Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
ACPI SystemIO conflict with new Kernel
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:59 pm    Post subject: ACPI SystemIO conflict with new Kernel Reply with quote

I upgraded my system and my kernel from 2.6.39 to 3.7.10. For some reason, dmesg shows the below ACPI conflict/error. My Gigabyte motherboard is only about 4 years old, so I don't know why I would be getting a lack of support for it's ACPI. This doesn't effect my system that I can see up front, but I would really like to fix this.

Code:

[    5.487051] systemd-udevd[1109]: starting version 197
[    1.676734] ACPI: Invalid Power Resource to register!
[    5.778759] ACPI Warning:
[    5.778764] 0x0000000000000b00-0x0000000000000b07 SystemIO conflicts with Region \SOR1 1 (20120913/utaddress-251)
[    5.778767] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver
[    5.962222] cdrom_id (1173) used greatest stack depth: 4280 bytes left


Here is what is from .config:

Code:

localhost linux-3.7.10-gentoo # grep -i acpi .config
CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=y
# Power management and ACPI options
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_EC_DEBUGFS is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=y
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_SBS is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_HED is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_APEI is not set
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y
# CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB is not set
# CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is not set
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
# CONFIG_PATA_ACPI is not set
# ACPI drivers
# ACPI drivers
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ACPI_POWER is not set
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
init_6
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 166

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Resource conflicts with 3.5.0 + looks like DSDT error. HOWTO: Fix Common ACPI Problems (DSDT, ECDT, etc.) + ACPI/Fix common problems
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think this is from the DSDT errors. Reason being, when using kernel 2.6.39, I recompiled my DSDT I got the same errors....this APCI error did not exist with that DSDT and it's errors.

I think this is more of an actual hardware conflict with the new kernel, but I don't know what resource Region \SOR1 1 is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trismo
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernel dev says ist not a error just a info

for use old driver *tco *wdt
blacklist LPC_ICH

EDIT
sory old is not right
just lpc_ich = generic driver

*tco *wdt contain chipset specific driver


Last edited by trismo on Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even if it is considered a warning, I am concerned because a resource conflict is something that should be resolved.

Not sure what you mean for use old driver *tco *wdt....I'm not sure what device Region \SOR1 1 is so I don't know what driver is being used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trismo
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

check here http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl/
with "lspci -n" search the module for LPC interface
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
[    5.778764] 0x0000000000000b00-0x0000000000000b07 SystemIO conflicts with Region \SOR1 1 (20120913/utaddress-251)


How can you tell this is a LPC Interface?

I did a search on that website with my lspc -n output and I got:

Code:

1002439d      Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI   SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller


That is what I got from lpci -n in regards to a LPC Interface:

Code:
00:14.3 0601: 1002:439d


But I still can't map out any relation from the above information to:
Code:
[    5.778764] 0x0000000000000b00-0x0000000000000b07 SystemIO conflicts with Region \SOR1 1 (20120913/utaddress-251)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is from a chroot enviroment into my new root partition...so its running in old kernel 2.6.39 if that matters(hopefully doesn't):

Code:

localhost / # lspci -n
00:00.0 0600: 1002:5957
00:02.0 0604: 1002:5978
00:0a.0 0604: 1002:597f
00:11.0 0106: 1002:4390
00:12.0 0c03: 1002:4397
00:12.1 0c03: 1002:4398
00:12.2 0c03: 1002:4396
00:13.0 0c03: 1002:4397
00:13.1 0c03: 1002:4398
00:13.2 0c03: 1002:4396
00:14.0 0c05: 1002:4385 (rev 3c)
00:14.1 0101: 1002:439c
00:14.3 0601: 1002:439d
00:14.4 0604: 1002:4384
00:14.5 0c03: 1002:4399
00:18.0 0600: 1022:1200
00:18.1 0600: 1022:1201
00:18.2 0600: 1022:1202
00:18.3 0600: 1022:1203
00:18.4 0600: 1022:1204
01:00.0 0300: 10de:0391 (rev a1)
02:00.0 0200: 10ec:8168 (rev 02)
localhost / #
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trismo
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh AMD sorry can not realy help you

i2c-piix4,sp5100_tco

check its load

EDIT was mistake on first post you use a intel system

EDIT2 open kernel bug but i thinks its a wontfix
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I beginning to think this is a won't get fixed thing ether.

What part of the system does this ACPI conflict apply to? Is it the cpu, memory, or hard drive bus? I am worried that in time my system will be buggy from it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trismo
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hwmon part can make problems not working sensors.
But the main system components a not affected.

