| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| But maybe there is a way to compile those weekly snapshots like 4.3.84? Or live ebuilds are the same thing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cruzki123
Apprentice
Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 194
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| live ebuils are a copy of the repository in the instact you compile. So if you install a live ebuild right now you wuld have the 4.3.85 copy (well a alitel more, perhaps) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jeanfrancis
Veteran
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 1481
Location: Québec, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ksirk-4.3.85 fails with the following:
* Failed Patch: ksirk-4.2.1-freebsd-darwin.patch !
EDIT:
This patch has been removed from the live ebuild: git diff
I guess the patch is now applied upstream on 4.3.85 so should be removed from the ebuild  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nice, pykde4 compiles at last |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
genstorm
Veteran
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 1957
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
..that's not pykde-4.3.85 you're speaking of? Because it now fails right after the beginning at 2%. 
_________________
backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jeanfrancis
Veteran
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 1481
Location: Québec, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | ..that's not pykde-4.3.85 you're speaking of? Because it now fails right after the beginning at 2%. |
pykde4-4.3.85 compiled here  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pholthau
Guru
Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can anyone give me a hint, why pykde complains about python3 not compiled with threads use-flag?
I have python3 installed with this flag enabled.
Eselect shows python2 as my system's python interpreter. Do I have to change that? I'd like to avoid
fiddling around with an experimental python as a system interpreter.
Thanks,
Patrick
_________________
The message is Feierei, alder! The message is Gude Laune, alder! [Sven] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jeanfrancis wrote: | | genstorm wrote: | | ..that's not pykde-4.3.85 you're speaking of? Because it now fails right after the beginning at 2%. |
pykde4-4.3.85 compiled here |
+1, it was 4.3.85, and it's compiled nicely here. I was a little afraid before compiling, so compiled without any USE flags, maybe that helps?
to pholthau
Everything seems to be like on my machine: python2 as default, python3 compiled with gdbm ipv6 ncurses readline ssl threads xml USE flags, but everything is OK for me. I think that you have to check that threads USE flag one more time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
genstorm
Veteran
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 1957
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
damnit, I'm starting to get angry now.
It doesn't work for me. Last words:
| Code: | [ebuild U ] kde-base/pykde4-4.3.85 [4.3.75] USE="akonadi* policykit semantic-desktop (-aqua) -debug -examples (-kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)"
Scanning dependencies of target compile_python_files
[ 1%] Generating sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart0.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart1.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart2.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart3.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart4.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart5.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart6.cpp, sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart7.cpp
[ 1%] Built target compile_python_files
[ 2%] Generating sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart0.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart1.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart2.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart3.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart4.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart5.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart6.cpp, sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart7.cpp
sip: /var/tmp/portage/kde-base/pykde4-4.3.85/work/pykde4-4.3.85-2.6/python/pykde4/sip/kdecore/typedefs.sip:472: %MappedType template for this type has already been defined
make[2]: *** [python/pykde4/sip/akonadi/sipakonadipart0.cpp] Error 1
make[1]: *** [python/pykde4/CMakeFiles/python_module_PyKDE4_akonadi.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
sip: /var/tmp/portage/kde-base/pykde4-4.3.85/work/pykde4-4.3.85-2.6/python/pykde4/sip/kdecore/typedefs.sip:472: %MappedType template for this type has already been defined
make[2]: *** [python/pykde4/sip/dnssd/sipdnssdpart0.cpp] Error 1
make[1]: *** [python/pykde4/CMakeFiles/python_module_PyKDE4_dnssd.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2 |
_________________
backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jeanfrancis
Veteran
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 1481
Location: Québec, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Have you tried to rebuild PyQt4 ans sip? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
genstorm
Veteran
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 1957
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes, doesn't change a thing.
_________________
backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Maybe it's because of sip or pyqt4 version? I have PyQt 4.6.2 and sip 4.9.3 (ones that aren't masked) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dusdan
n00b
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I've just installed 4.3.85: everything compiled smoothly, the file indexer worked a lot converting the old index and indexing again but now the nepomyk search doesn't work at all. Any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
firephoto
Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 1558
Location: +48° 5' 23.40", -119° 48' 30.00"
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After getting pykde4-9999 to build a week ago once it started failing again. There was a commit to pykde the other day enabling animations, this needs the snapshot of PyQt4. I updated sip and PyQt4 from qting-edge and it's building again.
The specific error was 'sip: QAbstractAnimation has not been defiined'.
_________________
#gentoo-kde on freenode |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
genstorm
Veteran
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 1957
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NForce wrote: | | Maybe it's because of sip or pyqt4 version? I have PyQt 4.6.2 and sip 4.9.3 (ones that aren't masked) |
Thank you very much, that finally did the trick.
_________________
backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pholthau
Guru
Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 358
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually portage complains about the missing threads use flag after this error message while trying to compile pykde4:
| Code: |
File "/usr/lib/portage/bin/portageq", line 52
print "ERROR: insufficient parameters!"
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
|
_________________
The message is Feierei, alder! The message is Gude Laune, alder! [Sven] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5345
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
smoke is missing a patch and thus failing:
| Quote: | [32;01m*[0m Applying smoke-phonon-fix.patch ...
[31;01m*[0m Failed Patch: smoke-phonon-fix.patch !
