| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:54 pm Post subject: Anybody here using systemd yet (in Gentoo, that is)? |
|
|
Anybody here using systemd yet (in Gentoo, that is)? Why or why not? Are most services functional under it? Any key ones that aren't? Problems? How much does it suck? _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mardok45 n00b

Joined: 21 Jun 2008 Posts: 54 Location: Right behind you
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:19 pm Post subject: Re: Anybody here using systemd yet (in Gentoo, that is)? |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | Anybody here using systemd yet (in Gentoo, that is)? |
I am.
| BoneKracker wrote: | | Why or why not? |
Mostly for the bootup speed and partly for shits and giggles. There's a noticeable difference in bootup speed on both my netbook and my desktop.
| BoneKracker wrote: | | Are most services functional under it? Any key ones that aren't? |
Everything so far is working well. There are a couple key services that do not come with the ebuild, like CUPS for example. However, you can find a lot of services here. And if you can't find them there, you can easily write your own. It's not that hard.
Here's a decent readup and guide:
http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Control-Centre-The-systemd-Linux-init-system-1565543.html
http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Booting-up-Tools-and-tips-for-systemd-1570630.html
| BoneKracker wrote: | | Problems? |
A little while ago I had a problem (with my desktop, not my netbook for some reason) with syslog dumping messages about eth0 attempting to reconnect with networkmanager that filled up my log until there was no room left on the disk, that somehow was remedied by switching back to OpenRC for some reason. I stuck with OpenRC until I decided to completely reinstall everything (Windows, my servers, everything) for a clean, updated slate. Hasn't done it since and I can't reproduce it.
| BoneKracker wrote: | | How much does it suck? |
It sucks less than OpenRC and SysV in my opinion. Problems, besides the above, has been minimal and I'm quite happy with it (mostly for the bootup speed, which is only less than 1% of systemd's features). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I worry that systemd will fork off as a completely different operating system based on the concept of a monolithic kernel paired with a monolithic privileged userspace. I worry that it's like The Blob, inexorably growing and swallowing up everything that it touches. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1197 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm on systemd. Good so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mardok45 n00b

Joined: 21 Jun 2008 Posts: 54 Location: Right behind you
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | I worry that systemd will fork off as a completely different operating system based on the concept of a monolithic kernel paired with a monolithic privileged userspace. I worry that it's like The Blob, inexorably growing and swallowing up everything that it touches. | If it happens and people think it sucks, then they'll make a new, more modular init system. What're you so worried about?
When systemd because The Blob, it's not going to suck up all the bits on the internetz and make it the only choice you have. Set aside your fears, sir. Give in to the dark side (non-Unix philosophy) a little bit. Everything will be okay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
We'll end up with 3 things on our computers: the kernel, systemd, and emacs. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mardok45 n00b

Joined: 21 Jun 2008 Posts: 54 Location: Right behind you
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I actually read that thread when you first posted it, and considered the following helpful responses, although I managed to suppress the urge:
a) "No wonder, running all that useless bloatware crap."
b) "Sounds like PEBKAC to me."
c) "Wow, sucks to be you." _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erm67 Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 130 Location: somewhere in Berlusconia.
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I went fully with systemd some time ago (not on gentoo), but for some strange reason, the lap was booting faster but not all devices were initialized correctly (I immagine a delay at some point could have solved the problem). Being too lazy I decided to uninstall and wait for better times, I might give it a try again one of this days. _________________ Truck!!
A posse ad esse non valet consequentia
Πάντα ῥεῖ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does it offer any advantages if you don't try to cut corners to shave off a few milliseconds of bootime? _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energyman76b Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2022 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if you are concerned about boot time use suspend-to-ram.
Problem solved. No systemd needed. _________________
| AidanJT wrote: |
Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.
|
Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sikpuppy n00b


Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 23 Location: Central Coast, NSW
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| energyman76b wrote: | if you are concerned about boot time use suspend-to-ram.
Problem solved. No systemd needed. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energyman76b Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2022 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sikpuppy wrote: | | energyman76b wrote: | if you are concerned about boot time use suspend-to-ram.
Problem solved. No systemd needed. |
 |
and to support that point:
uptime
16:33:52 up 7 days, 4:19, 9 users, load average: 0,00, 0,01, 0,05
with several suspend-to-ram cycles every fucking day.
Who cares about boot time of 5, 7 or 3 seconds, if you boot less than twice a month? And the bios taking at least 10s anyway? _________________
| AidanJT wrote: |
Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.
|
Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erm67 Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 130 Location: somewhere in Berlusconia.
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Faster booting was for me more a side effect that was giving me headaches
I just wanted to try this new wonderful piece of .... software from L.P.
I think system is all part of an attempt to fix pulseaudio, he always complained that the fault was in how the system was started so wrote systemd to try and fix pulseudio, when it didn't worked started complaining the fault was in udev and merged it in systemd, now is complaining that the problems are caused by the driver and probably is busy working to merge linux with systemd to fix pulseaudio. I read he already determined the probably the bios is also causing problems and will need to be included in systemd to finally fix pulseaudio.
I am starting to think it would be easier to scrap pulseaudio. _________________ Truck!!
A posse ad esse non valet consequentia
Πάντα ῥεῖ
Last edited by erm67 on Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:01 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr.Willy Apprentice

Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 288 Location: NRW, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| energyman76b wrote: | | sikpuppy wrote: | | energyman76b wrote: | if you are concerned about boot time use suspend-to-ram.
Problem solved. No systemd needed. |
 |
and to support that point:
uptime
16:33:52 up 7 days, 4:19, 9 users, load average: 0,00, 0,01, 0,05
with several suspend-to-ram cycles every fucking day.
Who cares about boot time of 5, 7 or 3 seconds, if you boot less than twice a month? And the bios taking at least 10s anyway? |
I tend to agree. It's not worth bastardizing the whole system in order to shave off a few seconds of boot time.
I'm curious about your uptime. You have 9 users logged in and they're doing absolutely nothing (virtually zero load)? _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe they're all users of tablets. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sikpuppy n00b


Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 23 Location: Central Coast, NSW
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | Maybe they're all users of tablets. |
They are at a rave, uhuh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energyman76b Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2022 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | energyman76b wrote: | | sikpuppy wrote: | | energyman76b wrote: | if you are concerned about boot time use suspend-to-ram.
Problem solved. No systemd needed. |
 |
and to support that point:
uptime
16:33:52 up 7 days, 4:19, 9 users, load average: 0,00, 0,01, 0,05
with several suspend-to-ram cycles every fucking day.
Who cares about boot time of 5, 7 or 3 seconds, if you boot less than twice a month? And the bios taking at least 10s anyway? |
I tend to agree. It's not worth bastardizing the whole system in order to shave off a few seconds of boot time.
I'm curious about your uptime. You have 9 users logged in and they're doing absolutely nothing (virtually zero load)? |
konsole with a couple of tabs. There is not much load just reading otw, watching EURO or chatting. _________________
| AidanJT wrote: |
Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.
|
Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. I have five virtual terminals open: three under X in urxvtc (two as myself and one su root); plus two outside of X (one as myself and one system console), and 'uptime' only shows 1 user (as does 'w' and 'who').
Maybe tracking these all as separate users is a side effect of consolekit (which I do not use). Seems to me they're not separate users, but seperate shell sessions.
Or maybe you have your vt set up to initate all terminal sessions as login sessions. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | We'll end up with 3 things on our computers: the kernel, systemd, and emacs. |
Don't forget the rest of Gnome (assuming it doesn't get absorbed by systemd). _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|