And don't use suspends mode.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, I got good news and bad news...the good news is I disabled the piix4 driver on the smbus which stooped the "SystemIO conflicts with Region \SOR1 1".

But the bad news is I still get this message upon boot up:
Code:
[    1.676734] ACPI: Invalid Power Resource to register!


What would be causing this?

Since this is my host pc that stays on 24hr/7days a week I have suspend disabled in the kernel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trismo
n00b
n00b


Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

you get this after udevd try rebuild udev.

check kernel with
CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=y
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y

hope that is it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found out the timing on that ACPI message came in late, back tracked to the time it came around, and found some more that have to do with the drives:


Code:

[    1.670708] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.670753] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.670791] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.670825] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.672184] scsi 4:0:0:0: CD-ROM            _NEC     DVD_RW ND-3520AW 3.07 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    1.673718] sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 48x/48x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
[    1.673720] cdrom: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
[    1.673860] sr 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
[    1.674028] sr 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 5
[    1.674253] scsi 5:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      OCZ-VERTEX       1.5  PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    1.674471] ACPI: Invalid Power Resource to register!
[    1.674471] sd 5:0:0:0: [sda] 250069680 512-byte logical blocks: (128 GB/119 GiB)
[    1.674558] sd 5:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[    1.674560] sd 5:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[    1.674586] sd 5:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[    1.675798] sd 5:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
[    1.676129]  sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
[    1.676139] ACPI: Invalid Power Resource to register!
[    1.676139] scsi 5:0:1:0: Direct-Access     ATA      WDC WD15EADS-00P 01.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    1.676369] sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] 2930277168 512-byte logical blocks: (1.50 TB/1.36 TiB)
[    1.676429] sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[    1.676431] sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[    1.676453] sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[    1.676877] sd 5:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
[    1.678706] sd 5:0:1:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
[    1.732845]  sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4 < sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 sdb8 >
[    1.733513] sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HomeUser
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Sun May 12, 2013 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello,


I have a GA-970A-DS3 gigabyte board with a AMD ATI Turks XT (Radeon HD 6670).
I am wondering why I see nothing of the Radeon card if submit the command "sensors".
sensors-detect tells me
Code:

Using driver `i2c-piix4' for device 0000:00:14.0: ATI Technologies Inc SB600/SB700/SB800 SMBus

but does not put i2c-piix4 in /etc/conf.d/lm_sensors.
Now I see every time I load i2c_piix4
Code:

[ 2952.162696] ACPI Warning: 0x0000000000000b00-0x0000000000000b07 SystemIO conflicts with Region \SOR1 1 (20120913/utaddress-251)
[ 2952.162708] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver
in dmesg.

Maybe a related problem?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ant P.
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 2374
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you have the correct driver loaded? Radeon cards only have a hwmon interface when the radeon kernel module is loaded.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HomeUser
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ant P. wrote:
Do you have the correct driver loaded? Radeon cards only have a hwmon interface when the radeon kernel module is loaded.

I am not sure. I don't seem to need the radeon module to use my screen. But dit put CONFIG_DRM_RADEON as module trying to get hwmon working for the video card.
I (now) see the i2c_piix4 module loaded afer startup but used by nobody. Trying to unload it, load radeon module and reload i2c_piix4 does not seem to make any difference for sensors and sensors-detect.
I understood from the radeon page on x.org the hwmon chip could be something like (lm63, lm64, etc.)
http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature
I did put all sensor drivers as modules, can load a number of modules associated with lm* chips (http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices) after loading radeon and before reloading or not loading i2c_piix4, it does not seem to make a difference for sensors and sensors-detect and the modules are not used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ffhaddad
n00b
n00b


Joined: 17 Oct 2013
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This post is a bit dated, but since it still shows up in internet searches, the information might be worth sharing.

I have an ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 motherboard for which I configured the stable Gentoo kernel (3.10.7 at the time of this writing). During boot, I received the same/similar error messages. After some digging through the kernel configuration, I found the settings that were causing the warnings to appear in dmesg.

I disabled ...
Code:
Device Drivers --->
  Multifunction device drivers --->
    < > Intel ICH LPC
    < > Intel SCH LPC

... and that resolved the problem.

Apparently, this isn't really a problem. Just more of a message from the kernel indicating that one driver was used over another.
_________________
Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement. ~Ronald Graham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5709
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2014 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bumped into the exact same error with

Quote:
< > Intel ICH LPC
< > Intel SCH LPC


will disable those


thanks !
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum