Forums

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Assistance Unsupported Software
  • Search

kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10 failed (install phase):

This forum covers all Gentoo-related software not officially supported by Gentoo. Ebuilds/software posted here might harm the health and stability of your system(s), and are not supported by Gentoo developers. Bugs/errors caused by ebuilds from overlays.gentoo.org are covered by this forum, too.
Locked
Advanced search
25 posts • Page 1 of 1
Author
Message
padoor
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 4185
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:43 am
Location: india

kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10 failed (install phase):

Post by padoor » Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:10 am

Code: Select all

e-pointer -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION  -c -o bar_python.o bar_python.cpp
bar_python.cpp:27:20: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[1]: *** [bar_python.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/work/superkaramba-3.5.10/superkaramba/src'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
emake failed
 * ERROR: kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10 failed (install phase):
 *   emake install failed.
 * 
 * Call stack:
 *     ebuild.sh, line   56:  Called src_install
 *   environment, line 4683:  Called kde-meta_src_install
 *   environment, line 3214:  Called kde-meta_src_install 'make' 'dodoc'
 *   environment, line 3223:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *                           emake DESTDIR="${D}" destdir="${D}" install || die "emake install failed.";
 * 
 * If you need support, post the output of 'emerge --info =kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10',
 * the complete build log and the output of 'emerge -pqv =kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10'.
 * This ebuild used the following eclasses from overlays:
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/kde-meta.eclass
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/kde.eclass
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/kde-functions.eclass
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/qt3.eclass
 * This ebuild is from an overlay named 'kde-sunset': '/var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/'
 * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/temp/environment'.
 * S: '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/work/superkaramba-3.5.10'
 * QA Notice: Unrecognized configure options:
 * 
 * 	configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --without-debug
 * 	configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --without-debug

>>> Failed to emerge kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10, Log file:

>>>  '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/temp/build.log'

 * Messages for package kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10:

 * ERROR: kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10 failed (install phase):
 *   emake install failed.
 * 
 * Call stack:
 *     ebuild.sh, line   56:  Called src_install
 *   environment, line 4683:  Called kde-meta_src_install
 *   environment, line 3214:  Called kde-meta_src_install 'make' 'dodoc'
 *   environment, line 3223:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *                           emake DESTDIR="${D}" destdir="${D}" install || die "emake install failed.";
 * 
 * If you need support, post the output of 'emerge --info =kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10',
 * the complete build log and the output of 'emerge -pqv =kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10'.
 * This ebuild used the following eclasses from overlays:
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/kde-meta.eclass
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/kde.eclass
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/kde-functions.eclass
 *   /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/eclass/qt3.eclass
 * This ebuild is from an overlay named 'kde-sunset': '/var/lib/layman/kde-sunset/'
 * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/temp/environment'.
 * S: '/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10/work/superkaramba-3.5.10'
localhost ramaswamy # 
it is looking for python-2.6 ?
any alternative ?
do i unmerge the file?

this is part of revdep-rebuild after python-updater
reach out a little bit more to catch it (DON'T BELIEVE the advocate part under my user name)
Top
Joseph_sys
Advocate
Advocate
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 4:05 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Post by Joseph_sys » Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:59 pm

I'm getting the same error.
I think KDE3.5 is no longer supported.
Top
VoidMage
Watchman
Watchman
User avatar
Posts: 6196
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:43 am

Post by VoidMage » Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:42 am

Joseph_sys wrote:I'm getting the same error.
I think KDE3.5 is no longer supported.
:roll: Since about 19 November 2009.
Top
padoor
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 4185
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:43 am
Location: india

Post by padoor » Sat Apr 23, 2011 3:43 am

does it mean kde-sunset also stopped support for kde3?
kde-3.5 is a nice package to have working for lesser resources machines.
:( :(

can i have python-2.6 also working along with 2.7 and 3.1?
then this problem can go
reach out a little bit more to catch it (DON'T BELIEVE the advocate part under my user name)
Top
ONEEYEMAN
Advocate
Advocate
Posts: 3717
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:49 pm

Post by ONEEYEMAN » Sat Apr 23, 2011 5:14 am

Hi,
You can still use KDE 3 from overlay, but it is not officially supported. :(

Thank you.
Top
AgBr
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:31 pm

Post by AgBr » Tue May 03, 2011 10:28 am

I've got the same problem. We generally use KDE4 but need KDE3.5 for running some older Terminals and for Quanta+ which is not ported to KDE4 unfortunately.
As far as I understand, Superkaramba generally is dispensable, but it's needed by some other package as a dependency. Does anybody know how to find out?
Top
Hu
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 24556
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:38 am

Post by Hu » Wed May 04, 2011 2:13 am

AgBr wrote:Superkaramba generally is dispensable, but it's needed by some other package as a dependency. Does anybody know how to find out?
How to find out what? If you mean, how do you learn why Portage still wants Superkaramba, then a good place to start is emerge --pretend --verbose --tree targets, which will show you which package marked superkaramba as a dependency.
Top
padoor
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 4185
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:43 am
Location: india

