Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Obama's "open hand" foreign policy: abject failure
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:32 am    Post subject: Obama's "open hand" foreign policy: abject failure Reply with quote

Part of the "Hope and Change" was to be "reaching out" to the Islamic world with an "open hand", sitting down "without preconditions" to have rational dialogue, and so on. Well, welcome to the real fucking world, ivory tower idealists; these are not rational actors. The meta-trend is that you either live under militant Islam, or you are at war with it: there will be no middle ground. Wake up and smell the Jihad.

We've had four years of purported "reaching out", bowing and scraping, apologizing, and bending over, and what has it wrought? We've lost Northern Africa to al Qaeda and their militant Islamist brethren -- gave them our sympathies and fought on their side, even. We probably armed and trained the very people who just wiped our Libyan embassy off the map in the most militarily sophisticated operation we have seen yet by Islamic terrorists.

So much for that fucking idea. Yet, here is our government, expressing more outrage over the exercise of free speech that served as an excuse for the attacks than the attacks themselves. Our President made one brief statement on the subject, from a campaign podium, never setting aside his re-election campaign for a moment, like he's pretending it isn't happening. The White House says he's "monitoring the situation". Hello, can we get a Reset button on the Reset button?
Quote:
More protests break out in Muslim world as U.S. appeals for calm

Two days after the deaths of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other American diplomatic employees, the U.S. Embassy in Sanaa, Yemen, was assaulted by protesters as Yemeni security personnel did little to intervene, witnesses said. In Cairo, clouds of tear gas enveloped the fortified area around the U.S. Embassy as security forces clashed with protesters for the third straight day. Other anti-U.S. protests were reported in cities across the region.

Quote:
“We want to expel the American ambassador,” said Abdelwadood al-Mutawa, a protester who was walking out of the compound. He said he was motivated by reports of the movie mocking the prophet Muhammad. “We cannot accept any insult to our prophet,” Mutawa said. “It’s a red line.”

Another protester said that some of the security forces protecting the building appeared sympathetic to the demonstrators’ cause. “Some soldiers were telling me, ‘These are dogs, and we cannot accept insulting our prophet,’ ” Yusef Mohammad said.

Smaller anti-American protests were reported in Iran and Bangladesh.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton took strong steps Thursday to distance the U.S. government from the movie, calling the film “disgusting and reprehensible” but also condemning the violence in response to it.

“The U.S. government has absolutely nothing to do with this video. We absolutely reject its content and messages,” Clinton said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-embassy-in-yemen-stormed-other-embassies-still-under-siege/2012/09/13/ad65ce7e-fd9b-11e1-a31e-804fccb658f9_story.html
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.


Last edited by BoneKracker on Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmitchell
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Austin, Texas

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:51 am    Post subject: Re: Obama's "open hand" foreign policy: abject fai Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
Part of the "Hope and Change" was to be "reaching out" to the Islamic world with an "open hand", sitting down "without preconditions" to have rational dialogue, and so on.

When did that happen? I'm pretty sure Mr. Peace Price is still bombing the fuck out of people left and right.
_________________
Your argument is invalid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:55 am    Post subject: Re: Obama's "open hand" foreign policy: abject fai Reply with quote

dmitchell wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
Part of the "Hope and Change" was to be "reaching out" to the Islamic world with an "open hand", sitting down "without preconditions" to have rational dialogue, and so on.

When did that happen? I'm pretty sure Mr. Peace Price is still bombing the fuck out of people left and right.

That's what he said with respect to Iran and the "global war on terror". He simultaneously vowed to take the fight to the enemy in Afghanistan and outlast the Taliban.

More to the point, what he said and what he's ended up doing are two entirely different things, not that either make any sense or are logically consistent. He reminds me more and more of Jimmy Carter all the time.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:35 am    Post subject: Re: Obama's "open hand" foreign policy: abject fai Reply with quote

dmitchell wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
Part of the "Hope and Change" was to be "reaching out" to the Islamic world with an "open hand", sitting down "without preconditions" to have rational dialogue, and so on.

When did that happen? I'm pretty sure Mr. Peace Price is still bombing the fuck out of people left and right.
You don't remember the new mission for the National Agency for Salacious Appeasment?
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

:lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I nominate this thread for pjp's new conceptual vision for OTW
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I nominate sugar to be quarantined to his own thread, where the contagion of his socio-economic cognitive distortions cannot spread to healthy minds.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bogamol
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Detroit, Michigan - The Home of Rock and Roll

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
I nominate sugar to be quarantined to his own thread, where the contagion of his socio-economic cognitive distortions cannot spread to healthy minds.


pjp wrote:
I second that emotion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

:lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darth Marley
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 105

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
I nominate this thread for pjp's new conceptual vision for OTW


We must wait for a Eurotard to insist that it is all because of the Zionist entity for that to happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big dave
n00b
n00b


Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 0
Location: land of first world problems

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/an-5ueQ4m7bnh7mu/swordfish_2001_the_war_on_terrorism/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
I nominate this thread for pjp's new conceptual vision for OTW
Make your case.

I believe I heard something similar to "open hand" on the news, so I don't think that could be considered a problem. Unless you object to the use of quotation marks, about the only other thing I see is a curse. Cursing in general was determined to be acceptable in 2002 IIRC.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
sugar wrote:
I nominate this thread for pjp's new conceptual vision for OTW
Make your case.

I believe I heard something similar to "open hand" on the news, so I don't think that could be considered a problem. Unless you object to the use of quotation marks, about the only other thing I see is a curse. Cursing in general was determined to be acceptable in 2002 IIRC.



Quote:
vit·ri·ol/ˈvitrēəl/
Noun:

Cruel and bitter criticism.


The commentary serves no purpose but to create vitriol and overly emotional arguments alongside a news story that does not require it.
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I disagree. Based on the violent outcome of the attack, it seems more than reasonable to discuss a sitting president's foreign policy. Claiming the existence of such a discussion is vitriolic is, IMO, baseless at best. But to be clear, you aren't objecting to anything specific within the thread up to that point, so that is a Good Thing IMO.

EDIT:

Oh, and since I specifically wrote "violent outcome," I figured that I would need come up with some explanation for that specific word. So in the other extreme, if the article linked to was about Muslim missionaries planting trees, demining a warzone, or otherwise helping the needy, you would have a strong case.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
I disagree. Based on the violent outcome of the attack, it seems more than reasonable to discuss a sitting president's foreign policy. Claiming the existence of such a discussion is vitriolic is, IMO, baseless at best. But to be clear, you aren't objecting to anything specific within the thread up to that point, so that is a Good Thing IMO.

EDIT:

Oh, and since I specifically wrote "violent outcome," I figured that I would need come up with some explanation for that specific word. So in the other extreme, if the article linked to was about Muslim missionaries planting trees, demining a warzone, or otherwise helping the needy, you would have a strong case.


ok, I see
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flysideways
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 145

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama's "open hand" foreign policy: abject fai Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
He reminds me more and more of Jimmy Carter all the time.
No one that worked for Rickover deserves such disparagement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The world is crumbling, and there are still people idiotic enough to support Obama. Fools.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Muso wrote:
The world is crumbling, and there are still people idiotic enough to support Obama. Fools.


Only idiots would take that opinion.

the world is improving after the total cluster fuck of a mess that Bush created. Who ever is dumb enough to support any republican candidate after the shit storm of dubya the real idiot.
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Republicans were just dealing with the mess created by Democrats. If Democrats hadn't created a massive economic bubble, deregulated the economy, ignored housing sector risk, thrown the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan under the bus, let al Qaeda go unmolested after they attacked us twice, and pretended genocide in Africa wasn't happening, then we wouldn't have had any of these problems.

Actually, it's sugar's fault. It's been all downhill since he learned to talk.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
ignored housing sector risk,


Bush drive for home ownership fueled housing bubble

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/worldbusiness/21iht-admin.4.18853088.html?pagewanted=all
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
deregulated the economy,


A Nation of Village Idiots

Quote:
How did we get here?

That's pretty easy to answer, too. His name is Phil Gramm. A few days after the Supreme Court made George W. Bush president in 2000, Gramm stuck something called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act into the budget bill. Nobody knew that the Texas senator was slipping America a 262 page poison pill. The Gramm Guts America Act was designed to keep regulators from controlling new financial tools described as credit "swaps." These are instruments like sub-prime mortgages bundled up and sold as securities. Under the Gramm law, neither the SEC nor the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were able to examine financial institutions like hedge funds or investment banks to guarantee they had the assets necessary to cover losses they were guaranteeing.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-moore/a-nation-of-village-idiot_b_127340.html
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
let al Qaeda go unmolested after they attacked us twice,


You went after Al Qaeda and it ended up costing you $4 trillion dollars. It probably doesn't seem like such a bad idea to have played the geopolitical game a little like Yosemite Sam.

How much will our wars cost? Report says $4 trillion

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/much-wars-cost-report-says-4-trillion-130934180.html
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
ignored housing sector risk,


Bush drive for home ownership fueled housing bubble

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/worldbusiness/21iht-admin.4.18853088.html?pagewanted=all

New York Times == Obama Propaganda

Everybody knows the drive for home ownership started under Clinton. Also, Democrats had oversight for the two years leading up to the collapse (and insisted there was no problem). Fail.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
deregulated the economy,


A Nation of Village Idiots

Quote:
How did we get here?

That's pretty easy to answer, too. His name is Phil Gramm. A few days after the Supreme Court made George W. Bush president in 2000, Gramm stuck something called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act into the budget bill. Nobody knew that the Texas senator was slipping America a 262 page poison pill. The Gramm Guts America Act was designed to keep regulators from controlling new financial tools described as credit "swaps." These are instruments like sub-prime mortgages bundled up and sold as securities. Under the Gramm law, neither the SEC nor the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were able to examine financial institutions like hedge funds or investment banks to guarantee they had the assets necessary to cover losses they were guaranteeing.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-moore/a-nation-of-village-idiot_b_127340.html

Huffington Post :lol:

Everybody knows the deregulation started under Clinton. Fail.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
let al Qaeda go unmolested after they attacked us twice,


You went after Al Qaeda and it ended up costing you $4 trillion dollars. It probably doesn't seem like such a bad idea to have played the geopolitical game a little like Yosemite Sam.

How much will our wars cost? Report says $4 trillion

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/much-wars-cost-report-says-4-trillion-130934180.html

You've got half an equation there? Do you expect us to believe the wars were waged for nothing? Fail.

How much is worth not to have planes flying into buildings in the U.S., killing thousands of innocent civilians? How much is it worth to have Saddam Hussein dead, his regime overthrown and no longer threatening our energy supply, Kuwait, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, trying to create a unified Arab military against the West, and to instead have a functioning example of an Arab democracy? How much is it worth to resist the Islamists, Jihadists and Muslim Brotherhood and their intent to subjugate the Western world under fundamentalist Islam? (Laugh all you want, we need only look back a hundred years to the Ottoman Empire, and the map of the violence this past week pretty much overlaps perfectly with it's boundaries.)
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.


Last edited by BoneKracker on Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:09 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum