Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:15 am    Post subject: The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious Reply with quote

Quote:
The Real Scandal of Fast and Furious
House Republicans have resorted to partisan finger-pointing over 3 percent of the guns crossing the border -- and ignored the other 97 percent.

Leave it to Stephen Colbert and his fearless writers to hone in on the extent of the cynicism and hypocrisy that marks the latest iteration of the "Fast and Furious" story. Before the sun had set on a day that Republicans on the House Oversight Committee had voted Attorney General Eric Holder "in contempt" for failing to produce enough documents about the failed gun-running sting, the gang at Comedy Central was telling it like it is.

Actually, despite silly headlines like this, it's not a complicated story at all. Operation Fast and Furious -- hey, let's give guns to bad guys, what could possibly go wrong? -- was a bad idea, poorly done, and thus not unlike hundreds or thousands of other poorly conceived and executed government plans of recent memory. (Like the Iraq War, for example). The Obama Administration, like the Bush Administration before it, deserves no small measure of blame for thinking that such a dangerous, unwieldy sting could be completed, successfully, without a great deal of unintended pain and sorrow.

To the right, the story has been an election-year blessing, a roiling melange of: (1) gun righteousness; (2) antipathy toward Holder, and; (3) fear and loathing of Mexico and Mexicans. When Colbert mocks the vast "conspiracy" the right sees in all of this -- what's the matter, good old-fashioned bureaucratic incompetence isn't good enough anymore? -- it's hilariously funny until you realize that tens of millions of people evidently believe the plot to be true. "If I lie in a lawsuit involving the fate of my neighbor's cow, I can go to jail," Walter Lippmann wrote in 1919:

But if I lie to a million readers in a matter involving war and peace, I can lie my head off, and, if I choose the right series of lies, be entirely irresponsible.
As I've followed the story -- and so much of it has been told so well by my CBS News colleague Sharyl Attkisson -- I keep thinking about the mission and the frustrations of the Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence. The folks there are, unsurprisingly, apoplectic at the week's events. A Republican-dominated Congress that has done nothing to stop gun trafficking on the Mexican border all of sudden is concerned enough about gun trafficking on the Mexican border to quickly hold contempt hearings and a floor vote?


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/06/the-real-scandal-of-fast-and-furious/258844/
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16028
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, the Real Scandal is in media trying to downplay the significance? I didn't expect such honesty from them.

Let's recap: Selling weapons to mass murdering drug dealers. What could possibly go wrong. But it's just typical bureaucratic incompetence? Wow. That's worse than pathetic. This story can't be spun in a positive light or blamed on Republicans.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
So, the Real Scandal is in media trying to downplay the significance? I didn't expect such honesty from them.

Let's recap: Selling weapons to mass murdering drug dealers. What could possibly go wrong. But it's just typical bureaucratic incompetence? Wow. That's worse than pathetic. This story can't be spun in a positive light or blamed on Republicans.


For those that need to catch up, Colbert has a good explanation of the issue.

Quote:
Obama started this gun tracking program in 2006, when he hypnotised George Bush. Then, he secretly ordered Attorney General Holder to order the Justice Department to order the ATF [Bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives] to order Arizona Gun shops to sell guns to Mexican drug cartels, and then lose track of them, thereby panicking Americans to gin up support for the draconian gun control measures that Obama has never introduced.

Complicated? Yes?

The fevered ramblings of a syphilitic brain? Perhaps.


I lol'd.
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16028
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny stuff. If it was Bush's fault, why not release the documents? Why claim executive privilege? Take it one step further. If Bush started it, why is Obama continuing it, thereby taking ownership? Indeed a syphilitic brain.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
Funny stuff. If it was Bush's fault, why not release the documents? Why claim executive privilege? Take it one step further. If Bush started it, why is Obama continuing it, thereby taking ownership? Indeed a syphilitic brain.


the article I posted just before wrote wrote:
Since his address, it has become even clearer that Mexican crime guns are originating in American gun shops. Last month, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives released its most recent data showing that, in the last five years, more than 68,000 crime guns were recovered in Mexico and traced back to the United States. The guns that "walked" across the border under the "Fast and Furious" operation constitute less than 3% of those guns. Where is Speaker Boehner's concern about the other 97%?

Not only has the Republican House majority done nothing to stem the trafficking of guns to Mexico; it has acted to block the modest efforts of the Obama Administration to address the problem. The House twice has voted to block continued implementation of the Administration's regulatory requirement that multiple sales of semi-automatic rifles in the border states be promptly reported to ATF to give the law enforcers real-time notice of the suspicious gun sales that are feeding the cartels.

Given that "Fast and Furious" has been rightly criticized for allowing guns to "walk" to Mexico, it seems odd that House Republicans would object to a regulation that is enabling ATF to better stop trafficked guns before they get to the border and to arrest the traffickers.

_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mcgruff
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gun restrictions only affect innocent people who need to defend themselves, not criminals. Don't you know anything? ;)
_________________
the underlay overlay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mcgruff wrote:
Gun restrictions only affect innocent people who need to defend themselves from the British Crown (curse those Red Coats!). Don't you know anything? ;)


ftfy
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Firstly I'm just going to bypass the obvious slant The Atlantic has and address the main point. The house GOP refuses to pass a bill which violates the second amendment to the constitution. Now as to Fast & Furious, Brian Terry is dead because of Holder and Obama. There is no possible spin you can add that changes that fact.

Secondly, I'll leave you and the crime-dog to get back to your mutual fellation.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mcgruff wrote:
Gun restrictions only affect innocent people who need to defend themselves, not criminals. Don't you know anything? ;)


++
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

:lol:

Brilliant 'self goal', sugar.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
mcgruff wrote:
Gun restrictions only affect innocent people who need to defend themselves, not criminals. Don't you know anything? ;)


++


++
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big dave
n00b
n00b


Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 0
Location: land of first world problems

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wait, is this nonsense claiming that we're idiots for believing the emails by administration officials are true?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

big dave wrote:
wait, is this nonsense claiming that we're idiots for believing the emails by administration officials are true?


For those that need to catch up, Colbert has a good explanation of the issue.

Quote:
Obama started this gun tracking program in 2006, when he hypnotised George Bush. Then, he secretly ordered Attorney General Holder to order the Justice Department to order the ATF [Bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives] to order Arizona Gun shops to sell guns to Mexican drug cartels, and then lose track of them, thereby panicking Americans to gin up support for the draconian gun control measures that Obama has never introduced.

Complicated? Yes?

The fevered ramblings of a syphilitic brain? Perhaps.

_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16028
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
the article I posted just before wrote wrote:
<deflecting> All hail Dear Leader! It is Right to give him Thanks and Praise!

_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big dave
n00b
n00b


Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 0
Location: land of first world problems

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
big dave wrote:
wait, is this nonsense claiming that we're idiots for believing the emails by administration officials are true?


For those that need to catch up, Colbert has a good explanation of the issue.

Quote:
Obama started this gun tracking program in 2006, when he hypnotised George Bush. Then, he secretly ordered Attorney General Holder to order the Justice Department to order the ATF [Bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives] to order Arizona Gun shops to sell guns to Mexican drug cartels, and then lose track of them, thereby panicking Americans to gin up support for the draconian gun control measures that Obama has never introduced.

Complicated? Yes?

The fevered ramblings of a syphilitic brain? Perhaps.

the bush administration started it with intent to find more out about firearms with mexican cartels. the obama administration is on record saying they need at least anecdotal evidence, because they didnt have any, that mexican cartels were actually buying US consumer firearms. the obama administration went into border state firearm stores and told them not to follow the law on shady ass sales (yes, that is a term of art, of course). then, citing the sales which the obama administration ordered the gun stores to allow, issued a regulatory letter to border gun stores.

this is all clear fact as shown in the emails that are now public. both cbs and even msnbc have said they cant support the administration on this, and im pretty sure it was actually cbs that found the email first that talked about using the project to create evidence of US guns getting into cartel hands.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wswartzendruber
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 1196
Location: Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That would make Colbert ignorant at best. The Bush Administration used the weapons to find cartels and make arrests. Obama just let them walk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Old School
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 231
Location: The Covered Bridge Capital of Oregon

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wswartzendruber wrote:
That would make Colbert ignorant at best. The Bush Administration used the weapons to find cartels and make arrests. Obama just let them walk.

The Bush Administration at some level also recognized that gunwalking was a stupid idea and halted the practice. It appears as if some ATF guy (imagine that :roll: ) instituted the practice again under the guise of Fast and Furious.

Does the fact that sugar gets his talking points from a comedian telling? :wink:
_________________
I am not young enough to know everything.
- Oscar Wilde
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Fast and Furious scandal is turning into President Obama's Watergate

Fast and furious hasn’t been discussed a lot in the mainstream media, which is why the facts can seem so preposterous when you read them for the first time. But the story is slowly unraveling and the public is catching up with the madness. On Wednesday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt over his decision to withhold documents related to the “gun walking” operation – documents that President Obama tried to keep secret by invoking executive privilege. The question of why the Prez intervened in this way will surely hang over the investigation and the White House for many months to come. Be patient, conservatives. It took nearly eight months for the Watergate break in to become a national news story. But when it finally did, it toppled a President.

Here’s what Fast and Furious is all about – and for the uninitiated, be prepared for a shock. In 2009, the US government instructed Arizona gun sellers illegally to sell arms to suspected criminals. Agents working for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) were then ordered not to stop the sales but to allow the arms to “walk” across the border into the arms of Mexican drug-traffickers. According to the Oversight Committee’s report, “The purpose was to wait and watch, in hope that law enforcement could identify other members of a trafficking network and build a large, complex conspiracy case…. [The ATF] initially began using the new gun-walking tactics in one of its investigations to further the Department’s strategy. The case was soon renamed ‘Operation Fast and Furious.”

Tracing the arms became difficult, until they starting appearing at bloody crime scenes. Many Mexicans have died from being shot by ATF sanctioned guns, but the scandal only became public after a US federal agent, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, was killed by one of them in a fire fight. ATF whistle blowers started to come forward and the Department of Justice was implicated. It’s estimated that the US government effectively supplied 1,608 weapons to criminals, at a total value of over $1 million. Aside from putting American citizens in danger, the AFT also supplied what now amounts to a civil war within Mexico.

It’s important to note that the Bush administration oversaw something similar to Fast and Furious. Called Operation Wide Receiver, it used the common tactic of “controlled delivery,” whereby agents would allow an illegal transaction to take place, closely follow the movements of the arms, and then descend on the culprits. But Fast and Furious is different because it was “uncontrolled delivery,” whereby the criminals were essentially allowed to drop off the map. Perhaps more importantly, Wide Receiver was conducted with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Fast and Furious was not.

So Obama’s operation is subtly different. But just as concerning is the heavy-handed way that the administration has handled criticism. Obama says that the Oversight Committee has been hijacked by Republicans who would rather talk about politics than creating jobs (because Obama is oh so very good at generating those). But there has been Democratic criticism too, and the Prez’s determined defence of Holder will only encourage conspiracy thinking that the scandal has hidden depths. Executive privilege is usually associated with protecting information that passes through the Oval Office. What did the documents reveal about Obama’s association with the operation?

Again, it’s important to contextualise. Executive privilege has been invoked 24 times since Ronald Reagan, and attempts to over-ride it rarely reach the courts. Moreover, Holder’s request for executive privilege made no reference to White House involvement in Fast and Furious, which seems to have been run exclusively by the ATF. Nevertheless, by refusing to sack Holder or push him to come clean, Obama may have made a very Nixonian mistake.

A lot of conservatives are writing at the moment that not only is Obama turning into Nixon Mark II, but Obama is worse because no one actually got killed during Watergate. The comparison is based on the myth that Nixon ordered the Watergate break in and that’s what he eventually had to resign over. But that’s not true. Nixon’s guilt was in trying to pervert the course of justice by persuading the FBI to drop its investigation of the crime. Mistake number one, then, was to involve the White House in covering up the errors of a separate, autonomous political department. Mistake number two was that when Congress discovered that evidence about the scandal might be recorded on the White House bugging system, Nixon invoked executive privilege to protect the tapes. In both cases, it was the cover up that destroyed Tricky Dick – not the original crime.

