Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Marine Discharged for Criticizing Obama on Facebook
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:56 am    Post subject: Marine Discharged for Criticizing Obama on Facebook Reply with quote

Quote:
Sgt. Gary Stein, the 26-year-old Marine who learned Wednesday he would be discharged for his online comments criticizing President Barack Obama, wishes he could take it back.

“People ask me, ‘Would you go back and change those words?’ I would most definitely,” Stein told msnbc.com. “I would articulate my point better.”

On March 1, Stein wrote on a closed forum for active-duty meteorologists and oceanographers that he would say "Screw Obama" and not follow all orders from him, according to Courthouse News.

“Obama is the economic enemy,” he wrote in the post. “He is the religious enemy ... He is the ‘fundamentally change’ America enemy … He IS the Domestic Enemy.”

Five minutes later, another Marine took down his post, but not before someone Stein knew took a screen shot and forwarded the comment to Stein’s superiors.

Stein had already been warned about a Facebook page he had started in 2010, which he named Armed Forces Tea Party.

“They said, ‘All we ask is that you write that the views are not that of the Marine Corps or the Department of Defense,’” Stein said. He said he put up the disclaimer that day.

The Facebook page, which had six moderators, including Stein, included posts about contraception, gays in the military, pundit Keith Olbermann and Obama. One post included a photo of Obama with the word, “Jackass” written underneath. Stein said that was not his post.

Service members are, according to Directive 1344 of the Department of Defense, allowed to express personal opinions on political candidates, but not as representatives of the Armed Forces.

Last month, a three-member military panel recommended that he be booted from the Marine Corps. On Wednesday, Brig. Gen. Daniel Yoo accepted their recommendation that Stein be dismissed for violating military law.

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/25/11396769-marine-who-criticized-obama-on-facebook-i-wish-i-could-take-it-back
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He violated the UCMJ.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wswartzendruber
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 1197
Location: Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate to say it, but I don't believe the rules were unclear to him. He chose to violate those rules.

EDIT: There's a less-than-obvious element here. I heard on Limbaugh's program that Sgt. Stein was a ten year veteran. Being a sergeant after ten years seems a little...slow. I'm wondering if there isn't more at work here, and the Facebook thing was only an official reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmitchell
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Austin, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At least now he can be a real man with a real job.
_________________
Your argument is invalid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:07 am    Post subject: Re: Marine Discharged for Criticizing Obama on Facebook Reply with quote

So, what did he do?

Quote:
‘All we ask is that you write that the views are not that of the Marine Corps or the Department of Defense,’” Stein said. He said he put up the disclaimer that day. [...]

Service members are, according to Directive 1344 of the Department of Defense, allowed to express personal opinions on political candidates, but not as representatives of the Armed Forces.

So, what did he do?

That said, they keep making it easy for people to get out. I wish it was that easy when I was doing my time.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmitchell wrote:
At least now he can be a real man with a real job.

:lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmitchell
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Austin, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're laughing at me, not with me, aren't you? :lol:
_________________
Your argument is invalid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:50 am    Post subject: Re: Marine Discharged for Criticizing Obama on Facebook Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
So, what did he do?

If he was an Officer, it would be a violation of UCMJ Article 88: Contempt Toward Officials, which specifically forbids "contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present". But he is enlisted.

He might not have technically violated DoD Directive 1344, in my opinion, since he was in a closed forum. Regardless, it's a clear violation of UCMJ Article 134 (General Article), in that his act was directly prejudicial to good order and discipline, and also in that it is a breach of a custom of the service (the long-standing custom of military members refraining from public political activism, now specifically articulated in the latest version of DoD Directive 1344, which says you shouldn't wear your uniform to a political rally and stuff like that). It might also be argued that it further qualifies in that it brings discredit upon the Marine Corps, although that's arguably not true.
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitivearticles/a/134.htm

The guy obviously didn't want to serve under the current Commander-in-Chief. The enlisted oath actually says, "Obey the orders of the President of the United States and the officers appointed over me":
Quote:
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. [So help me God.]

I guess his issue was that he felt there was a conflict between (a) obey the orders of the President; and (b) support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. He literally considers Obama to be a "domestic enemy".

Flapping his lips as he was doesn't do the Marine Corps any good, in terms of morale, confidence in its leadership, willingness to follow orders, and in general "good order and discipline". I don't think punishment of such an individual is really justifiable, but they should probably be administratively separated without delay. It's sort of like being a conscientious objector.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmitchell wrote:
You're laughing at me, not with me, aren't you? :lol:

I think I was laughing with you. I was picturing you actually meaning that, but realizing that saying it would offend a couple of people, then laughing to yourself and saying it anyway.

Edit: no, I guess you're right; now that I spell it out, I guess I was laughing at you. :lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the explanation.

"While not in uniform" has been around for a long time, so it seems like that is really trumped on a whim.

I'm so glad I got out. Freedom of speech should NEVER be abridged ("fire!" is not abridged, just in case someone wanted to go there).

As for saying he wouldn't obey his orders, that's questionable, and quite probably bluster. He'd first have to ignore orders in his direct chain of command.

Of course that's now extended to Corporate America, so we're pretty much done with the 1st Amendment.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmitchell
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Austin, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
I think I was laughing with you. I was picturing you actually meaning that, but realizing that saying it would offend a couple of people, then laughing to yourself and saying it anyway.

Edit: no, I guess you're right; now that I spell it out, I guess I was laughing at you. :lol:

:lol:

Have you seen the most recent episode of Parks and Recreation? Ron Swanson explains to Chris (a mid-level city bureaucrat) that he needs to consider the positives of losing his job: "You would no longer be a government parasite sucking the lifeblood from honest, hardworking people. Instead, you'd contribute to society, like a man." I do love Ron Swanson. :)
_________________
Your argument is invalid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had a recent conversation something like that with a relative who is approaching retirement after many years of working in government. :lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum