ACL's because reiserfs can't compile without them. _________________ This post has been over explained for newb-informing purposes.
Registered Linux user 347334
Abit AV8-3rd eye, AMD Athlon64 3500+ 90nm, ATI Radeon x850 pro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maddog39 n00b
Joined: 12 Sep 2003 Posts: 16 Location: Melbourne, AU
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nevynxxx wrote: | Ewww supermount eww ewww eww.....Please steel, please don't do it again. |
does this mean steel300 owes us all a pizza? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steel300 Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1155
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There will be no more discussion about supermount. I have made a decision, and it's staying in. _________________ Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheCoop Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
until udev and dbus is sorted _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chocoba65 n00b
Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
nevynxxx wrote: | Ewww supermount eww ewww eww.....Please steel, please don't do it again. |
Looks like somebody owes steel300 a pizza... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chrisyu Apprentice
Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 207 Location: China
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does LIRC work with this kernel?
I can not compile it as modules.
How about you guys?
And Thanks for the kernel, steel300.
-edit-
It should be lirc_i2c that don't compile.
Code: |
SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/*
make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC [M] drivers/char/lirc/lirc_bt829.o
CC [M] drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.o
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_pcf8574':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:137: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_haup':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:170: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_pixelview':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:203: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: invalid type argument of `unary *'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: `b' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:212: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_pv951':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:223: error: structure has no member named `c'
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c: In function `add_to_buf_knc1':
drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.c:248: error: structure has no member named `c'
make[3]: *** [drivers/char/lirc/lirc_i2c.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/char/lirc] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/char] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
|
Last edited by chrisyu on Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
truekaiser l33t
Joined: 05 Mar 2004 Posts: 801
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
just a quick question. how do i install the sources without overwriteing my current ones for 2.4.25? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steel300 Veteran
Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1155
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
truekaiser wrote: | just a quick question. how do i install the sources without overwriteing my current ones for 2.4.25? |
They are slotted, so they won't overwrite any kernel you currently have installed. There's a howto somewhere on the forums that a quick search will bring up. _________________ Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
truekaiser l33t
Joined: 05 Mar 2004 Posts: 801
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
thank you |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mcoulman n00b
Joined: 20 Sep 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Maui
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:49 am Post subject: usb borked on notebook |
|
|
Code: | usb 2-1: control timeout on ep0in
usb 2-1: device descriptor read/all, error -108
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: Cannot enable port 1. Maybe the USB cable is bad?
hub 2-0:1.0: cannot disable port 1 (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_hub_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: get_hub_status failed
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_port_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: hub_hub_status failed (err = -19)
hub 2-0:1.0: get_hub_status failed
|
lsmod says
Code: | hid 22432 -
ohci_hcd 16132 -
ehci_hcd 23428 -
usbcore |
The hw (external kb & trackball) is fine, works with 2.6.4-rc1-love2.
Pointers? TIA, keep up the good work steel!
Last edited by mcoulman on Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:11 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nevynxxx Veteran
Joined: 12 Nov 2003 Posts: 1123 Location: Manchester - UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
chocoba65 wrote: | nevynxxx wrote: | Ewww supermount eww ewww eww.....Please steel, please don't do it again. |
Looks like somebody owes steel300 a pizza... |
I'd like to think steel ows us all a pizza for including supermount.
But hey I can live with just not enabling it. Great job steel keep them coming _________________ My Public Key
Wanted: Instructor in the art of Bowyery |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rumil Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 108 Location: Krakow, Poland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm having some ALSA errors with this kernel....
When ALSA starts it gives me some "unexpected char" error (but sound works) and it actually segfaults when shutting down:
Code: |
root@gentoo rumil # /etc/init.d/alsasound stop
* WARNING: you are stopping a boot service.
* Unloading ALSA...
* Storing ALSA Mixer Levels
ALSA lib conf.c:1565:(snd_config_load1) _toplevel_:1:30:Unexpected char
* Unloading modules
/sbin/runscript.sh: line 529: 9296 Segmentation fault /sbin/rmmod ${MODULE} 2>/dev/null
|
It gives more output when shutting system down (it says it's a bug in fs/proc/generic.c ) but I don't know how to copy it here.
I use 2 soundcards, as primary SB Live and as secondary intel8x0 (Nvidia Soundstorm). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daagar Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is anyone using the Aureal support? I enabled support for my Aureal Vortex 8820, but at boot ALSA comes up and says no soundcards found :P Just curious if there are additional tricks necessary to get it working. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evermind Guru
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rumil wrote: | I'm having some ALSA errors with this kernel....
When ALSA starts it gives me some "unexpected char" error (but sound works) and it actually segfaults when shutting down:
Code: |
root@gentoo rumil # /etc/init.d/alsasound stop
* WARNING: you are stopping a boot service.
* Unloading ALSA...
* Storing ALSA Mixer Levels
ALSA lib conf.c:1565:(snd_config_load1) _toplevel_:1:30:Unexpected char
* Unloading modules
/sbin/runscript.sh: line 529: 9296 Segmentation fault /sbin/rmmod ${MODULE} 2>/dev/null
|
It gives more output when shutting system down (it says it's a bug in fs/proc/generic.c ) but I don't know how to copy it here.
I use 2 soundcards, as primary SB Live and as secondary intel8x0 (Nvidia Soundstorm). |
After removing this line it works for me
Code: |
/usr/src/linux-2.6.4_rc2-love1/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -661,7 +661,6 @@
proc_alloc_map);
proc_kill_inodes(de);
de->nlink = 0;
- BUG_ON(de->subdir);
if (!atomic_read(&de->count))
free_proc_entry(de);
else {
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rumil Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 108 Location: Krakow, Poland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
evermind wrote: |
After removing this line it works for me
Code: |
/usr/src/linux-2.6.4_rc2-love1/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -661,7 +661,6 @@
proc_alloc_map);
proc_kill_inodes(de);
de->nlink = 0;
- BUG_ON(de->subdir);
if (!atomic_read(&de->count))
free_proc_entry(de);
else {
|
|
Yeah, works for me as well. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PrakashP Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 1249 Location: C.C.A.A., Germania
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@neenee
Thx.
@all
Has anybody with nforce2 noticed *with* CPU Disconnect on (with the nforce2 quirks inside you have to either not use APIC or Ross patches and use athcool to turn disconnect on), the idle temps got higher, ie like CPU DIsconnect isn't used at all? It seems that this behaviour started since some releases. I found that 2.6.3 vanilla is OK (idle at 46°C, even after hours), but since 2.6.3-mm4 (dunno which is the first version where it starts) or 2.6.4-rc1 vanilla, after a few hours or even less, idle temp rises to 52°C. Rebooting doesn't help too long, only if I reboot to 2.6.3, then temp goes back. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|