View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Clad in Sky l33t
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 887 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On a sidenote: Why would you have to go to Mint? There's MATE in portage (or an overlay), which is a fork of gnome2.
52midnight, making Gentoo easier for newcomers is a good idea. Perhaps you should participate in the Gentoo documentation and weed out dead ends. Personally, I've never run into one with the documentation available, but if there's an obvious blunder in there, it'd be nice if it got corrected. _________________ Kali Ma
Now it's autumn of the aeons
Dance with your sword
Now it's time for the harvest |
|
Back to top |
|
|
52midnight Apprentice
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 176 Location: Brisbane AU
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
> I think in your place I'd recommend Cinnamon Mint
Yes, I took a long, hard look at Mint but ultimately decided against it. Fact is I don't like any of the 'buntu's - it's their philosophy, I guess; the new go-it-alone graphics server scares the willies out of me, especially as the project is run by a billionaire; and numerous other things.
> there is a lot of good documentation and these (very helpful) forums.
I've always praised Gentoo for its docn, but much of it is very out-of-date and due for a rewrite. And as I said in another post, it's always suffered from the major flaw of interspersing essential procedural instructions with verbose explanations of fundamental topics, such as partitioning and IP address formats, which should be hived off to other pages. It makes going back to look for forgotten info a nightmare, since it's buried in a morass of irrelevant material. Alternatively, (if you'll pardon my waving my own flag again) it could be treated similarly to what I've done:
http://52midnight.com/gentoo/isa-install.html
And I've always found its forums friendly and helpful, which is why I'm bothering to criticize - I regard Gentoo as one of the most valuable pieces of IP on the 'net.
> Perhaps you should participate in the Gentoo documentation and weed out dead ends.
I've thought about it; never done such, and wouldn't want to step in where I'm not wanted. I thought I might complete the present project (the link above) and see if it could serve as a basis for direct contribution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
52midnight wrote: | And as I said in another post, it's always suffered from the major flaw of interspersing essential procedural instructions with verbose explanations of fundamental topics, such as partitioning and IP address formats, which should be hived off to other pages. It makes going back to look for forgotten info a nightmare, since it's buried in a morass of irrelevant material. |
Then why don't you use the Quick Install Guide, which is at the top of the Gentoo Documentation List? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
52midnight Apprentice
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 176 Location: Brisbane AU
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
> Then why don't you use the Quick Install Guide, which is at the top of the Gentoo Documentation List?
Because the new procedure I've defined doesn't use the Installation CD, doesn't require chrooting and all the rest, and is much quicker and simpler:
http://52midnight.com/gentoo/isa-install.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
52midnight wrote: | > Then why don't you use the Quick Install Guide, which is at the top of the Gentoo Documentation List?
Because the new procedure I've defined doesn't use the Installation CD, doesn't require chrooting and all the rest, and is much quicker and simpler: |
I don't see what point you're trying to make about the CD, normal Gentoo has always been possible to install from any running Linux system with the basic POSIX commands...
Your method avoids chroot by rendering the existing Linux install on disk unusable, by altering its fstab to mount the Gentoo partition as root (which will now also break without an initramfs). You tell users to use the ancient ext2 filesystem and then later on tell them to install xfstools without explanation, and delete their root password. This may be quicker and simpler to install — by some pedantic strict definition of those words — but anyone following these instructions is set for hours of grief later on when they try to actually use their now extremely brittle system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
52midnight Apprentice
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 176 Location: Brisbane AU
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
> I don't see what point you're trying to make about the CD, normal Gentoo has always been possible to install from any running Linux system with the basic POSIX commands...
And newcomers know about these things ...
> Your method avoids chroot by rendering the existing Linux install on disk unusable
Wrong. I've done it several times and it works fine.
> by altering its fstab to mount the Gentoo partition as root
Wrong again. No alteration to the existing system is required other than a new entry in grub.conf. A new fstab is required for the new installation, though given that this is the first draft of a new project, this is not as explicit as a final version would require.
> (which will now also break without an initramfs).
Wrong again; the initramfs is copied over with the kernel.
> You tell users to use the ancient ext2 filesystem
Because it's mature, stable, and perfectly usable it's "ancient" and therefore contemptible?
> and then later on tell them to install xfstools without explanation,
The idea is to get them to a working installation without irrelevant explanations.
> and delete their root password.
As does the original Gentoo documentation.
> This may be quicker and simpler to install — by some pedantic strict definition of those words
Ordinary dictionary definitions are perfectly applicable.
> but anyone following these instructions is set for hours of grief later on when they try to actually use their now extremely brittle system.
Wrong again. My installations are very robust, and given that the remainder of the instructions haven't yet been uploaded, you're talking out of your rear end.
Anyhow, given that you're rated a "Veteran", you've convinced me not to bother getting involved with the Gentoo development community. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John R. Graham Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 10589 Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Merged a thread (the previous twelve posts) originally entitled Gentoo Xorg docn versus the real world, as it was looking more and more like it fits right in here.
- John _________________ I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chiitoo Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010 Posts: 2575 Location: Here and Away Again
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:55 pm Post subject: ><)))°€ |
|
|
52midnight,
Please do note that the 'ranks' or 'ratings' are solely dependant on a user's post-count, excluding administrators etc., and even if it was a developer, one such does not speak for everyone. Look at me! Mine says 'guru', but it really is only what it is: a post-count thingy. I'm the Noob Unlimited, now and forever.
What I guess I'm maybe trying to say, is that try not to get discouraged so easily, or you'll surely not last long! Not even here, where people are mostly very nice to each other (do take care if you happen to stroll close enough to the 'off the wall', though).
Your idea looks interesting, at least as an idea. I haven't yet read more into it to give any feedback, but I shall try to do so at some point of time!
And that, of course, is just my opinion. ^^; _________________ Kindest of regardses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GFCCAE6xF Apprentice
Joined: 06 Aug 2012 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, since I have nothing better to do atm I shall reply to the current topic here to
I agree with Chiitoo, don't be discouraged.
But, on the other hand my view is much like the Arch Linux communities view on "spin-offs" or "easy installs" - Don't like them too much since a user not familiar with the distro is skipping important information and choices that could be beneficial to later tinkering or problem fixing.
Again, don't be discouraged, any community effort is good community effort (well, unless it is some kind of dangerous misinformation or such ). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
52midnight Apprentice
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 176 Location: Brisbane AU
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
> Please do note that the 'ranks' or 'ratings' are solely dependant on a user's post-count
Ah! OK, thx.
> What I guess I'm maybe trying to say, is that try not to get discouraged so easily
Over the years (more than a dozen with Lx) I've made a few attempts to contribute to projects, but each time came up against an Insect Urine who seemed to be a senior adminythingy, so have quietly disappeared. Be very glad to find things better here.
> Your idea looks interesting, at least as an idea.
Not sure how useful it is in the overall scheme of things. I'm coming back to Gentoo - first time was seven years back, and I still recall the frustration of rereading yards of docn to clarify odd points. This time I'm taking it slowly and critically, since I want to pass on what I'm doing to nontech friends, hence the pages on my site - new and very incomplete.
> I haven't yet read more into it to give any feedback, but I shall try to do so at some point of time!
Be grateful for any feedback, esp if it's constructive.
> "easy installs" - .. is skipping important information and choices that could be beneficial to later tinkering or problem fixing.
Agreed; but Gentoo is SUCH a big step for newcomers from other distros that I believe it's important for them to prove that they CAN do it (and I'd never recommend it to first-time Lx users - always recommend a Knoppix LiveCD as a first step, then a mainline distro). What I want to encourage them to do is NOT a one-time "there you are" installation, but repeat the process three or four times because of the important things you learn; and they'll only do this if the first stages are clear and easy to repeat - hence my advice to use FEATURES="buildpkg" to avoid repeatedly downloading and re-emerging all the basic stuff.
> unless it is some kind of dangerous misinformation or such
Which is all too easy to do inadverdently unless you have constructive, critical feedback. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sundialsvc4 Guru
Joined: 10 Nov 2005 Posts: 436
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, seems to me that the whole thread ("Gentoo will die ...") is kinda wrongly-titled. Just get involved. Make it better, whatever "better" is. Make an improvement and spread the good word. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johncrist1988 n00b
Joined: 02 Dec 2012 Posts: 18 Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sundialsvc4 wrote: | Yeah, seems to me that the whole thread ("Gentoo will die ...") is kinda wrongly-titled. Just get involved. Make it better, whatever "better" is. Make an improvement and spread the good word. |
I completely agree with this. I'm not a Gentoo developer per se, but I've recognized other distributions that appear more accessible over the years simply by being more "simple". The past few weeks I've been toying with building a sort of universal installation method much like the tried and burned Gentoo Installer using precompiled packages and genkernel. I haven't written an installer but cutting out all the compile times you can get a system up and going in about 15-20 minutes. Add in a GUI installer on a liveDVD and boom, we're back to something similar to what we had back when we first started trying the installer.
I have this idea of having precompiled packages for different arcs sitting somewhere and the user being able to choose either the "less-than-optimized" precompiled package or compiling from source. The idea is having the aspiring user have the accessibility of Ubuntu... but without using Ubuntu. Sort of. As they grow and advance in Linux they can choose to compile packages themselves or whatever the case may be. This can also help with rapid deployment and recompiling things later.
This could be looked at as breaking Gentoo's original core strength, but I'd happily allow for accessibility for the sake of attracting new users by initially sacrificing some of that core philosophy. That philosophy, after all, is all about choice. I've always looked at Gentoo as my old stomping ground. I learned what I know now through Gentoo. To me, the flavor is all about learning the nitty gritty, short of LFS. I'd love to make it more accessible so other people can slowly experience that without waiting a day to compile everything they need and spending a few more days bugfixing. Not that my idea would solve that, but I feel like if it's a step in the right direction and a way I can contribute to the Gentoo community, it is something that'll just make it better.
Or we can feed the fragmentation gnomes and fork. Either way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
smartass Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 189 Location: right behind you ... (you did turn around, didn't you?)
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
johncrist1988,
that sounds a lot like Sabayon, maybe you should check it out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johncrist1988 n00b
Joined: 02 Dec 2012 Posts: 18 Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
smartass wrote: | johncrist1988,
that sounds a lot like Sabayon, maybe you should check it out. |
Hah, I never knew! Thank you for mentioning that. That's more or less exactly what I had envisioned. I guess my question then is -- Why don't we as a distribution take what our forks are doing well and adding them ourselves? Obviously it works and obviously it's successful to a certain extent. It only makes sense, short of the "well we are us and they are them, we are separate and we don't want to inherit from them" mentality. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ppurka Advocate
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 3256
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
johncrist1988 wrote: | smartass wrote: | johncrist1988,
that sounds a lot like Sabayon, maybe you should check it out. |
Hah, I never knew! Thank you for mentioning that. That's more or less exactly what I had envisioned. I guess my question then is -- Why don't we as a distribution take what our forks are doing well and adding them ourselves? Obviously it works and obviously it's successful to a certain extent. It only makes sense, short of the "well we are us and they are them, we are separate and we don't want to inherit from them" mentality. | It is not like sabayon is completely separate from Gentoo. They try to keep the system compatible with emerge/portage. And their package manager is available in portage (emerge -p equo).
What is difficult is to keep compatibility of all packages with your custom Gentoo install. It is simply impossible to do so, unless you have kept very generic and extensive default USE flags. _________________ emerge --quiet redefined | E17 vids: I, II | Now using kde5 | e is unstable :-/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gentooP4 Apprentice
Joined: 20 Sep 2010 Posts: 182 Location: NZ
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
52midnight wrote: | Agreed; but Gentoo is SUCH a big step for newcomers from other distros that I believe it's important for them to prove that they CAN do it |
This has never really bothered me - chasing the newcomers. If your 'other distros' haven't prepared you for Gentoo then I personally feel you need to spend more time there. I spent 3 or 4 years using various distros before coming to Gentoo. It was a steep learning curve when I got here (never needed to compile the kernel before, etc), but that's the effort you need to put in to get the results.
Also you might not be aware, but KDE4 isn't a "glitzy, bloated dog" under Gentoo as you compile it how you like. _________________ The United States has announced that it will deploy thoughts and prayers in the battle against online extremism.
If you voted for Trump or Brexit, you were likely influenced by the Cambridge Analytica propaganda machine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sitquietly Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 143 Location: On the Wolf River, Tennessee
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
johncrist1988 wrote: | .....The past few weeks I've been toying with building a sort of universal installation method much like the tried and burned Gentoo Installer using precompiled packages and genkernel. I haven't written an installer but cutting out all the compile times you can get a system up and going in about 15-20 minutes. Add in a GUI installer on a liveDVD and boom, we're back to something similar to what we had back when we first started trying the installer.
I have this idea of having precompiled packages for different arcs sitting somewhere and the user being able to choose either the "less-than-optimized" precompiled package or compiling from source..... |
You could probably learn a lot by studying the way Calculate Linux has put together an "enterprise linux distribution" that is "100% compatible with Gentoo." They've done what you propose. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
theMerge Apprentice
Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 158 Location: Little Elm, TX
|
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let's just say that the original poster's prediction has taken more than six years to NOT come true. Gentoo will never take over the world, but it probably won't die a horrible death either.
Of course one of the most ironic parts about the whole thing is that this thread has been around for a decent percentage of Gentoo's actual lifetime. Gentoo got it's start in 1999 (under another name) and this thread started in 2006. That means that of the roughly 13 years and change Gentoo has been around this thread has been alive for around 6. That's getting pretty darn close to 50% here.
I realize the thread has evolved a bit over the years, but I thought the irony was worth pointing out.
_________________ [Insert favorite Ghandi quote here] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ShadowCat8 Apprentice
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Posts: 173 Location: San Bernardino, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Found this thread looking for info on creating a binary-only updater for a number Gentoo servers, and realized that the thread is still active! A thread running over 6 years? WOW!
@gentooP4: Absolutely agree!
As a note, I came to Gentoo from LFS! And, Gentoo was a real "hair-saver" from LFS! Since I have been on Gentoo, I have tried a number of other distros (to include Sabayon, Linux Mint, CentOS just to name a couple), and find myself *always* returning to Gentoo. It gives me the granular control I like to have on my systems, the flexibility of being able to add whatever software catches my fancy (whether in the portage tree, in an overlay or build myself) and the general reliability of knowing that when the devs say that a particular package in the portage tree is stable for a specific architecture, that someone really *has* run the software on that architecture and didn't just mark it as stable because upstream said it is. Now, the architecture config that the package was tested on may not be anything close to what you are running, but that generally isn't an issue either... If you had a problem building a specific package, that's what all of us on these forums are here for; Helping each other out.
IMHO, Gentoo is one of the truest distros of linux available... It's all about choice! You can choose to build your system whichever way you want, choosing from so many different applications, desktops, frameworks, etc... BUT, having the option to choose from so many different possibilities confers the responsibility of making a choice! Unfortunately, that alone seems to be a big showstopper for many end-users. And, if that's the case for you, there are many other distros out there that are willing to tell you what to run. Find the one that you are comfortable with and enjoy it.
Neil Peart of 'Rush' in the song 'Free Will' wrote: | You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill;
I will choose a path that's clear-
I will choose Free Will. |
President Skroob in 'Spaceballs' wrote: | Sandurz, Sandurz, you've got to help me. I don't know what to do. I can't make decisions. I'm the president! |
@theMerge: Definitely worth pointing out... Good catch! And, on that point, I don't see it "ultimately dying" any time soon either. Looking forward to many more years of computing the way I want instead of the way someone else tells me I should/have to. _________________ ________________________
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."
-- Albert Einstein
Last edited by ShadowCat8 on Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Logicien Veteran
Joined: 16 Sep 2005 Posts: 1555 Location: Montréal
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Realnot Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 120 Location: Ferrara
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:57 pm Post subject: Gentoo is dead?? |
|
|
Hi guys, I've heard rumors about gentoo, that gentoo is dead, many developers are switching to archlinux and the community was reduced .. I can't believe this
Someone may tell me something? _________________ I'm not stupid, only mentally free... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John R. Graham Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 10589 Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. Gentoo is dead. Has been for years. Almost all that is left is this automated script that moves all such queries to a common thread, left operating long ago by mistake by the very last dev to leave. We also have automated scripts that generate threads arguing amongst themselves about the implementation choices of new versions of packages, which are somehow added to the tree with no developer involvement at all. Nobody knows how this occurs.
- John _________________ I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Realnot Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 120 Location: Ferrara
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the developers are the core of gentoo, the users are all the rest... if developers continue to believe, why should not I?
i forgot the "smile", so happy _________________ I'm not stupid, only mentally free... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aCOSwt Bodhisattva
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 2537 Location: Hilbert space
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John R. Graham wrote: | Yes. Gentoo is dead. Has been for years. Almost all that is left is this automated script that moves all such queries to a common thread |
And when this automated script occasionally dies, it leaves its own threads zombified! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John R. Graham Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 10589 Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. The automated script should get back on that, shouldn't it?
- John _________________ I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|