| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
danilo2 n00b

Joined: 01 Oct 2010 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: qsynergy problem |
|
|
Hi! I was trying to emerge qsynergy but I've got message that qsynergy is blocking synergy (qsynergy is front end for synergy)
Is it bug? can it be fixed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VinzC Advocate


Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 4551 Location: Spa (Belgium)
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's what I have on my system:
| ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 emerge -pv qsynergy: | * Last emerge --sync was Sat Feb 11 15:05:01 2012.
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] x11-misc/synergy-1.4.5-r2 USE="-qt4" 2,933 kB
[ebuild N ] x11-misc/qsynergy-0.9.1-r1 USE="(-debug)" 155 kB
Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 3,088 kB |
Note the last --sync date though. Are you running stable or ~testing architecture? _________________ Gentoo addict: tomorrow I quit, I promise!... Just one more emerge...
GNU/Linux user #369763
“Wow! I feel root” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaggyStyle Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 4735
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
do NOT use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64! if you wise to use testing use /etc/portage/packages.keywords notion. _________________ Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
ProjectFootball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rgawenda n00b


Joined: 30 Mar 2005 Posts: 47 Location: Ourense, Spain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:38 am Post subject: Re: qsynergy problem |
|
|
| danilo2 wrote: | Hi! I was trying to emerge qsynergy but I've got message that qsynergy is blocking synergy (qsynergy is front end for synergy)
Is it bug? can it be fixed? |
Use plain synergy with USE=qt4 _________________ Rafael C. Gawenda
Linuxer since 0.99pl11
Registered Linux User #93375 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VinzC Advocate


Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 4551 Location: Spa (Belgium)
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DaggyStyle wrote: | | do NOT use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64! if you wise to use testing use /etc/portage/packages.keywords notion. |
LOL
Of course. But for the example's sake (mind the -p parameter), the demonstration as to what happens on a different system is clear in that there's no such blocking error message like the one danilo talked about. Other than that... _________________ Gentoo addict: tomorrow I quit, I promise!... Just one more emerge...
GNU/Linux user #369763
“Wow! I feel root” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaggyStyle Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 4735
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VinzC wrote: | | DaggyStyle wrote: | | do NOT use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64! if you wise to use testing use /etc/portage/packages.keywords notion. |
LOL
Of course. But for the example's sake (mind the -p parameter), the demonstration as to what happens on a different system is clear in that there's no such blocking error message like the one danilo talked about. Other than that... |
new users doesn't understand such comments. _________________ Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
ProjectFootball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phunehehe n00b

Joined: 26 Sep 2010 Posts: 17 Location: Vietnam
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:34 am Post subject: Re: qsynergy problem |
|
|
| rgawenda wrote: | | Use plain synergy with USE=qt4 |
Thank you! This work. x11-misc/qsynergy is not needed. With the qt4 use flag, x11-misc/synergy contains /usr/bin/qsynergy. _________________ http://phunehehe.net/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|