Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
tox and alternatives: skype requires pulseaudio now
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Multimedia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tae_kyon
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, my mistake ... a slip of the tongue, ehm finger ... I meant pulseaudio not alsa of course!
_________________
We shall not cease from exploration. And the end of all our exploring
will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
szatox
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 3136

PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bump!
I gave psi with jingle another try (in case anyone didn't know psi, it's xmpp/jabber client). Doesn't have echo cancelation and does not support video AKA you better use it with headphones, but once you provide it a name of STUN server it has a good chance of piercing NATs and firewalls. This means... direct voice chat from one private network to another private network. Without proxy, without botnets. Streams take like 40kbps each direction.
It turned out the most tricky part is making your computer-illiterate friends reach that 5th tab in account settings and type STUN server address there :roll:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
genoobish
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Feb 2015
Posts: 73

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has anybody heard of apulse? I found this on the arch forums.

https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse/
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=187258

It's supposed to be a workaround for pulseaudiofree users. I never used it myself but it seems to work with some minor tweeks given the commentaries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
v_andal
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 541
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

genoobish wrote:
Has anybody heard of apulse? I found this on the arch forums.


There's even a thread in this forum discussing use of apulse together with skype. Just put 'apulse' USE flag for skype and run emerge --update --newuse. It works for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6051
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2015 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naib wrote:
Fitzcarraldo wrote:
charles17 wrote:
mv wrote:
It seems that microsoft now started to force the new skype protocol: <net-im/skype-4.3 cannot connect anymore :evil:

Why not use WebRTC? Can be tried on https://opentokrtc.com/ and should work in Firefox or Google chrome.

Thanks for posting. I had never heard of WebRTC so decided to check it out, and indeed it turns out to be a viable alternative for some of the functions offered by Skype (although I did not check if Skype-to-landline, something I need to use quite often, is replicated by any of the commercial Web sites that use WebRTC).

I did not find the WebRTC free demo sites particularly intuitive to use, so have prepared a blog post (WebRTC – A viable alternative to Skype) as an aide-mémoire and to help others.
MS are actually working on a WebRTC based Skype. The present beta needs a 3rd party plugin to work via your browser, but the aim is to be a plugin-less, using WebRTC webclient.


Looks like it is in Skype for Web is in beta https://login.skype.com.
It seems to actively check useragent string but when I switch it it IE8 it logs in. So far it seems focused on making called so no access to VOIP or chat
But as I stated, no plugin required (uses webRTc) :) whether MS makes it useragent Agnostic is another thing. BUT if you still need skype (and unfortunately some do...)
_________________
Quote:
Removed by Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stephan-t
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 12 May 2014
Posts: 122

PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Started this week the uTox client and this is very good alternative. Maybe try the command line clients, because i want more than GUI.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chiitoo
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 2575
Location: Here and Away Again

PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bäh. They started shoving a Skype web-interface over to Outlook as well, which I've been using to stay in contact with people. The 'messenger' there was (and partially still is) was (and is) horrible, too, but they're making it even /worse/.

Not that I'd expect anything else from them, but I digress.


I'm not here to rant about that, but rather giving a heads-up with regards to Tox.

The domains tox.im, toxme.se, and libtoxcore.so are no longer to be associated with the Tox Project (the domains belong to the Tox Foundation, which is no longer a part of the Tox Project).


The current site is: https://tox.chat/

For a (GUI) client, qTox is what I would mostly recommend at this time.

The tox-overlay (https://github.com/Tox/gentoo-overlay-tox) has been available via app-portage/layman for some time now.


As to why the new site, this will explain at least some of it: https://blog.tox.chat/2015/07/current-situation-3/
_________________
Kindest of regardses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Multimedia All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum