View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SarahS93 l33t
Joined: 21 Nov 2013 Posts: 693
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:12 pm Post subject: gcc update - AssertionError: EbuildProcess: pid is non-integ |
|
|
Hallo,
bei einem "emerge -uaDvN world" kam foglende Fehlermeldung:
Code: | >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-devel/gcc-4.8.3
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/emerge", line 50, in <module>
retval = emerge_main()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/main.py", line 1070, in emerge_main
return run_action(emerge_config)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/actions.py", line 4082, in run_action
emerge_config.args, spinner)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/actions.py", line 454, in action_build
retval = mergetask.merge()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/Scheduler.py", line 1000, in merge
rval = self._run_pkg_pretend()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/Scheduler.py", line 921, in _run_pkg_pretend
current_task.wait()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/AsynchronousTask.py", line 54, in wait
self._wait()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/CompositeTask.py", line 85, in _wait
task.wait()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/AsynchronousTask.py", line 54, in wait
self._wait()
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_emerge/SubProcess.py", line 98, in _wait
(self.__class__.__name__, repr(self.pid)))
AssertionError: EbuildProcess: pid is non-integer: None |
Ich weiss leider nicht genau wie ich dazu etwas finden soll im Internet.
Was genau ist das für ein Fehler?
Habt ihr Ideen wie das Problem gelöst werden könnte? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klaus Meier Advocate
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 2908 Location: Bozen
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Da scheint etwas mit python zu klemmen. Mach mal einen python-updater. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SarahS93 l33t
Joined: 21 Nov 2013 Posts: 693
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Es lag wohl an zu wenig Arbeitsspeicher.... :/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tazinblack Veteran
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1146 Location: Baden / Germany
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wie viel davon ist denn drin? _________________ Gruß / Regards
tazinblack
_______________________________________________________
what's the point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klaus Meier Advocate
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 2908 Location: Bozen
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Das hatten wir ja auch schon woanders. -j runter setzen hat da geholfen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SarahS93 l33t
Joined: 21 Nov 2013 Posts: 693
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
1048MB waren drin und mit 2048MB hat es funktioniert.
Was und wo mit "-j" herrunter setzen? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klaus Meier Advocate
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 2908 Location: Bozen
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In der make.conf hast du folgenden Eintrag:Dieser Wert gibt an, wie oft gcc parallel gestartet wird. Normalerweise sollte der Wert die Anzahl der CPU-Kerne +1 sein. Vorausgesetzt, der Speicher reicht. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|