Post by padoor » Wed May 04, 2011 2:57 am

Code: Select all

ramaswamy@localhost ~ $ emerge --pretend --verbose --tree superkaramba

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N    ] kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10  USE="-debug -kdehiddenvisibility" 0 kB [1]
[ebuild  N    ]  x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2  USE="cups ipv6 -debug -doc -examples -firebird -immqt -immqt-bc -mysql -nas -nis -odbc -opengl -postgres -sqlite -xinerama" 0 kB [1]

Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 0 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
 [0] /usr/portage
 [1] /var/lib/layman/kde-sunset

!!! The following installed packages are masked:
- kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.10-r10 (masked by: package.mask)
/etc/portage/package.mask:
#=x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.0
# move x11-libs/qt x11-libs/qt-meta
# move x11-libs/qt x11-libs/qt-meta

- net-print/cups-1.4.6 (masked by: package.mask)
/etc/portage/package.mask:
#=x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.0

For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.

ramaswamy@localhost ~ $ 
these packages i have masked for the kde upgrade nagging of the portage.
seems superkaramba is only ornamental desktop appearance enhancer
reach out a little bit more to catch it (DON'T BELIEVE the advocate part under my user name)
Top
AgBr
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:31 pm

Post by AgBr » Wed May 04, 2011 6:20 am

Thanks for your suggestions. Based on some hint I got offline meanwhile, I took another route.
I did echo "kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10" > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
Thus avoiding the need to find out what is pulling the package
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:18 pm

superkaramba needs python-2.6!!! just install it and you can build superkaramba with no problems.
ps: needs to send this depends to portage, someone can do that plz?
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:19 pm

Code: Select all

emerge =python-2.6* -av

Code: Select all

emerge -av =superkaramba-3*
Top
i92guboj
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva
User avatar
Posts: 10315
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:17 pm
Location: Córdoba (Spain)

Post by i92guboj » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:54 am

Moved from Portage & Programming to Unsupported Software.
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:07 am

please mark this topic as [SOLVED], thnx!
Top
asturm
Developer
Developer
Posts: 9509
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by asturm » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:44 am

anest wrote:superkaramba needs python-2.6!!! just install it and you can build superkaramba with no problems.
ps: needs to send this depends to portage, someone can do that plz?
Best practise would be to add the python-2.6 dependency to the superkaramba ebuild in your local overlay, that's a no-brainer and would prevent a messy world file spiked with kde-3.5 dependencies.
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:48 am

whatever... i just show you solution. how to use it is your choice.
ps: but imho, should be better to send this to maintainer of kde-3.5 portage. i did my part, maybe now is your turn to do something too? ;)
Top
asturm
Developer
Developer
Posts: 9509
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by asturm » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:53 am

But then I thought you could contribute that to your kde3 overlay maintainers, so probably lots of other people won't have to deal with the issue. ;)

I'm not a KDE-3.5 user anymore since 4.0 has seen the light of day - I don't even know where to get the ebuild to begin with. ;)
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:01 am

listen dude, if you do not want "OLD and NASTY KDE3" for your self - WHAT YOU DOING HERE? just killing your time here? i saw your many postings on this forum and lots of them about how you don't like kde3 and you pushing people to stop used that. WHY YOU DO THIS? if you don't like something (maybe just not understand?) - simple solution - JUST LEAVE PLEASE. go get your life, do not waste your time here. thanks.
ps: i hope my post will not motivate you to start flood and flame in this topic. if you wana talk about why i want kde3 - please lets start talking somewhere else, but not here (just send me link to PM). thnx!
Top
asturm
Developer
Developer
Posts: 9509
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by asturm » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:04 am

Wow, that came unexpected. So, because I'm a KDE4 user I can't lend a helping hand? :roll:
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:08 am

what help? your flame? its NOT help. its just spam a-la "don't do kde3 because its ugly!". even its not close looks like any help.
if you really wana help us then stop this stream of nothing. thank you.
Top
asturm
Developer
Developer
Posts: 9509
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by asturm » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:14 am

Funny, where did I say that again? :lol:

Seems obvious that trying to get that dependency to the kde3 maintainers would be in your best interest and improve the situation for everyone using it.
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:24 am

i think all your posts in this topic is just to get your counter higher, nothing else.
please just leave (you don't care about kde3 anyway), its will really help ;) THANK YOU.
Top
asturm
Developer
Developer
Posts: 9509
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by asturm » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:31 am

You're really not doing yourself a favour here, unless there exists some unspoken law to never ever mention KDE4 in any KDE3.5 thread, that I don't know of. I was just trying to explain why it is probably not up to me to forward this to the kde3 overlay maintainers. If you rather keep this solution to this thread so that any new kde3 user must first undertake n forum searches to resolve dependency issues (python is not the only one) before being able to fully enjoy it, I'm perfectly fine with that. ;)

Oh, btw, here is my own quote from the Trinity thread:
genstorm wrote:KDE3 would still be a damn good DE.
Top
anest
n00b
n00b
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Post by anest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:58 am

please. PLEASE. PLEASE!!!
stop hijacking thread. we talking here ONLY about kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10 and nothing else.
thank you.

