View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lowspirit Apprentice
Joined: 31 Jul 2002 Posts: 258 Location: Northern Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2002 12:32 am Post subject: ReiserFS corrupted my Gentoo =( |
|
|
Always thirsting for more performance and hearing all the latest "reiserfs is rock solid" talk I decided to change my root partition to reiserfs from ext3. The transfer went smooth and the first couple of boots and usage was pure heaven, I did notice a difference, first startup of Mozilla under X was almost 30% faster then before, and things overall felt smoother.
But then one sad boot it decided to act up, first I noticed modules.conf was a crapped up, restored from backup, rebooted, no errors on bootup but X refused to start, it just froze and rebooted.
In the end, a reiserfschk did a check, did a rebuild-tree (it told me that was only solution), and I rebooted into a broken Gentoo =(
Is this user fault? I would really like to use reiserfs cause of it's speed, but I refuse to reinstall Gentoo another time (after the one I'll have to do tomorrow) because of filesystem corruption, I've slowly switched over all my Windows work to Linux, what a misstake that was, thank god for backups.
Lowspirit = |
|
Back to top |
|
|
haylocki Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 85 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, I used to use Reiserfs myself, and it was Rock solid.
Recently I upgraded my motherboard and processor
Soltek SL75DRV5 & Duron 1100 MHz
Since then whenever I rebooted my PC the filesystem was corrupt
I have since reverted to using EXT3 and the system works fine.
I suggest you try another filesystem, and see if your file corruption stops.
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zen_guerrilla Guru
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 343 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use reiserfs here (gentoo-1.4rc1) for about 1 week without probs. Faster than ext3, more supported than XFS. However, our main servers (slackware-8.0) at work have both reiserfs and operate 24/7/365 for about 2 years now without a single hitch. So I'd suggest that u better also check your hardware and remove the notail option from /etc/fstab.
.:: zen ::. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronmon Veteran
Joined: 15 Apr 2002 Posts: 1043 Location: Key West, FL
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All of the Linux partitions on my desktop machine have been reiserfs for the last 18 months or so, running Gentoo since last May and Slackware before that. Aside from the scare during the mid-2.4.x kernels (from which I escaped unscathed), I have had no file corruption or other problems even with lots of improper shutdowns. We have lots of power outages where I live and journaling is essential to system health.
When I picked up a new laptop last month, I decided to use the supposedly "stable" xfs for my Gentoo partitions and have since had to delete and rebuild my /usr/portage and am having some trouble with /etc. Despite what I've read on this subject, my personal experience says that reiser is very reliable. The lappy will likely get wiped soon and a fresh Gentoo install done on a known-good (to me) file system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkane l33t
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 918 Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Before everyone posts more "hey, I've been running an unstable filesystem for x amount of time, it has to be your hardware" replies, I have to say that I had it corrupt my filesystem on 3 different machines at 3 different occasions. It's definately not a hardware problem, nor is it a user issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lowspirit Apprentice
Joined: 31 Jul 2002 Posts: 258 Location: Northern Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zen_guerrilla wrote: | I use reiserfs here (gentoo-1.4rc1) for about 1 week without probs. Faster than ext3, more supported than XFS. However, our main servers (slackware-8.0) at work have both reiserfs and operate 24/7/365 for about 2 years now without a single hitch. So I'd suggest that u better also check your hardware and remove the notail option from /etc/fstab.
.:: zen ::. |
I'll try removing notail from fstab and give it another go, hope it won't reduce performance too much. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zen_guerrilla Guru
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 343 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lowspirit wrote: | I'll try removing notail from fstab and give it another go, hope it won't reduce performance too much. |
The difference is not that big. However here I have it enabled & works fine.
Very important: Check also your cables & your motherboard for probs. I had also corruptions with ext3 on a 440bx system & after week its mobo died...
.:: zen ::. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malakin Veteran
Joined: 14 Apr 2002 Posts: 1692 Location: Victoria BC Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2002 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've used Reiser on two machines since it first made it into the kernel, never had a problem with it. I would think that by now especially it would be quite stable having been in the kernel for so long. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
c_kuzmanic Guru
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 488 Location: Los Angeles , California
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I've been using reiserfs on two maxtor ata 133 drives (RAID 0) and put it through some hardcore torture testing (burning cdr's at 12x speed while encoding videos, running p2p apps and opening three instances of emerge), so far I have seen absolutely no problem. The other day I even switched off the power button during disk-intensive operations, again to (thank god) no negative effect.
I did have minor prob's with earlier versions of reiserfs (2.4.8 kernel) but I've upgraded my hardware since then. Reiserfs does seem to perform well on newer, faster drives. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|