| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Muso l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 655 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cach0rr0 wrote: | | mmealman wrote: |
If Gentoo does die it'll be to a better quality source based distro. |
basically this
at the moment your options for a "better" source-based distro are zero. For what problems it may have, Gentoo is still top of the heap far as source-based distros go, and for a fair number of the usability complaints, it's not at all a cop-out to say "that's a side-effect of a source-based distro" |
Also agreed.
When I started using source based distros there were a few around, with Sorcerer being the main "first" I believe. Sorcerer had a dev shakeup and that caused the splintering into various others. Quite a few of the Sorcerer devs migrated to Gentoo, others went to Sourcemage, some went to Lunar... but in the end Gentoo had risen above the competition. This was many years ago and little has changed since. Gentoo is still the core source based distro. _________________ If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theMerge Apprentice


Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 158 Location: Little Elm, TX
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We are still doing this? Crap!
I switched to Ubuntu a few years back because I didn't have the time (or desire) to work up and maintain a Gentoo System. Since Ubuntu is now a glorious resource hog (imho, no flame intended here) I moved back home to Gentoo. I found several things to be true.
- Gentoo installed clean, fast (for gentoo) and easily. In fact it was easier this time than ever before.
- Gentoo is no longer "bleeding edge", rather it is up to date and stable. This is better for me.
- Once I worked out the kinks, it was faster, less buggy, and nearly as feature rich as Ubuntu.
- It is lean and does not have bloat... just like always... unless you want it to.
Far from dead, Gentoo has proven itself to be a viable distro that suits my needs as a web developer to the "T". Of course there are the fringe cases where Gentoo falls short, but that's true no matter where you go. For the most part Gentoo feels just as strong as it always has.
GJ Devs, and long live Gentoo _________________ [Insert favorite Ghandi quote here] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dirkfanick Apprentice


Joined: 12 Jan 2011 Posts: 201 Location: germany - hamburg
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Looks like Gentoo is a sinking ship |
As gentoo is highly configurable and transparent (trusted) in what-happens-and-what-is-possible-with-your-machine it is a good and professional choice for webmasters, sysadmins and companys which handle sensible (user)-data and access.
It was a long way for unix/linux but it was it worth.
I hope it won't sink - even if the hardwaremaket comes along with handys, tablets, etc. and human behavior may choose completely other information and multimediatools. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lightvhawk0 Guru


Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 388
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:23 am Post subject: Re: Looks like Gentoo is a sinking ship. |
|
|
| SlashBeast wrote: | Hi there.
Gentoo is not in good shape, it looks more like sinking ship nowdays. And why is that? I see a lot powerusers leaving gentoo and going to distros like for example archlinux.
The current situation has been nicely summarized by Raffaello D. Di Napoli in comment to a post on a Flameyes's blog.
| Raffaello D. Di Napoli wrote: | I have offered to maintain a few packages, as well as some I had created and submitted myself, but I got no comments or actions whatsoever.
Many of the bugs I report also include ready-to-apply fixing patches, written as clearly as possible, and tested before being uploaded.
A while ago, some dev called for action to help take care of maintained-wanted and maintainer-needed bugs; I did browse a few, signaled one that could be closed because upstream had been gone for years, so the packages was long dead, but even that one request went completely unnoticed, so I stopped bothering altogether.
That’s to say, calling for volunteers and not following up (not talking about you right now) doesn’t really help, it only gets wannabe-devs frustrated. I don’t think I have time to be a dev, but I’d sure love to contribute, if listened to. |
And I agree in 100% with this, sadly... |
I've been here since 2003
Every year since inception people post that Gentoo is dieing.
Every year I read the thread and laugh, and every year I post the same thing.
Gentoo isn't dieing it's an ever changing system with growing pains and set backs... _________________ If God has made us in his image, we have returned him the favor. - Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yoshi314 l33t


Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 796 Location: PL
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 8:11 am Post subject: Re: Looks like Gentoo is a sinking ship. |
|
|
| lightvhawk0 wrote: | I've been here since 2003
Every year since inception people post that Gentoo is dieing.
Every year I read the thread and laugh, and every year I post the same thing.
Gentoo isn't dieing it's an ever changing system with growing pains and set backs... | i think it's more of a matter of personal burnout. quite often i find myself tired or having to build software that i just want to try out, or fixing linking problems after certain upgrades.
there is certain inertia related to certain package upgrades, as they need way more testing than in binary distributions. also, gentoo has its fair share of regular problems related to certain package upgrades (like libpng12/14). and sometimes it really shows that there is a lack of manpower in the project - many new-package/improvement bugs can lay around unadressed for quite a while on bugzilla.
i admit, i am one of those people that switch to arch linux once they get fed up with gentoo. but i eventually come back, because gentoo has more flexibility when it comes to package customization. and when i have time to run some builds.
if there is anything i would change about gentoo, it would be to take some hints from arch towards simplifying the system (configs and backing scripts). _________________ ~amd64, ~x86
shrink your /usr/portage with squashfs+aufs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keet Guru

Joined: 09 Sep 2008 Posts: 330
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember the first time that I tried to install Gentoo, probably back in 2005 or 2006. I used the LiveCD, and I didn't understand it. It gave me a bunch of checkboxes for 'features' which I could enable or disable, so I scrolled through this list of what looked like hundreds of 'features', wondering exactly what they were for. After I chose some features and clicked through a few more prompts, Gentoo said that it was installing, and I knew that it could take a while, so I left my computer on overnight, but nothing seemed to happen. I tried a couple variations on this a few times, but it didn't work, so I eventually installed Ubuntu.
Now I know that they were USE flags, and realize that (in my opinion), having an automated, graphical installer is against the spirit of Gentoo. It's fine for other distributions, like Ubuntu, which are of the proper nature to have user-friendly, shiny, graphical installers. I'm not sure whether Gentoo itself is realizing what it is more, or whether I just understand it better and have a clear idea of what to expect. It seems to me that Gentoo has improved significantly, but that could be based merely on my own rocky start with it, which might have been due to some minor bug or misunderstanding.
A few years later, I installed Ubuntu again, but realized that it lacked support for my sound card. I learned that I needed to significantly reconfigure my kernel to make it work, found instructions on how to do this, and did it successfully. Well, it was somewhat successful; my sound card worked, but now my wireless card didn't! I decided that if I was going to spend lots of time tweaking it just to make my sound card work, I might as well just use Gentoo.
I've tried Ubuntu a few times since then (on flash drives and virtual machines), but it's just too user-friendly-ish and simplistic, but it doesn't really seem qualitatively better. I've also tried FreeBSD, OpenSuse, OpenSolaris, Puppy, DSL, and others, but I'm the sort of person who doesn't mind spending an extra fifteen minutes or half hour to tweak something, and Gentoo makes that straightforward for me.
I'll know that Gentoo is dying for me when I can't figure out how to configure it in a way that I like, or something essential just won't work as well as I want it to. Then, though, it might be fine for other people. I suppose that people will know that it is dead when people stop using these forums and cease installing or using it on their computers. I doubt that will ever happen, though. _________________ My Gentoo computers:
Home-built i7 2600K / 8GB RAM || Dell T6400/4GB RAM
Panasonic Toughbook CF-51 T2300/4GB RAM || Fujitsu Lifebook P4/1.6Ghz, 512MB RAM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dirkfanick Apprentice


Joined: 12 Jan 2011 Posts: 201 Location: germany - hamburg
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Looks like Gentoo is a sinking ship |
If gentoo is a ship it has just no captain like mr.kingsize.ubuntu - and I like both for their different offers.
Even if ubuntu or alike is much more userfriendly and easy to install (compilation-times aside).
gentoo is gentoo,
and we all are captains a bit.
gentoo is maybe the most democratic sys in our world.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alveraan n00b

Joined: 24 Oct 2004 Posts: 59 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only reason why I changed my desktop distro from gentoo to arch a few months ago was because I wanted a simple and fast bleeding edge system.
Arch has all the newest packages, is nevertheless pretty stable, extremely simple to use and configure (if you're not afraid of the command line) and has good documentation and a good community. Gentoo has all that too, but is not bleeding edge anymore. A few years ago, Gentoo still was, so I guess the application range has changed, and it's now more like debian stable. It is also much more customizable than arch, being a source based distribution with the great use flags concept.
So for my two servers, gentoo (hardened) remains the distro of choice.
Gentoo is still a fine distro and it seems far from being dead. _________________ Everytime you kill a kitten, god masturbates. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
durian Guru


Joined: 16 Jul 2003 Posts: 312 Location: Margretetorp
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:57 pm Post subject: Re: Looks like Gentoo is a sinking ship. |
|
|
| yoshi314 wrote: | | i think it's more of a matter of personal burnout. quite often i find myself tired or having to build software that i just want to try out, or fixing linking problems after certain upgrades. | Yeah, I have the same feeling. I got tired a few times of breakages or just not having the energy. But in the end, Gentoo wins :)
-peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amightywind Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 137 Location: Andover, MN USA
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:21 pm Post subject: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
I must agree Gentoo is in decline. The recent switch to the new baselayout program trashed my system. And after after a routine emerge world && revdep-rebuild my python 2.6 was gone! sweet. System decapitated. Over the past 2 years the quarterly updates have been getting worse and worse. The latest baselayout/openrc rollout stunk. The old one was great. It worked reliably. My system never shutdown correctly after openrc was installed. Yes, wise asses I followed the migration guide. It not joins the four inch stack of previous ones. Who tested it? How many users and for how long? There is not a lot of transparency. On top of that the priesthood rolled out yet another massive X upgrade 2 days after the openrc fiasco. Nice timing fellas. I have had to emerge Chromium 3 time in the last month. Who wants to spend 50% of their computer time trying to keep their system alive?
Here are the major problems with Gentoo as I see them:
1. Python based emerge is a complete disaster. Why would I want a nice minimal source based system and be required to use that junkyard? What are you retards thinking?
2. The quality of ebuilds has been declining as the number of packages increases exponentially. I just want a gnome desktop than runs and a gcc that works.
3. Gentoo quality control sucks. Who is testing what to what standard?
After keeping a Gentoo system alive since 2004 I bid adieu. This distro is off the rails. I will move on to arch or fedora or something. My computer is already thanking me that it won't have to compile all night again to produce a broken system. The first thing I will do is remove python... _________________ amightywind |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aCOSwt Advocate


Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 2035 Location: Between the keyboard and the chair
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:56 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | Gentoo quality control sucks. Who is testing what to what standard? |
I believe that each dev tests what he has on his machine according to his own standards.
And that the average is supposed to represent a fair percentage of the total amount of Gentoo's installs.
Hence I believe I just have to behave accordingly and *not* install packages *because* they are flagged stable or because they are available in portage, *but because* I need them.
I like Gentoo because I can make a system with what I want irrespective of any policy. I kept kernel 2.6.34 long time after it was removed from portage, the fact it was working perfectly was more important for me than any QA statement about 2.6.35 or 2.6.36. And only upgraded to 2.6.37 because of the in-kernel availability of the snd_aloop driver...
After this... if it does not work as I expected... I can only blame... myself !
Regarding the quality of the ebuilds, I must say that each time (apart from one) I complained about the quality of an ebuild on bugzilla (and suggested a correction), changes have been made.
I believe that we are all co-responsible about the quality of portage's packages.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tld l33t

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Posts: 704
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:58 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | I must agree Gentoo is in decline. The recent switch to the new baselayout program trashed my system. |
Did you follow the migration guide? There were very good reasons for the change to baselayout2 and openrc and it was a radical change. I was really impressed at how well the devs handled it. For me, I found that about 80% of what was described in the guide happened automatically. The whole thing probably took me 10 minutes from update to reboot.
I also don't get all your railing about portage and python. You seem to think that because it's a source based distro that everything should be simple. How do you suggest handling everything portage has to do...dependencies etc etc? The fact is that a) it's a complex thing to do, b) it MUST be written in SOME language. What would you suggest writing all that in, and why would it work better??
I'll give you one thing however: The last Python 2.6 to 2.7 upgrade produced an elog that told you to run python-updater but neglected to say that, if you didn't eselect python 2.7 first, you could end up in a world of shit. That was an oversight I thought.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tld l33t

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Posts: 704
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:04 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| aCOSwt wrote: | | I like Gentoo because I can make a system with what I want irrespective of any policy. I kept kernel 2.6.34 long time after it was removed from portage, the fact it was working perfectly was more important for me than any QA statement about 2.6.35 or 2.6.36. And only upgraded to 2.6.37 because of the in-kernel availability of the snd_aloop driver... |
Ditto...on my mythtv backend I've had to stick with old kernels on two different occasions, once with 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 and now with 2.6.35-gentoo-r12, because the kernel developers keep introducing ext4 performance regressions that are just enough to make me start getting IOBOUND errors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phajdan.jr Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 1740 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | I have had to emerge Chromium 3 time in the last month. |
I hope it worked (I'm maintaining the package by the way). Is that a bad thing? That's just how often the upstream makes releases, especially in beta and dev channels. You can mask more recent versions, and remove the mask when you want to upgrade. _________________ http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Etal Veteran


Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 1633
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:40 pm Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | I will move on to arch or fedora or something [...] The first thing I will do is remove python... |
Oh, good luck with yum after that  _________________ “And even in authoritarian countries, information networks are helping people discover new facts and making governments more accountable.”– Hillary Clinton, Jan. 21, 2010 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amightywind Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 137 Location: Andover, MN USA
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
The last Python 2.6 to 2.7 upgrade produced an elog that told you to run python-updater but neglected to say that, if you didn't eselect python 2.7 first, you could end up in a world of shit.
|
Classic Gentoo moron response. Perhaps the ebuild maybe should have just run python-updater, hmm? Enjoy your butcher knife juggling.
How hard can it be when the package contains a forked rewrite of every support package known to man targeted to Linux? Next to Open Office it is the longest compile I have ever seen. That is not a compliment. You might want to inflict it on your users a little less often, or better get ccache involved. 99.99% of any release is the same. That would be more intelligent. _________________ amightywind |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phajdan.jr Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 1740 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | Perhaps the ebuild maybe should have just run python-updater, hmm? |
That's not so simple. python-updater launches another emerge. If one of those packages decides to run python-updater again, an infinite loop might occur. Anyway, it's generally assumed that ebuilds should not launch emerge. Perhaps there is a better way to handle the upgrades, but if you've failed to follow the instructions, it's not fair to blame resulting problems on the distro.
| amightywind wrote: |
How hard can it be when the package contains a forked rewrite of every support package known to man targeted to Linux? |
Well, there are still some bundled libraries, but there is an ongoing effort to use system versions instead. But do you have some hard data how much that increases the build time? My estimate is that most of that time is spent in webkit (try compiling qt-webkit or webkit-gtk), and the browser's code is not small either. If you have small RAM, the linking of the final executable may be very long, because it will start using the swap.
| amightywind wrote: | | You might want to inflict it on your users a little less often, or better get ccache involved. 99.99% of any release is the same. That would be more intelligent. |
You can use ccache - that's a decision made on the user's side, not packager's. Again, you don't have to upgrade. It's possible to mask packages based on version numbers. Ah, and most of the updates in the stable channel are security fixes. _________________ http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tld l33t

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Posts: 704
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | Quote: |
The last Python 2.6 to 2.7 upgrade produced an elog that told you to run python-updater but neglected to say that, if you didn't eselect python 2.7 first, you could end up in a world of shit.
|
Classic Gentoo moron response. Perhaps the ebuild maybe should have just run python-updater, hmm? Enjoy your butcher knife juggling.
|
Moron?? Wow...I though my response to your post was pretty civil...my mistake I guess.
Anyway...this moron got through the upgrade and you didn't...make of that what you will...
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dalek Veteran


Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 1288 Location: Mississippi USA
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doing the openrc upgrade was a breeze for me and most others on the mailing list didn't have any problems.
On python, I learned a LONG time ago to run python-updater after a python update. If you don't do that, it's the fault of the person in the chair typing on the keyboard or not typing in this case.
 _________________ My rig: Gigabyte GA-770T-USB3 mobo AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2GHz ZALMAN CNPS10X Performa CPU cooler
G.SKILL 16GB DDR3 PC3 12800 Memory Nvidia GT-220 video card LG W2253 Monitor
WD1600AAJS & WD2502ABYS hard drives
Cooler Master HAF-932 Case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cach0rr0 Moderator


Joined: 13 Nov 2008 Posts: 4117 Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: |
Classic Gentoo moron response. Perhaps the ebuild maybe should have just run python-updater, hmm? Enjoy your butcher knife juggling.
|
I'm sorry, how old are you? Have you yet held down a job in your life that didn't involve someone's fry grease? Do you burn the building down every time you quit your job?
Grow up. You're running around calling people on here "morons" - hey, guess what, I figured out how to have a working functional Gentoo system on baselayout-2 with openrc. You didn't. My system is perfectly functional. Yours isn't. Which of us is the moron?
At any rate, your childish personal attacks have absolutely no business here, or anywhere else. Throwing a tantrum on your way out isn't something that's to be expected beyond adolescence, speaks volumes as to your level of maturity, and gives me great confidence the people involved with other distros will most likely have no inclination whatsoever to put up with you. Act like a professional, and an adult, and people will treat you in kind. Throw a tantrum when things don't go your way like some hormonally-driven pimply teenager, and people will, well, treat you in kind.
I won't even bother entertaining the apparent technical inaccuracies or failed logic in your points.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out. You have, through your childish tone, ensured that not a single soul will give the slightest shit about your departure, inclusive of dismissing any critiques you may have had that might otherwise be useful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slonocode Apprentice


Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 273
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cach0rr0 wrote: | | hey, guess what, I figured out how to have a working functional Gentoo system on baselayout-2 with openrc. You didn't. My system is perfectly functional. Yours isn't. Which of us is the moron? |
It's not an either/or situation. It's quite possible that you could both be morons. It's also quite possible that you could be a moron and he is not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
krinn Advocate


Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 3678
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:33 am Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | And after after a routine emerge world && revdep-rebuild my python 2.6 was gone! sweet. System decapitated. |
Don't bug us with false arguments ! Portage doesn't remove python2.6 because of slot
So your "routine emerge world && revdep-rebuild" is hiding in fact a stupid "routine emerge world && emerge --depclean && revdep-rebuild" !!!
If a mess happen, it's your own fault because you can't even run it with -p switch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yoshi314 l33t


Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 796 Location: PL
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:27 am Post subject: Re: Gentoo slouching to chaos |
|
|
| amightywind wrote: | | I must agree Gentoo is in decline. The recent switch to the new baselayout program trashed my system. And after after a routine emerge world && revdep-rebuild my python 2.6 was gone! sweet. System decapitated. Over the past 2 years the quarterly updates have been getting worse and worse. The latest baselayout/openrc rollout stunk. The old one was great. It worked reliably. My system never shutdown correctly after openrc was installed. Yes, wise asses I followed the migration guide. It not joins the four inch stack of previous ones. Who tested it? How many users and for how long? There is not a lot of transparency. On top of that the priesthood rolled out yet another massive X upgrade 2 days after the openrc fiasco. Nice timing fellas. I have had to emerge Chromium 3 time in the last month. Who wants to spend 50% of their computer time trying to keep their system alive? | i can only say - works for me. never had any issues with openrc, switched to it as soon as it hit ~arch.
as for chromium - blame google. they update the browser that frequently. unless you mean linking breakages - they mostly happen when ffmpeg/libx264 is updated.
| Quote: | Here are the major problems with Gentoo as I see them:
1. Python based emerge is a complete disaster. Why would I want a nice minimal source based system and be required to use that junkyard? What are you retards thinking? | gentoo is not supposed to be minimal. it's supposed to be flexible.
| Quote: | | 2. The quality of ebuilds has been declining as the number of packages increases exponentially. I just want a gnome desktop than runs and a gcc that works. | i can agree with that. there were numerous failures with updates that i still remember.
but just because you want working gnome+gcc doesn't mean that everyone wants the same.
| Quote: | | 3. Gentoo quality control sucks. Who is testing what to what standard? | i agree to that. but testing in gentoo involves testing against multiple factors (architectures, dependencies, use combinations, compiler version etc) which makes it much harder.
| Quote: | | After keeping a Gentoo system alive since 2004 I bid adieu. This distro is off the rails. I will move on to arch or fedora or something. My computer is already thanking me that it won't have to compile all night again to produce a broken system. The first thing I will do is remove python... | i also think now and then that gentoo is dying or stagnating. but it's actually going on, just not with the level of innovation/attention i would expect/desire.
i left gentoo many many times for other distros. and i always come back after a while. gentoo has that flexibility that other distribution cannot offer. it surely lags with package updates, or integration of new technologies.
of course you might say that LFS has even more flexibility. but it's all manual, while gentoo's automation makes it more convenient. _________________ ~amd64, ~x86
shrink your /usr/portage with squashfs+aufs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dalek Veteran


Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 1288 Location: Mississippi USA
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have always described Gentoo this way. Gentoo is Linux From Scratch with a nice package handler. I think Gentoo is about as close to source as you can get other than LFS. Key word "about". There may be another one I have not heard of.
I been using Gentoo since about 2003. You can look to the left to see that. I signed up here and within a couple days, I had Gentoo running. I must add, other than some updates that were tricky, expat being one of them, I have had no problems with mine. When there is a upgrade that is tricky, they post a guide and walk you through it. Then just to make things better, they added the news item with eselect. That way even if you use Gentoo but don't use the mailing lists, forums or keep up with things in other ways, you still know what is coming and can be aware of the update process.
I used Mandrake before I switched to Gentoo. I can't even think of one reason I would switch back or to anything else.
LONG LIVE GENTOO !!!
 _________________ My rig: Gigabyte GA-770T-USB3 mobo AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2GHz ZALMAN CNPS10X Performa CPU cooler
G.SKILL 16GB DDR3 PC3 12800 Memory Nvidia GT-220 video card LG W2253 Monitor
WD1600AAJS & WD2502ABYS hard drives
Cooler Master HAF-932 Case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tld l33t

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Posts: 704
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dalek wrote: | | I have always described Gentoo this way. Gentoo is Linux From Scratch with a nice package handler. I think Gentoo is about as close to source as you can get other than LFS. Key word "about". There may be another one I have not heard of. |
Yup. I don't understand why so many seem to downplay the complexity of what it must take to do that, and think there should never be any odd cases where you have to be paying attention and perform some special steps.
When you think about it, Gentoo is doing things on your live running system that, in the Ubuntu (or other binary distribution) world, never take place except on some developers/packages system while the prepare the next major version upgrade. I've always been amazed that it's even doable frankly.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|