[31;01m*[0m ( /usr/gentoo/overlays/kde-testing/kde-base/smoke/files/smoke-phonon-fix.patch )
[31;01m*[0m
[31;01m*[0m Include in your bugreport the contents of:
[31;01m*[0m
[31;01m*[0m /var/tmp/portage/kde-base/smoke-4.3.85/temp/smoke-phonon-fix.patch-24569.out
[31;01m*[0m ERROR: kde-base/smoke-4.3.85 failed:
[31;01m*[0m Failed Patch: smoke-phonon-fix.patch!
[31;01m*[0m
[31;01m*[0m Call stack:
[31;01m*[0m ebuild.sh, line 55: Called src_prepare
[31;01m*[0m environment, line 9104: Called kde4-meta_src_prepare
[31;01m*[0m environment, line 8286: Called kde4-base_src_prepare
[31;01m*[0m environment, line 7919: Called base_src_prepare
[31;01m*[0m environment, line 5607: Called base_src_util 'autopatch'
[31;01m*[0m environment, line 5657: Called epatch '/usr/gentoo/overlays/kde-testing/kde-base/smoke/files/smoke-phonon-fix.patch'
[31;01m*[0m environment, line 6955: Called die
[31;01m*[0m The specific snippet of code:
[31;01m*[0m die "Failed Patch: ${patchname}!"; |
for reference for those having problems with pykde4, sip, PyQt4:
* python-2.6.4 (python-2.6 is selected)
* dev-python/sip-4.9.3-r1
* dev-python/PyQt4-4.6.2
qt-version is 4.6.9999 (non-stable branch)
I first emerged sip, PyQt4 and after that kdelibs, etc. as a dependency followed pykde4
then it should compile ...
Good luck !
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Holysword
l33t
Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 635
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What do you guys think about KDE-4.4? (I am afraid of trying upgrade it =X)
About the Amarok-2.20, it isn't editing id3 tags yet, is it? Neither Moving/Copying to collection, right?
_________________
i7-720QM | nVidia GT 230M | 4 GB DDR3 + 640GB swap (I know right?)
2.6.39.3-zen+ | CFQ+CFS+SLAB
"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
genstorm
Veteran
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 1957
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
4.4 works like a charm (speaking of 4.3.85). If you want to try it out, wait for the next beta/RC release coming soon. 4.3.85 has been around for some time now.
Can't tell about amarok-2.20, but 9999 does edit tags and moving/copying to collection.
_________________
backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Holysword wrote: | What do you guys think about KDE-4.4? (I am afraid of trying upgrade it =X)
About the Amarok-2.20, it isn't editing id3 tags yet, is it? Neither Moving/Copying to collection, right? |
KDE 4.4 is usable already. Yes, plasma crashes when i try to start knetworkmanager and yes, kmail is working a bit strangely (does not automatically start on KDE startup), but i think it's more bug-free than 4.3.0 was. I dont think about going to 4.3.x since 4.3.82.
I am using Amarok 2.2.2 beta 1 and moving/copying to collection works as far. And tag editing works too, but I tried it only few times and sometimes it worked even on 2.0.0
| genstorm wrote: | | 4.4 works like a charm (speaking of 4.3.85). If you want to try it out, wait for the next beta/RC release coming soon. 4.3.85 has been around for some time now. |
Right, i think it's coming january 5th or 6th |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Holysword
l33t
Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 635
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | 4.4 works like a charm (speaking of 4.3.85). If you want to try it out, wait for the next beta/RC release coming soon. 4.3.85 has been around for some time now. |
Great, waitin'
| NForce wrote: | | I am using Amarok 2.2.2 beta 1 and moving/copying to collection works as far. And tag editing works too, but I tried it only few times and sometimes it worked even on 2.0.0 |
Weird... I don't even have that option to move/copy to collection. I have the edit option, but it just does nothing.
I'm upgrading to 2.2.1.90, see if something changes.
_________________
i7-720QM | nVidia GT 230M | 4 GB DDR3 + 640GB swap (I know right?)
2.6.39.3-zen+ | CFQ+CFS+SLAB
"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Holysword
l33t
Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 635
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After upgrading amarok it started to change *some* things in ID3 tags, but only when it wants to. Moreover it messed up some of my old tags, like deleting track number or renaming to other song's name. Other thing that I noticed is that some of the songs now have weird length, like 00:00 or 63:00 (okay, they are not Mike Oldfield's songs, so they are like 5min long, not 63 xD).
Ah, the option to move to collection appears now, but again, only sometimes. I cannot rate albums anymore or set a song to be displayed under "Various Artists".
It is acting pretty unstable here 
_________________
i7-720QM | nVidia GT 230M | 4 GB DDR3 + 640GB swap (I know right?)
2.6.39.3-zen+ | CFQ+CFS+SLAB
"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Strange thing, because it's pretty stable over here. The only thing that bothers me - if I connect one of 3 my mp3 players, amarok grabs it and doesnt let to open it with dolphin but doesnt show it's files in collection like it does with creative zen v. And there is no option in amarok to release the player, so I cant upload pictures, movies or music to that player when amarok is running. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 4.3.90 has been tagged for release today The 4.4.0 is getting closer and closer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
n00b
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pykde4 is broken again (PyQt4.6.2, sip 4.9.3). Maybe someone got it compiled with newer PyQt4 or sip? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
