| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:09 am Post subject: Awesome teacher fired for excellent idea (Cone of Shame) |
|
|
Teacher Used "Cone Of Shame" To Discipline Students _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fran Guru


Joined: 29 Feb 2004 Posts: 511 Location: Coruña (Spain)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just the other day in my office I found a cubicle labelled "Cubicle of Shame."
It had a further details of who'd qualify to sit there (had to do with some metrics). And I immediately thought "Manager of the year." _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energyman76b Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2022 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
same thing happened in Bavaria. Math teacher incited the love for math in the kids. They all excelled in the tests - and she was removed. Because the Ministry WANTS failing kids.
You need retards to buy crap and let the banking system rob you without complaining. _________________
| AidanJT wrote: |
Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.
|
Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shadow Skill Veteran

Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 1023
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WTF? The teacher gets through to the kids, they excel, teacher gets fired for owning too much? _________________ Ware wa mutekinari.
Wa ga kage waza ni kanau mono nashi.
Wa ga ichigeki wa mutekinari.
"First there was nothing, so the lord gave us light. There was still nothing, but at least you could see it." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shadow Skill wrote: | | WTF? The teacher gets through to the kids, they excel, teacher gets fired for owning too much? |
The education bureaucracy doesn't want smart, well informed young people, they want slowed down drones who're compliant with the bureaucracy and wont rock the boat or do their job well. _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:17 pm Post subject: Re: Awesome teacher fired for excellent idea (Cone of Shame) |
|
|
ZOMG! Torture!!!111 _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:18 pm Post subject: Re: Awesome teacher fired for excellent idea (Cone of Shame) |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | ZOMG! Torture!!!111 |
Nope, just regular child abuse. But I could understand how the psychotic could confuse the two. _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:03 am Post subject: Re: Awesome teacher fired for excellent idea (Cone of Shame) |
|
|
| aidanjt wrote: | | Nope, just regular child abuse. | :rotflmao:
:facepalm: _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energyman76b Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2022 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:10 am Post subject: Re: Awesome teacher fired for excellent idea (Cone of Shame) |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | aidanjt wrote: | | Nope, just regular child abuse. | :rotflmao:
:facepalm: |
no, it really is. A funny hat is one thing, such a device usually used on animals is abuse. _________________
| AidanJT wrote: |
Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.
|
Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see how it differs from a hat. Other than it not being a hat. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aidanjt wrote: | | Shadow Skill wrote: | | WTF? The teacher gets through to the kids, they excel, teacher gets fired for owning too much? |
The education bureaucracy doesn't want smart, well informed young people, they want slowed down drones who're compliant with the bureaucracy and wont rock the boat or do their job well. |
++
a teachers job is to empower students, not to repress them. _________________ Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Definitely child abuse. As I tried to illustrate with an example in the corporate world but went :whoosh: _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, there is (or was). I went back to see who was sitting there (not that I'd know who he/she was) but they had removed the sign. _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmitchell Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 1154 Location: Austin, Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Obviously it is child abuse. Would you use this device to discipline your grandparents? No? Then why would you think it is OK to use it on children? _________________ Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | Obviously it is child abuse. Would you use this device to discipline your grandparents? No? Then why would you think it is OK to use it on children? |
You've used that rule of thumb before, and I hope you didn't learn from some so-called parenting expert. Grandparents are not children. While senior citizens may suffer from diminished capacity, a senior's caregiver trying to maximize the quality of their last few years is only superficially similar to a parent preparing a developing child for adult life. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmitchell Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 1154 Location: Austin, Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | You've used that rule of thumb before, and I hope you didn't learn from some so-called parenting expert. Grandparents are not children. While senior citizens may suffer from diminished capacity, a senior's caregiver trying to maximize the quality of their last few years is only superficially similar to a parent preparing a developing child for adult life. |
Grandparents aren't the point. Would you use it on any adult whatsoever? Would you use it on an employee? On your spouse? On a colleague? The point isn't grandparents. The point is that children are people, and I submit that this is an unacceptable way to treat people. _________________ Your argument is invalid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | BoneKracker wrote: | | You've used that rule of thumb before, and I hope you didn't learn from some so-called parenting expert. Grandparents are not children. While senior citizens may suffer from diminished capacity, a senior's caregiver trying to maximize the quality of their last few years is only superficially similar to a parent preparing a developing child for adult life. |
Grandparents aren't the point. Would you use it on any adult whatsoever? Would you use it on an employee? On your spouse? On a colleague? The point isn't grandparents. The point is that children are people, and I submit that this is an unacceptable way to treat people. |
Adults are not children either. However, in some circumstances, a person's role might be similar to that of a parent preparing a developing child for adult life, and I could see something like this being used effectively, provided it is used responsibly. How is it any different from a college professor humiliating a student verbally for not knowing the material, showing up late, etc.?
If your role involves teaching a developing person to feel a sense of personal responsibility for something important, then providing a touch of public humiliation when they are failing to show that responsibility may be quite appropriate.
Granted, the dog cone is a bit over the top, but apparently it was being used in a spirit of fun and was not being used systematically (it just happened to be there). I imagine that if the student had refused to put it on, that would have been the end of it, or the teacher would have done whatever she normally does (such as send the student to the principal's office). _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excessive coddling is child abuse. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmitchell Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003 Posts: 1154 Location: Austin, Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | Adults are not children either. However, in some circumstances, a person's role might be similar to that of a parent preparing a developing child for adult life, and I could see something like this being used effectively, provided it is used responsibly. How is it any different from a college professor humiliating a student verbally for not knowing the material, showing up late, etc.?
If your role involves teaching a developing person to feel a sense of personal responsibility for something important, then providing a touch of public humiliation when they are failing to show that responsibility may be quite appropriate. |
I'm against humiliation too. One way it is different is that neuroscience has found emotionally traumatic childhood events actually cause physical damage to a child's brain. Fragile. Handle with care.
| Quote: | | Granted, the dog cone is a bit over the top, but apparently it was being used in a spirit of fun and was not being used systematically (it just happened to be there). I imagine that if the student had refused to put it on, that would have been the end of it, or the teacher would have done whatever she normally does (such as send the student to the principal's office). |
Yes. I don't think I would classify this particular event as abuse. But if it was used as a real means of discipline, then I would definitely call it abuse. _________________ Your argument is invalid.
Last edited by dmitchell on Sat May 12, 2012 3:15 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
BK is allegedly a manager. You can imagine how he treats his subordinates.
http://youtu.be/JI3Y1auTFpU <-- Visual aid. _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wildhorse Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 148 Location: Estados Unidos De América
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dmitchell wrote: | | Obviously it is child abuse. Would you use this device to discipline your grandparents? | Sure! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John-Boy Guru


Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 436 Location: Desperately seeking Moksha in all the wrong places
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 2:27 pm Post subject: Re: Awesome teacher fired for excellent idea (Cone of Shame) |
|
|
| energyman76b wrote: | | pjp wrote: | | aidanjt wrote: | | Nope, just regular child abuse. | :rotflmao:
:facepalm: |
no, it really is. A funny hat is one thing, such a device usually used on animals is abuse. |
No it isn't and on the plus side, it would stop any student it's used on licking his/her stitches _________________ When you break rules, break 'em good and hard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
:lol: _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|