| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
highland n00b

Joined: 05 Nov 2008 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject: Vrf |
|
|
Hello
I wanted to configure VRF lite/virtual routing tables on my gentoo.
I simulate in QEMU cisco ASA and i wanted to send some traffic thru it.
to do it i use two tap interfaces on my gentoo.
I wanted to send traffic from one tap1 interface to other tap2 interface thru ASA.
So i need VRF functionality on gentoo.
I've configured:
ifconfig tap5 inet 1.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up promisc #my int on one side
ifconfig tap6 inet 2.2.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up promisc #my int on the other side
ip rule add table 1
ip rule add table 2
ip rule add iif tap1 table 1 #ASA inside int
ip rule add iif tap5 table 1
ip rule add iif tap4 table 2 #ASA outside int
ip rule add iif tap6 table 2
ip route add 2.2.2.0/24 table 1 dev tap1 via 192.168.0.1
ip route add 1.1.1.0/24 table 2 dev tap4 via 192.168.2.1
!marking from 1.1.1.1 to 2.2.2.2
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 1.1.1.0/24 -d 2.2.2.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 1
!putting traffic from 1.1.1.1 to 2.2.2.2 into routing table 1
ip rule add fwmark 4 table 1
# ip route list table 1
2.2.2.0/24 via 192.168.0.1 dev tap1
When i try from gentoo:
# ping -I tap5 2.2.2.2
my packets does not reach ASA.
Does the mangling works for tap interfaces ?
Has anybody tried to simulate VRF on linux ?
Thanx |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
papahuhn Guru


Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some things you could try:
- Properly match fwmark with set-mark?
- Use OUTPUT mangle, not PREROUTING, as ping is a local process.
- Avoid the local ping. Use 2 VMs instead, which connect to tap5 and tap6, respectively.
Regards _________________ Death by snoo-snoo! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
highland n00b

Joined: 05 Nov 2008 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2012 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have too many other VMs to add another 2 to just test ping or telnet connection.
But on the other side my network topology with all those rules and virtual devices becomes very complicated.
Maybe it will be easier using namespaces (LXC) on linux ? Anybody tried it for VRF simulation ?
The main problems are the tools (ping/telnet) which should put the traffic into specific "VRF"...
It's a pity that today linux does not have a proper tools for that... (and also vrf lite support in kernel). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|