| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rüpel Guru


Joined: 06 Nov 2002 Posts: 314 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:23 pm Post subject: chromium stabilization |
|
|
Guys,
all is great and such ...
... but the frequency of new stable versions of www-client/chromium really pi**** me off. I'm on an old computer and compiling chromium takes me >8 hours! And there is no chromium-bin ebuild.
I literally *fear* every emerge --sync, it might *again* include a new stable chromium version.
Yes, buy a new computer, yes, Ctrl-C is an option,yes, I know masking, yes, upstream is releasing like crazy, but the stable kernel is 3.3.8 and I'm pretty happy with it.
Is there a chance the stabilization process for www-client/chromium might slow down a little bit?
pretty please ...
just my 2 cents _________________ :wq |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
platojones Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002 Posts: 1491 Location: Just over the horizon
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One other option is to switch to www-client/google-chrome...it's a bin package, so no compiling and I don't think it get's updated as often. I use that on my netbook, because compile times are atrocious. It works very well.
As far as regular chromium goes...I like the latest and greatest always....so I hope they keep them coming. Of course, I have a new machine that knocks it out in < 40 minutes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rüpel Guru


Joined: 06 Nov 2002 Posts: 314 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
www-client/google-chrome - that sounds like the solution to me! thank you very much!  _________________ :wq |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kimmie Guru


Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 531 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Both google-chrome and chromium get updated nearly every time there's a bump upstream... else how would you get all those security patches? Credit to the devs for keeping up. But yeah, recompiling chromium is a bit of a pain.
A bonus from using google-chrome instead of chromium is that you'll get the built-in PepperF API flash, which is more up to date and secure than the netscape plugin flash. If you're only using chrome, you can then unmerge www-plugins/adobe-flash altogether. If you want to keep it around for another browser, you can still make sure it's disabled for google-chrome by going to chrome://plugins and disabling the NSAPI flash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djdunn l33t


Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 617 Location: Under the moon and all the stars in the sky.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eh if you watch lots of videos, they get laggy with pepper flash on fullscreen that adobe flash doesnt do for me _________________ Now, with penguins, (cuddly such), "contented" means it has either just gotten laid, or it's stuffed on herring. Take it from me, I'm an expert on penguins, those are really the only two options.
--Linus Torvalds |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John R. Graham Administrator


Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 6424 Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|