| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dark Foo
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2008
Posts: 1045
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Have decided to test this out on my laptop while i am away so i can solve the issue when i get back from travelling.
After checking apaches logs (was using lighttpd) and it shows
| Code: | [Tue Dec 14 14:24:15 2010] [error] [client 192.168.0.73] PHP Fatal error: Call to a member function query_col() on a non-object in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/mythweb/modules/backend_log/init.php on line 19, referer: http://192.168.0.73/mythweb/
[Tue Dec 14 14:24:15 2010] [error] [client 192.168.0.73] File does not exist: /var/www/localhost/htdocs/mythweb/skin_url, referer: http://192.168.0.73/mythweb/mythweb.php |
The line it refers to is
$enabled = $db->query_col('SELECT SUM(data) FROM settings WHERE value="LogEnabled"');
I know its not a database connection issue as the database has be populated with information and mythfilldatabase works.
Any one know when mythtv-0.24 will hit the portage tree, either unstable or stable?
_________________
I know 43 ways to kill with a SKITTLE, so taste my rainbow bitch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ld1982a
n00b
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 9
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've finally tried to upgrade out of .21, but it seems mythtv .22 (the one in the portage tree) doesn't like qt4.7:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367391
Is there a version that works with qt4.7 in portage, or should I move to an overlay that I've seen some people talk about?
Can I skip .22 if I've fixed the database?
I haven't touched this myth box in a *long* time because it has been working. I don't know the proper way to use gentoo and mythtv because I haven't thought about it in a while.
Thanks for any tips. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prf84
n00b
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Location: Chicago, IL
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:26 pm Post subject: QT 3 support in QT 4.7 |
|
|
| ld1982a wrote: | I've finally tried to upgrade out of .21, but it seems mythtv .22 (the one in the portage tree) doesn't like qt4.7:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367391
Is there a version that works with qt4.7 in portage, or should I move to an overlay that I've seen some people talk about?
Can I skip .22 if I've fixed the database?
I haven't touched this myth box in a *long* time because it has been working. I don't know the proper way to use gentoo and mythtv because I haven't thought about it in a while.
Thanks for any tips. |
Try adding this to: /etc/portage/package.use
| Code: | x11-libs/qt-core qt3support
x11-libs/qt-sql qt3support mysql
x11-libs/qt-gui qt3support tiff dbus xinerama
x11-libs/qt-opengl qt3support
x11-libs/qt-phonon qt3support
|
_________________
Thank you
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ld1982a
n00b
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 9
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:47 pm Post subject: Re: QT 3 support in QT 4.7 |
|
|
Thanks for the reply.
It has been a little while, but I think I ended up unmasking .23 (at that point it wasn't stable yet and I like to keep my mythbox on stable). That seemed to fix it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
depontius
Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 2156
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Way back at the move from 0.21 to 0.22, I masked things so that I could manage the upgrade on my own time, and a rough upgrade it was. I had partial corruption of my database, and a bit of a rocky road getting back from that. Things have run well since then, and I'm currently running 0.24.1 out of the upstream "overlay". (not really an overlay, but like one)
Way back when, I also masked ">=dev-db/mysql-5.1". I saw a notice about mysql-5.1 and a migration guide, but no specifics, and never got a round tuit. More recently I've seen a notice about mysql-5.5, no migration guide, and a notice that mysql-5.0 is at death's door, radioactive, and all that.
Does anyone have any advice about mysql upgrade? I presume I should take it 5.0 -> 5.1 and then 5.1 -> 5.5, but I'd like to hear of any experiences. Did the binary database upgrade in-place, or did you have to reload from a backup, etc?
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Multimedia