ps: where is moderators?? some ppl have HUGE EGO and probably got bored (and a lot of time).
pps: yes, genstorm, you can take LAST WORD in this topic, if its will make you happy. your ego probably needs do that. so just do it. say something about nothing (again). thank you.
Top
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Watchman
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:57 am

Post by DaggyStyle » Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:02 pm

anest wrote:please. PLEASE. PLEASE!!!
stop hijacking thread. we talking here ONLY about kde-base/superkaramba-3.5.10 and nothing else.
thank you.

ps: where is moderators?? some ppl have HUGE EGO and probably got bored (and a lot of time).
pps: yes, genstorm, you can take LAST WORD in this topic, if its will make you happy. your ego probably needs do that. so just do it. say something about nothing (again). thank you.
with all due respect, you have woken a dormant 11.8 month old thread...
shouting on others for trying to help (genstorm's answer has nothing to do with KDE4) doesn't shine on you with a better light.

be nice and be kind to others.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
Top
i92guboj
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva
User avatar
Posts: 10315
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:17 pm
Location: Córdoba (Spain)

Post by i92guboj » Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:15 pm

anest wrote:listen dude, if you do not want "OLD and NASTY KDE3" for your self - WHAT YOU DOING HERE? just killing your time here? i saw your many postings on this forum and lots of them about how you don't like kde3 and you pushing people to stop used that. WHY YOU DO THIS? if you don't like something (maybe just not understand?) - simple solution - JUST LEAVE PLEASE. go get your life, do not waste your time here. thanks.
ps: i hope my post will not motivate you to start flood and flame in this topic. if you wana talk about why i want kde3 - please lets start talking somewhere else, but not here (just send me link to PM). thnx!
This was totally uncalled for, and we won't tolerate this kind of personal, emotional and offensive tone here. Consider yourself warned.

First, the fact that he likes or doesn't like kde3 doesn't disqualify his words by any means. As long as he's on topic, your personal issues with him, or your religious differences about what desktop is better are totally irrelevant here. Keep them personal and everyone of us will be happier.

Second, you came to resurrect an old thread for no good reason, but, if you are the part that has the interest you shouldn't really be telling anyone to do the work for you. That's highly rude in my book. Not to take into account that you just landed in this forum. The fact that he is giving a tip or trying to help doesn't grant you the right to ask from him anything more. You should just be grateful for what he, voluntarily, is giving you. Or, if you don't like it or don't need it, just say "thanks" or shut up and move on. No one here owes you anything.

Third, you are not the one to tell the people what threads they can help with. Each one acts willingly and in a completely non interested basis, and helps with the issues they can or want. If you want to give orders as a captain, pay for technical support. But beware that even payed workers do have rights, and deserve respect, just like any human being.

This thread really has no longer a purpose. If anyone thinks it does, please, poke me privately and I might consider reopening it. Now closing.
Top
Locked

25 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to “Unsupported Software”

Jump to
  • Assistance
  • ↳   News & Announcements
  • ↳   Frequently Asked Questions
  • ↳   Installing Gentoo
  • ↳   Multimedia
  • ↳   Desktop Environments
  • ↳   Networking & Security
  • ↳   Kernel & Hardware
  • ↳   Portage & Programming
  • ↳   Gamers & Players
  • ↳   Other Things Gentoo
  • ↳   Unsupported Software
  • Discussion & Documentation
  • ↳   Documentation, Tips & Tricks
  • ↳   Gentoo Chat
  • ↳   Gentoo Forums Feedback
  • ↳   Duplicate Threads
  • International Gentoo Users
  • ↳   中文 (Chinese)
  • ↳   Dutch
  • ↳   Finnish
  • ↳   French
  • ↳   Deutsches Forum (German)
  • ↳   Diskussionsforum
  • ↳   Deutsche Dokumentation
  • ↳   Greek
  • ↳   Forum italiano (Italian)
  • ↳   Forum di discussione italiano
  • ↳   Risorse italiane (documentazione e tools)
  • ↳   Polskie forum (Polish)
  • ↳   Instalacja i sprzęt
  • ↳   Polish OTW
  • ↳   Portuguese
  • ↳   Documentação, Ferramentas e Dicas
  • ↳   Russian
  • ↳   Scandinavian
  • ↳   Spanish
  • ↳   Other Languages
  • Architectures & Platforms
  • ↳   Gentoo on ARM
  • ↳   Gentoo on PPC
  • ↳   Gentoo on Sparc
  • ↳   Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
  • ↳   Gentoo on AMD64
  • ↳   Gentoo for Mac OS X (Portage for Mac OS X)
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC
  • Delete cookies

© 2001–2026 Gentoo Authors
Gentoo is a trademark of the Gentoo Foundation, Inc. and of Förderverein Gentoo e.V.
The contents of this document, unless otherwise expressly stated, are licensed under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
The Gentoo Name and Logo Usage Guidelines apply.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy Policy