And, forty years later almost to the day, here we have Obama making the same mistake. Perhaps it’s an act of chivalry to stand by Holder; perhaps it’s an admission of guilt. Either way, it sinks the Oval Office ever further into the swamp that is Fast and Furious. Make no mistake about: Fast and Furious was perhaps the most shameful domestic law and order operation since the Waco siege. It’s big government at its worst: big, incompetent and capable of ruining lives.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16028
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Muso wrote:
Be patient, conservatives. It took nearly eight months for the Watergate break in to become a national news story. But when it finally did, it toppled a President.
Just over 4 months to go. If he's reelected, Biden would be President.

Quote:
just as concerning is the heavy-handed way that the administration has handled criticism. Obama says that the Oversight Committee has been hijacked by Republicans
Never is anything Obama's fault. Bush, Republicans, TEA party, Birthers. Anything he can use to get traction to distract from what he's doing.

Quote:
Executive privilege has been invoked 24 times since Ronald Reagan, and attempts to over-ride it rarely reach the courts.
IIRC, it was overturned for the first time since Nixon when Clinton invoked it over Lewinsky.

Quote:
In both cases, it was the cover up that destroyed Tricky Dick – not the original crime.
That's the most important part, and IMO, most relevant to Obama.

Quote:
Perhaps it’s an act of chivalry to stand by Holder; perhaps it’s an admission of guilt. Either way, it sinks the Oval Office ever further into the swamp that is Fast and Furious.
IMO, one of Bush's biggest mistakes was too much loyalty. Loyalty is great, but at a certain point, you need to recognize it is time to change course. Perhaps Obama was only trying to protect Holder (and not himself), but he would have been much better off letting it run, then pardoning Holder. Unless of course Obama was really trying to protect himself.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Follow the ideology.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pigeon768
l33t
l33t


Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 667

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Muso wrote:
So Obama’s operation is subtly different. But just as concerning is the heavy-handed way that the administration has handled criticism. Obama says that the Oversight Committee has been hijacked by Republicans who would rather talk about politics than creating jobs (because Obama is oh so very good at generating those).
Of the $40 million from the american recovery and reinvestment act that allocated to law enforcement, $10 million was allocated to project gunrunner. Obama is a mockery of himself.
_________________
My political bias.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16028
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pigeon768 wrote:
Of the $40 million from the american recovery and reinvestment act that allocated to law enforcement, $10 million was allocated to project gunrunner. Obama is a mockery of himself.
The economy snowballs. Americans stop buying illegal drugs, threatening jobs in many sectors. The drug lords fear a revolt, so they need to keep the thugs paid. With less drug activity, the WoD employees jobs are threatened. Which says nothing about the potential impact to snack industry. All of those potential job losses further impact the jobs in the service industry. $10m is insignificant.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1480
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

big dave wrote:
wait, is this nonsense claiming that we're idiots for believing the emails by administration officials are true?

Yes, and being upset about a government cover-up makes us "believers in some grand conspiracy". And the "Republican Congress" that has done nothing about gun trafficking (in the one year they've in office) has no right to talk about it.

What a load of horse shit. I watched Colbert the other night for a few minutes, and it's just old now. The PC Brigade-inspired appeal to ridicule tactic "If we all point and laugh at the other guys, we'll all start to feel like we're right" really isn't working anymore.

I don't want to see that shit. I want to see comedy. If I want biased political opions and propaganda, I'll turn on Fox News, MSNBC, or a White House Press Conference.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
What a load of horse shit. I watched Colbert the other night for a few minutes, and it's just old now. The PC Brigade-inspired appeal to ridicule tactic "If we all point and laugh at the other guys, we'll all start to feel like we're right" really isn't working anymore


It still works on the retarded. Notice the ones who use him as a source.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Prenj
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Location: Mostar, BiH

PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Muso wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
What a load of horse shit. I watched Colbert the other night for a few minutes, and it's just old now. The PC Brigade-inspired appeal to ridicule tactic "If we all point and laugh at the other guys, we'll all start to feel like we're right" really isn't working anymore


It still works on the retarded. Notice the ones who use him as a source.


I thought he was funny at times in 2010, but you figure him out and its not funny anymore, it gets predictable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum