View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lamer0 n00b
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:22 am Post subject: Benchmarking ut2k4 demo |
|
|
Save benchmark.sh into ut2004demo/Benchmark dir.
Code: |
#!/bin/sh
../ut2004demo dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt $*
|
Save botmatchexec.txt in ut2004demo/Benchmark/Stuff
Run the Benchmark and post the results / system info.
Benchmark results in ~/.ut2004demo/Benchmark dir
Mine:
athlon xp1800@1.75ghz (166fsb) / 512 ram / geforceti4600 / 5336 nvidia drivers
Going to re-run the test with the xp1800 running at 1.82ghz see if it helps the fps any.
dm-rankin
16.560684 / 54.121933 / 173.402466 fps
Score = 53.688744 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the lone crouton Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
19.296822 / 54.756439 / 169.507797 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 54.284588
XP2600/512MBpc2700/GF4Ti4200/2.4.20-gaming-sources/43.63 drivers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
himpierre l33t
Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86-64 Linux
Unknown processor @ 2003 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE2
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchma
rk -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini-exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
28.596342 / 78.571991 / 173.701935 fps rand[1049344192]
Score = 73.384811 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
grover Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 27 Sep 2002 Posts: 77 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2169 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
17.729950 / 56.111809 / 151.388306 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 55.516609 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Swift n00b
Joined: 09 Jun 2002 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the benchmark excites with:
Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
the game itself runs without any problem...
anyone knows how to fix? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackhole n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2003 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1804 MHz
RADEON 9700 PRO x86/MMX/3DNow!/SSE
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchma
rk -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
2.615759 / 14.122698 / 53.081150 fps rand[823438765]
Score = 14.126121
i'm also getting the Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error,
is that kind of performance normal with ati drivers (i'm using 3.70) or is something wrong with my system? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trINItr0n_ n00b
Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 44 Location: Belgium::Leuven
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2071 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
14.166430 / 41.299141 / 150.046814 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 41.066727
running 2.6.2-gentoo-r1/512 ram/amd barton 2500 @ 166x12.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
windsok n00b
Joined: 20 Oct 2003 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1545 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
11.040814 / 36.640057 / 105.341064 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 36.634865
slackware-current (2.4.24)
Athlon XP 1800+
512MB DDR DRAM
Geforce 2 GTS 64MB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Uranus Guru
Joined: 07 May 2002 Posts: 438 Location: Portugal, Braga
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1400 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
6.825200 / 24.210106 / 90.555168 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 24.213776 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zakk l33t
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 614 Location: Oakland, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Swift wrote: | the benchmark excites with:
Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
the game itself runs without any problem...
anyone knows how to fix? |
http://icculus.org/lgfaq/#launcheveryxig
You'll have to find another culprit for why it exits. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
(l)user Guru
Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 334 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1394 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
10.063552 / 26.078394 / 68.335289 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 26.082407
athlon xp 1600+
Geforce 2 GTS 64 mb ddr
512 ram ddr (266) _________________ Registered Linux user #302020
Gadu Gadu #490092 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mailportugal n00b
Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Linux xxx 2.4.22-gentoo-r2 #1 Qua Dez 24 22:38:34 WET 2003 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496-r3
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 2406 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4400/AGP/SSE2
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
10.190522 / 49.977371 / 142.187653 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 49.710190 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sgaap l33t
Joined: 16 Aug 2002 Posts: 754 Location: Enschede, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1667 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin
4.520851 / 21.064482 / 71.450638 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 21.062794
agp: nvagp @ 2x
nvidia driver: 1.0.5336
chipset: kt133a
memory: 384mb pc133@133
amd xp 2000+@1666mhz
Maybe its time to upgrade my mobo and mem _________________ In "old" Europe we already have a word for "pre-emptive strikes" mr Bush: its called "war" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edave n00b
Joined: 28 Sep 2003 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1830 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/PCI/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
10.913903 / 23.713099 / 125.413025 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 23.692850 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wedge_ Advocate
Joined: 08 Aug 2002 Posts: 3614 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2205 MHz
Radeon 9800 (AIB) Athlon (3DNow!)
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt
17.854683 / 53.148735 / 144.163788 fps rand[2032932547]
Score = 52.405056 |
@blackhole: the 3.7.0 drivers are pretty crap in UT2K3/2K4 for me. The 3.2.8 driver should be a lot better. _________________ Per Ardua Ad Astra
The Earth is the cradle of the mind, but we cannot live forever in a cradle - Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky
Gentoo Radeon FAQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MNKyDeth n00b
Joined: 13 Dec 2003 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get that Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error also. It happens everytime in the sameplace in the benchmark. When the guy runs up the wooden sloped plank and fires 2 maybe 3 rockets.
I been looking for a fix cause I really wanted to see what my system could do in it.
A64 3400+
Chaintech ZNF3-150
1gig Corsair Pc3200LL XMS
GFFX 5900se
SB Audigy2zs
BTW, I have tried all nvidia drivers from 4496 on up to 5336. None of them fixed the problem from what I could see. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarrenM l33t
Joined: 25 Apr 2002 Posts: 653 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
If anyone is dual booting 64 and 32 bit installs I'd love to see the performance from both systems. I know the 64 bit isn't supposed to be all that optimised but it'd still be interesting to see. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zakk l33t
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 614 Location: Oakland, CA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
MNKyDeth wrote: | I get that Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error also. It happens everytime in the sameplace in the benchmark. When the guy runs up the wooden sloped plank and fires 2 maybe 3 rockets.
I been looking for a fix cause I really wanted to see what my system could do in it.
A64 3400+
Chaintech ZNF3-150
1gig Corsair Pc3200LL XMS
GFFX 5900se
SB Audigy2zs
BTW, I have tried all nvidia drivers from 4496 on up to 5336. None of them fixed the problem from what I could see. |
...
The XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD message is useless. It is there simply for people who have purchased the X server from XiG (which adds nothing, though you can find them at http://www.xig.com.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ashtray n00b
Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get the same thing on Radeon 9600 Pro with drivers 3.2.8 and 3.7.0 kernel 2.4.22. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazycat l33t
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 838 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've got it on my amd64 3000+, 1024MB@166 running 64 bit version of ut2k4
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86-64 Linux
Unknown processor @ 2010 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE2
dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -in$
33.064117 / 86.589905 / 182.003525 fps rand[904465829]
Score = 76.442833
It is strange , i get even more score than a guy with a same cpu but fx5900 instead. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
himpierre l33t
Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It is strange , i get even more score than a guy with a same cpu but fx5900 instead
|
Indeed. Really strange.
regards
Thomas |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lamer0 n00b
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for all the replies. Seems ut2k4 is very cpu dependant. Interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazycat l33t
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 838 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
And that means i can still live with my beloved ti4200 for a year or two
btw , does anyone know how to overclock geforce on amd64? nvclock is now working and i get nice 300/600 compared to original 250/513 in windows. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cduchesne n00b
Joined: 21 Apr 2003 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AMD Athlon64 3200+ (2000.043 Mhz)
Corsair 1 GB PC3200 (CAS 2-3-3)
GeForce FX 5900XT (driver v. 5336)
26.773998 / 78.098778 / 235.808655 fps -- rand[1814308868]
Score = 70.436974 _________________ WX
MSI K8T Neo
Athlon64 3200+
GF4 Ti4400
1024 MB PC3200
Gentoo 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trINItr0n_ n00b
Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 44 Location: Belgium::Leuven
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for mentioning nvclock, looks very handy ... but got strange results in this test: overclocked my Gainward ti4200 (very good overclocker) from a default 250MHz/444MHz to 310MHz/550MHz, and i actually get worse results
Under windows with these settings it gives quite an impressive boost, but linux seems not to like it tho
Any ideas about this ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|